Abstract
All numerical weather prediction (NWP) models inherently have substantial biases, especially in the forecast of near-surface weather variables. Statistical methods can be used to remove the systematic error based on historical bias data at observation stations. However, many end users of weather forecasts need bias corrected forecasts at locations that scarcely have any historical bias data. To circumvent this limitation, the bias of surface temperature forecasts on a regular grid covering Iran is removed, by using the information available at observation stations in the vicinity of any given grid point. To this end, the running mean error method is first used to correct the forecasts at observation stations, then four interpolation methods including inverse distance squared weighting with constant lapse rate (IDSW-CLR), Kriging with constant lapse rate (Kriging-CLR), gradient inverse distance squared with linear lapse rate (GIDS-LR), and gradient inverse distance squared with lapse rate determined by classification and regression tree (GIDS-CART), are employed to interpolate the bias corrected forecasts at neighboring observation stations to any given location. The results show that all four interpolation methods used do reduce the model error significantly, but Kriging-CLR has better performance than the other methods. For Kriging-CLR, root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) were decreased by 26% and 29%, respectively, as compared to the raw forecasts. It is found also, that after applying any of the proposed methods, unlike the raw forecasts, the bias corrected forecasts do not show spatial or temporal dependency.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acharya, N., S. Chattopadhyay, U. C. Mohanty, et al., 2013: On the bias correction of general circulation model output for Indian summer monsoon. Meteor. Appl., 20, 349–356, doi: 10.1002/met.2013.20.issue-3.
Breiman, L., 2001: Random forests. Machine Learning, 45, 5–32, doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324.
Breiman, L., J. Friedman, C. J. Stone, et al., 1984: Classification and Regression Trees. Taylor and Francis, Oxford, 368 pp.
Courault, D., and P. Monestiez, 1999: Spatial interpolation of air temperature according to atmospheric circulation patterns in Southeast France. Int. J. Climato,l. 19, 365–378, doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0088(19990330)19:4<365::AIDJOC369> 3.0.CO;2-E.
Cressie, N. A. C., 2015: Statistics for Spatial Data. Wiley, New York, 928 pp.
Cressman, G. P., 1959: An operational objective analysis system. Mon. Wea. Re,v. 87, 367–374, doi: 10.1175/1520-0493(1959)087<0367:AOOAS>2.0.CO;2.
Dodson, R., and D. Marks, 1997: Daily air temperature interpolated at high spatial resolution over a large mountainous region. Climate Res., 8, 1–20, doi: 10.3354/cr008001.
Galanis, G., and M. Anadranistakis, 2002: A one-dimensional Kalman filter for the correction of near surface temperature forecasts. Meteor. Appl., 9, 437–441, doi: 10.1017/S1350482702004061.
Gel, Y. R., 2007: Comparative analysis of the local observationbased (LOB) method and the nonparametric regression-based method for gridded bias correction in mesoscale weather forecasting. Wea. Forecasting, 22, 1243–1256, doi: 10.1175/2007WAF2006046.1.
Glahn, B., K. Gilbert, R. Cosgrove, et al., 2009: The gridding of MOS. Wea. Forecasting, 24, 520–529, doi: 10.1175/2008WAF2007080.1.
Glahn, H. R., and D. A. Lowry, 1972: The use of model output statistics (MOS) in objective weather forecasting. J. Appl. Meteor., 11, 1203–1211, doi: 10.1175/1520-0450(1972) 011<1203:TUOMOS>2.0.CO;2.
Hacker, J. P., and D. L. Rife, 2007: A practical approach to sequential estimation of systematic error on near-surface mesoscale grids. Wea. Forecastin,g 22, 1257–1273, doi: 10.1175/2007WAF2006102.1.
Homleid, M., 1995: Diurnal corrections of short-term surface temperature forecasts using the Kalman filter. Wea. Forecasting, 10, 689–707, doi: 10.1175/1520-0434(1995)010<0689: DCOSTS>2.0.CO;2.
Klein, W. H., B. M. Lewis, and I. Enger, 1959: Objective prediction of five-day mean temperatures during winter. J. Atmos. Sci., 16, 672–682.
Lam, H., K. K.-Y. Shum, and J. S.-Y. Tang, 2011: Regional temperature forecast for the next day in Hong Kong. Acta Meteor. Sinica, 25, 725–733, doi: 10.1007/s13351-011-0603-9.
Li, C., D. H. Chen, X. L. Li, et al., 2015: Effects of terrain-following vertical coordinates on high-resolution NWP simulations. J. Meteor. Res., 29, 432–445, doi: 10.1007/s13351-015-4212-x.
Li, J., P. Wang, H. Han, et al., 2016: On the assimilation of satellite sounder data in cloudy skies in numerical weather prediction models. J. Meteor. Res., 30, 169–182, doi: 10.1007/s13351-016-5114-2.
Liston, G. E., and K. Elder, 2006: A meteorological distribution system for high-resolution terrestrial modeling (MicroMet). J. Hydrometeor., 7, 217–234, doi: 10.1175/JHM486.1.
Marzban, C., 2003: Neural networks for postprocessing model output: ARPS. Mon. Wea. Rev,. 131, 1103–111,1 doi: 10.1175/1520-0493(2003)131<1103:NNFPMO>2.0.CO;2.
Mass, C. F., J. Baars, G. Wedam, et al., 2008: Removal of systematic model bias on a model grid. Wea. Forecasting, 23, 438–459, doi: 10.1175/2007WAF2006117.1.
Murphy, A. H., 1988: Skill scores based on the mean square error and their relationships to the correlation coefficient. Mon. Wea. Rev., 116, 2417–2424, doi: 10.1175/1520-0493(1988) 116<2417:SSBOTM>2.0.CO;2.
Nalder, I. A., and R. W. Wein, 1998: Spatial interpolation of climatic normals: Test of a new method in the Canadian boreal forest. Agric. Forest Meteor., 92, 211–225, doi: 10.1016/S0168-1923(98)00102-6.
Roeger, C., R. Stull, D. McClung, et al., 2003: Verification of mesoscale numerical weather forecasts in mountainous terrain for application to avalanche prediction. Wea. Forecasting, 18, 1140–1160, doi: 10.1175/1520-0434(2003)018< 1140:VOMNWF>2.0.CO;2.
Skamarock, W. C., J. B. Klemp, J. Dudhia, et al., 2008: A description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3. NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-475+STR.
Stahl, K., R. D. Moore, J. A. Floyer, et al., 2006: Comparison of approaches for spatial interpolation of daily air temperature in a large region with complex topography and highly variable station density. Agric. Forest Meteor., 139, 224–236, doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.07.004.
Stein, M. L., 1999: Interpolation of Spatial Data: Some Theory for Kriging. Springer Series in Statistics, New York, USA, 249 pp.
Stensrud, D. J., and J. A. Skindlov, 1996: Gridpoint predictions of high temperature from a mesoscale model. Wea. Forecasting, 11, 103–110, doi: 10.1175/1520-0434(1996)011<0103:GPOHTF> 2.0.CO;2.
Sweeney, C. P., P. Lynch, and P. Nolan, 2013: Reducing errors of wind speed forecasts by an optimal combination of postprocessing methods. Meteor. Appl., 20, 32–40, doi: 10.1002/met.2013.20.issue-1.
Wang, D., J. F. Miao, and D. L. Zhang, 2015: Numerical simulations of local circulation and its response to land cover changes over the Yellow Mountains of China. J. Meteor. Res., 29, 667–681, doi: 10.1007/s13351-015-4070-6.
Warner, T. T., 2011: Numerical Weather and Climate Prediction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 550 pp.
Wilks, D. S., and T. M. Hamill, 2007: Comparison of ensemble- MOS methods using GFS reforecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135, 2379–2390, doi: 10.1175/MWR3402.1.
Yussouf, N., and D. J. Stensrud, 2006: Prediction of near-surface variables at independent locations from a bias-corrected ensemble forecasting system. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 3415–3424, doi: 10.1175/MWR3258.1.
Yuval, and W. W. Hsieh, 2003: An adaptive nonlinear MOS scheme for precipitation forecasts using neural networks. Wea. Forecasting, 18, 303–310, doi: 10.1175/1520-0434(2003)018<0303:AANMSF>2.0.CO;2.
Acknowledgments
We would like to show our gratitude to Islamic Republic of Iran Meteorological Organization (IRIMO) for providing access to the observation data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mohammadi, S.A., Azadi, M. & Rahmani, M. Comparison of spatial interpolation methods for gridded bias removal in surface temperature forecasts. J Meteorol Res 31, 791–799 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-017-6135-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-017-6135-1