Abstract
In this paper, a hybrid slit- shape memory alloy (SMA) energy dissipation device is devised by attaching a SMA bar to each face of a steel slit plate. An analysis model of a SMA bar with super elastic capability is developed using various link elements, and the accuracy of the analysis model is verified by comparing with finite element analysis results. The seismic performance of the hybrid slit damper is verified by incorporating them in seven-story steel structure. The nonlinear dynamic analysis results of the model structure subjected to seven earthquake ground motions show that the addition of SMA bars in slit damper results in significant reduction both in the maximum and the residual deformation compared to those of the structure installed with typical steel slit dampers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ANSYS (2012), Mechanical APDL (Release 14.0). ANSYS Inc. Canonsburg, US
Andrawes B, DesRoches R (2005). “Unseating prevention for multiple frame bridges using superelastic devices.” Smart materials and structures, 14(3), S60.
Cardone D, Dolce M, Ponzo FC (2004). “Experimental behaviour of R/C frames retrofitted with dissipating and re-centring braces.” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 8(03), pp. 361–396.
Chan RW, Albermani F (2008). “Experimental study of steel slit damper for passive energy dissipation.” Engineering Structures, 30(4), pp. 1058–1066.
Clark PW, Aiken I, Kelly JM, Krumme R (1995). Experimental and analytical studies of shape-memory alloy dampers for structural control. Smart Structures & Materials’ 95, International Society for Optics and Photonics.
DesRoches, R., McCormick, J, Delemont, M (2004). “Cyclic properties of superelastic shape memory alloy wires and bars.” Journal of Structural Engineering, 130(1), pp. 38–46.
Dolce M, Cardone D, Marnetto R (2000). “Implementation and testing of passive control devices based on shape memory alloys.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 29(7), pp. 945–968.
FEMA 356, Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., 2000
Fremond, M. (1996). Shape memory alloy, Springer.
Han YL, Li QS, Li AQ, Leung AYT (2003). “Structural vibration control by shape memory alloy damper.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 32(3), pp. 483–494.
Ingalkar, Rameshwar. S. (2014). Rehabilitation of Buildings and Bridges by Using Shape Memory Alloys (SMA). International Journal of Civil Engineering Research, 5(2), pp. 163–168.
Jalaeefar A, Asgarian B (2014). A simple hybrid damping device with energy-dissipating and re-centering characteristics for special structures. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 23(7), pp. 483–499.
Kim J, Jeong J (2016). “Seismic retrofit of asymmetric structures using steel plate slit dampers”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 120, pp. 232–244
Kim J, Shin H (2017). “Seismic loss assessment of a structure retrofitted with slit-friction hybrid dampers”, Engineering Structures, 130, pp. 336–350
Lee J, Kang H, Kim J (2017). “Seismic performance of steel plate slit-friction hybrid dampers”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 136, pp. 128–139.
Ma H, Cho C (2008). “Feasibility study on a superelastic SMA damper with re-centring capability.” Materials Science and Engineering: A 473(1), pp. 290–296.
McCormick J, Aburano H, Ikenaga M (2008). Permissible residual deformation levels for building structures considering both safety and human elements. Proceedings of the 14th world conference on earthquake engineering.
McCormick J, DesRoches R, Fugazza D (2007). “Seismic assessment of concentrically braced steel frames with shape memory alloy braces.” Journal of Structural Engineering, 133(6), pp. 862–870.
Miller DJ, Fahnestock LA, Eatherton MR (2012). Development and experimental validation of a nickeltitanium shape memory alloy self-centering bucklingrestrained brace. Engineering Structures, 40, pp. 288–298.
Ocel J, DesRoches R, Leon RT, Hess WG (2004). “Steel beam-column connections using shape memory alloys.” Journal of Structural Engineering, 130(5), pp. 732–740.
Ozbulu, OE, Hurlebaus S (2012). Application of a SMA-based hybrid control device to 20-story nonlinear benchmark building. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 41(13), pp. 1831–1843.
Saadat S, Salichs J, Noori M, Hou Z (2002). “An overview of vibration and seismic applications of NiTi shape memory alloy.” Smart materials and structures, 11(2), pp.218.
SAP (2010). Analysis Reference Manual. Computer and Structures, Berkeley.
Song G, Ma N, Li HN (2006). “Applications of shape memory alloys in civil structures.” Engineering Structures, 28(9), pp. 1266–1274.
Tamai, H. and Y. Kitagawa (2002). “Pseudoelastic behavior of shape memory alloy wire and its application to seismic resistance member for building.” Computational materials science, 25(1), pp. 218–227.
Tanaka T, Chung SW, Chaing LF, Makii K (2004). “Postcharacteristics of formed Zn-22 mass% Al alloy to seismic damper for general residence.” Materials transactions, 45(8), pp. 2542–2546.
Torra V, Isalgue A, Auguet C, Carreras G, Lovey F, Terriault P (2013). Damping in civil engineering using SMA Part 2-particular properties of NiTi for damping of stayed cables in bridges. Canadian Metallurgical Quarterly, 52(1), pp. 81–89.
Wilde K, Gardoni P, Fujino Y (1997). Seismic response of base-isolated structures with shape memory alloy damping devices. Smart Structures and Materials’ 97, International Society for Optics and Photonics.
Wierschem N, Andrawes B (2010). Superelastic SMA-FRP composite reinforcement for concrete structures. Smart materials and structures, 19(2), 025011.
Yan, X. and J. Nie (2003). “Study of a new application form of shape memory alloy superelasticity.” Smart materials and structures, 12(6), N14.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Naeem, A., Eldin, M.N., Kim, J. et al. Seismic performance evaluation of a structure retrofitted using steel slit dampers with shape memory alloy bars. Int J Steel Struct 17, 1627–1638 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-017-1227-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-017-1227-4