Introduction

The use of mass spectrometry (MS) to characterize intact proteins and protein complexes has expanded in recent years due to improvements in instrumentation [1,2,3,4], new applications to structural biology [5,6,7,8,9], and increased commercial use for biotherapeutic applications [6, 8,9,10,11]. The increased use of top-down and native MS approaches creates a significant demand for user-friendly, robust, and high-throughput deconvolution of electrospray (ESI) mass spectra. Unlike bottom-up proteomics, the available data analysis pipelines for native and intact protein MS are not well optimized for large datasets. Commercial deconvolution programs are available from instrument vendors and third parties, but their cost and lack of published algorithms limits their accessibility. Several academic packages, CIUSuite [12], ORAGAMI [13], and PULSAR [14], offer analysis and visualization of collision-induced unfolding ion mobility-MS datasets. Other academic software packages [15,16,17,18,19,20] are generally low throughput, operating on a single spectrum at a time. Thus, conventional approaches are poorly suited for analyzing large datasets that vary ligand concentration [21,22,23], lipid species [24, 25], collision voltage [12,13,14], temperature, pH, reaction time [26,27,28,29], or retention/migration time [30].

UniDec [19] offers uniquely powerful deconvolution of native and intact protein MS data because it is fast, able to analyze complex spectra, and requires minimal user input. It has been used by a number of research groups [3, 19, 21, 22, 24, 31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50]. UniDec uses a Bayesian deconvolution algorithm to determine the charge state distribution of each m/z data point, which is captured in a two-dimensional matrix of intensity values as a function of m/z and charge. By converting m/z into mass, UniDec produces a two-dimensional matrix of intensity values as a function of mass and charge, which is summed along the charge dimension to determine the mass distribution—sometimes called the zero-charge mass spectrum. In addition to the core deconvolution algorithm, UniDec provides an extensive graphical user interface (GUI) for data visualization and analysis. Although it allows batch processing of multiple spectra, the data formats and algorithms of UniDec are tailored for individual spectra and are not optimized for processing of larger datasets.

To address this limitation, we developed a high-throughput derivative of UniDec, termed MetaUniDec, which is optimized for analysis of larger datasets. MetaUniDec uses the same core deconvolution algorithm as UniDec and will thus show the same high performance level for native mass spectra as UniDec [19]. First, we bundled each dataset into a hierarchical data format 5 (HDF5) file, which provides a faster, smaller, and simpler data format. MetaUniDec includes tools to automatically parse data into HDF5, including chromatographic data. Second, we extended the UniDec executable, which is written in C, to operate on the HDF5 files and to include functions previously performed by the Python advanced programming interface (API). Finally, we designed a new user interface for visualization and quantitative analysis of multiple spectra. Together, these improvements greatly streamline processing, quantitative analysis, and visualization of MS datasets. MetaUniDec is two to nine times faster than batch processing with UniDec, and the streamlined executable and file structure are amenable to remote execution with high-performance computers.

Here, we describe the design, performance, and application of MetaUniDec to native MS for characterizing collision-induced dissociation of heme from a bacterial heme-nitric oxide/oxygen binding (H-NOX) protein from Nostoc sp. PCC 7120 and lipoprotein nanodiscs with a Q-Exactive HF with ultra-high mass range (UHMR) research modifications [1]. The UHMR modifications optimize the optics for transmission of large ions up to m/z 80,000 and include the ability to trap and activate ions in the injection flatapole. Our objective was to use heme loss with H-NOX and lipid loss with lipoprotein nanodiscs as a relative indicator of the level of activation under different instrumental conditions. With H-NOX, MetaUniDec was used to extract the area of the holo- (heme bound) and apo- (heme lost) protein peaks as a function of collision voltage. In contrast, MetaUniDec was used to extract the average mass of the nanodisc complexes as a function of collision voltage. Because automated methods were used to adjust the collision voltage as a function of time, the same methods described here could be readily translated to time-dependent experiments such as chromatography [30].

Methods

Data Structure

HDF5 [51] is a hierarchical data format that groups multiple types of data objects into a set of virtual directories. Thus, although it is a single file, we will discuss the organization of the file in directory notation. HDF5 also includes metadata, which can be associated with either directories or data objects. As shown in Fig. 1, the MetaUniDec HDF5 file contains three top directories, /ms_dataset, /config, and /peaks. The /ms_dataset contains subdirectories for each of the individual spectra listed by their index: /0, /1, etc. Each of these individual spectra contains a number of data objects such as raw_data, processed_data, mass_data, and charge_data. Moreover, each individual spectrum directory can have associated metadata such as the collision voltage, time point, or ligand concentration. In addition to the individual spectra, the /ms_dataset directory contains the combined mass and m/z data from each spectrum that has been merged into a single matrix with a uniform mass and m/z axis.

