Abstract
Aim
The purpose of this study was to reveal differences in clinical diagnosis of gallbladder cancer among patients with or without adenomyomatosis (ADM) by analyzing demonstrated tumor patterns on imaging and diagnostic opportunities.
Methods
Ninety-seven patients with gallbladder cancer were enrolled. Demonstrated imaging patterns were classified into mass lesion (ML), wall thickening (WT), and papillary lesion (PL). Clinical status during periodic follow up and other diagnostic opportunities were determined from medical records.
Results
All adenomyomatosis-associated cases were diagnosed at the T2 or higher stage. The distribution of demonstrated imaging patterns was significantly different between the adenomyomatosis-associated and non-adenomyomatosis-associated groups (p = 0.0002). No adenomyomatosis-associated gallbladder cancer had the PL pattern, which was readily identifiable and characteristic of early-stage cancer. The WT pattern presented difficulties for diagnosis, and the ML pattern was relatively specific, although most of these cases were at advanced stages. Approximately 40 % of ADM patients were found to be in advanced stages of gallbladder cancer, in spite of undergoing periodic follow up.
Conclusions
This study revealed the difficulty of early diagnosis of primary gallbladder cancer in the setting of concurrent ADM. Current results suggest the possible utility of preventive cholecystectomy for management of asymptomatic ADM patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sobin L, Gospodarowicz M, Wittekind C, (eds). TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors. 7th ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2009. p. 118–121.
Furuse J, Kasuga A, Takasu A, Kitamura H, Nagashima F. Role of chemotherapy in treatments for biliary tract cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2012;19:337–41.
Furuse J, Takada T, Miyazaki M, et al. Guidelines for chemotherapy of biliary tract and ampullary carcinomas. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2008;15:55–62.
Miyakawa S, Ishihara S, Takada T, et al. Flowcharts for the management of biliary tract and ampullary carcinomas. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2008;15:7–14.
Miyazaki M, Takada T, Miyakawa S, et al. Risk factors for biliary tract and ampullary carcinomas and prophylactic surgery for these factors. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2008;15:15–24.
Jutras JA, Longtin JM, Levesque HP. Hyperplastic cholecystoses. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1960;83:795–827.
Jutras JA, Levesque HP. Adenomyoma and adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder. Radiol Clin North Am. 1966;4:483–500.
Ootani T, Shirai Y, Tsukada K, Muto T. Relationship between gallbladder carcinoma and the segmental type of adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder. Cancer. 1992;69:2647–52.
Nabatame N, Shirai Y, Nishimura A, Yokoyama N, Wakai T, Hatakeyama K. High risk of gallbladder carcinoma in elderly patients with segmental adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2004;23:593–8.
Kai K, Ide T, Masuda M, et al. Clinicopathologic features of advanced gallbladder cancer associated with adenomyomatosis. Virchows Arch. 2011;459:573–80.
Ash-Miles J, Roach H, Virjee J, Callaway M. More than just stones: a pictorial review of common and less common gallbladder pathologies. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2008;37:189–202.
Aldridge MC, Gruffaz F, Castaing D, Bismuth H. Adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder. A premalignant lesion? Surgery. 1991;109:107–10.
Funabiki T, Matsumoto S, Tsukada N, Kimura T, Yoshizaki S, Horibe Y. A patient with early gallbladder cancer derived from a Rokitansky–Aschoff sinus. Surg Today. 1993;23:350–5.
Kawarada Y, Sanda M, Mizumoto R, Yatani R. Early carcinoma of the gallbladder, noninvasive carcinoma originating in the Rokitansky–Aschoff sinus: a case report. Am J Gastroenterol. 1986;81:61–6.
Terada T. Gallbladder adenocarcinoma arising in Rokitansky–Aschoff sinus. Pathol Int. 2008;58:806–9.
Albores-Saavedra J, Shukla D, Carrick K, Henson DE. In situ and invasive adenocarcinomas of the gallbladder extending into or arising from Rokitansky–Aschoff sinuses: a clinicopathologic study of 49 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004;28:621–8.
Kai K, Ide T, Egashira R, et al. A unique case of gallbladder cancer arising in the neck side of segmental adenomyomatosis that mimicked hepatocellular carcinoma on contrast CT. Oncol Gastroenterol Hepatol Rep. 2012;1:33–6.
Nishimura A, Shirai Y, Hatakeyama K. Segmental adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder predisposes to cholecystolithiasis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2004;11:342–7.
Ching BH, Yeh BM, Westphalen AC, Joe BN, Qayyum A, Coakley FV. CT differentiation of adenomyomatosis and gallbladder cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:62–6.
Ram MD, Midha D. Adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder. Surgery. 1975;78:224–9.
Stunell H, Buckley O, Geoghegan T, O’Brien J, Ward E, Torreggiani W. Imaging of adenomyomatosis of the gall bladder. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2008;52:109–17.
Irie H, Kamochi N, Nojiri J, Egashira Y, Sasaguri K, Kudo S. High b-value diffusion-weighted MRI in differentiation between benign and malignant polypoid gallbladder lesions. Acta Radiol. 2011;52:236–40.
Tongdee R, Maroongroge P, Suthikeree W. The value of MDCT scans in differentiation between benign and malignant gallbladder wall thickening. J Med Assoc Thai. 2011;94:592–600.
Kim SJ, Lee JM, Lee JY, et al. Analysis of enhancement pattern of flat gallbladder wall thickening on MDCT to differentiate gallbladder cancer from cholecystitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191:765–71.
Tsukada K, Takada T, Miyazaki M, et al. Diagnosis of biliary tract and ampullary carcinomas. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2008;15:31–40.
Kondo S, Takada T, Miyazaki M, et al. Guidelines for the management of biliary tract and ampullary carcinomas: surgical treatment. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2008;15:41–54.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kai, K., Irie, H., Ide, T. et al. Actual status of clinical diagnosis in patients with primary gallbladder cancer associated with adenomyomatosis. Indian J Gastroenterol 32, 386–391 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-013-0355-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-013-0355-9