Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Characterization of mesoporous biochar produced from biogas digestate implemented in an anaerobic process of large-scale hog farm

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using a laboratory-scale pyrolyzer, porous biochars were produced at a wide operating temperature range from 300 to 800 °C for holding times of 30–120 min from biogas digestate (BD), which was derived from the anaerobic digestion unit in a large-scale pig farm. The resulting biochars were characterized by elemental analyzer, oxygen-bomb calorimeter, inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES), pycnometer, surface area and porosity analyzer, and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). The pore properties of the BD-based biochar products were on an increasing trend as pyrolysis temperature increased, indicating that operating temperature at about 800 °C seemed to be the optimal condition for producing biochar. The Brunauer-Emmet-Teller (BET) surface area of the optimal biochar was about 110 m2/g due to its mesoporous feature. Furthermore, the mineral elements of the optimal biochar were rich in calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P), magnesium (Mg), silicon (Si), iron (Fe), and potassium (K), which should be present in the forms of phosphates, carbonates, oxides, silicates, or their composites. Based on the pore properties and chemical characteristics, the BD-based biochar could be used as an excellent soil conditioner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Osei E (2010) Manure management: issues and options. In: Dellaguardia CS (ed) Manure: management, uses and environmental impacts. Nova, New York, pp 1–48

    Google Scholar 

  2. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2006) 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gases inventories. IPCC, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kumar P, Hussain A, Dubey SK (2016) Methane formation from food waste by anaerobic digestion. Biomass Convers Biorefin 6:271–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dahlin J, Nelles M, Herbes C (2017) Biogas digestate management: evaluation the attitudes and perceptions of German gardeners towards digestate-based soil amendments. Resour Conserv Recy 118:27–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kataki S, Hazarika S, Baruah DC (2017) Investigation on by-products of bioenergy systems (anaerobic digestion and gasification) as potential crop nutrient using FTIR, XRD, SEM analysis and phyto-toxicity test. J Environ Manag 196:201–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Quina MJ, Lopes DV, Cruz LG, Andrade J, Martins RC, Gando-Ferreira LM, Dias-Ferreira C, Quinta-Ferreira RM (2015) Studies on the chemical stabilization of digestate from mechanically recovered organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Waste Biomass Valor 6:711–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dragicevic I, Eich-Greatorex S, Sogn TA, Horn SJ (2018) Use of high metal-containing biogas digestates in cereal production – mobility of chromium and aluminium. J Environ Manag 217:12–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sogn TA, Dragicevic I, Linjordet R, Krogstad T, Eijsink VGH, Eich-Greatorex S (2018) Recycling of biogas digestates in plant production: NPK fertilizer value and risk of leaching. Int J Recycl Org Waste Agric 7:49–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hubner T, Mumme J (2015) Integration of pyrolysis and anaerobic digestion – use of aqueous liquor from digestate pyrolysis for biogas production. Bioresour Technol 183:86–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Neumann J, Binder S, Apfelbacher A, Gasson JR, Garcia PR, Hornung A (2015) Production and characterization of a new quality pyrolysis oil, char and syngas from digestate – introducing the thermo-catalytic reforming process. J Anal Appl Pyrol 113:137–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Stefaniuk M, Oleszczuk P (2015) Characterization of biochars produced from residues from biogas production. J Anal Appl Pyrol 115:157–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wisniewski D, Golaszewski J, Bialowiec A (2015) The pyrolysis and gasification of digestate from agricultural biogas plant. Arch Environ Protect 41:70–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hossain AK, Serrano C, Brammer JB, Omran A, Ahmed F, Smith DI, Davies PA (2016) Combustion of fuel blends containing digestate pyrolysis oil in a multi-cylinder compression ignition engine. Fuel 171:18–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Monlau F, Francavilla M, Sambusiti C, Antoniou N, Solhy A, Libutti A, Zabaniotou A, Barakat A, Monteleone M (2016) Toward a functional integration of anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis for a sustainable resource management. Comparison between solid-digestate and its derived pyrochar as soil amendment. Appl Energy 169:652–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Neumann J, Meyer J, Ouadi M, Apfelbacher A, Binder S, Hornung A (2016) The conversion of anaerobic digestion waste into biofuels via a novel thermo-catalytic reforming process. Waste Manag 47:141–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hung CY, Tsai WT, Chen JW, Lin YQ, Chang YM (2017) Characterization of biochar prepared from biogas digestate. Waste Manag 66:53–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Basu P (2013) Biomass gasification, pyrolysis and torrefaction, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lehmann J, Joseph S (2015) Biochar for environmental management: an introduction. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management, 2nd edn. Routledge, New York, pp 1–13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Jenkins BM, Baxter LL, Miles TR Jr, Miles TR (1998) Combustion properties of biomass. Fuel Process Technol 54:17–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kratzeisen M, Starcevic N, Martinov M, Maurer C, Muller J (2010) Applicability of biogas digestate as solid fuel. Fuel 89:2544–2548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Carchesio M, Tatano F, Lancellotti I, Taurino R, Colombo E, Barbieri L (2014) Comparison of biomethane production and digestate characterization for selected agricultural substrates in Italy. Environ Technol 352:212–2226

    Google Scholar 

  22. van Loo S, Koppejan J (2008) The handbook of biomass combustion and co-firing. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chia CH, Dowine A, Munroe P (2015) Characteristics of biochar: physical and structural properties. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management, 2nd edn. Routledge, New York, pp 89–110

    Google Scholar 

  24. Brown RA, Kerche AK, Nguyen TH, Nagle DC, Ball WP (2006) Production and characterization of synthetic wood chars for use as surrogates for natural sorbents. Organic Geochem 37:321–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Brewer CE, Schmidt-Rohr K, Satrio JA, Brown RC (2009) Characterization of biochar from fast pyrolysis and gasification systems. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 28:386–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tsai WT, Liu SC, Chang CH (2012) Preparation and fuel properties of biochars from the pyrolysis of exhausted coffee residue. J Anal Appl Pyrol 93:63–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tsai WT, Liu SC, Chen HR, Chang CH, Tsai YL (2012) Textural and chemical properties of swine-manure-derived biochar pertinent to its potential use as a soil amendment. Chemosphere 89:198–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Touray N, Tsai WT, Chen HL, Liu SC (2014) Thermochemical and pore properties of goat-manure-derived biochars prepared from different pyrolysis temperatures. J Anal Appl Pyrol 109:116–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. David RL (Editor-in-Chief) (2009) CRC handbook of chemistry and physics, 90th edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton

  30. Smith JM (1981) Chemical engineering kinetics, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  31. Suzuki M (1990) Adsorption engineering. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lowell S, Shields JE, Thomas MA, Thommes M (2006) Characterization of porous solids and powders: surface area, pore size and density. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mukome FND, Parikh SJ (2016) Chemical, physical, and surface characterization of biochar. In: Ok YK, Uchimiya SM, Chang SX, Bolan N (eds) Biochar: production, characterization, and applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 67–96

    Google Scholar 

  34. Beruto D, Barco L, Searcy AW (1983) Rearrangement of porous CaO aggregates during calcite decomposition in vacuum. J Am Ceram Soc 66:893–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciated the analytical assistances by the Instrument Centers of National Chung Hsing University in elemental analysis (EA), National Ching-Hwa University in inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES), and National Pingtung University of Science in energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS).

Funding

This research has been granted by the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan (grant no. MOST 105-ET-E-020-001-ET).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wen-Tien Tsai.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsai, WT., Fang, YY., Cheng, PH. et al. Characterization of mesoporous biochar produced from biogas digestate implemented in an anaerobic process of large-scale hog farm. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 8, 945–951 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-018-0344-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-018-0344-4

Keywords

Navigation