Skip to main content
Log in

Microstructural Studies of Composite (Cr3C2–NiCr) Laser Clads Developed on Preheated Substrate T91

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

High cooling speed in laser cladding process yields excellent metallurgical and mechanical properties. Indeed, this attribute along with the process’s additive nature contributes significantly to the development of thermal stresses that are the major cause of any possible crack and delamination formation across the deposition. This limitation is more common for additive materials such as chromium carbide which are crack-sensitive by nature during most of the hard facing process. In the current work, A 90 wt% Cr3C2–10 wt% NiCr-based laser clads were developed with and without preheating the substrate T91. In the case of preheating, the substrate was preheated at 200 °C, 400 °C, and 600 °C temperature before clad deposition. Liquid dye penetration test was carried out on the developed composite clads, whereas 20 numbers of cracks per unit length were observed on without preheated substrate. The microstructure studies revealed that the preheated substrates have shown a crack-free structure as compared to those without preheating of the substrate. The clad height, heat-affected zone, and dilution rate were found reliable in the case of cladding developed at preheated temperature (200 °C) as compared to higher preheated temperature (400 °C and 600 °C). Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy study cleared that the chromium-rich phases were more segregated with iron and nickel elements on the developed clad on the preheated surface as compared to the surface developed on without preheating of the substrate. The average microhardness of the developed composite laser clads with and without preheating of the substrate was 802 ± 94 HV and 878 ± 68 HV, respectively. This was found to be much higher than the substrate microhardness (439 ± 12 HV).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dubourg L, Ursescu D, Hlawka F, and Cornel A, Wear 258 (2005) 1745.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Santos E C, Shiomi M, Osakada K, and Laoui T, Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46 (2006) 1459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alimardani M, and Toyserkani E, Appl Soft Comput 8 (2008) 316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen H Y, and Huang S J, Int J Manuf Technol 24 (2004) 667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Adak B, Nash P, and Chen D, J Mater Sci 40 (2005) 2051.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pinkerton A J, and Li L, Appl Surf Sci 208–209 (2003) 411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pinkerton A J, and Li L, Thin Solid Films. 453–454 (2004) 471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cho C, Zhao G, Kwak S, and Kim C B, J Mater Process Technol 153–154 (2004) 494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Qi H, Mazumder J, and Ki H, J Appl Phys 100 (2006) 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nickel A H, Barnett D M, and Prinz F B, J Mater Sci Eng A 317 (2001) 59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Klingbeil N W, Beuth J L, Chin R K, and Amon C H, Int J Mech Sci 44 (2002) 57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jendrzejewski R, and Sliwinski G, J Appl Surf Sci 254 (2007) 921.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Alimardani M, Toyserkani E, Huissoon J P, and Paul C P, Opt Lasers Eng 47 (2009) 1160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Amado J M, Tobar M J, Yáñez A, Amigó V, and Candel J, J Phys Proc 12 (2011) 338.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Song W L, Echigoya J, Zhu B D, Xie C S, and Cui K, Surf Coat Technol 138 (2001) 291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhou S, Zeng X, Hu Q, and Huang Y, Appl Surf Sci 255 (2008) 1646.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Weisheit A, Rittinghaus S, Dutta A, and Majumdar J, Opt Laser Eng 131 (2020) 106041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sun D, Fabijanic D, Annasamy M, Gallo S, Fordyce I, Leary M, Easton M, and Brandt M, J Laser Appl 32 (2020) 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ding C, Cui X, Jiao J, and Zhu P, Materials 11 (2018) 1.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Liang M C, Huang J, Jiang R, Hui Y, Xie Z, and Liu S, Eng Fail Anal 31 (2013) 320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shengfeng Z, Xiaoyan Z, Qianwu H, and Yongjun H, Appl Surf Sci 255 (2008) 1646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work is carried out in the center for laser processing of materials, ARCI Hyderabad. The authors would like to express their gratitude to the director, team leader, and also special thanks to Mr. J Shyam Rao, technical assistant, CLPM, ARCI-Hyderabad.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ajit M. Hebbale.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hebbale, A.M., Tak, M. & Bathe, R. Microstructural Studies of Composite (Cr3C2–NiCr) Laser Clads Developed on Preheated Substrate T91. Trans Indian Inst Met 74, 593–600 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-020-02150-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-020-02150-0

Keywords

Navigation