Skip to main content
Log in

Acquired Spinal Conditions in Evolutionary Perspective: Updating a Classic Hypothesis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biological Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 29 August 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

In 1923, Sir Arthur Keith proposed that many common back problems are due to the stresses caused by our evolutionarily novel form of locomotion, bipedalism. In this article, we introduce an updated version of Keith’s hypothesis with a focus on acquired spinal conditions. We begin by outlining the main ways in which the human spine differs from those of our closest living relatives, the great apes. We then review evidence suggesting there is a link between spinal and vertebral shape on the one hand and acquired spinal conditions on the other. Next, we discuss recent studies that not only indicate that two common acquired spinal conditions—intervertebral disc herniation and spondylolysis—are associated with vertebral shape, but also suggest that the pathology-prone vertebral shapes can be understood in terms of the shift from quadrupedalism to bipedalism in the course of human evolution. Subsequently, we place the aforementioned findings under an umbrella hypothesis, which we call the “Evolutionary Shape Hypothesis.” This hypothesis contends that individuals differ in their propensity to develop different acquired spinal conditions because of differences in vertebral shape that relate to the evolutionary history of our species. We end the article with some possible directions for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Bernard Crespi and Bernard Wood for providing insightful feedback on a previous draft of this article. We also thank two anonymous reviewers and the editor for helping to improve the paper.

Funding

This work was supported by the Canada Research Chairs Program (228117 and 231256), Canada Foundation for Innovation (23808 and 36801), British Columbia Knowledge Development Fund (862-804231 and 962-805808), Simon Fraser University (14518), MITACS (IT03519), the Wenner-Gren Foundation (62447), and Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (748200).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Collard.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: In this article the author name William Sellers was incorrectly written as William Sellars.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Collard, M., Plomp, K.A., Dobney, K.M. et al. Acquired Spinal Conditions in Evolutionary Perspective: Updating a Classic Hypothesis. Biol Theory 17, 186–197 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-022-00402-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-022-00402-4

Keywords

Navigation