Skip to main content
Log in

Appreciation Through Use: How Industrial Technology Articulates an Ecology of Values Around Norwegian Seaweed

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Philosophy & Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper offers a moral history of the industrialisation of seaweed harvesting in Norway. Industrialisation is often seen as degrading natural resources. Ironically, we argue, it is precisely the scale and scope of industrial utilisation that may enable non-instrumental valuations of natural resources. We use the history of the Norwegian seaweed industry to make this point. Seaweed became increasingly interesting to harvest as a fruit and then as a crop of the sea in the early twentieth century following biochemical applications for alginates derived from seaweed. When harvesting was mechanised, however, attention turned to the environmental and aesthetic value of kelp forests. Further, the sale of the industry to the American FMC corporation flagged the national value of these plants. In sum epistemic, aesthetic and moral appreciations of natural resources are tangled up and co-evolve with their industrial utilisation, in an ecology of values. Our account uses interview and ethnographic material from key sites in Norway.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We concede with Weston’s (1985, p. 322) pragmatic approach to environmental ethics, and discuss this in our concluding remarks here.

  2. For instance Kerry health care; Ireland industry; SOFIA corporate report.

  3. For example, the site of FMC http://www.stortare.no/?service=tarehosting-en-del-av-norsk-kystkultur

  4. cf. http://www.seaweed.ie/uses_general/industrialgums.php

  5. See his patent at www.google.co.uk/patents/US598790

  6. A Norwegian seaweed meal producer (mainly intended as fodder additive) started with Algea Produkter A/S in 1937, and is still in operation, now owned by a foreign company.

  7. The acquisition is announced here: http://www.prnewswire.co.uk/news-releases/fmc-agrees-to-buy-alginate-business-from-norsk-hydro-156035115.html

References

  • Andersson, A. (2016) Kjemper om tareskogens skattkammer. Bergens Tidende, 20 august 2016 10:04. Available at (with subscription): http://www.bt.no/nyheter/lokalt/Kjemper-om-tareskogens-skattkammer-320623b.html

  • Anker, P. (2007). Science as a vacation: a history of ecology in Norway. History of Science, xlv, 455–479.

  • Aure, J. (2016). Kystklima. In Havforskningsrapporten 2016, Havforskningsinstituttet: 40–42. Available at: https://www.hi.no/publikasjoner/andre_publikasjoner/havforskningsrapporten/2016/nb-no

  • Bekkby, T. (2015). Flotte tareskoger, sørgelige kråkebolleørkener og annet snacks, Forskning.no, 12.8.2015. Avaliable at http://forskning.no/blogg/trine-bekkbys-blogg/flotte-tareskoger-sorgelige-krakebolleorkener-og-fine-alegrasenger-niva

  • Booth, E. (1977). History of the seaweed industry. 1. Alginate Industry. Chemistry & Industry, 13, 528–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, H. E. (2009). Science, policy and the value-free ideal. Pittsburgh PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fikse Ness, K. (2014) Bli med ned i Trøndelags fantastiske undervannsverden, Adresseavisen, 7.10.2014. Avaliable at http://www.adressa.no/nyheter/innenriks/article10203186.ece

  • Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (2008). When species meet, MN. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havressursloven (2008). Lov om forvaltning av viltlevande marine ressursar. Available at https://lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/2008-06-06-37

  • Indergaard, M. (2010). Tang og tare - i hovedsak norske brunalger: Forekomster, forskning og anvendelse. Report. Available at http://ntnu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:397862/FULLTEXT02

  • Indergaard, M. (2016). The first international seaweed symposium held in Edinburgh 1952: applied seaweed science coming of age. Journal of Applied Phycology. 1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-016-0958-5

  • Indergaard, M., & Jensen, A. (1991). Utnyttelse av marin biomasse. NTH-Trykk: Trondheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, S. (2004). Ordering knowledge, ordering society. In S. Jasanoff (Ed.), States of Knowledge: The co-production of science and social order. Oxon and New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, O. (1962). About this number. Norway Exports, 3/1962, 27.

  • Lunde, G. (1937). Vår sjøtang og dens industrielle utnyttelse. Teknisk Ukeblad, 84(16), 192–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minteer, B. A., & Miller, T. R. (2011). The new conservation debate: Ethical foundations, strategic trade-offs and policy opportunities. Biological Conservation, 144, 945–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Næss, A. (1973). The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement. A summary. Inquiry, 16(1), 95–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakshaug, E., et al. (2002). Rapport til Fiskeridepartementet: Nedbeiting av tareskog i Norge. Oslo: Fiskeri-departementet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, S. (2008). The scientific life: a moral history of a late modern vocation. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stanford, E. C. C. (1883). On algin: a new substance obtained from some of the commoner species of marine algae. The chemical news and journal of physical science, 47(254–257), 1267–1269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steen, H., Bodvin, T. & Moy, F. (2013). Effekter av tarehøsting på fisk og skalldyr Nord-Trøndelag 2012. Havforskningsinstituttet: Rapport fra Havforskningsinstituttet, nr.4/2013.

  • Steen, H., Moy, F. & Bodvin, T. (2014). Undersøkelser av stortarehøsting i Nord-Trøndelag og Nordland i 2013. Havforskningsinstituttet: Rapport fra Havforskningsinstituttet.

  • Steen, H., Bodvin, T. & Moy, F. (2016). God gjenvekst av stortare etter prøvehøsting i Nordland. In Havforskningsrapporten 2016, Havforskningsinstituttet: 63–65. Available at: https://www.hi.no/publikasjoner/andre_publikasjoner/havforskningsrapporten/2016/nb-no

  • Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42(9), 1568–1580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swierstra, T. (2013). Nanotechnology and technomoral change. Etica & Politica/ Ethics & Politics, XV, 1, 200–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swierstra, T. (2015). Identifying the normative challenges posed by technology’s ‘soft’ impacts. Nord J Appl. Ethics, 9(1), 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. B. (1995). The spirit of the soil: agriculture and environmental ethics, London and. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Joven, J., Vermaas, P. E., & van de Poel, I. (Eds.). (2015). Handbook of Ethics, Values and Technology Design: Sources, theory, values and application domains, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vea, J., & Ask, E. (2011). Creating a sustainable commercial harvest of Laminaria hyperborea, in Norway. Journal of Applied Phycology, 23, 489–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner A. & Kraan, S. (2004). Review of the potential mechanisation of kelp harvesting in Ireland, Marine Environment and Health Series, no. 17, especially pp. 1–27. Available at http://oar.marine.ie/handle/10793/261

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sophia Efstathiou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Efstathiou, S., Myskja, B.K. Appreciation Through Use: How Industrial Technology Articulates an Ecology of Values Around Norwegian Seaweed. Philos. Technol. 32, 405–424 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-018-0301-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-018-0301-y

Keywords

Navigation