Abstract
A better understanding of the main forces that affect oil droplets is expected to play an important role in enhancing oil recovery from reservoirs. The effects of the various forces on an oil droplet on the top of a rock surface or hanging from the bottom of a rock surface are analysed. The results proved that increasing the mass of an oil droplet creates a favourable condition for interaction between the displaced and displacing fluids, which prevents the displacing fluid from bypassing the oil droplets. The results show that the mass of an oil droplet plays an important role in initiating its movement if the gravity force is greater than the capillary force. This study provides a sound understanding of the main forces affecting oil droplet movements and opportunities for future enhanced oil recovery projects.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) changes the properties of a reservoir and increases the oil production. The change could occur between the displaced and the displacing fluid or the displaced fluid and the reservoir rock. The change might take the form of oil swelling, wettability alteration, reduction of interfacial tension, oil viscosity and capillary forces (Green and Willhite 1998; M.A. Samba et al. 2019a, b; Elsharafi 2018; Naser, et al. 2020).
Capillary force has a considerable effect on the oil recovery efficiency (Green and Willhite 1998; Kathel and Mohanty 2013; Romanuka et al. 2012; Elraies and Tan 2012), and many studies have focused on the mechanisms involved (Guo et al. 2020; Nobakht et al. 2007; Tola et al. 2017; Esfe et al. 2020; Rossen and Lu 1997). Nevertheless, the effect of capillary force is still under investigation, particularly its relationship with aging time, wettability type, pore throat diameter and mass of the oil droplet.
The molecules of any homogeneous material are held together by molecular attraction forces (cohesion forces). The magnitude of these forces in liquids is less than those in solids. These forces dissociate due to fluid displacement or drive mechanisms during the initial stage of oil production, whereby large oil droplets dissociate into small droplets (Hinze 1955; M J Van der Zande, Janssen, and Van den Broek 2001; Marinus Johannes Van der Zande 2000). Most of the small droplets will stick onto the surface of the pores, generating another force. This force affects the molecules of the liquid and also those of other media in contact with them, whether they are solids, liquids or gases. This force is an adhesion force, the origin of capillary force, which is generated when adhesion to the walls is stronger than the cohesive forces between the liquid molecules (Boyd 2020). Many factors affect the capillary force, such as the mass of the oil droplet and the diameter of the pore throat. Studies have shown that the effect of capillary forces is inversely proportional to the mass of the oil droplet (Andersen 2020). Thus, an oil droplet with a larger mass has smaller capillary forces (Pak et al. 2015). Also, the relationship between the oil droplet mass and the pore throat diameter has an important influence on the displacement process. Indeed, the mass of the oil droplet compared to the pore throat diameter can determine whether or not an oil droplet can be produced (Fig. 1). To illustrate the figure, water injection is considered as immiscible flooding, when the mass of the oil droplet fills the pore throat (d1), the oil droplet is affected by the cohesive forces of the water droplet, even if there is no interaction between the molecules of the liquids (a capillary force can be established) (Fig. 1A). If the mass of the oil droplet does not fill the pore (d2), the water droplets may bypass the oil droplet and fail to displace it (Fig. 1B).
It is also important to determine the capillary force based on the wettability of the reservoir, which has a significant influence on oil recovery efficiency. Many researchers have investigated the effect of wettability on capillary force (Guo et al. 2020; Chinedu C Agbalaka et al. 2009; Andersen 2020; Chinedu Christian Agbalaka et al. 2008; Roustaei et al. 2012). The effect of the capillary force has been noticed during the wettability change from oil-wet to water-wet (Masalmeh 2003; Jabbar et al. 2017; Al Sayari 2009). The change in wettability causes a change in capillary force based on the wetting phase. In an oil-wet reservoir, the capillary force is between the oil droplet and the rock surface, in this case more effort is needed to reduce the capillary force in order to free the oil droplet. On the other hand, in a water-wet reservoir, the capillary is primarily between the water droplet and the oil droplet if the water droplet cannot be bypassed, as mentioned previously. This capillary force is not the main hindrance to enhancing oil recovery in a water-wet because oil is not miscible with water. In a water-wet case, chemical injection could be used to create an interaction between the oil droplet and the water droplet or, in the oil-wet case, to change the wetting phase from the oil-wetting to a water-wetting phase.
Based on the empirical literature, the main recovery challenges result from the relationship between an oil droplet and the solid surface due to the multiplicity of physical phenomena involved (mass of the oil droplet, aging time, pore throat diameter, etc.). Nevertheless, some physical phenomena could be further investigated. In this study, the relationship between the different forces and the oil droplet spreading on a rock surface at the late stage of oil production is analysed. It is anticipated that the mass of the oil droplet may play an important role in displacing the remaining oil in place since the proposed theory indicates that an increase in the mass of an oil droplet helps to displace the oil droplet and reduce the capillary force, but another force is still required to displace the large oil droplets. This point will be elaborated in the second part of this work, the second part will also introduce a new material to enhance oil recovery in the order to prove the analytical investigation in this paper. Moreover, the effect of these forces could be further introduced to the reservoir simulation.
Analytical investigation
Assumptions
-
1.
Oil droplets are not located on a flat surface.
-
2.
The analysis included two cases: an oil droplet on the top of a rock surface and an oil droplet hanging from the roof of the rock surface.
-
3.
The flow direction is along the X-axis.
-
4.
The contact angle (\(\theta\)) is between the centralized capillary force and the main axis.
-
5.
The system is in the oil-wetting phase.
-
6.
The oil droplet is affected by two forces in the base case: gravity force, and capillary force.
-
7.
Absence of linear streamlines (in the late stage of production).
-
8.
The relative permeability of water and oil is a uniform function of oil and water saturation, i.e., the value does not change over time.
-
9.
The driving mechanisms are neglected.
The oil droplet is located on the top of a rock surface
The oil droplet is located on the top of a rock surface without injection
Pressure is the force per unit area and it works as a vector. However, pressure at any point in a fluid is the same in all directions. That is, it has magnitude but no specific direction and, therefore, it is a scalar quantity. The main pressures that have an effect on the oil droplet are; pressure in X-direction (Px), pressure in Y-direction (Py), and capillary pressure (Pc) (Fig. 2).
From Newton’s second law, a force balance in the X and Y-direction gives the following:
where.
\(\rho\) is the density and W = mg = \(\frac{1}{2} \rho g \Delta y\) is the weight of the oil droplet.
So
We have \(\Delta {\text{x }} = {\text{ l}}\cos \theta\) and \(\Delta y = l\sin \theta\). Substituting these geometric relations and dividing Eq. 1 by \(\Delta\) y and Eq. 2 by \(\Delta {\text{x}}\) gives
In this case, it is assumed that \(\sum {\text{F}}_{{\text{x}}} {\text{ is smaller or equal to }}\sum {\text{F}}_{{\text{y}}} { }\). Thus, the oil droplet will stick to the surface of the rock and prevent forward movement. Based on Eq. 3, the mass of the oil droplet plays a significant role in allowing the oil droplet to be free, where the positive effect of the pressure in the X-direction (Px) is ignored in this case because there is no injection \({ }\left( {\sum {\text{F}}_{{\text{x}}} = { } - {\text{P}}_{{\text{C}}} } \right)\). Thus, the oil droplet in the X-direction is affected only by capillary force, which is against the flow direction and prevents the oil droplet from moving. As mentioned above, the smallest mass of the oil droplet has the strongest capillary force, so the increase in the mass of the oil droplet can reduce the Pc that acts on the oil droplet. Also, there are other forces that have effects on the oil droplet in the Y-direction, these are the capillary pressure and the gravity force \(({ }\sum {\text{F}}_{{\text{y}}} = { } - {\text{P}}_{{\text{C}}} - {\text{mg }})\) and both of them work against the flow direction (Eq. 4). The conclusion in this case is that the oil droplet sticks due to the gravity force in the Y-direction and the capillary force in both Y and X-direction as well. Figure 2 shows that if the mass of the oil droplet increases and is supported by the inclination of the rock surface, or the oil droplet is subjected to a positive force along the X-axis (Px), the oil droplet will move forward with the flow direction.
