Abstract
Research in archaeology and anthropology on the evolution of modern patterns of human behavior often makes use of general theories of signs, usually derived from semiotics. Recent work generalizing David Lewis’ 1969 model of signaling provides a better theory of signs than those currently in use. This approach is based on the coevolution of behaviors of sign production and sign interpretation. I discuss these models and then look at applications to human prehistoric behavior, focusing on body ornamentation, tools, and other artifacts.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For partial common interest, see Crawford and Sobel (1982) and Godfrey-Smith (2013). For cases with signaling despite complete conflict of interest, see Godfrey-Smith and Martinez (in press). Another sense of complete conflict of interest is the sense seen in a “zero-sum game.” Relationships between this sense and the preference-reversal sense are discussed in the Godfrey-Smith and Martinez paper. The cases where information use exists despite complete conflict of interest are not also zero-sum.
For a model in which sender and receiver conflicts prevent them from settling into a stable pattern, see Wagner (2012).
“Examples of recognizable external symbolic storage include art work, personal ornamentation, lithic style, and the social use of space” (Henshilwood and Marean 2003, p. 635).
References
Atkin A (2013) Peirce’s theory of signs. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, Summer 2013 edition. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/peirce-semiotics/. Accessed 8 Aug 2013
Chase PG (1991) Symbols and paleolithic artifacts: style, standardization, and the imposition of arbitrary form. J Anthropol Archaeol 10:193–214
Chase PG, Dibble H (1987) Middle paleolithic symbolism: a review of current evidence and interpretations. J Anthropol Archaeol 6:263–296
Cheney D, Seyfarth RM (2007) Baboon metaphysics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Clottes J, Lewis-Williams D (1998) The Shamans of prehistory: trance and magic in the painted caves. Harry Abrams, New York
Cover TM, Thomas JA (2006) Elements of information theory, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
Crawford VP, Sobel J (1982) Strategic information transmission. Econometrica 50:1431–1451
Deacon T (1998) The symbolic species: the co-evolution of language and the human brain. Penguin, London
Farrell J, Rabin M (1996) Cheap talk. J Econ Perspect 10:103–118
Godfrey-Smith P (2013) Information and influence in sender–receiver models, with applications to animal behavior. In: Stegmann U (ed) Animal communication theory: information and influence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 377–396
Godfrey-Smith P, Martinez M (2013) Communication and common interest. PLOS Comput Biol (in press)
Henshilwood CS, Marean CW (2003) The origin of modern human behavior: critique of the models and their test implications. Curr Anthropol 44:627–637
Hiscock P (2014) Learning in lithic landscapes: a reconsideration of the hominid ‘tool-using’ niche. Biol Theory 9. doi:10.1007/s13752-013-0158-3
Hovers E, Ilani S, Bar-Yosef O, Vandermeersch B (2003) Ochre use by modern humans in Qafzeh Cave. Curr Anthropol 44:491–522
Hume D (1739) A treatise of human nature: being an attempt to introduce the experimental method of reasoning into moral subjects. J. Noon, London
Klein R (2003) Untitled. Comments on Henshilwood and Marean. Curr Anthropol 44:640–641
Krebs J, Dawkins R (1984) Animal signals: mind-reading and manipulation. In: Krebs J, Davies R (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 380–402
Kuhn SL (2014) Signaling theory and technologies of communication in the Paleolithic. Biol Theory 9. doi:10.1007/s13752-013-0156-5
Leach E (1976) Culture and communication: the logic by which symbols are connected. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Lévi-Strauss C (1969) In: Weightman J, Weightman D (trans.) The raw and the cooked: mythologies, vol 1. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Lewis DK (1969) Convention. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Maynard Smith J, Harper D (2003) Animal signals. Oxford University Press, Oxford
McBrearty S, Brooks A (2000) The revolution that wasn’t: a new interpretation of the origin of modern human behaviour. J Hum Evol 39:453–563
Owren M, Rendall D, Ryan M (2010) Redefining animal signaling: influence versus information in communication. Biol Philos 25:755–780
Peirce CS (1998) In: Peirce Edition Project (ed) The essential Peirce. Vol. 2 (1893–1913): selected philosophical writings. Indiana University Press, Bloomington
Robb JE (1998) The archeology of symbols. Annu Rev Anthropol 27:329–346
Robson A (1990) Efficiency in evolutionary games: Darwin, Nash, and the secret handshake. J Theor Biol 144:379–396
Rossano M (2010) Making friends, making tools, and making symbols. Curr Anthropol 51:S89–S98
Sackett JR (1982) Approaches to style in lithic archaeology. J Anthropol Archaeol 1:59–112
Saussure F (1974) In: Harris R (trans) Course in general linguistics. Open Court, La Salle
Shannon C (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Math J 27:379–423
Skyrms B (1996) Evolution of the social contract. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Skyrms B (2010) Signals: evolution, learning, and information. Oxford University Press, New York
Sperber D, Wilson D (1986) Relevance: communication and cognition. Blackwell, Oxford
Sterelny K (2012) The evolved apprentice: how evolution made humans unique. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Stiner MC (2014) Finding a common band-width: causes of convergence and diversity in Paleolithic beads. Biol Theory 9. doi:10.1007/s13752-013-0157-4
Tomasello M (1999) The cultural origins of human cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Wagner E (2012) Deterministic chaos and the evolution of meaning. Br J Philos Sci 63:547–575
Zollman KJ, Bergstrom CT, Huttegger SM (2012) Between cheap and costly signals: the evolution of partially honest communication. Proc R Soc Lond B 20121878. doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.1878
Acknowledgments
Thanks to all the participants at the 2012 “Symbols, Signals and the Archaeological Record” workshop at the Australian National University, and to the City University of New York for research support. Helpful comments on an earlier draft were provided by Peter Hiscock, Steven Kuhn, Jane Sheldon, Kim Sterelny, and Mary Stiner.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Godfrey-Smith, P. Signs and Symbolic Behavior. Biol Theory 9, 78–88 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-013-0140-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-013-0140-0