Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Hungry for free trade? Food trade and extreme hunger in developing countries

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Food Security Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the greatest challenges of the twenty-first century is to ensure that the world population has reliable access to adequate, affordable and nutritious food sufficient to avoid hunger. Agricultural trade liberalization is often considered a central element of economic strategies aiming at improving food security in developing countries. Many, however, argue that most developing countries may not benefit from freer agricultural trade and that liberalization may accentuate food insecurity. From an empirical perspective, little is known about the effects of trade on food security in developing countries. We estimated the effects of food trade openness on extreme hunger in developing countries using a novel two-step approach. First, we estimated the reverse causal impacts of hunger on food trade openness using rainfall anomalies as instrumental variables to generate exogenous variation in hunger. In a second step, we estimated the effect of food trade openness on hunger using the residual food trade openness that is not driven by hunger as an instrument. We found that a 10% increase in food trade openness would increase the prevalence of undernourishment by about 6%. We also found evidence that developing countries reduce food trade openness as a response to increased hunger, suggesting protectionist policies. A percentage point increase in undernourishment prevalence would decrease food trade openness by 0.9%. Our results suggest that countries may be better off adopting food self-sufficiency for some time, despite such actions clashing with World Trade Organization’s regulations and current agenda.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Levine and Rothman (2006) is a notable exception.

  2. This would be in line with a recent literature linking trade openness and rising overweight and obesity (Miljkovic et al. 2015, 2017).

  3. Conceptually, we think a linear-log form seems more adequate. Indeed, our specification suggests that as trade openness increases, the gains in terms of hunger reductions become smaller, but remain positive. A quadratic specification would mean that past a certain level, trade openness could result in hunger increases. On a purely statistical basis, we also estimated a model using a linear-linear form and then compared the adjusted R-2 and compared the residuals, finding that the linear-log form performed best. We also tested the inclusion of a squared term in our main model and the coefficient turned out to be statistically insignificant.

  4. The exclusion of climate variables such as rainfall or temperature from the ‘basic’ model is consistent with the classification of climate as an immediate and underlying cause of undernutrition. Similarly, the inclusion of food aid would not respect this principle as food aid is considered to be an underlying factor (Ickes et al. 2015). On a more practical level, the coverage of data on food aid, food consumer price indexes or agricultural foreign direct investment is particularly limited for developing countries and/or the pre-2000s period. For example, the OECD discourages the use of sector aid data (and thus food aid) before 2002 because the coverage of sector disbursements is incomplete.

  5. We originally used temperature anomalies but found that as instruments they do not meet the exclusion restrictions in this setting.

  6. This is implemented using the BACON command in Stata.

  7. FDI data do not give a complete picture of international investment in an economy. Balance of payments data on FDI do not include capital raised locally, an important source of investment financing in some developing countries (World Bank 2018).

  8. This is calculated as (e−0.009 − 1) ≈ 0.89%.

  9. While we follow Brückner and Lederman (2015) who included the instruments in the second step (here shown in column 2), it is important to note that the models in columns 1 and 2 are not exactly the same. We provide a full comparison of models including and excluding the instruments in Appendix 4 Table 12. The differences are minimal.

  10. This is calculated as: \( \frac{10.86}{18.13}\ast \frac{10}{100}\approx 5.99\% \).

  11. An extension of the approach to two potentially endogenous variables can be found in Mary et al. (2017).

  12. We do so for food supply and producer prices.

  13. Full tables of the interaction models can be requested from the author.

  14. It is important to note we cannot directly compare the estimates in Table 6 with those of Table 3 because the interaction models include more variables than in Table 3.

References

  • Anderson, K. (2016). Agricultural trade, policy reforms, and global food security, Palgrave studies in agricultural economics and food Policy, Palgrave MacMillan US. ISBN: 978-1-137-46925-0.

  • Anderson, K. (2017). Finishing global farm trade reform, Implications for Developing Countries. University of Adelaide Press. ISBN: 978-1-925261-34-9.

  • Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2008). Mostly harmless econometrics: An Empiricist’s companion. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bazzi, S., & Clemens, M. (2013). Blunt instruments: Avoiding common pitfalls in identifying the causes of economic growth. American Economic Journal: Macroecon, Am Econ Assoc, 5(2), 152–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellemare, M., & Carnes, N. (2015). Why do members of congress support agricultural protection? Food Policy, 50, 20–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bezuneh, M., & Yeheyis, Z. (2012). The effect of trade liberalization on food security: The experience of selected African countries. Journal of African Development, 14, 13–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, R., Victora, C. G., Walker, S., Bhutta, Z., Christian, P., de Onis, M., Ezzati, M., Grantham-McGregor, S., Katz, J., Martorell, R., & Uauy, R. (2013). Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries. The Lancet, 382(9890), 427–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandao, A. S. P., & Martin, W. (1993). Implications of agricultural trade liberalization for the developing countries. Agricultural Economics, 8, 313–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brückner, M. (2013). On the simultaneity problem in the aid and growth debate. Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 28(1), 126–150 01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brückner, M., & Lederman, D. (2015). Trade openness and economic growth: Panel data evidence from sub-Sahran Africa. Economica, 82, 1302–1323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau, J.-C., Jean, S., Matthews, A., (2006). The consequences of agricultural trade liberalization for developing countries, invited paper for presentation at the International Association of Agricultural Economists Conference, Gold Coast, Australia, August 12–18.

  • Cafiero, C., (2014). Advances in hunger measurement, traditional FAO methods and recent innovations. FAO. http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/ess/ess_test_folder/Food_security/Cafiero_Global_Food_Security.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2018.

  • CRU-TYN (2016). https://crudata.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/hrg/. Accessed 27 Jan 2018.

  • De Schutter, O. (2011). The World Trade Organization and the post-global food crisis agenda. November: Activity report. United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devadoss, S. (2006). Why do developing countries resist global trade agreements? Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 15, 191–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz-Bonillo, E. (2013). Agricultural trade and food security: Some thoughts about a continuous debate, think piece, E15 expert group on agriculture, Trade and Food Security challenges.

  • Dithmer, J., & Abdulai, A. (2017). Does trade openness contribute to food security? A dynamic panel analysis. Food Policy, 69, 218–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donald, S. G., Imbens, G. W., & Newey, W. K. (2009). Choosing instrumental variables in conditional moment restriction models. Journal of Econometrics, 152, 28–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2006). Trade reforms and food security: Country case studies and synthesis, Rome.

  • FAO (2015a). Food security and international trade, unpacking disputed narratives, by Clapp, J., December, Background Paper.

  • FAO (2015b). Lost in translation, the fractured conversation about trade and food security, by Diaz-Bonilla, E., Bakcground Paper, December.

  • FAO (2016). How does agricultural trade impact food security? Trade policy brief 17, May.

  • FAO (2018). Rome. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data. Accessed 27 Jan 2018.

  • FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP and WHO. (2017). The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2017. Building resilience for peace and food security. Rome, FAO.

  • Fulgitini, L. E., & Shogren, J. F. (1992). Agricultural protection in developing countries. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 74(3), 795–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gayi, S.K. (2006). Does the WTO agreement on agriculture endanger food security in sub-Saharan Africa?, research paper no. 2006/60, UNU-WIDER, United Nations University.

  • Hawkes, C. (2006). Uneven dietary development: Linking the policies and processes of globalization with the nutrition transition, obesity and diet-related chronic diseases. Globalization and Health, 2(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Headey, D. (2013). Developmental drivers of nutritional change: A cross-country analysis. World Development, 42, 76–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ickes, S. B., Trichler, R. B., & Parks, B. C. (2015). Building a stronger system for tracking nutrition sensitive spending: A methodology and estimate of global spending for nutrition sensitive foreign aid. Food and Nutrition Bulletin, 36(4), 520–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IFPRI (2014). Global nutrition report 2014: Actions and accountability to accelerate the World’s Progress on nutrition. Washington, DC.

  • International Country Risk Guide, the Political Risk Services Group (2018). https://www.prsgroup.com/. Accessed 27 Jan 2018.

  • Karnik, A., & Lalvani, M. (1996). Interst groups, subsidies and public goods: Farm lobby in Indian agriculture. Economic and Political Weekly, 31(13), 818–820.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koning, N., & Pinstrup-Andersen, P. (2007). In N. Koning & P. Pinstrup-Andersen (Eds.), Agricultural trade liberalization and the least developed countries, chapter 1 introduction. Wageningen: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, D. I., & Rothman, D. (2006). Does trade affect child health? Journal of Health Economics, 25, 538–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madeley, J., Solagral (2001). The impact of trade liberalization on food security in the south: Literature review, A CIDSE Background Paper, May.

  • Magrini, E., Montlabano, P., Nenc, S., & Salvatici, L. (2017). Agricultural (dis) incentives and food security: Is there a link? American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 99(4), 847–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mary, S., Shaw, K., Coleen, L., & Gomez y Paloma, S. (2017). Does agricultural aid reduce child stunting?, workshop paper prepared for the conference “quantitative methods for integrated food and nutrition security measurements – Lessons to be learned!”, November, European Commission, Brussels. https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/event/conference/methods-food-security-measurements. Accessed 12 Feb 2018.

  • Mary, S., Saravia-Matus, S., & Gomez y Paloma, S. (2018a). Does nutrition-sensitive aid reduce the prevalence of undernourishment? Food Policy, 74, 100–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mary, S., Shaw, K., Gomez y Paloma, S. (2018b). Does the sectoral composition of growth affect child stunting reductions? Development policy review. Accepted article.

  • Matthews, A. (2014). Food security and WTO domestic support disciplines postBali; ICTSD Programme on agricultural trade and sustainable development; issue paper no. 53; International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, Geneva, Switzerland, www.ictsd.org.

  • McCorriston, S., Hemming, D. J., Lamontagne-Godwin, J. D., Parr, M. J., Osborn, J., & Roberts, P. D. (2013). What is the evidence of the impact of agricultural trade liberalisation on food security in developing countries? A systematic review. London: EPPICentre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGovern, M.E., Khrisna, A., Aguayo, V.M., Subramanian, S.V. (2017). A review of the evidence linking child stunting to economic outcomes. International Journal of Epidemiology 46:4,August, pp. 1171–1191.

  • Mgeni, C. P., Sieber, S., Amjath-Babu, T. S., & Mutabazi, K. D. (2018). Can protectionism improve food security? Evidence from an imposed tariff on imported edible oil in Tanzania, food security: The science, sociology and economics of food production and access to food, springer. The International Society for Plant Pathology, 10(4), 799–806.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihalache-O’Keef, A., & Li, Q. (2011). Modernization vs. dependency revisited: Effects of foreign direct investment on food security in less developed countries. International Studies Quarterly, 55, 71–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miljkovic, D., Shaik, S., Miranda, S., Barabanov, N., & Liogier, A. (2015). Globalisation and obesity. The World Economy, 38(8), 1278–1294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miljkovic, D., de Miranda, S.H.G., Kassouf, A.L., Oliveira, F.C.R. (2017). Determinants of obesity in Brazil: The effects of trade liberalization and socio-economic variables. Applied Economics, pp 1-13, December.

  • Rabassa, M., Skoufias, E., & Jacoby, H. G. (2014). Weather and child health in rural Nigeria. Journal of African Economies, 23(4), 464–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanjuan-Lopez, A. I., & Dawson, O. J. (2010). Agricultural exports and economic growth in developing countries: A panel Cointegration approach. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61(3), 565–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sexton, R. J., Sheldon, I., McCorriston, S., & Wang, H. (2007). Agricultural trade liberalization and economic development: The role of downstream market power. Agricultural Economics, 36, 253–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, I. (2014). Linkages between agricultural trade liberalization and food security: Evidence from India and policy challenges. International Journal of Economic Issues, 7(2), 231–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. C., & Haddad, L. (2015). Reducing child undernutrition: Past drivers and priorities for the post-MDG era. World Development, 68, 180–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soriano, B., & Garrido, A. (2016). How important is economic growth for reducing undernourishment in developing countries? Food Policy, 63(C), 87–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock, J. H., & Yogo, M. (2005). Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. In J. H. Stock & D. W. K. Andrews (Eds.), Identification and inference for econometric models: Essays in Honor of Thomas J. Rothenberg. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thow, A. M., & Hawkes, C. (2009). The implications of trade liberalization for diet and health: A case study from Central America. Globalization and Health, 5(5), 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tokarick, S., (2008). Dispelling some misconceptions about agricultural trade liberalization 22 (1), pp. 199-216.

  • UNICEF. (1998). The state of the World's children. New York: United Nations Children's Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winters, A., McCulloch, N., & McKay, A. (2004). Trade liberalisation and poverty: The evidence so far. Journal of Economic Literature, XLII, 72–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wise, T.A. (2008). The limited promise of agricultural trade liberalization, working group on development and environment in the Americas, Disucssion Paper Number 19, July.

  • World Bank (2017). The economic costs of stunting and how to reduce them. Policy Research Note.

  • World Bank (2018). World Development Indicators. In World development indicators. Washington D.C: The World Bank. http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators. Accessed 27 Jan 2018.

  • World Food Summit (1996) Rome Declaration on World Food Security.

  • World Health Organization (2018). Geneva. http://apps.who.int/gho/data/node.main.522. Accessed 27 Jan 2018.

  • WTO (2009). Un rapporteur and WTO head debate the impact of trade on hunger. Forum https://www.wto.org/english/forums_e/debates_e/debate14_summary_e.htm

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sébastien Mary.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Table 8 List of 52 countries

Appendix 2. Test of exclusion restrictions in the first step

Table 9 Test of exclusion restrictions (first step)

Appendix 3. First-stage estimates for causal pathways

Table 10 Transmission channels: first-step estimates

Appendix 4. Robustness analyses

Table 11 The effect of food trade openness on hunger prevalence
Table 12 The effect of food trade openness on hunger prevalence

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mary, S. Hungry for free trade? Food trade and extreme hunger in developing countries. Food Sec. 11, 461–477 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-019-00908-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-019-00908-z

Keywords

JEL codes

Navigation