Figure 1
figure 1

Schematic of MetaUniDec HDF5 file format organization (left) with example data from H-NOX (right). Examples are shown from the 50 V spectrum (index 10) and global analysis

Full size image

The /config directory contains the metadata parameters for data preparation, deconvolution, and analysis. All metadata are associated directly with the /config directly. A few data objects can be included when necessary to specify manual assignments, limited mass lists, and potential oligomers. Finally, the /peaks directory contains /peakdata, which details the mass and intensities of detected peaks, and /extracts, which includes the extracted quantitative values of intensities or mass as defined by the /config.

MetaUniDec Software

The compiled program and source code for MetaUniDec are available online as part of the UniDec software package: https://github.com/michaelmarty/UniDec. We have removed licensing restrictions from previous versions and released version 2 as free and open source for both commercial and academic users.

MetaUniDec continues to use the UniDec executable and was built to operate on top of the existing UniDec code. It was written in C and compiled with Intel Parallel Studio XE 17.0. UniDec was originally designed to separate data preparation and analysis into the Python API and use the C-based executable only for deconvolution, which sacrificed speed for flexibility. Because speed is paramount with high-throughput deconvolution, we incorporated many of the functions from the Python API into the executable. However, we also constructed a Python API for scripting MetaUniDec processing and analysis. The GUI is also programmed in Python and has been integrated into the same package as conventional UniDec, which we have upgraded to version 2 to reflect the additions. As shown in Fig. 2, the GUI assembles the raw data and configuration parameters into the HDF5 file. UniDec.exe operates on the HDF5 file, and the results are imported by the GUI for visualization. Here, we describe the new additions to the code and refer the reader to the original publication [19] for a complete description and benchmarking of the deconvolution algorithm.

Figure 2
figure 2

Schematic of MetaUniDec software. Raw data are parsed by the Python GUI and stored in the HDF5 with the configuration parameters. The UniDec.exe opens the HDF5 for data processing, deconvolution, and analysis. Results are written back into the HDF5 file, which is read by the GUI for visualization. Text colors on the HDF5 file match the outlined regions of the GUI they are plotted in or taken from

Full size image

There are several initial steps to prepare the data for analysis. First, the data can optionally be binned to average n data points together. Binning offers an unbiased smoothing of the data and can be used to reduce the number of data points. Because the speed of deconvolution depends primarily on the number of data points and potential charge states, binning significantly speeds up the algorithm. Second, the data can optionally be limited to a specific m/z range. Third, any data points with zero intensity that are flanked by data points with zero intensity are removed. Removing these middle zeros speeds up the algorithm by removing useless data points. Fourth, data points with the same m/z values are averaged together to eliminate duplicates. Fifth, an optional background subtraction is performed using a curved background as previously described [15, 19]. Sixth, the data are optionally normalized to a maximum intensity of one. Finally, any negative intensities are set to zero. By looping through each spectrum in /ms_dataset, the /raw_data objects are converted to /processed_data objects. Together, these steps help to speed up the algorithm and avoid potential artifacts while minimizing distortion of the data.

The /processed_data object is then deconvolved using the conventional UniDec Bayesian deconvolution algorithm as previously described [19]. Each spectrum in /ms_dataset is deconvolved sequentially using parallelized deconvolution code. An alternative parallelization scheme with parallelized spectra and sequential deconvolution code did not show any speed advantage and introduced significant complexities to coordinate reading and writing of data between threads. Following deconvolution of each spectrum, the fit to /processed_data is written to /fit_data, the m/z vs. charge matrix is written to /mz_grid, and the mass vs. charge matrix is written to /mass_grid. By summing the mass vs. charge matrix along the charge axis, the mass vs. intensity spectrum is written to /mass_data. Summing the m/z vs. charge matrix along the m/z axis produces the total charge distribution, which is written to /charge_data.

Following deconvolution, the data are combined and summed. Because the m/z (/processed_data) and mass (/mass_data) axes of each spectrum may be different, a linear interpolation is applied with the /0 spectrum as a reference to make the m/z and mass axes the same for each spectrum. Note, this is only applied to the new global /mass_grid and /mz_grid and not to the data in each spectrum directory. The sum of the zero-charge mass spectra is used for peak detection by detecting local maxima within a specified window and above a specified threshold [19].

Finally, specified quantities are extracted from the data for each peak based on an optional specified window around each peak. Currently, there are several forms of extraction. The intensities can be extracted using the peak height, local max, or area. The mass of the peak can be extracted using the local max position or the center of mass for all intensities above a 0, 10, or 50% threshold. These allow a range of different quantitative experiments with the same framework.

UltraMeta for Visualization and Quantitation of Multiple Data Sets

We have also developed a module, called UltraMeta, to visualize and quantify multiple HDF5 datasets from MetaUniDec. The inputs to UltraMeta include the file name, the color and line style for plots, and the label for the legend. UltraMeta groups all files with the same legend label and assumes these are replicate experiments. During extraction, the replicate experiments are used to automatically generate error bars on the extracted values.

After supplying and grouping the input files, the user defines which peaks to extract, the type of extraction as defined above, the extraction window, and the normalization performed on the extraction. The peaks are automatically imported from MetaUniDec but can be manually adjusted or defined to investigate specific features. UltraMeta then passes the desired peaks back to the HDF5 files as peaks/ultrapeakdata. UniDec.exe performs the extraction and exports the mass and charge extracts as peaks/ultraextracts and peaks/ultrazextracts respectively. Thus, UltraMeta allows quantitation of a variety of parameters such as average mass, average charge, and peak area across multiple datasets. Furthermore, these extracted parameters can be automatically fit to sigmoidal, exponential, or linear functions with automatically generated error bars for multiple experiments. Thus, UltraMeta enables an integrated workflow for quantitative analysis of multiple datasets and replicate experiments.

H-NOX Native Mass Spectrometry

Ns H-NOX was expressed and purified from E. coli as previously described [52]. Briefly, the H-NOX was engineered into a pET21b + plasmid with a C-terminal His6 affinity purification tag with TEV cleavage sequence. Expression was in Rosetta competent cells initially grown at 37 °C followed by protein induction with 0.5 mM IPTG at 16 °C and inclusion of 0.1 mM δ-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) to stimulate heme production. After cell lysis (French press) and removal of cell debris, the protein was loaded onto a HisTrap FF Ni-NTA affinity column (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden) and eluted by supplementing the buffer with 30 mM EDTA rather than imidazole to prevent imidazole-dependent heme extraction. After incubating at 4 °C overnight with TEV protease (1:100 protease/protein molar ratio), the sample was again passed over a HisTrap FF column. Cleaved protein was further purified using a Superdex 200 gel filtration column (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden) equilibrated with 20 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl. Protein concentrations were assessed based on Soret band absorption, and samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen for storage at − 80 °C.

The final H-NOX protein was fully loaded with ferrous heme and quite pure. The final sequence after TEV cleavage was 190 residues long, one residue longer than native H-NOX due to the TEV cleavage site. The final eight residues, which are not conserved, differ from the wild-type protein and have the sequence “GAENLYFQ.” The wild-type sequence for this region is “DSNLYDD.”

For mass spectrometry experiments, purified H-NOX was diluted with 0.2 M ammonium acetate and exchanged into 0.2 M ammonium acetate (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) buffer using micro bio-spin columns with bio-gel P-6 (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Native MS was performed as previously described [37, 53]. Briefly, H-NOX samples were loaded into homemade nanoelectrospray needles coated in gold. Mass spectrometry was performed using a Q-Exactive HF mass spectrometer with UHMR modifications (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany) [1]. Ionization was performed using static nanoelectrospray gold-coated needles. Key parameters included 15,000 resolution, 10 microscans, 50 ms max inject time, 4 ms in-source trapping time, 0 V source fragmentation, pulser mode 100, noise threshold 4, 4 V C-trap entrance lens, and nitrogen as the higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD). Method files were created at different HCD gas pressure settings to automatically ramp the HCD voltage from 0 to 95 V in 5 V increments with 0.25 min acquisitions at each step. The HCD gas pressure settings were set to 1, 3, or 5 in the vendor’s Tune software, and in-source trapping dissociation was performed with an HCD gas setting of 3 by adjusting the desolvation voltage from 0 to 300 V. These settings control the pressure in the HCD cell, which leaks upstream to affect the pressure in other regions of the instrument. Because there is no vacuum gauge in the injection flatapole where in-source trapping is performed or in the HCD cell, we have reported the gas pressure settings rather than the absolute pressures in the HCD cell. For reference, HCD gas settings of 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 corresponded with a high vacuum reading in the quadrupole region of 31.6, 102, 168, 233, and 298 nanobar, respectively.

In MetaUniDec, the charge range was 3–12, and the mass range was 20,000–25,000 Da. The mass was sampled every 1 Da, the peak full-width at half max (FWHM) was 1.15 Th (determined automatically) with a Gaussian peak shape function, and the charge smooth width was 1. Peak areas were extracted within an extraction window of ± 150 Da.

Nanodisc Native Mass Spectrometry

Nanodiscs were created as previously described [54, 55]. Briefly, MSP1D1 scaffold protein was expressed in E. coli and purified by immobilized metal affinity chromatography. The polyhistidine tag was cleaved with TEV protease to create MSP1D1(−), which was mixed with 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (POPC) lipids dissolved in cholate. Addition of Amberlite XAD-2 (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) initiated nanodisc assembly. Nanodiscs were purified using a Superose 6 Increase 10/300 column (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden) equilibrated in 0.2 M ammonium acetate. Eluted fractions were analyzed directly by native MS without further concentration.

Key parameters were the same as described above except for the pulsar mode was 0 and the HCD gas pressure settings were set to 5, 7, and 9. In-source trapping data were collected at an HCD gas pressure setting of 7. To collisionally activate the nanodisc complexes, we created methods files at different HCD gas pressure settings to automatically ramp the HCD voltage and in-source trapping desolvation voltage from 0 to 200 V in 20 V increments with 1 min acquisitions at each step in the ramp. The deconvolution parameters were as follows: m/z range 5000–20,000, background subtraction 100, charge range 1–30, mass range 20,000–200,000 Da with mass being sampled every 10 Da. The peak FWHM was 5.0 with a Gaussian peak shape function. Charge smooth width was set to 1.0, the mass difference was 760 Da, and the mass smooth width was 1.0. Peaks were extracted using the center of mass above a 50% intensity threshold with an extraction window of 50,000.

Results and Discussion

Performance

To compare the performance of MetaUniDec and batch processing with conventional UniDec, we compared six nanodisc datasets and six H-NOX datasets collected over a range of collision voltages. Each nanodisc dataset contained 11 spectra, and each H-NOX dataset contained 20 spectra. We collected the data using an automated method as a single Thermo RAW file, parsed the data into an HDF5 using the automatic chromatogram parser in MetaUniDec, and then exported each of the spectra as text files for conventional UniDec analysis. Timing analysis was performed on a laptop with an Intel Core i7-6700 CPU (2.6 GHz, 4 cores, 8 threads).

Comparing the total execution time for data processing, deconvolution, and extraction of the center of mass, we observed that MetaUniDec was 2.3 ± 0.1 times faster than UniDec batch processing for nanodiscs and 7.0 ± 0.6 times faster for H-NOX (Fig. S-1B and C). This improvement in speed is likely the result of speed enhancements from moving the Python functions to C and the improved data reading and writing speed of the HDF5 file compared with the text files used by conventional UniDec. Analysis of the parallelization efficiency of the nanodisc datasets (Fig. S-1A) showed improved speed with additional cores but was less than ideal due to non-parallelizable functions such as reading and writing to the HDF5 files.

Similar improvements are observed in the hands-on time it takes for the user to perform the analysis. To process three H-NOX files from raw data to a final VC50 (described below) with conventional UniDec batch processing required two custom Python scripts and 6.07 ± 0.06 min. In contrast, MetaUniDec was able to perform the same analysis in 2.12 ± 0.03 min with an entirely integrated GUI workflow. Although UniDec is able to batch process spectra, it still requires manual selection of spectra within a single dataset. MetaUniDec offers batch processing of entire datasets, which greatly streamlines the analysis of multiple experiments at once. Thus, MetaUniDec shows better scalability across multiple datasets. Finally, comparison of file sizes (Fig. S-1D and E) showed that the total file size for the HDF5 files from H-NOX and nanodiscs was respectively 43 and 82% of the batch-processed files from conventional UniDec.

To demonstrate the performance on a large data file, we collected a 65-min acquisition of H-NOX at an HCD pressure setting of 3 and an HCD collision voltage of 20 V. In total, this long acquisition file contained 5153 spectra. Batch processing with conventional UniDec led to the creation of 61,836 separate files with a combined size of 8.9 GB. Processing with MetaUniDec created a single HDF5 file with a size of 5.8 GB, demonstrating the improved portability with the HDF5 format. Conventional UniDec required 46 ± 3 min to execute while MetaUniDec required only 4.98 ± 0.07 min, over a nine-fold speed enhancement. Interestingly, it was not possible to batch process 5153 files in conventional UniDec due to fundamental limitations on the number of files that can be selected at once in the Windows file system, so we have reported the combined execution time over two smaller batches. Together, these results demonstrate the superior performance of MetaUniDec for large datasets and long chromatograms.

Application to Collision-Induced Dissociation of H-NOX

To monitor the behavior of a small soluble protein, we performed collisional activation of bacterial H-NOX protein in the HCD cell, which loses a heme group upon sufficient activation. Heme loss provides a clean transition (Fig. 3c) to monitor the internal energy of the ions under different instrumental conditions. With each HCD gas pressure, the HCD voltage was ramped from 0 to 95 V in 5 V increments with 0.25 min acquisitions at each step. The chromatograms were imported into HDF5 by averaging each step into a single spectrum. Different gas pressures were applied in the HCD cell. All measurements were performed with the same sample but triplicate nESI needles (Fig. 3d). Because each of the 9 datasets contained 20 spectra, the total number of spectra in the global dataset was 180.

Figure 3
figure 3

MetaUniDec analysis of H-NOX. (a) A single dataset with collision voltage ramping in 5 V increments from 0 to 95 V is deconvolved into (b) the corresponding mass distributions. Integration of the holo (green) and apo (black) forms is plotted in (c). Results from multiple datasets (d) are extracted and plotted in (e). Sigmoidal fits to the extracted peak areas reveal the VC50 (f) and baseline dissociation (g). Vertical lines in E represent the midpoints of the sigmoidal fit

Full size image

Because loss of the heme causes a shift in the charge state distribution (Fig. S-2), deconvolution and summation of all charge states is required to achieve accurate quantitation of the relative distribution between holo and apo forms. MetaUniDec was used to deconvolve the m/z data (Fig. 3a) into a set of zero-charge mass spectra (Fig. 3b). For each dataset, relative peak areas normalized to a total of 100% for both the holo-protein and the apo-protein were plotted as a function of collision voltage (Fig. 3c, e). Each of these collisional dissociation curves was fit to a sigmoid to determine the voltage at which 50% of the species is decayed, which is sometimes referred to as the VC50 (Fig. 3f) [56].

We observed that increased gas pressure initially shifts the dissociation of the heme-protein complex to higher collisional energy, but this effect plateaus after an HCD gas setting of 3. Thus, increasing the HCD pressure up to 3 will provide a more gentle dissociation, but settings above 3 have little effect on the VC50. However, although the VC50 plateaus, higher gas pressure shows an increasing level of baseline activation (Fig. 3f) that is present at all collision energies. We believe that this baseline activation is caused by activation of ions as they are injected into the Orbitrap. The increased pressure in the HCD cell leaks upstream into the C-trap and Orbitrap, and increased pressures in the C-trap collisionally activate the ions to a small degree as they are injected into the Orbitrap. A similar analysis was performed using activation in the in-source trapping (IST), which is applied in the injection flatapole region. The IST activation and trapping conditions were not able to activate the smaller H-NOX beyond around 50% dissociation even at very high collision voltage (Fig. S-3). Thus, IST activation on the UHMR Q-Exactive HF is limited for collisional activation of smaller ions. MetaUniDec allows these types of collision-induced dissociation (CID) experiments to be analyzed and visualized in a high-throughput manner with a unified workflow from data to final fits.

Application to CID of Nanodiscs

To probe the collisional activation of larger complexes, we performed native MS on POPC MSP1D1(−) nanodiscs using different gas pressures applied in the HCD cell and with activation in the in-source trapping region. Nanodiscs are nanoscale lipoprotein particles consisting of a lipid bilayer surrounded by two membrane scaffold protein (MSP) belts and are a promising system for studying membrane proteins by native MS. All measurements were performed with triplicate nanodisc assembly reactions with different needles for each sample (Fig. 4d). The collision voltage in either the HCD or IST regions was ramped from 0 to 200 V in 20 V steps with 1-min acquisitions at each step. Each 1-min acquisition was averaged into a single spectrum for data processing. Because each of the 15 datasets contained 11 spectra, the total number of spectra in the global dataset was 165.

Figure 4
figure 4

MetaUniDec analysis of nanodisc data sets. A representative data set (a) is deconvolved to get the mass distribution (b), which is distilled into the average mass (c). Deconvolution of multiple data sets (d) provides average mass as a function of collision voltage (e). A linear fit (dashed lines) to the 100–200 V region shows no significant changes in the slope of the line (f) but shows a shift in the intercept of the linear fit with in-source trapping activation (g), which shows that a higher voltage is required in the IST region to achieve the same level of HCD activation

Full size image

Because nanodiscs contain around 130 lipids and 2 MSP belts, there is an intrinsic distribution in the number of lipids per nanodiscs of about ± 5 lipids [53, 57]. As observed previously [19, 57], nanodiscs fragment gradually under increasing collisional activation, losing charge, and mass in a continuous manner (Fig. 4a, b). Thus, rather than measure the intensity of specific peaks as described above, we extracted the average mass weighted by the intensity of the peaks above a 50% threshold (Fig. 4c).

In contrast to H-NOX, no significant differences in activation were observed for nanodiscs with HCD activation at different pressures (Fig. 4e). Combined with results from H-NOX, this suggests that changes to the HCD gas setting above 3 do not significantly affect collisional dissociation, but it may also be that larger ions are less influenced by HCD pressure under these instrumental conditions. However, nanodiscs activated in the IST region showed mildly higher masses throughout the same collisional energy range. When fitting the linear region from 100 to 200 V, the slope of the mass loss (Fig. 4f) is the same with the IST, but the intercept is higher (Fig. 4g). Thus, to compensate for this higher intercept, 35 ± 3 extra volts of IST activation are required to achieve the same level of activation as HCD.

These data provide a quantitative description of the role of pressure on the dissociation of macromolecular complexes, which is important because instrumental pressures are crucial for effective transmission of larger m/z ions [58]. At moderate to high levels of HCD pressure, there is very little influence of increasing pressure on HCD dissociation except for a small amount of background activation. However, activation in the higher-pressure in-source trapping region requires a higher voltage to achieve the same level of activation as the HCD cell.

One final question is how the UHMR Orbitrap instrument compares with a more conventional quadrupole time-of-flight (Q-ToF) instrument. Because nanodiscs show a continuous loss of lipids with increasing CID, we can compare the relative levels of activation observed on the UHMR with previously published data from a Waters Synapt G1 [19]. Although these nanodiscs were not the same physical sample, they were prepared with the same protocol and contents. The dissociation shows remarkable quantitative agreement in average mass as a function of collision voltage (Fig. S-4). The Q-ToF activation curve is generally closer to the HCD than the IST curve, and it is within error of the HCD curve at all collision voltage steps. IST activation shows higher masses and thus less dissociation at higher collision voltages. Another difference is that the UHMR shows improved desolvation at low collision voltages as the Q-ToF was not as effective at resolving nanodisc peaks below 50 V. However, for POPC nanodiscs, we conclude that the similarities between the Orbitrap and Q-ToF instruments are greater than their differences.

MetaUniDec provides a rapid and automated means of quantitatively monitoring the mass as a function of collision voltage. In addition to nanodisc systems, these tools will be useful for quantitation of labeling experiments, including hydroxyl-radical footprinting or gas-phase hydrogen/deuterium exchange, which both show a shift in mass as a function of labeling time [59,60,61]. Similarly, because average mass can be used to determine the drug-to-antibody ratio or the glycosylation state, monitoring the average mass or the intensities of specific peak as a function of processing parameters will be useful in characterization of therapeutic antibodies [62].

Conclusions

MetaUniDec provides simplified high-throughput data analysis for extracting mass and intensity information from native mass spectra. Compared to batch processing with conventional UniDec, MetaUniDec was faster and reduced file sizes. To quantitate the energetic differences between different forms of activation, we analyzed the intensity and average mass of H-NOX and nanodiscs respectively as a functional of collision voltage applied in both the HCD and in-source trapping region. With increased HCD pressure, H-NOX showed an initial increase in the VC50 followed by an increase in the baseline activation. In contrast, nanodiscs did not show a significant increase in activation with increasing HCD pressure but showed an offset towards lower activation when subjected to in-source trapping activation. These applications demonstrate the utility of MetaUniDec for high-throughput deconvolution of mass spectra and provide a more quantitative picture of relative activation energy differences with an UHMR Q-Exactive.

Resources

The compiled program and source code for the UniDec executable, Python API, and GUI are available online: https://github.com/michaelmarty/UniDec.