Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Perspective of Turkish Medicine Students on Cancer, Cancer Treatments, Palliative Care, and Oncologists (ARES Study): a Study of the Palliative Care Working Committee of the Turkish Oncology Group (TOG)

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cancer is one of the most common causes of death all over the World (Rahib et al. in Cancer Res 74(11):2913–2921, 2014; Silbermann et al. in Ann Oncol 23(Suppl 3):iii15–iii28, 2012). It is crucial to diagnose this disease early by effective screening methods and also it is very important to acknowledge the community on various aspects of this disease such as the treatment methods and palliative care. Not only the oncologists but every medical doctor should be educated well in dealing with cancer patients. Previous studies suggested various opinions on the level of oncology education in medical schools (Pavlidis et al. in Ann Oncol 16(5):840–841, 2005). In this study, the perspectives of medical students on cancer, its treatment, palliative care, and the oncologists were analyzed in relation to their educational status. A multicenter survey analysis was performed on a total of 4224 medical school students that accepted to enter this study in Turkey. After the questions about the demographical characteristics of the students, their perspectives on the definition, diagnosis, screening, and treatment methods of cancer and their way of understanding metastatic disease as well as palliative care were analyzed. The questionnaire includes questions with answers and a scoring system of Likert type 5 (absolutely disagree = 1, completely agree = 5). In the last part of the questionnaire, there were some words to detect what the words “cancer” and “oncologist” meant for the students. The participant students were analyzed in two study groups; “group 1” (n = 1.255) were phases I and II students that had never attended an oncology lesson, and “group 2” (n = 2.969) were phases III to VI students that had attended oncology lessons in the medical school. SPSS v17 was used for the database and statistical analyses. A value of p < 0.05 was noted as statistically significant. Group 1 defined cancer as a contagious disease (p = 0.00025), they believed that early diagnosis was never possible (p = 0.042), all people with a diagnosis of cancer would certainly die (p = 0.044), and chemotherapy was not successful in a metastatic disease (p = 0.003) as compared to group 2. The rate of the students that believed gastric cancer screening was a part of the national screening policy was significantly more in group 1 than in group 2 (p = 0.00014). Group 2 had a higher anxiety level for themselves or their family members to become a cancer patient. Most of the students in both groups defined medical oncologists as warriors (57% in group 1 and 40% in group 2; p = 0.097), and cancer was reminding them of “death” (54% in group 1 and 48% in group 2; p = 0.102). This study suggested that oncology education was useful for the students’ understanding of cancer and related issues; however, the level of oncology education should be improved in medical schools in Turkey. This would be helpful for medical doctors to cope with many aspects of cancer as a major health care problem in this country.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rahib L, Smith BD, Aizenberg R, Rosenzweig AB, Fleshman JM, Matrisian LM (2014) Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res 74(11):2913–2921

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Silbermann M, Arnaout M, Daher M, Nestoros S, Pitsillides B, Charalambous H, Gultekin M, Fahmi R, Mostafa KA, Khleif AD et al (2012) Palliative cancer care in middle eastern countries: accomplishments and challenges. Ann Oncol 23(Suppl 3):iii15–iii28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bray F, Jemal A, Grey N, Ferlay J, Forman D (2012) Global cancer transitions according to the human development index (2008–2030): a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 13(8):790–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gaffan J, Dacre J, Jones A (2006) Educating undergraduate medical students about oncology: a literature review. J Clin Oncol 24(12):1932–1939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Edwards BK, Noone AM, Mariotto AB, Simard EP, Boscoe FP, Henley SJ, Jemal A, Cho H, Anderson RN, Kohler BA, Eheman CR, Ward EM (2014) Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2010, featuring prevalence of comorbidity and impact on survival among persons with lung, colorectal, breast, or prostate cancer. Cancer 120(9):1290–1314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pavlidis N, Vermorken JB, Costa A (2005) Oncology for medical students: a new ESO educational avenue. Ann Oncol 16(5):840–841

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Agarwal A, Koottappillil B, Shah B, Ahuja D, Hirsch AE (2015) Medical student reported outcomes of a radiation oncologist led preclinical course in oncology: a five-year analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 92(4):735–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Granek L, Mizrakli Y, Ariad S, Jotkowitz A, Geffen DB (2017) Impact of a 3-day introductory oncology course on first-year international medical students. J Cancer Educ 32(3):640–646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-015-0972-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sudhakar A (2009) History of cancer, ancient and modern treatment methods. J Cancer Sci Ther 1:1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shaikh AJ, Khokhar NA, Raza S, Kumar S, Haider G, Haider AG, Muhammad R, Masood N (2008) Knowledge, attitude and practices of non-oncologist physicians regarding cancer and palliative care: a multicenter study from Pakistan. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 9(4):581–584

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tanriverdi O, Yavuzsen T, Akman T, Senler FC, Taskoylu BY, Turhal S, Komurcu S, Cehreli R, Yaren A, Ozyilkan O (2015) The perspective of non-oncologist physicians on patients with metastatic cancer and palliative care (ALONE study): a study of the palliative care working Committee of the Turkish Oncology Group (TOG). J Cancer Educ 30(2):253–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-015-0794-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pavlidis N, Vermorken JB, Stahel R, Bernier J, Cervantes A, Audisio R, Pentheroudakis G, Costa A (2007) Oncology for medical students: a European School of Oncology contribution to undergraduate cancer education. Cancer Treat Rev 33:419–426

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Budkaew J, Chumworathayi B (2013) Knowledge and attitudes toward palliative terminal cancer care among Thai generalists. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 14(10):6173–6180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Barclay S, Wyatt P, Shore S, Finlay I, Grande G, Todd C (2003) Caring for the dying: how well prepared are general practitioners? A questionnaire study in Wales. Palliat Med 17(1):27–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tattersall MHN, Simpson JS, Langlands AO (1983) Perspectives in medical oncology the education of medical students about cancer-time for change. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 19(3):303–306

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Esin Oktay.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oktay, E., Levent, M., Gelincik, H. et al. Perspective of Turkish Medicine Students on Cancer, Cancer Treatments, Palliative Care, and Oncologists (ARES Study): a Study of the Palliative Care Working Committee of the Turkish Oncology Group (TOG). J Canc Educ 35, 69–75 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-018-1441-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-018-1441-6

Keywords

Navigation