Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

On definition of energy flow velocity of electromagnetic waves: a new way to address Abraham–Minkowski controversy

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Optics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this work, we shall demonstrate that time-averaged stored energy density (TASED) of a circularly polarized wave is equal to zero, in addition, TASEDs of both circularly and linearly polarized waves do not directly relate to their time-averaged Poynting vector (TAPV), respectively, which indicates that the usual definition of energy flow velocity needs to be reconsidered. Noting that energy U of electromagnetic wave (photon) obtained from relativistic energy–momentum relation corresponds to transport of electromagnetic energy, combining expressions of both TAPV and time-averaged electromagnetic wave momentum density, a new definition of energy flow velocity is proposed by applying energy U instead of TASED. Furthermore, we shall show from the new definition that a rational energy flow velocity of electromagnetic wave traveling in a material medium is obtained by adopting Minkowski electromagnetic wave momentum density, which may provide a new way to further discuss the long-standing Abraham–Minkowski controversy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L.D. Landau, E.M. Lifschitz, Electrodynamics of Continuous Media (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1984)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Z. Yin, Electrodynamics (Nanjing University Press, Nanjing, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. K.Q. Zhang, Electromagnetic Theory for Microwaves and Optoelectronics (Springer, Berlin, 1998)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Abraham, Zur elektrodynamik bewegter korper. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo 28, 1 (1909)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. H. Minkowski, Die grundlagen fur die elektromagnetischen vorgenge in bewegten korpern. Nachr. Ges. Wiss. Gottn. Math. Phys. K 53, 1978 (1908)

    Google Scholar 

  6. U. Leonhardt, Optics: momentum in an uncertain light. Nature 444, 823 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. R.N.C. Pfeifer, T.A. Nieminen, N.R. Heckenberg, H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, Momentum of an electromagnetic wave in dielectric media. Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 1197 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. B.A. Kemp, Resolution of the Abraham–Minkowski debate: implications for the electromagnetic wave theory of light in matter. J. Appl. Phys. 109, 111101 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. M.G. Silveirinha, Reexamination of the Abraham–Minkowski dilemma. Phys. Rev. A 96, 033831 (2017)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. J.W. Chen, Y.Y. Dai, Y. Xuanyuan, Covariant formulations of classical electrodynamics for lossless linear isotropic homogeneous media (submitted)

  11. R.W. Ziolkowski, Superluminal transmission of information through an electromagnetic metamaterial. Phys. Rev. E 63, 046604 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. R. Ruppin, Electromagnetic energy density in a dispersive and absorptive material. Phys. Lett. A 299, 309 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. N. Sun, J.W. Chen, D.M. Tang, Stopping light in an active medium. Eur. Phys. J. D 69, 219 (2015)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiangwei Chen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dai, Y., Xuanyuan, Y. & Chen, J. On definition of energy flow velocity of electromagnetic waves: a new way to address Abraham–Minkowski controversy. J Opt 51, 211–215 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12596-021-00778-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12596-021-00778-9

Keywords

Navigation