Skip to main content
Log in

Seismic performance evaluation of a structure retrofitted using steel slit dampers with shape memory alloy bars

  • Published:
International Journal of Steel Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a hybrid slit- shape memory alloy (SMA) energy dissipation device is devised by attaching a SMA bar to each face of a steel slit plate. An analysis model of a SMA bar with super elastic capability is developed using various link elements, and the accuracy of the analysis model is verified by comparing with finite element analysis results. The seismic performance of the hybrid slit damper is verified by incorporating them in seven-story steel structure. The nonlinear dynamic analysis results of the model structure subjected to seven earthquake ground motions show that the addition of SMA bars in slit damper results in significant reduction both in the maximum and the residual deformation compared to those of the structure installed with typical steel slit dampers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ANSYS (2012), Mechanical APDL (Release 14.0). ANSYS Inc. Canonsburg, US

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrawes B, DesRoches R (2005). “Unseating prevention for multiple frame bridges using superelastic devices.” Smart materials and structures, 14(3), S60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardone D, Dolce M, Ponzo FC (2004). “Experimental behaviour of R/C frames retrofitted with dissipating and re-centring braces.” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 8(03), pp. 361–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan RW, Albermani F (2008). “Experimental study of steel slit damper for passive energy dissipation.” Engineering Structures, 30(4), pp. 1058–1066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark PW, Aiken I, Kelly JM, Krumme R (1995). Experimental and analytical studies of shape-memory alloy dampers for structural control. Smart Structures & Materials’ 95, International Society for Optics and Photonics.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • DesRoches, R., McCormick, J, Delemont, M (2004). “Cyclic properties of superelastic shape memory alloy wires and bars.” Journal of Structural Engineering, 130(1), pp. 38–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolce M, Cardone D, Marnetto R (2000). “Implementation and testing of passive control devices based on shape memory alloys.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 29(7), pp. 945–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FEMA 356, Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., 2000

  • Fremond, M. (1996). Shape memory alloy, Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Han YL, Li QS, Li AQ, Leung AYT (2003). “Structural vibration control by shape memory alloy damper.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 32(3), pp. 483–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingalkar, Rameshwar. S. (2014). Rehabilitation of Buildings and Bridges by Using Shape Memory Alloys (SMA). International Journal of Civil Engineering Research, 5(2), pp. 163–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalaeefar A, Asgarian B (2014). A simple hybrid damping device with energy-dissipating and re-centering characteristics for special structures. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 23(7), pp. 483–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J, Jeong J (2016). “Seismic retrofit of asymmetric structures using steel plate slit dampers”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 120, pp. 232–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J, Shin H (2017). “Seismic loss assessment of a structure retrofitted with slit-friction hybrid dampers”, Engineering Structures, 130, pp. 336–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee J, Kang H, Kim J (2017). “Seismic performance of steel plate slit-friction hybrid dampers”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 136, pp. 128–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma H, Cho C (2008). “Feasibility study on a superelastic SMA damper with re-centring capability.” Materials Science and Engineering: A 473(1), pp. 290–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick J, Aburano H, Ikenaga M (2008). Permissible residual deformation levels for building structures considering both safety and human elements. Proceedings of the 14th world conference on earthquake engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick J, DesRoches R, Fugazza D (2007). “Seismic assessment of concentrically braced steel frames with shape memory alloy braces.” Journal of Structural Engineering, 133(6), pp. 862–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller DJ, Fahnestock LA, Eatherton MR (2012). Development and experimental validation of a nickeltitanium shape memory alloy self-centering bucklingrestrained brace. Engineering Structures, 40, pp. 288–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ocel J, DesRoches R, Leon RT, Hess WG (2004). “Steel beam-column connections using shape memory alloys.” Journal of Structural Engineering, 130(5), pp. 732–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozbulu, OE, Hurlebaus S (2012). Application of a SMA-based hybrid control device to 20-story nonlinear benchmark building. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 41(13), pp. 1831–1843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saadat S, Salichs J, Noori M, Hou Z (2002). “An overview of vibration and seismic applications of NiTi shape memory alloy.” Smart materials and structures, 11(2), pp.218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAP (2010). Analysis Reference Manual. Computer and Structures, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song G, Ma N, Li HN (2006). “Applications of shape memory alloys in civil structures.” Engineering Structures, 28(9), pp. 1266–1274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamai, H. and Y. Kitagawa (2002). “Pseudoelastic behavior of shape memory alloy wire and its application to seismic resistance member for building.” Computational materials science, 25(1), pp. 218–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka T, Chung SW, Chaing LF, Makii K (2004). “Postcharacteristics of formed Zn-22 mass% Al alloy to seismic damper for general residence.” Materials transactions, 45(8), pp. 2542–2546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torra V, Isalgue A, Auguet C, Carreras G, Lovey F, Terriault P (2013). Damping in civil engineering using SMA Part 2-particular properties of NiTi for damping of stayed cables in bridges. Canadian Metallurgical Quarterly, 52(1), pp. 81–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilde K, Gardoni P, Fujino Y (1997). Seismic response of base-isolated structures with shape memory alloy damping devices. Smart Structures and Materials’ 97, International Society for Optics and Photonics.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wierschem N, Andrawes B (2010). Superelastic SMA-FRP composite reinforcement for concrete structures. Smart materials and structures, 19(2), 025011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, X. and J. Nie (2003). “Study of a new application form of shape memory alloy superelasticity.” Smart materials and structures, 12(6), N14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinkoo Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Naeem, A., Eldin, M.N., Kim, J. et al. Seismic performance evaluation of a structure retrofitted using steel slit dampers with shape memory alloy bars. Int J Steel Struct 17, 1627–1638 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-017-1227-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-017-1227-4

Keywords

Navigation