Abstract
Shear stress occurs in flowing liquids, especially at the interface of a flowing liquid and a stationary solid phase. Thus, it occurs inside the artery system of the human body, where it is responsible for a number of biological functions. The shear stress level generally remains less than 70 dyne/cm2 in the whole circulatory system, but in the stenotic arteries, which are constricted by 95%, a shear stress greater than 1,000 dyne/cm2 can be reached. Methods of researching the effects of shear stress on cells are of large interest to understand these processes. Here, we show the development of a microfluidic device for generating shear stress gradients. The performance of the shear stress gradient generator was theoretically simulated prior to experiments. Through simple manipulations of the liquid flow, the shape and magnitude of the shear stress gradients can be manipulated. Our microfluidic device consisted of five portions divided by arrays of micropillars. The generated shear stress gradient has five distinct levels at 8.38, 6.55, 4.42, 2.97, and 2.24 dyne/cm2. Thereafter, an application of the microfluidic device was demonstrated testing the effect of shear stress on human umbilical vein endothelial cells.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Korin, N., Gounis, M.J., Wakhloo, A.K. & Ingber, D.E. Targeted Drug Delivery to Flow–Obstructed Blood Vessels Using Mechanically Activated Nanotherapeutics. JAMA Neurol. 72, 119–122 (2015).
Chistiakov, D.A., Orekhov, A.N. & Bobryshev, Y.V. Effects of shear stress on endothelial cells: go with the flow. Acta Physiol. 219, 382–408 (2017).
Zhang, X., Jones, P. & Haswell, S.J. Attachment and detachment of living cells on modified microchannel surfaces in a microfluidic–based lab–on–a–chip system. Chem. Eng. J. 135, S82–88 (2008).
Plouffe, B.D. et al. Peptide–mediated selective adhesion of smooth muscle and endothelial cells in microfluidic shear flow. Langmuir 23, 5050–5055 (2007).
Plouffe, B.D., Kniazeva, T., Mayer, J.E., Murthy, S.K. & Sales, V.L. Development of microfluidics as endothelial progenitor cell capture technology for cardiovascular tissue engineering and diagnostic medicine. FASEB J. 23, 3309–3314 (2009).
Sin, A., Murthy, S.K., Revzin, A., Tompkins, R.G. & Toner, M. Enrichment using antibody–coated microfluidic chambers in shear flow: model mixtures of human lymphocytes. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 91, 816–826 (2005).
Sorescu, G.P. et al. Bone morphogenic protein 4 produced in endothelial cells by oscillatory shear stress stimulates an inflammatory response. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 31128–31135 (2003).
Glen, K. et al. Modulation of functional responses of endothelial cells linked to angiogenesis and inflammation by shear stress: differential effects of the mecha notransducer CD31. J. Cell Physiol. 227, 2710–2721 (2012).
Stolberg, S. & McCloskey, K.E. Can shear stress direct stem cell fate? Biotechnol. Progr. 25, 10–19 (2009).
Park, J. et al. Control of stem cell fate and function by engineering physical microenvironments. Intrgr. Biol. 4, 1008–1018 (2012).
Bowden, N. et al. Experimental Approaches to Study Endothelial Responses to Shear Stress. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 25, 389–400 (2016).
Chiu, D.T. et al. Small but Perfectly Formed? Successes, Challenges, and Opportunities for Microfluidics in the Chemical and Biological Sciences. Chem. 2, 201–223 (2017).
Kim, T.H., Lee, J.M., Chung, B.H. & Chung B.G. Development of microfluidic LED sensor platform. Nano Converg. 2, 12 (2015).
Kim, J.–y., Chang, S.–I. & O’Hare, D. Integration of monolithic porous polymer with droplet–based microfluidics on a chip for nano/picoliter volume sample analysis. Nano Converg. 1, 3 (2014).
Panigrahi, P.K. Transport Phenomena in Microfluidic Systems: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 13–19 (2016).
Yuki, T., Masayuki, Y., Teruo, O., Takehiko, K. & Kiichi, S. Evaluation of effects of shear stress on hepatocytes by a microchip–based system. Meas. Sci. Technol. 17, 3167 (2006).
Gutierrez, E. & Groisman, A. Quantitative Measurements of the Strength of Adhesion of Human Neutrophils to a Substratum in a Microfluidic Device. Anal. Chem. 79, 2249–2258 (2007).
Rupprecht, P. et al. A tapered channel microfluidic device for comprehensive cell adhesion analysis, using measurements of detachment kinetics and shear stressdependent motion. Biomicrofluidics 6, 014107 (2012).
Kim, H.W., Han, S., Kim, W., Lim, J. & Kim, D.S. Modulating wall shear stress gradient via equilateral triangular channel for in situ cellular adhesion assay. Biomicrofluidics 10, 054119 (2016).
Chen, W.–M. et al. A novel gait platform to measure isolated plantar metatarsal forces during walking. J. Biomech. 43, 2017–2021 (2010).
Kärki, S., Lekkala, J., Kuokkanen, H. & Halttunen, J. Development of a piezoelectric polymer film sensor for plantar normal and shear stress measurements. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 154, 57–64 (2009).
Heywood, E.J., Jeutter, D.C. & Harris, G.F. Tri–axial plantar pressure sensor: design, calibration and characterization. The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 2010–2013 (2004).
Rajala, S. & Lekkala, J. Plantar shear stress measurements — A review. Clin. Biomech. 29, 475–483 (2014).
Gnanamanickam, E.P., Nottebrock, B., Groβe, S., Sullivan, J.P. & Schröder, W. Measurement of turbulent wall shear–stress using micro–pillars. Meas. Sci. Technol. 24, 124002 (2013).
Green, J.V. et al. Effect of channel geometry on cell adhesion in microfluidic devices. Lab Chip 9, 677–685 (2009).
Lee, J.M., Kim, J.–e., Kang, E., Lee, S.–H. & Chung, B.G. An integrated microfluidic culture device to regulate endothelial cell differentiation from embryonic stem cells. Electrophoresis 32, 3133–3137 (2011).
Galie, P., Van Oosten, A., Chen, C. & Janmey, P. Application of multiple levels of fluid shear stress to endothelial cells plated on polyacrylamide gels. Lab Chip 15, 1205–1212 (2015).
Back, L.H., Radbill, J.R., Cho, Y.I. & Crawford, D.W. Measurement and prediction of flow through a replica segment of a mildly atherosclerotic coronary artery of man. J. Biomech. 19, 1–17 (1986).
Saxena, A., Ng, E. & Raman, V. Thermographic venous blood flow characterization with external cooling stimulation. Infrared Phys. Technol. 90, 8–19 (2018).
Inoguchi, H., Tanaka, T., Maehara, Y. & Matsuda, T. The effect of gradually graded shear stress on the morphological integrity of a huvec–seeded compliant small–diameter vascular graft. Biomaterials 28, 486–495 (2007).
Abu–Reesh, I. & Kargi, F. Biological responses of hybridoma cells to defined hydrodynamic shear stress. J. Biotechnol. 9, 167–178 (1989).
Bruus, H. Acoustofluidics 1: Governing equations in microfluidics. Lab Chip 11, 3742–3751 (2011).
Duffy, D.C., McDonald, J.C., Schueller, O.J.A. & Whitesides, G.M. Rapid Prototyping of Microfluidic Systems in Poly(dimethylsiloxane). Anal. Chem. 70, 4974–4984 (1998).
Choi, J.W. et al. Dual–nozzle microfluidic droplet generator. Nano Converg. 5, 12 (2018).
Choi, J.–H. et al. Priming nanoparticle–guided diagnostics and therapeutics towards human organs–on–a–chips microphyiological system. Nano Converg. 6, 24 (2016).
Kim, J.–Y., Chang, S.–I., de Mello, A.J. & O’Hare, D. Integration of monolithic porous polymer with droplet–based microfluidics on a chip for nano/picoliter volume sample analysis. Nano Converg. 1, 3 (2014).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, T.H., Lee, J.M., Ahrberg, C.D. et al. Development of the Microfluidic Device to Regulate Shear Stress Gradients. BioChip J 12, 294–303 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13206-018-2407-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13206-018-2407-9