The oil droplet is located on the top of a rock surface with water injection
The oil droplet is affected by the same forces shown in Eq. 3 and Eq. 4, even in the case of water injection. The pressure in the X-direction does not affect the oil droplet due to its small mass compared to the pore throat diameter. This allows the water droplet to bypass the oil droplet since gravity and capillary forces are acting on the oil droplet. In this case, the \(\sum {\text{F}}_{{\text{x}}} {\text{ is still smaller or equal to}}\sum {\text{F}}_{{\text{y}}} { }\) because of the small size of the oil droplet, so there is a chance for the water droplet to bypass the oil droplet (Fig. 3). In addition, there is no interaction between the oil droplets and water droplets, because the pore diameter compared to the size of the oil droplet, which it does not provide a suitable condition for the water droplets to displace the oil droplets due to the capillary force. The conclusion in this case is that the oil droplet sticks due to gravity force in the Y-direction and the capillary force in both Y-direction and X-direction. As mentioned above, to allow the oil droplet to be free, its mass should be increased to decrease the capillary force and prevent the water droplet from bypassing it, so that it will be subjected to a positive force on the X-axis (Px).
The oil droplet is located on the top of a rock surface and it is mass increases
In the case shown in Fig. 4, it is assumed that \(\sum {\text{F}}_{{\text{x}}} {\text{ is larger than}}\sum {\text{F}}_{{\text{y}}} .{ }\) Thus, the oil droplet will move forward in the direction of production. Equation 3 shows that, the oil droplet moves due the pressure in the X-direction (Px), where Px is greater than the capillary pressure. Generally, Px will have an effect on the oil droplet if its mass is increased. In any case, the effect of Px will neglect the capillary force effect on the oil droplet due to the small value of this force compared to the Px (\(\sum {\text{F}}_{{\text{x}}} { } = { }P{\text{x}})\). In addition, the increase in the mass of the oil droplet will not only create a favourable condition for interaction between the displaced and displacing fluid but will also increase Px and determine the direction of acceleration (Eq. 3). The conclusion in this case is that the movement of the oil droplet is due to increase of its mass, which allows the oil droplet to be pushed by the water droplet. Even though, the oil droplet remains exposed to the gravity force in the Y-direction and the capillary force in both Y and X-direction, these forces are negligible because their small magnitude compared to value of Px. The second part of this paper will include one of the methods that can be used to increase the mass of an oil droplet.
The oil droplet hangs from the bottom of a rock surface
The oil droplet hangs from the bottom of a rock surface without injection
From Newton’s second law, a force balance in the X and Y direction gives the following:
where:
\(\rho\) is the density and W = mg = \(\frac{1}{2} \rho g\Delta y\) is the weight of the oil droplet.
So
We have \(\Delta {\text{x}} = {\text{l}}\sin \theta { }\) and \(\Delta {\text{y}} = {\text{l}}\cos \theta\). Substituting these geometric relations and dividing Eq. 5 by \(\Delta\) y and Eq. 6 by \(\Delta {\text{x}}\) gives
In this case, it is assumed that \(\sum {\text{F}}_{{\text{x}}} {\text{ is smaller or equal to }}\sum {\text{F}}_{{\text{y}}} .{ }\) Thus, the oil droplet will stick to the bottom surface of the rock, as shown in Fig. 5. Based on Eq. 7, two forces affect the oil droplet along the X-axis; pressure in the X-direction (Px) and \(P_{{\text{C}}}\). The positive effect of the pressure in the X-direction (Px) is ignored in this case because there is no injection. Thus, \(\sum {\text{F}}_{{\text{x}}} = { } - {\text{P}}_{{\text{C}}}\), where Pc works against the flow direction. Meanwhile, the forces that affect the oil droplet on the Y-axis are Pc and gravity force (mg) \((\sum {\text{F}}_{{\text{y}}} = {\text{P}}_{{\text{C}}} - {\text{mg}}).{ }\) based on Eq. 8, it is apparent that the gravity force works against Pc and Pc works against the flow direction. Therefore, increasing the mass of the oil droplet will help to free it and allow it to move forward with the flow direction.
The oil droplet hangs from the bottom surface of a rock with water injection
In this case, it is assumed that \(\sum {\text{F}}_{{\text{x}}} {\text{ is smaller than or equal to }}\sum {\text{F}}_{{\text{y}}} .{ }\) Therefore, the oil droplet will stick on the bottom surface of the rock and cannot move forward (Fig. 6). Equation 8 shows that there are three forces acting on the oil droplet in the Y-direction; Py, Pc and the gravity force (mg). Py and Pc will cause the droplet to hang, but in this case, there is no Py effect on the oil droplet, so the oil droplet sticks due to the capillary force (Pc), and the gravity force works against the capillary force. Meaning, the capillary force is greater than the gravity force. In this case, the water droplets bypass the oil droplet in the presence of the capillary force due to the small mass of the oil droplet compared to the pore throat diameter. Furthermore, there is no interaction between the displaced and displacing fluid.
The oil droplet hangs from the bottom of a rock surface and its mass increases
Based on the previous investigation, if the mass of the oil droplet is successfully increased (Fig. 7), the oil droplet can be moved easily because the gravity force would be greater than the capillary force. Moreover, the increase in the mass of the oil droplet will not allow the water droplets to bypass it. In addition, the material that will be used to increase the oil droplet mass will help to create an interaction between the oil droplet and the water droplet.
Conclusions
In this study, detailed analysis of the forces that affect the oil droplet help to explain the oil droplet’s movement in porous media. The main findings of this study can be summarised as follows:
-
Increasing the oil droplet mass causes a reduction of the capillary pressure and creates the conditions for an interaction between the displacing and displaced fluid, hence movement of the oil droplet.
-
The results show that the mass of an oil droplet plays an important role in initiating its movement if the gravity force is greater than the capillary force.
-
The analyses confirm that the mass of the oil droplet has a systematic effect in order to recover the oil. Increasing the mass of the oil droplet will create an opportunity to displace the oil droplet and reduce the capillary force.
Abbreviations
- \({\text{a}}_{{\text{x}}}\) :
-
Acceleration of the fluid element in the X-direction
- \({\text{a}}_{{\text{y}}}\) :
-
Acceleration of the fluid element in the Y-direction
- g:
-
Gravity acceleration
- l:
-
Vector length
- m:
-
Mass of the oil droplet
- P c :
-
Capillary pressure
- P x :
-
Pressure in the X-direction
- P y :
-
Pressure in the Y-direction
- W:
-
Weight of the oil droplet
- \(\sum {\text{Fx }}\) :
-
Summation of the forces affecting oil droplet in the X-direction
- \(\sum {\text{Fy }}\) :
-
Summation of the forces affecting oil droplet in the Y-direction
- \(\Delta {\text{x}}\) :
-
Change in the X-direction
- \(\Delta {\text{y}}\) :
-
Change in the Y-direction
- \(\theta\) :
-
Contact angle between the centralized capillary force and the main axis
- \(\rho\) :
-
Oil droplet density
References
Agbalaka CC, Dandekar AY, Patil SL, Khataniar S, Hemsath JR (2009) Coreflooding studies to evaluate the impact of salinity and wettability on oil recovery efficiency. Transp Porous Media 76(1):77–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-008-9235-7
Agbalaka, Chinedu Christian, Abhijit Yeshwant Dandekar, Shirish Liladhar Patil, Santanu Khataniar, and James Hemsath. 2008. “The Effect of Wettability on Oil Recovery: A Review.” In SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition. OnePetro. https://doi.org/10.2118/114496-MS.
Al SS Sayari, (2009) The influence of wettability and carbon dioxide injection on hydrocarbon recovery. Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London. doi:https://doi.org/10.25560/5491
A Roustaei, J Moghadasi, A Iran, H Bagherzadeh, and A Shahrabadi (2012) An experimental investigation of polysilicon nanoparticles’ recovery efficiencies through changes in interfacial tension and wettability alteration. In SPE International Oilfield Nanotechnology Conference and Exhibition. OnePetro. https://doi.org/10.2118/156976-MS
Andersen PØ (2020) Capillary pressure effects on estimating the enhanced-oil-recovery potential during low-salinity and smart waterflooding. SPE J 25(01):481–496. https://doi.org/10.2118/191974-PA
CE Boyd, (2020). Physical properties of water. In Water Quality, 1–19. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23335-8_1
Elraies, Khaled Abdalla, and Isa M Tan. 2012. The application of a new polymeric surfactant for chemical EOR. Introduction to enhanced oil recovery (EOR) processes and bioremediation of oil-contaminated sites
Elsharafi MO (2018) Literature review of water alternation gas injection. J Earth Energy Eng 7(2):33–45. https://doi.org/10.25299/jeee.2018.vol7(2).2117
Esfe MH, Esfandeh S, Hosseinizadeh E (2020) Nanofluid flooding in a randomized heterogeneous porous media and investigating the effect of capillary pressure and diffusion on oil recovery factor. J Mol Liq 320:113646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.113646
Green DW, PaulWillhite G (1998) Enhanced oil recovery, vol 6. Doherty Memorial Fund of AIME, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Henry L
