Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Split Crest Technique with Immediate Implant to Treat Horizontal Defects of the Alveolar Ridge: Analysis of Increased Thickness and Implant Survival

  • Clinical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To assess bone thickness augmentation and implant survival in ridges with horizontal atrophy managed through split crest technique with concomitant installation of dental implants.

Materials and Methods

Thirteen patients with maxillary bone atrophy underwent surgery and had their bone thickness assessed through cone beam computed tomography 6 months pre- and postoperatively. Comparative measurements of initial and final bone height and thickness were taken using Dolphin Imaging® 11.5 software. The distance between the nasal fossa floor or the maxillary sinus and the alveolar crest determined the bone height, while the measurement of bone thickness took into account the distance between the vestibular cortical bone and the palatal cortical bone at the crest level, and at 5 mm and 10 mm from it.

Results

The bone height loss of 0.68 mm was statistically significant (p = 0.01). The average horizontal bone gain was 3.45 mm at ridge level, 3.03 mm at 5 mm from it and 2.42 mm at 10 mm from it. The mean horizontal gain for the three regions was 2.97 mm, and the values were statistically significant for all three regions assessed (p < 0.01). No complications were associated with the surgical procedures, and 23 implants were installed following the surgical expansion. No implants were lost (100% survival).

Conclusion

The split crest technique proved to be viable and predictable, enabling a significant increase in ridge thickness and a high percentage of implant survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nóia CF, Ortega-Lopes R, Kluppel LE, De Sá BCM (2017) Sandwich osteotomies to treat vertical defects of the alveolar ridge. Implant Dent 26:101–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M, Boisco M (2006) Augmentation procedures for the rehabilitation of deficient edentulous ridges with oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 17:136–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Filho JG, Araújo MG (2007) Modificação da técnica de expansão do rebordo alveolar atrófico seguida da instalação imediata de implantes Straumann®: acompanhamento de 10 casos clínicos observados durante 1 ano. Rev Dent Press Periodontia Implant 1:84–97

    Google Scholar 

  4. Figliuzzi MM, Giudice A, Pileggi S, Pacifico D, Marrelli M, Tatullo M et al (2016) Implant-Prosthetic rehabilitation in bilateral agenesis of maxillary lateral incisors with a mini split crest. Case Rep Dent 2016:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bassetti MA, Bassetti RG, Bosshardt DD (2016) The alveolar ridge splitting/expansion technique: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 27:310–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Triplett RG, Schow S (1996) Autologous bone grafts and endosseous implants: complementary technique. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 54:486–494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Agabiti I, Botticelli D (2017) Two-stage ridge split at narrow alveolar mandibular bone ridges. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 75:2115.e1–2115.e12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Garcez-Filho J, Tolentino L, Sukekava F, Seabra M, Cesar-Neto JB, Araújo MG (2015) Long-term outcomes from implants installed by using split-crest technique in posterior maxillae: 10 years of follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res 26:326–331

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bruschi G, Capparé P, Bravi F, Grande N, Gherlone E, Gastaldi G et al (2017) Radiographic evaluation of crestal bone level in split-crest and immediate implant placement: minimum 5-year follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 32:114–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Blus C, Szmukler-Moncler S (2006) Split-crest and immediate implant placement with ultra-sonic bone surgery: a 3-year life-table analysis with 230 treated sites. Clin Oral Implants Res 17:700–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Waechter J, Leite FR, Nascimento GG, Carmo Filho LC, Faot F (2017) The split crest technique and dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 46:116–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shibuya Y, Yabase A, Ishida S, Kobayashi M, Komori T (2014) Outcomes and treatments of mal fractures caused by the split-crest technique in the mandible. Kobe J Med Sci 60:E37–E42

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudio Ferreira Nóia.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This study was approved by the research ethics committee of the Piracicaba School of Dentistry—Unicamp (Protocol Number is 93082218.1.0000.5418).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Souza, C.S.V., de Sá, B.C.M., Goulart, D. et al. Split Crest Technique with Immediate Implant to Treat Horizontal Defects of the Alveolar Ridge: Analysis of Increased Thickness and Implant Survival. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 19, 498–505 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-020-01332-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-020-01332-z

Keywords

Navigation