Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Developing new marketing strategy theory: addressing the limitations of a singular focus on firm financial performance

  • Theory\/Conceptual
  • Published:
AMS Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This commentary complements the Hunt (2015) essay and identifies the challenges that the R-A theory poses with its emphasis on superior financial performance as a firm’s primary and superordinate objective. It points to the need for new marketing strategy theory with a broader perspective of including other stakeholders beyond investors while designing firm objectives. In addition, the commentary points to short-termism as an inevitable consequence of focusing on financial performance. It thus calls for new marketing strategy theory that includes intermediate objectives based on customer mindset metrics that reflect intangible marketing assets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing brand equity: capitalizing on the value of a brand name. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alderson, W. (1957). Marketing behavior and executive action. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.

  • Alderson, W. (1965). Dynamic marketing behavior. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.

  • Becker-Olsen, K., Andrew Cudmore, B., & Hill, R. P. (2006). The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 59, 46–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bharadwaj, S., Bharadwaj, A., & Bendoly, E. (2007). The performance effects of complementarities between information systems, marketing, manufacturing, and supply chain processes. Information Systems Research, 18(4), 437–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, C. B., Sen, S., & Korschun, D. (2008). Using corporate social responsibility to win the war for talent. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49(2), 39–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. The Academy of Management Review, 4, 497–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty, A., & Grewal, R. (2011). The stock market in the driver's seat! implications for r&d and marketing. Management Science, 57(9), 1594–1609.

  • Chapman, C. J., & Steenburgh, T. J. (2011). An investigation of earnings management through marketing actions. Management Science, 57(1), 72–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, G. S. (2011). Closing the marketing capabilities gap. Journal of Marketing,75(4), 183–195.

  • Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2007). Reaping relational rewards from corporate social responsibility: the role of competitive positioning. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24, 224–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, S., Narasimhan, O., & Rajiv, S. (1999). Success in high-technology markets: is marketing capability critical? Marketing Science, 18(4), 547–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, J. (2003). The blended value proposition: integrating social and financial return. California Management Review, 45(4), 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, H., Hoyer, W., & Rübsaamen, C. (2010). Sales, marketing, and research-and-development cooperation across new product development stages: implications for success. Journal of Marketing, 74(5), 80–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. R., & Rajgopal, S. (2005). The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 40(1), 3–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunny, K. A. (2010). The Relation Between Earnings Management Using Real Activities Manipulation and Future Performance: evidence from Meeting Earnings Benchmarks*. Contemporary Accounting Research, 27(3), 855–888.

  • Haanaes, K., Balagopal, B., Kong, M. T., Velken, I., Arthur, D., Hopkins M. S., & Kruschwitz, N. (2011). New sustainability study: the ‘Embracers’ Seize Advantage. MIT Sloan Management Review, Research Report

  • Homburg, C., & Jensen, O. (2007). The thought worlds of marketing and sales: which differences make a difference? Journal of Marketing, 71(3), 124–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D. (2015). The theoretical foundations of strategic marketing and marketing strategy: foundational premises, R-A theory, three fundamental strategies, and societal welfare. AMS Review, 5(3--4). doi:10.1007/s13162-015-0069-5.

  • Kim, H. R., Lee, M., Lee, H. T., & Kim, N. M. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and employee–company identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(4), 557–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P. (2011). Reinventing marketing to manage the environmental imperative. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 132–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markovitch, D., & Golder, P. (2008). Using stock prices to predict market events: evidence on sales takeoff and long-term survival. Marketing Science, 27, 717–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mizik, N. (2010). The theory and practice of myopic management. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(4), 594–611.

  • Moorman, C., & Slotegraaf, R. (1999). The contingency value of complementary capabilities in product development. Journal of Marketing Research, 36, 239–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, C., Weis, S., Mizik, N., & Spencer, F. (2012). Firm innovation and the rachet effect among consumer packaged goods firms. Marketing Science, 31(6), 934–951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the 21st century. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 84, 2–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. N., Drumwright, M. E., & Gentile, M. (2010). The new marketing myopia. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 29, 4–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, S., & Hanssens, D. M. (2009). Marketing and firm value: Metrics, methods, findings, and future directions. Journal of Marketing research, 46(3), 293–312.

  • Srivastava, R. K., Shervani, T. A. & Fahey, L. (1998). Market-based assets and shareholder value: a framework for analysis. Journal of Marketing, 2–18.

  • Srivastava, R. K., Shervani, T. A. & Fahey, L. (1999). Marketing, business processes, and shareholder value: an organizationally embedded view of marketing activities and the discipline of marketing. Journal of Marketing, 168–179.

  • Trudel, R., & Cotte, J. (2009). Does it pay to be good? MIT Sloan Management Review, 50(Winter), 61–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. The Academy of Management Journal, 40, 658–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varadarajan, R. (2010). Strategic marketing and marketing strategy: domain, definition, fundamental issues and foundational premises. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(2), 119–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vila, O. R. & Bharadwaj, S. (2015). Constitutents-based marketing: an emerging capability to drive business performance. Working Paper.

  • Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 303–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wartick, S. L., & Cochran, P. L. (1985). The evolution of the corporate social performance model. The Academy of Management Review, 10, 758–769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wies, S. & Moorman, C. (2015). Going public: how stock market listing changes firm innovation behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, forthcoming

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Terry College of Business, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA

    Sundar Bharadwaj

Authors
  1. Sundar Bharadwaj
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sundar Bharadwaj.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bharadwaj, S. Developing new marketing strategy theory: addressing the limitations of a singular focus on firm financial performance. AMS Rev 5, 98–102 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-015-0072-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-015-0072-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation