Skip to main content
Log in

Decision system framework for performance evaluation of advanced manufacturing technology under fuzzy environment

  • Application Article
  • Published:
OPSEARCH Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Modern world is a competitive world. To survive in this world, every industry must achieve competitiveness. So, it has become the most important task for them to select the best Advanced Manufacturing Technology (AMT). The process involves both quantitative and qualitative factors. The aim of this paper is to solve the problem by Fuzzy TOPSIS method. According to the method of TOPSIS, a closeness co-efficient is determined by calculating the distances to both the Fuzzy positive ideal solution (FPIS) and Fuzzy negative ideal solution (FNIS). Then, a Suitability Index (SI) is calculated by taking into account the Objective Factor Measurement (OFM) to rank the alternatives. Finally, a numerical example using triangular fuzzy numbers is shown to highlight the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Ahmari, A.M.A.: Implementing CIM systems in SMEs. Int. J. Comput. Appl. Technol. 15, 122–127 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Al-Ahmari, A.M.A.: Evaluation of CIM technologies in Saudi industries using AHP. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 34, 736–747 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Al-Ahmari, A.M.A.: A methodology for selection and evaluation of advanced manufacturing technologies. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 21(7), 778–789 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Arbel, A., Seidmann, A.: Performance evaluation of PMS. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 14, 606–617 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bellman, R.E., Zadeh, L.A.: Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Manag. Sci. 17, 141–164 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bojadziev, G., Bojadziev, M.: Fuzzy sets, fuzzy logic, applications. In: Advances in fuzzy systems-applications and theory vol. 5. World Scientific, Singapore (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Buyukozkan, G., Feyzioglu, O., Nebol, E.: Selection of the strategic alliance partner in logistics value chain. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 113, 148–158 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Celik, M., Kahraman, C., Cebi, S., Er, I.D.: Fuzzy axiomatic design-based performance evaluation model for docking facilities in shipbuilding industry:the case of Turkish shipyards. Exp. Syst. Appl. (2007). doi:10.1016/j.eswa,2007.09.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chamodrakas, I., Batis, D., Martakos, D.: Supplier selection in electronic market places using satisficing and fuzzy AHP. Exp. Syst. Appl. 37, 490–498 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chiadamrong, N.: An integrated fuzzy multi criteria decision making method for the manufacturing strategies selection. Comput. Ind. Eng. 37, 433–436 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chuu, S.-J.: Group decision-making model using fuzzy multiple attributes analysis for the evaluation of advanced manufacturing technology. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 160, 586–602 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chuu, S.-J.: Selecting the advanced manufacturing technology using fuzzy multiple attributes group decision making with multiple fuzzy information. Comput. Ind. Eng. 57, 1033–1042 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Datta, V., Sambasivarao, K.V., Kodali, R., Deshmukh, S.G.: Multi-attribute decision model using the analytic hierarchy process for the justification of manufacturing systems. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 28, 227–234 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Demmel, J.G., Askin, R.G.: A multiple-objective decision model for the evaluation of advanced manufacturing system technologies. J. Manuf. Syst. 11(3), 179–194 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hung, K.-C., Julian, P., Chien, T., Jin, W.T.-H.: A decision support system for engineering design based on an enhanced fuzzy MCDM approach. Exp. Syst. Appl. 37, 202–213 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hwang, C.-L., Yoon, K.P.: Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and applications. Springer, Berlin (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kahraman, C., Cebi, S.: Anew multi-attribute decision making method: Hierarchical fuzzy axiomatic design. Exp. Syst. Appl. 36, 4848–4861 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kahraman, C., Ulukan, Z.: Fuzzy multi-objective linear programming based justification of advanced manufacturing systems. IEEE. 226–232 (1996)

  19. Kahraman, C., Ruan, D., Dogan, I.: Fuzzy group decision making for facility location selection. Inform. Sci. 157, 135–153 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Karsak, E.E.: Distance-based fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluating flexible manufacturing system alternatives. Int. J. Prod. Res. 40(13), 3167–3181 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Karsak, E.E., Tolga, E.: Fuzzy multi-criteria decision making procedure for evaluating advanced manufacturing system investments. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 69, 49–64 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kassicieh, S.K., Ravinder, H.V., Yourstone, S.A.: Proposed design of a DSS for the justification of advanced manufacturing technologies. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 404, 398–402 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kengpol, A., O’Brien, C.: The development of a decision support tool for the selection of advanced technology to achieve rapid product development. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 69, 177–191 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Liang, G.S., Wang, M.J.J.: A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach for robot selection. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 10, 267–274 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Luong Lee, H.S.: A decision support system for the selection of computer integrated manufacturing technologies. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 14, 45–53 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Maldonado, A., Garcia, J.L., Alvarado, A., Balderrama, C.O.: A hierarchical fuzzy axiomatic design methodology for ergonomic compatibility evaluation of advanced manufacturing technology. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. (2012). doi:10.1007/s00170-012-4316-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Meredith, J.R., Suresh, N.C.: Justification techniques for advanced manufacturing technologies. Int. J. Prod. Res. 24, 1043–1057 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Miltenburg, G.J., Krinsky, I.: Evaluating flexible manufacturing systems. IIE Trans. 19, 222–233 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mohanty, R.P., Deshmukh, S.G.: Advanced manufacturing technology selection: a strategic model for learning and evaluation. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 55, 295–307 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mohanty, R.P., Veokataraman, S.: Use of the analytic hierarchy process for selecting automated manufacturing systems. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage 13, 45–57 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nagarur, N.: Some performance measures of flexible manufacturing systems. Int. J. Prod. Res. 30, 799–809 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nelson, C.A.: A scoring model for flexible manufacturing systems project selection. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 24, 346–359 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  33. O’Kane, J.F., Spenceley, J.R., Taylor, R.: Simulation as an essential tool for advanced manufacturing technology problems. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 107, 412–424 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Orddobadi, S.M., Nancy, J.: Development of a justification tool for advanced manufacturing technologies: (SWBVA). J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 18, 157–184 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Park, C.S., Kim, G.T.: An economic evaluation model for advanced manufacturing systems using activity based costing. J. Manuf. Syst. 16, 439–451 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Perego, A., Rangone, A.: A reference framework for the application of MADM fuzzy techniques to selecting AMTS. Int. J. Prod. Res. 36, 437–458 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rouse, W.B.: intelligent decision support for advanced manufacturing systems. Am. Soc. Mech. Eng. (1988)

  38. Sambasivarao, V., Deshmukh, S.G.: A decision support system for selection and justification of advanced manufacturing technologies. Prod. Plan. Control 8, 270–284 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Samll, M.H., Chen, I.: Economic and strategic justification of AMT inference from industrial practice. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 49, 65–75 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Stam, A., Kuula, M.: Selecting a flexible manufacturing system using multiple criteria analysis. Int. J. Prod. Res. 29, 803–820 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Talluri, S., Yoon, K.P.: A cone-ratio DEA approach for AMT justification. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 66, 119–129 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wabalickis, R.N.: Justification of FMS with the analytic hierarchy process. J. Manuf. Syst. 7, 175–182 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Yurdakul, M.: Selection of computer-integrated manufacturing technologies using a combined analysis hierarchy process and goal programming model. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 20, 329–340 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control. 8, 338–353 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Zadeh, L.A.: The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-I. Inf. Sci. 8, 199–249 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support of Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India in carrying out this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Surajit Nath.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nath, S., Sarkar, B. Decision system framework for performance evaluation of advanced manufacturing technology under fuzzy environment. OPSEARCH 55, 703–720 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-016-0262-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-016-0262-9

Keywords

Navigation