Skip to main content
Log in

The Bennett-Orlicz Norm

  • Published:
Sankhya A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

van de Geer and Lederer (Probab. Theory Related Fields 157(1-2), 225–250, 2013) introduced a new Orlicz norm, the Bernstein-Orlicz norm, which is connected to Bernstein type inequalities. Here we introduce another Orlicz norm, the Bennett-Orlicz norm, which is connected to Bennett type inequalities. The new Bennett-Orlicz norm yields inequalities for expectations of maxima which are potentially somewhat tighter than those resulting from the Bernstein-Orlicz norm when they are both applicable. We discuss cross connections between these norms, exponential inequalities of the Bernstein, Bennett, and Prokhorov types, and make comparisons with results of Talagrand (Ann. Probab., 17(4), 1546–1570, 1989, 1991), and Boucheron et al. (2013).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arcones, M. A. and Giné, E. 1995 On the law of the iterated logarithm for canonical U-statistics and processes. Stochastic Process. Appl., 58(2), 217–245.

  • Bennett, G. (1962) Probability inequalities for the sum of independent random variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 57, 33–45.

  • Birgé, L. and Massart, P. (1998) Minimum contrast estimators on sieves: exponential bounds and rates of convergence. Bernoulli, 4(3), 329–375.

  • Boucheron S., Lugosi G. and Massart P. (2013). Concentration Inequalities. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Corless, R. M., Gonnet, G. H., Hare, D. E. G., Jeffrey, D. J. and Knuth, D. E. (1996) On the Lambert W function. Adv. Comput. Math., 5(4), 329–359.

  • de la Peña, V. H. and Giné, E. (1999) Decoupling; From dependence to independence. Probability and its Applications (New York). Springer-Verlag, New York.

  • Dudley, R. M. (1999) Uniform Central Limit Theorems, volume 63 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  • Ghosh, S. and Goldstein, L. (2011a) Applications of size biased couplings for concentration of measures. Electron. Commun. Probab., 16, 70–83.

  • Ghosh, S. and Goldstein, L. (2011b) Concentration of measures via size-biased couplings. Probab. Theory Related Fields, 149(1-2), 271–278.

  • Goldstein, L. and Iṡlak, Ü. (2014) Concentration inequalities via zero bias couplings. Statist. Probab. Lett., 86, 17–23.

  • Hewitt, E. and Stromberg, K. (1975) Real and Abstract Analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York-Heidelberg. A modern treatment of the theory of functions of a real variable, Third printing, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, No. 25.

  • Johnson, W. B., Schechtman, G. and Zinn, J. (1985) Best constants in moment inequalities for linear combinations of independent and exchangeable random variables. Ann. Probab., 13(1), 234–253.

  • Krasnosel\(^{\prime }\)skiı̆ M. A. and Rutickiı̆, J. B. (1961) Convex Functions and Orlicz Spaces. Translated from the first Russian edition by Leo F. Boron. P. Noordhoff Ltd., Groningen.

  • Kruglov, V. M. (2006) Strengthening of Prokhorov’s arcsine inequality. Theor. Probab. Appl., 50, 677–684. Transl. from Strengthening the Prokhorov arcsine inequality, Teor. Veroyatn. Primen., 50, (2005).

  • Ledoux, M. (2001) The Concentration of Measure Phenomenon, volume 89 of Mathematical Surveys and Monographs. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.

  • Massart, P. (2000) About the constants in Talagrand’s concentration inequalities for empirical processes. Ann. Probab., 28(2), 863–884.

  • Pisier, G. (1983) Some applications of the metric entropy condition to harmonic analysis. In Banach spaces, harmonic analysis, and probability theory (Storrs, Conn., 1980/1981), volume 995 of Lecture Notes in Math., pages 123–154. Springer, Berlin.

  • Pollard, D. (1990) Empirical Processes: Theory and Applications. NSF-CBMS Regional Conference Series in Probability and Statistics, 2. Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Hayward CA; American Statistical Association, Alexandria, VA.

  • Prokhorov, Y. V. (1959) An extremal problem in probability theory. Theor. Probability Appl., 4, 201–203.

  • Rao, M. M. and Ren, Z. D. (1991). Theory of Orlicz spaces, volume 146 of Monographs and Textbooks in Pure and Applied Mathematics. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, R. and Olver, F. W. J. (2010) Elementary functions. IN NIST handbook of mathematical functions, pages 103-134. U.S. Dept. Commerce, Washington, DC.

  • Shorack, G. R. and Wellner, J. A. (1986). Empirical Processes with Applications to Statistics. Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics: Probability and Mathematical Statistics. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Stout, W. F. (1974) Almost Sure Convergence. Academic Press [A subsidiary of Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers], New York-London. Probability and Mathematical Statistics, Vol. 24.

  • Talagrand, M. (1989) Isoperimetry and integrability of the sum of independent Banach-space valued random variables. Ann. Probab., 17(4), 1546–1570.

  • Talagrand, M. (1991) A new isoperimetric inequality and the concentration of measure phenomenon. In Geometric aspects of functional analysis (1989–90), volume 1469 of Lecture Notes in Math., pages 94–124. Springer, Berlin.

  • Talagrand, M. (1994) Sharper bounds for Gaussian and empirical processes. Ann. Probab., 22(1), 28–76.

  • Talagrand, M. (1995) Concentration of measure and isoperimetric inequalities in product spaces. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math., 81, 73–205.

  • van de Geer, S. and Lederer, J. (2013) The Bernstein-Orlicz norm and deviation inequalities. Probab. Theory Related Fields, 157(1-2), 225–250.

  • van der Vaart, A. W. and Wellner, J. A. (1996). Weak Convergence and Empirical Processes. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I owe thanks to Evan Greene and Johannes Lederer for several helpful conversations and suggestions. Thanks are also due to Richard Nickl for a query concerning Prokhorov’s inequality.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jon A. Wellner.

Additional information

Jon A. Wellner was supported in part by NSF Grants DMS-1104832 and DMS-1566514, and NI-AID grant 2R01 AI291968-04

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wellner, J.A. The Bennett-Orlicz Norm. Sankhya A 79, 355–383 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13171-017-0108-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13171-017-0108-4

Keywords

AMS (2000) subject classification

Navigation