H Guo, K Song, and R Hilfer (2020) A critical review of capillary number and its application in enhanced oil recovery. In SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers. https://doi.org/10.2118/200419-MS
Hinze JO (1955) Fundamentals of the hydrodynamic mechanism of splitting in dispersion processes. AIChE J 1(3):289–295. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690010303
Jabbar MY, Sowaidi AA, Obeidli AA, Willingham TW, Britton C, Adkins S, Delshad M, Xiao R, Teletzke GF (2017) Chemical formulation design in high salinity, high temperature carbonate reservoir for a super giant offshore field in middle east. Abu Dhabi Int Petrol Exhib Conf Soc Petrol Eng. https://doi.org/10.2118/188604-MS
P Kathel, and KK Mohanty (2013) EOR in tight oil reservoirs through wettability alteration. In SPE annual technical conference and exhibition. OnePetro https://doi.org/10.2118/166281-MS
MJ Zande Van der (2000) Droplet break-up in turbulent oil-in-water flow through a restriction
MJ Zande Van der, PH Janssen, and WMGT Van den Broek (2001). Size of oil droplets under high-water-cut conditions. In SPE Production and Operations Symposium. OnePetro. https://doi.org/10.2118/67250-MS
Masalmeh SK (2003) The effect of wettability heterogeneity on capillary pressure and relative permeability. J Petrol Sci Eng 39(3–4):399–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-4105(03)00078-0
Naser MA, Samba MA, Li Y (2020) An experimental investigation the optimum of salinity and Ph of sea-water to improve oil recovery from sandstone reservoir as a secondary recovery process. J Petrol Geotherm Technol 1(2):83–91
Nobakht M, Moghadam S, Yongan Gu (2007) Effects of viscous and capillary forces on CO2 enhanced oil recovery under reservoir conditions. Energy Fuels 21(6):3469–3476. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef700388a
Pak T, Butler IB, Geiger S, Van Dijke MIJ, Sorbie KS (2015) Droplet fragmentation: 3D imaging of a previously unidentified pore-scale process during multiphase flow in porous media. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112(7):1947–1952
Romanuka J, Hofman J, Ligthelm DJ, Suijkerbuijk B, Marcelis F, Oedai S, Brussee N, van der Linde H, Aksulu H, Austad T (2012) Low salinity eor in carbonates. Society of Petroleum Engineers, In SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium. https://doi.org/10.2118/153869-MS
Samba MA, Hassan HA, Munayr MS, Yusef M, Eschweido A, Burkan H, and Elsharafi MO (2019a). Nanoparticles EOR aluminum oxide (Al2O3) used as a spontaneous imbibition test for sandstone core. In ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Proceedings (IMECE). Vol. 6. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2019-10283
Samba MA, Aldokali I, Elsharaf MO (2019b) A new EOR technology: gas alternating gas injection. J Earth Energy Eng 8(1):27–32. https://doi.org/10.25299/jeee.2019.vol8(1).2354
S Tola, K Sasaki, and Y Sugai (2017). Wettability alteration of sandstone with zinc oxide nano-particles. In 23rd Formation Evaluation Symposium of Japan. Society of Petrophysicists and Well-Log Analysts
WR Rossen, and Q Lu (1997) Effect of capillary crossflow on foam improved oil recovery. In SPE Western Regional Meeting. OnePetro. https://doi.org/10.2118/38319-MS
Acknowledgements
The authors thank China University of petroleum Beijing for all the technical support. The authors also express sincere gratitude to Chinese government scholarship for supporting international students. Furthermore, the authors are grateful to oil and gas laboratory staff at China University of Petroleum Beijing for the excellent resources (high performance experience) made available for conducting the research reported in this paper. Special thanks go to Mr, Peter Owusu Anyimah and Dr, Ibrahim Ali Amar for their academic sharing that enabled the successful analysis in this research.
Funding
This research received no specific funding from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
We wish to confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Samba, M.A., Li, Y., liu, Z. et al. The effect of forces affecting the spread of oil droplets on a rock surface. J Petrol Explor Prod Technol 13, 1487–1494 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-023-01625-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-023-01625-2