Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical Evaluation of a Low-pain Long Microneedle for Subcutaneous Insulin Injection

  • Original Article
  • Published:
BioChip Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Microneedles (MNs) are being developed to overcome the limitations of the conventional hypodermic needle, e.g. the injection pain. In this study, we conducted an analysis of clinical pain and bleeding at the site of MN insertion and evaluated the insulin pharmacodynamic profile compared with parameters obtained with a conventional pen needle. MN insertion into the skin of 25 healthy adults or 15 patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) revealed significantly less pain relative to a conventional hypodermic pen needle, thus reducing pain scores from 2.1±1.9 to 1.3±1.4 (mean±standard deviation [SD]). Besides, no bleeding was observed when the MN was used. In the insulin pharmacodynamic assay, no significant differences were observed in the blood glucose-lowering effect between the pen needle and MN. Based on these results, the MN is expected to be a good substitute for conventional hypodermic pen needles and improve the quality of life of patients by significantly reducing the pain associated with insulin treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fraser, R. Metabolic disorders in diabetes. Br. Med. J. 4, 591–596 (1972).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Nathan, D.M. et al. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of longterm complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N. Engl. J. Med. 329, 977–986 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nathan, D.M. et al. Intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 353, 2643–2653 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hameed, I. et al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus: From a metabolic disorder to an inflammatory condition. World J. Diabetes 6, 598–612 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Thrasher, J. Pharmacologic Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Available Therapies. Am. J. Cardiol. 120, S4-S16 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  6. CADTH Therapeutic Reviews. in Third-line Drugs for Type 2 Diabetes-Project Protocol (Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Copyright (c) 2017 Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health., Ottawa (ON), 2017).

  7. Humphrey, M.J. The Oral Bioavailability of Peptides and Related Drugs. in Delivery Systems for Peptide Drugs (eds. Davis, S.S., Illum, L. & Tomlinson, E.) 139–151 (Springer US, Boston, MA, 1986).

  8. Shaji, J. & Patole, V. Protein and Peptide Drug Delivery: Oral Approaches. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 70, 269–277 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Rubin, R.R., Peyrot, M., Kruger, D.F. & Travis, L.B. Barriers to insulin injection therapy: patient and health care provider perspectives. Diabetes Educ. 35, 1014–1022 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Aronson, R. The Role of Comfort and Discomfort in Insulin Therapy. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 14, 741–747 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Oleck, J., Kassam, S. & Goldman, J.D. Commentary: Why Was Inhaled Insulin a Failure in the Market? Diabetes Spectr. 29, 180–184 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kling, J. Inhaled insulin’s last gasp? Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 479–480 (2008).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mohanty, R.R. & Das, S. Inhaled Insulin-Current Di rection of Insulin Research. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 11, OE01-OE02 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gill, H.S., Denson, D.D., Burris, B.A. & Prausnitz, M.R. Effect of microneedle design on pain in human subjects. Clin. J. Pain 24, 585–594 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Martanto, W. et al. Transdermal delivery of insulin using microneedles in vivo. Pharm. Res. 21, 947–952 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gill, H.S. & Prausnitz, M.R. Coated microneedles for transdermal delivery. J. Control. Release 117, 227–237 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Martin, C.J., Allender, C.J., Brain, K.R., Morrissey, A. & Birchall, J.C. Low temperature fabrication of biodegradable sugar glass microneedles for transdermal drug delivery applications. J. Control. Release 158, 93–101 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gill, H.S. & Prausnitz, M.R. Pocketed Microneedles for Drug Delivery to the Skin. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 69, 1537–1541 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Gupta, J., Felner, E.I. & Prausnitz, M.R. Rapid pharmacokinetics of intradermal insulin administered using microneedles in type 1 diabetes subjects. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 13, 451–456 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Pettis, R.J. et al. Intradermal microneedle delivery of insulin lispro achieves faster insulin absorption and insulin action than subcutaneous injection. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 13, 435–442 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. McAllister, D.V. et al. Microfabricated needles for transdermal delivery of macromolecules and nanoparticles: Fabrication methods and transport studies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 13755–13760 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Akkus, O., Oguz, A., Uzunlulu, M. & Kizilgul, M. Evaluation of skin and subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness for optimal insulin injection. J. Diabetes Metab. 3, 2 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Norman, J.J., Brown, M.R., Raviele, N.A., Prausnitz, M.R. & Felner, E.I. Faster pharmacokinetics and increased patient acceptance of intradermal insulin delivery using a single hollow microneedle in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes 14, 459–465 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gupta, J., Felner, E.I. & Prausnitz, M.R. Minimally invasive insulin delivery in subjects with type 1 diabetes using hollow microneedles. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 11, 329–337 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Li, C.G. et al. A Novel Ultrafine Needle (UN) for Innocuous and Efficient Subcutaneous Insulin Delivery. Advanced Functional Materials 27, (2017).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Pettis, R.J. et al. Microneedle-based intradermal versus subcutaneous administration of regular human insulin or insulin lispro: pharmacokinetics and postprandial glycemic excursions in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 13, 443–450 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kochba, E., Levin, Y., Raz, I. & Cahn, A. Improved Insulin Pharmacokinetics Using a Novel Microneedle Device for Intradermal Delivery in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 18, 525–531 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Lee, C.Y., Lee, K., You, Y.S., Lee, S.H. & Jung, H. Tower microneedle via reverse drawing lithography for innocuous intravitreal drug delivery. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2, 812–816 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. McKay, M., Compion, G. & Lytzen, L. A comparison of insulin injection needles on patients’ perceptions of pain, handling, and acceptability: A randomized, open-label, crossover study in subjects with diabetes. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 11, 195–201 (2009)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Miwa, T. et al. Comparison of the effects of a new 32-gauge x 4-mm pen needle and a 32-gauge x 6-mm pen needle on glycemic control, safety, and patient ratings in Japanese adults with diabetes. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 14, 1084–1090 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee, K., Lee, H.C., Lee, D.S. & Jung, H. Drawing lithography: three-dimensional fabrication of an ultrahigh-aspect-ratio microneedle. Adv. Mater. 22, 483–486 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyungil Jung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, G., Ma, Y., Lee, Yh. et al. Clinical Evaluation of a Low-pain Long Microneedle for Subcutaneous Insulin Injection. BioChip J 12, 309–316 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13206-018-2411-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13206-018-2411-0

Keywords

Navigation