Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of the simulation capability of the Wavewatch III model for Pacific Ocean wave

  • Published:
Acta Oceanologica Sinica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wave climate analysis and other applications for the Pacific Ocean require a reliable wave hindcast. Five source and sink term packages in the Wavewatch III model (v3.14 and v4.18) are compared and assessed in this study through comprehensive observations, including altimeter significant wave height, advanced synthetic aperture radar swell, and buoy wave parameters and spectrum. In addition to the evaluation of typically used integral parameters, the spectra partitioning method contributes to the detailed wave system and wave maturity validation. The modified performance evaluation method (PS) effectively reduces attribute numbers and facilitates the overall assessment. To avoid possible misleading results in the root mean square error-based validations, another indicator called HH (indicating the two authors) is also calculated to guarantee the consistency of the results. The widely used Tolman and Chalikov (TC) package is still generally efficient in determining the integral properties of wave spectra but is physically deficient in explaining the dissipation processes. The ST4 package performs well in overall wave parameters and significantly improves the accuracy of wave systems in the open ocean. Meanwhile, the newly published ST6 package is slightly better in determining swell energy variations. The two packages (ACC350 and BJA) obtained from Wavewatch III v3.14 exhibit large scatters at different sea states. The three most ideal packages are further examined in terms of reproducing waveinduced momentum flux from the perspective of transport. Stokes transport analysis indicates that ST4 is the closest to the NDBC-buoy-spectrum-based transport values, and TC and ST6 tend to overestimate and underestimate the transport magnitude, respectively, in swell mixed areas. This difference must be considered, particularly in air–wave–current coupling research and upper ocean analysis. The assessment results provide guidance for the selection of ST4 for use in a background Pacific Ocean hindcast for high wave climate research and China Sea swell type analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdalla S, Bidlot J R. 2002. Wind gustiness and air density effects and other key changes to wave model in CY25R1. Rep, Research Department, ECMWF, Reading, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardhuin F, Chapron B, Collard F. 2009. Observation of swell dissipation across oceans. Geophysical Research Letters, 36(6): doi: 10.1029/2008GL037030

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardhuin F, Jenkins A D. 2006. On the interaction of surface waves and upper ocean turbulence. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 36(3): 551–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ardhuin F, Rogers E, Babanin A V, et al. 2010. Semiempirical dissipation source functions for ocean waves. Part I: Definition, calibration, and validation. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 40(9): 1917–1941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babanin A. 2011. Breaking and Dissipation of Ocean Surface Waves. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 480

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Babanin A V. 2012. Swell attenuation due to wave-induced turbulence. Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Artic Engineering (OMAE2012), 439–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Babanin A V, Haus B K. 2009. On the existence of water turbulence induced by nonbreaking surface waves. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 39(10): 2675–2679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babanin A V, Tsagareli K N, Young I R, et al. 2009. Numerical investigation of spectral evolution of wind waves. Part II: Dissipation term and evolution tests. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 40(4): 667–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bi Fan. 2013. On the wave-induced effect to circulation transport and the characteristics of swell propagation and dissipation (in Chinese)[dissertation]. Qingdao: Ocean University of China, 119

    Google Scholar 

  • Bi Fan, Wu Kejian. 2014. Wave effect on the ocean circulations through mass transport and wave-induced pumping. Journal of Ocean University of China, 13(2): 175–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bi Fan, Wu Kejian, Zhang Yuming. 2012. The effect of Stokes drift on Ekman transport in the open sea. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 31(6): 12–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bidlot J R, Abdalla S, Janssen P. 2005. A revised formulation for ocean wave dissipation in CY25R1. in Tech Rep Memorandum R60. 9/JB/0516. Research Department, ECMWF, Reading, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalikov D. 1995. The parameterization of the wave boundary layer. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 25(6): 1333–1349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalikov D V, Belevich M Y. 1993. One-dimensional theory of the wave boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 63(1–2): 65–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodet G, Bertin X, Taborda R. 2010. Wave climate variability in the North-East Atlantic Ocean over the last six decades. Ocean Modelling, 31(3–4): 120–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan Y, Lin S-J, Held I M, et al. 2012. Global ocean surface wave simulation using a coupled atmosphere–wave model. Journal of Climate, 25(18): 6233–6252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grachev A A, Fairall C W. 2001. Upward momentum transfer in the marine boundary layer. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 31(7): 1698–1711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley K E, Belcher S E. 2008. Wave-driven wind jets in the marine atmospheric boundary layer. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 65(8): 2646–2660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley K E, Belcher S E, Sullivan P P. 2010. A global climatology of wind–wave interaction. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 40(6): 1263–1282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanna S, Heinold D W. 1985. Development and Application of A Simple Method for Evaluating Air Quality Models. Washington DC: American Petroleum Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson J L, Jensen R E. 2004. Wave system diagnostics for numerical wave models. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Wave Hindcasting and Forecasting. Oahu, Hawaii

