Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bladder Cancer and Google Trends: Associations Between US Search Patterns and Disease Outcomes May Show Need for Improved Awareness Strategies

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interest in and awareness of bladder cancer may translate to better health-seeking behaviors and earlier detection, given modifiable risk factors such as smoking. We assessed bladder cancer interest in the USA over the past 15 years as reflected by Internet search trends, and correlated these trends with epidemiologic patterns in bladder cancer. Google Trends was used to estimate US bladder cancer interest in the unit search volume index (SVI), which estimates the volume of online search activity for a specified period relative to the highest volume of searches within a specified location. Between January 2004 and June 2019, SVIs were collected for the search term “bladder cancer” and other related search terms. To evaluate the effect of public awareness campaigns, the SVIs for the month of May (US bladder cancer awareness month) were compared with the SVIs of all other months. Correlations between “bladder cancer” SVI and incidence, mortality, and mortality-to-incidence ratio (proxy for survival) by state were evaluated. There was no increase in the relative search volumes for “bladder cancer” during the national bladder cancer awareness month compared with all other months (p = 0.27). By state, there were positive correlations between SVIs of “bladder cancer” and incidence (R = 0.72, p < 0.001) and mortality (R = 0.47, p < 0.001). However, there was no correlation between SVIs and mortality-to-incidence ratio (R = − 0.24, p = 0.08). Interest in bladder cancer is positively associated with disease incidence and mortality but not survival, suggesting interest is driven by new diagnoses or deaths, and not early detection that can improve survival. Our findings may show the need for better public education endeavors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cancer Research UK (2014) Bladder cancer - cancer statistics key stats.

  2. American Cancer Society. Survival rates for bladder cancer. American Cancer Society. http://www.cancer.org/cancer/bladdercancer/detailedguide/bladder-cancer-survival-rates. Published 2016

  3. Smith ND, Prasad SM, Patel AR, Weiner AB, Pariser JJ, Razmaria A, Maene C, Schuble T, Pierce B, Steinberg GD (2016) Bladder cancer mortality in the United States: a geographic and temporal analysis of socioeconomic and environmental factors. J Urol 195(2):290–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.07.091

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Freedman ND, Silverman DT, Hollenbeck AR, Schatzkin A, Abnet CC (2011) Association between smoking and risk of bladder cancer among men and women. JAMA 306(7):737–745. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.1142

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. May is Bladder Cancer Awareness Month. Urology Care Foundation. https://www.urologyhealth.org/careblog/may-is-bladder-cancer-awareness-month. Published 2017. Accessed August 1, 2019

  6. Steiner H, Bergmeister M, Verdorfer I, Granig T, Mikuz G, Bartsch G, Stoehr B, Brunner A (2008) Early results of bladder-cancer screening in a high-risk population of heavy smokers. BJU Int 102(3):291–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07596.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vallone DM, Duke JC, Cullen J, McCausland KL, Allen JA (2011) Evaluation of EX: a national mass media smoking cessation campaign. Am J Public Health 101(2):302–309. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.190454

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Ironmonger L, Ohuma E, Ormiston-Smith N, Gildea C, Thomson CS, Peake MD (2015) An evaluation of the impact of large-scale interventions to raise public awareness of a lung cancer symptom. Br J Cancer 112(1):207–216. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.596

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fox S (2011) The social life of health information. In: Pew Res. Cent. 336. 337 http://www.pewinternet.org/2011/05/12/the-social-life-of-health-information-2011/. Accessed 6 July 2019

  10. Hesse BW, Greenberg AJ, Rutten LJF (2016) The role of Internet resources in clinical oncology: promises and challenges. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 13(12):767–776. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Castleton K, Fong T, Wang-Gillam A, Waqar MA, Jeffe DB, Kehlenbrink L, Gao F, Govindan R (2011) A survey of Internet utilization among patients with cancer. Support Care Cancer 19(8):1183–1190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-010-0935-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bloom R, Amber KT, Hu S, Kirsner R (2015) Google search trends and skin cancer: evaluating the US population’s interest in skin cancer and its association with melanoma outcomes. JAMA Dermatol 151(8):903–905. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.1216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dreher PC, Tong C, Ghiraldi E, Friedlander JI (2018) Use of Google Trends to track online behavior and interest in kidney stone surgery. Urology. 121:74–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2018.05.040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sha ST, Perni S, Muralidhar V et al (2020) Trends, quality, and readability of online health resources on proton radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.12.043

  15. Dee EC, Lee G (2019) Adverse effects of radiotherapy and chemotherapy for common malignancies: what is the quality of information patients are finding online? J Cancer Educ:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-019-01614-2

  16. Dee EC, Varady NH (2019) Radiation oncology online: quality, strategies, and disparities. J Cancer Educ:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-019-01553-y

  17. Lawrentschuk N, Abouassaly R, Hackett N, Groll R, Fleshner NE (2009) Health information quality on the internet in urological oncology: a multilingual longitudinal evaluation. Urology. 74(5):1058–1063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2009.05.091

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dee EC, Varady NH, Katz JN, Buchmiller TL (2019) Disparity in online health information in pediatric vs. adult surgical conditions. Pediatr Surg Int. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-019-04451-y

  19. Varady NH, Dee EC, Katz JN (2018) International assessment on quality and content of internet information on osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 26(8):1017–1026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2018.04.017

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Chang DTS, Abouassaly R, Lawrentschuk N (2018) Quality of health information on the internet for prostate cancer. Ther Adv Urol 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6705152

  21. Google. Google Trends. http://www.google.com/trends. Accessed June 20, 2019

  22. Sugrue R, Carthy E, Kelly ME, Sweeney KJ (2018) Science or popular media: what drives breast cancer online activity? Breast J 24(2):189–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.12864

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group. U.S. Cancer Statistics Data Visualizations Tool, based on November 2018 submission data (1999–2016): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institu

  24. Fitzmaurice C, Allen C, Barber RM et al (2017) Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 32 cancer groups, 1990 to 2015. JAMA Oncol 3(4):524. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5688

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Drash W. Renowned CNN (2011) Sports broadcaster Nick Charles dies at 64.

  26. Anahad O (2011) Bladder cancer a growing concern for smokers. The New York Times.

  27. Associated Press (2011) “Moon River” singer Andy Williams reveals he has bladder cancer. Fox News

  28. Dey M, Zhao SS, Goodson N (2019) Global public interest in infectious and non-infectious arthritis: an evaluation using Google Trends. Rheumatology. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kez283

  29. Jellison SS, Bibens M, Checketts J, Vassar M (2018) Using Google Trends to assess global public interest in osteoarthritis. Rheumatol Int 38(11):2133–2136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-018-4158-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bhide S, Collada A, Reid AB, Jackson CDT, Hopp E, Nakayama J (2019) The ovarian cancer message isn’t getting out: using Google search data to gauge ovarian cancer awareness. Gynecol Oncol 154:130–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.04.310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tambor ES, Rimer BK, Strigo TS (1997) Genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: awareness and interest among women in the general population. Am J Med Genet 68(1):43–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19970110)68:1<43::AID-AJMG8>3.0.CO;2-Z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sharma A, Kasza K, Hyland A, Cummings KM, Bansal-Travers M, Fong GT, O’Connor RJ (2019) Awareness and interest in lung cancer screening among current and former smokers: findings from the ITC United States Survey. Cancer Causes Control 30(7):733–745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-019-01186-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wardle J, Waller J, Brunswick N, Jarvis MJ (2001) Awareness of risk factors for cancer among British adults. Public Health 115(3):173–174. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ph.1900752

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Niksic M, Rachet B, Warburton FG, Wardle J, Ramirez AJ, Forbes LJL (2015) Cancer symptom awareness and barriers to symptomatic presentation in England-are we clear on cancer? Br J Cancer 113(3):533–542. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.164

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Ma GX, Fleisher L (2003) Awareness of cancer information among Asian Americans. J Community Health 28(2):115–130. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022695313702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Fitch MI, Greenberg M, Levstein L, Muir M, Plane S, King E (1997) Health promotion and early detection of cancer in older adults: needs assessment for program development. Cancer Nurs 20(6):381–388. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002820-199712000-00001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Paul C, Barratt A, Redman S, Cockburn J, Lowe J (1999) Knowledge and perceptions about breast cancer incidence, fatality and risk among Australian women. Aust N Z J Public Health 23(4):396–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842X.1999.tb01281.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Linsell L, Forbes LJL, Kapari M, Burgess C, Omar L, Tucker L, Ramirez AJ (2009) A randomised controlled trial of an intervention to promote early presentation of breast cancer in older women: effect on breast cancer awareness. Br J Cancer 101:S40–S48. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605389

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Marie Gabrielle Dee, Gabriel B. Borja, and Carolyn H. Cong for assistance with proofreading the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Grace Lee or Edward Christopher Dee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic Supplementary Material

ESM 1

(DOCX 19 kb).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Paguio, J.A., Yao, J.S., Reyes, M.S.G.L. et al. Bladder Cancer and Google Trends: Associations Between US Search Patterns and Disease Outcomes May Show Need for Improved Awareness Strategies. J Canc Educ 36, 1086–1092 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-020-01739-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-020-01739-9

Keywords

Navigation