Skip to main content
Log in

Aging, DNA Information, and Authorship: Medawar, Schrödinger, and Samuel Butler

  • Historical Essay
  • Published:
Biological Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Eminent scientists are well-placed to bring the novel works of others, even if not in their own areas of expertise, to general attention. In so doing, they may be able to extend original accounts or introduce new terminologies, but they are basically messengers, not innovators. In the 1940s an evolutionary theory of biological aging was explained by Peter Medawar, and informational concepts relating to DNA were explained by Erwin Schrödinger. Both explanations were eventually traced back to the Victorian polymath Samuel Butler—one by Medawar’s research associate Alex Comfort, and the other, albeit indirectly, by Schrödinger himself. In his time Butler’s works were too erudite for general readers and too laden with populist jargon for contemporary experts to take seriously. However, today it appears counterfactually plausible that an early acceptance of his ideas would have greatly quickened the pace of research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austad SN, Hoffman JM (2018) Is antagonistic pleiotropy ubiquitous in aging biology? Evol Med Public Health 2018:287–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein C, Bernstein H (1992) Aging, sex, and DNA repair. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks WK (1883) The law of heredity. A study of the cause of variation and the origin of living organisms. John Murphy, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler S (1865) Lucubratio Ebria. Reprinted from The Press, Christchurch (29 July). In: A first year in Canterbury settlement with other early essays. Fifield, London, 1914, pp 186–194

  • Butler S (1878) Life and habit. Trübner, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler S (1879) Evolution old and new; or the theories of Buffon, Dr. Erasmus Darwin, and Lamarck, as compared with that of Mr. Charles Darwin. Hardwicke & Bogue, London

  • Butler S (1880) Unconscious memory. David Bogue, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler S (1887) Luck or cunning as the main means of organic modification? Trübner, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler S (1890) The deadlock in Darwinism. The universal review 7:238–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler S (1904) Thought and language. A lecture given at the Somerville Club. In: Streatfeild RA (ed) Essays on life, art and science. Grant Richards, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cock AG, Forsdyke DR (2008) “Treasure your exceptions.” The science and life of William Bateson. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Comfort A (1956) The biology of senescence. Rinehart, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Comfort A (1964) Aging. The biology of senescence. Routledge & Kegan-Paul, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin CR (1837) Notebook. See Darwin Online http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?viewtype=side&itemID=CUL-DAR205.5.28-29&pageseq=1 Accessed 14 Nov 2019

  • Dawkins R (1976) The selfish gene. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R (1982) The extended phenotype. W. H. Freeman, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster WJ (2005) The illustrious hunter and the Darwins. Book Guild Publishing, Lewes

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliot G (1876) Daniel Deronda. William Blackman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsdyke DR (1995) The origins of the clonal selection theory of immunity. A case study for evaluation in science. FASEBJ 9:164–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsdyke DR (2000) Tomorrow’s cures today? How to reform the health research system. Harwood Academic, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsdyke DR (2006) Heredity as transmission of information. Butlerian intelligent design. Centaurus 48:133–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsdyke DR (2011) The selfish gene revisited: reconciliation of Williams-Dawkins and conventional definitions. Biol Theor 5:246–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsdyke DR (2015) “A vehicle of symbols and nothing more.” George Romanes, theory of mind, information, and Samuel Butler. Hist Psychiatry 26:270–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsdyke DR (2016a) William Bateson, black slavery, eugenics and speciation: the relative roles of politics and science. Soc Sci Res Netw. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2783480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsdyke DR (2016b) Epilogue: to preserve is not to select. In: Forsdyke DR (ed) Evolutionary bioinformatics, 3rd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsdyke DR (2017) Speciation: Goldschmidt’s chromosomal heresy, once supported by Gould and Dawkins, is again reinstated. Biol Theor 12:4–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsdyke DR (2018) Mendel, Gregor Johann. Encyclopedia of life sciences. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankland PW, Josselyn SA, Köhler S (2019) The neurobiological foundation of memory retrieval. Nat Neurosci 22:1576–1585

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillott D (2015) Samuel Butler against the professionals. Rethinking Lamarckism 1860–1900. Maney Publishing, Leeds

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt R (1940) The material basis of evolution. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldane JBS (1932) The causes of evolution. Longman & Green, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldane JBS (1942) New paths in genetics. Harper, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartog M (1914) Samuel Butler and recent mnemic biological theories. Scientia 15:38–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes K, Coxworth JE (2013) Grandmothers and the evolution of human longevity: a review of findings and future directions. Evol Anthropol 22:294–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Horsthemke B (2018) A critical view on transgenerational epigenetic inheritance in humans. Nat Commun 9:2973

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones HF (1919) Samuel Butler. Author of Erewhon (1835–1902). A Memoir. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalmus H (1950) A cybernetical aspect of genetics. J Hered 41:19–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn TS (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Medawar PB (1946) Old age and natural death. Mod Quart 1:30–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Medawar PB (1952) An unsolved problem in biology. H. K. Lewis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Medawar PB (1957) The uniqueness of the individual. Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Moriera T (2019) Anticipatory measure: Alex Comfort, experimental gerontology and the measurement of senescence. Stud Hist Phil Biol Biomed Sci 77:101179

    Google Scholar 

  • Otis L (1994) Organic memory. History and the body in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrödinger E (1964) My view of the world. Hastings C (Translator). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigmund K (2019) The physicist and the dawn of the double helix. Erwin Schrödinger’s prescient musings on molecular biology turn 75. Science 366:43

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson GG (1944) Tempo and mode of evolution. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloan PR, Fogel B (2011) Creating a physical biology: the three-man paper and early molecular biology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern C (1962) Wilhelm Weinberg, 1862–1937. Genetics 47:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Tingle CM (2000) Symptomatic writings: prefigurations of Freudian theories and models of the mind in the fiction of Sheridan Le Fanu, Wilkie Collins and George Eliot. Dissertation, University of Leeds. http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/1227/ Accessed 14 Nov 2019

  • Wallace AR (1879) Organization and intelligence. Nature 19:477–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward J (1884) Review of “mental evolution in animals” by G. J. Romanes. Athenaeum 2773:282–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg W (1912) Zur Vererbung des Zwergwuchses. Arch Rassen Gesell Biol 9:710–718

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams GC (1957) Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence. Evolution 11:398–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams GC (1966) Adaptation and natural selection. A critique of some current evolutionary thought. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams GC (1999) The Tithonus error in modern gerontology. Quart Rev Biol 74:405–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams PD, Day T, Fletcher Q, Rowe L (2018) The shaping of senescence in the wild. Trends Ecol Evol 21:458–463

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood RJ, Orel V (2005) Scientific breeding in central Europe during the early nineteenth century: background to Mendel’s later work. J Hist Biol 38:239–272

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

A preliminary account of this work accompanies Sigmund (2019) as an e-letter in Science. Queen’s University hosts Forsdyke’s evolution webpages (https://archive-it.org/collections/7641).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donald R. Forsdyke.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Forsdyke, D.R. Aging, DNA Information, and Authorship: Medawar, Schrödinger, and Samuel Butler. Biol Theory 15, 50–55 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-019-00340-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-019-00340-8

Keywords

Navigation