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson J L, Phillips O M. 2001. Automated analysis of ocean surface directional wave spectra. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 18(2): 277–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson J L, Tracy B A, Tolman H L, et al. 2009. Pacific hindcast performance of three numerical wave models. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 26(8): 1614–1633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen P A E M. 1982. Quasilinear approximation for the spectrum of wind-generated water waves. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 117: 493–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins A D. 1986. A theory for steady and variable wind-and waveinduced currents. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 16(8): 1370–1377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins A D. 1987. Wind and wave induced currents in a rotating sea with depth-varying eddy viscosity. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 17(7): 938–951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang L F, Zhang Z X, Qi Y Q. 2010. Simulations of SWAN and WAVEWATCH III in northern south China sea. In: Proceedings of the Twentieth (2010) International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. Beijing, China: ISOPE, 213–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalantzi G D, Gommenginger C, Srokosz M. 2009. Assessing the performance of the dissipation parameterizations in WAVEWATCH III using collocated altimetry data. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 39(11): 2800–2819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenyon K E. 1969. Stokes drift for random gravity waves. Journal of Geophysical Research, 74(28): 6991–6994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee Harris D. 1966. The wave-driven wind. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 23(6): 688–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams J C, Restrepo J M. 1999. The wave-driven ocean circulation. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 29(10): 2523–2540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mentaschi L, Besio G, Cassola F, et al. 2013. Problems in RMSE-based wave model validations. Ocean Modelling, 72: 53–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles J W. 1957. On the generation of surface waves by shear flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 3(2): 185–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz-Royero J C, Mercado-Irizarry A. 2008. An intercomparison of SWAN and WAVEWATCH III models with data from NDBCNOAA buoys at oceanic scales. Coastal Engineering Journal, 50(1): 47–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padilla-Hernández R, Perrie W, Toulany B, et al. 2004. Intercomparison of modern operational wave models. In: Proceedings of the Eigth International Workshop on Wave Hindcasting and Forecasting. North Shore, Oahu, Hawaii

    Google Scholar 

  • Perignon Y, Ardhuin F, Cathelain M, et al. 2014. Swell dissipation by induced atmospheric shear stress. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 119(10): 6622–6630

    Google Scholar 

  • Rascle N, Ardhuin F. 2013. A global wave parameter database for geophysical applications. Part 2: Model validation with improved source term parameterization. Ocean Modelling, 70: 174–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rascle N, Ardhuin F, Queffeulou P, et al. 2008. A global wave parameter database for geophysical applications. Part 1: Wave-current- turbulence interaction parameters for the open ocean based on traditional parameterizations. Ocean Modelling, 25(3–4): 154–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren Qifeng, Zhang Jie, Meng Junmin, et al. 2011. Comparison and analysis of Envisat ASAR ocean wave spectra with buoy data in the northern Pacific Ocean. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 29(1): 10–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers W E, Babanin A V, Wang D W. 2012. Observation-consistent input and whitecapping dissipation in a model for wind-generated surface waves: Description and simple calculations. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 29(9): 1329–1346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saha S, Moorthi S, Pan Hualu, et al. 2010. The NCEP climate forecast system reanalysis. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 91(8): 1015–1057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song Jinbao. 2009. The effects of random surface waves on the steady Ekman current solutions. Deep-Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 56(5): 659–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamura H, Miyazawa Y, Oey L-Y. 2012. The Stokes drift and wave induced- mass flux in the North Pacific. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 117(C8): C08021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang C L, Perrie W, Jenkins A D, et al. 2007. Observation and modeling of surface currents on the Grand Banks: A study of the wave effects on surface currents. Journal of Geophysical Research, 112(C10): C10025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira M A C, Belcher S E. 2002. On the distortion of turbulence by a progressive surface wave. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 458: 229–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsagareli K N, Babanin A V, Walker D J, et al. 2009. Numerical investigation of spectral evolution of wind waves. Part I: Wind-input source function. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 40(4): 656–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb A, Fox-Kemper B. 2011. Wave spectral moments and Stokes drift estimation. Ocean Modelling, 40(3–4): 273–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young I R, Babanin A V, Zieger S. 2013. The decay rate of ocean swell observed by altimeter. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 43(11): 2322–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Peng, Chen Xiaoling, Lu Jianzhong, et al. 2011. Research on wave simulation of Bohai Sea based on the CCMP remotely sensed sea winds. Marine Science Bulletin (in Chinese), 30(3): 266–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Hongsheng, Gu Junbo, Wang Hailong, et al. 2013a. Simulating wind wave field near the Pearl River Estuary with SWAN nested in WAVEWATCH. Journal of Tropical Oceanography, 32(1): 8–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Yuming, Wu Kejian, Zhang Xiaoshuang, et al. 2013b. Improving the estimate of wind energy input into the Ekman layer within the Antarctic Circumpolar Current. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 32(3): 19–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng Chongwei, Pan Jing, Li Jiaxun. 2013. Assessing the China Sea wind energy and wave energy resources from 1988 to 2009. Ocean Engineering, 65: 39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zieger S, Babanin A V, Rogers E, et al. 2011. Observation-based dissipation and input terms for a WAVEWATCH III: implementation and simple simulations. In: Proceedings of the 12th Int Workshop on Wave Hindcasting and Forecasting and 3rd Coastal Hazards Symposium. Kohala Coast, Hawaii

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Ocean Circulation and Waves, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, 266071, China

    Fan Bi & Yao Xu

  2. College of Physical and Environmental Oceanography, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266100, China

    Fan Bi & Kejian Wu

  3. Ocean College, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China

    Jinbao Song

  4. Key Laboratory of Physical Oceanography (Ocean University of China), Ministry of Education, Qingdao, 266003, China

    Kejian Wu

Authors
  1. Fan Bi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jinbao Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kejian Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yao Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinbao Song.

Additional information

Foundation item: The National High Technology Research and Development Program (863 Program) of China under contract No. 2013AA122803; the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences under contract No. XDA11010104.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bi, F., Song, J., Wu, K. et al. Evaluation of the simulation capability of the Wavewatch III model for Pacific Ocean wave. Acta Oceanol. Sin. 34, 43–57 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-015-0737-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-015-0737-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation