Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effect of educational leadership on students’ achievement: a cross-cultural meta-analysis research on studies between 2008 and 2018

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Education Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this meta-analysis study, different leadership approaches were combined, and the relationship between educational leadership and student achievement was analyzed. In the literature review, 151 research articles/dissertations, independent from one another, were brought together, and 131,498 study subjects were included in the sample group. The results of the analyses performed with a random effects model revealed that educational leadership has a medium-level effect on students’ achievement. Educational leadership has comprehensive effect on student achievement in vertical-collectivist cultures (e.g., in Asian) than horizontal-individualistic cultures (e.g., in USA). As was expected, the most comprehensive effect among leadership theories was found in instructional leadership. Considering the effect of educational leadership on students’ achievement, it is recommended to examine the effect of leadership on other components of school and stakeholders in future studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Graphic 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alig-Mielcarek, J. M., & Hoy, W. K. (2005). Instructional leadership: Its nature, meaning, and influence. In C. G. Miskel & W. K. Hoy (Eds.), Educational leadership and reform (pp. 29–54). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balcı, A. (2007). Etkili okul geliştirme kuram, uygulama ve araştırma [Effective school development; theory, practice and research]. Ankara: Pegema.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamburg, J. D., & Andrews, R. L. (1991). School goals, principals and achievement. School Effectiveness & School Improvement,2(3), 175–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. (1999). Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology,8(1), 9–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1997). Full range leadership development: Manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire (pp. 43–44). Palo Alto, CA: Mind Garden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, N., Harvey, J. A., Wise, C., & Woods, P. A. (2003). Distributed leadership: A desk study. http://www.ncsl.org.uk/literature.

  • Blake, R., & Mouton, J. (1964). The managerial grid: The key to leadership excellence. Houston: TX Gulf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, D. P. (2012). A study of the relationship between the servant leader principal on school culture and student achievement in the lower Kuskokwim school district. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Grand Canyon University, Arizona.

  • Braun, D. (2008). The relationship among essential school leadership preparation practices, principal leader behavior, school learning environment, and student achievement in elementary and middle schools in Rhode Island. (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No: 3321561).

  • Brewer, D. J. (1993). Principals and student outcomes: Evidence from U.S. high schools. Economics of Education Review,12(4), 281–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E., & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly,17, 595–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulris, M. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of research on the mediated effects of principal leadership on student achievement: examining the effect size of school culture on student achievement as an indicator of teacher effectiveness. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). East Carolina University, North Carolina.

  • Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busher, H., Harris, A., & Wise, C. (2000). Subject leadership and school improvement. USA: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M., & Miller, D. (2011). The relational perspective as a business mindset: Managerial implications for East and West. Academy of Management Perspectives,25(3), 6–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, J. M. C. (2007). Meta-analysis of transformational school leadership effects on school outcomes in Taiwan and the USA. Asia Pacific Education Review,8(2), 166–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988/1998). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Cotton, K. (2003). Principals and student achievement: What the research says?. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, B. W. (2010). The relationship of principal leadership style as it affects school climate and student achievement. (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No: 3425719).

  • Dickson, M. W., Den Hartog, D. N., & Mitchelson, J. K. (2003). Research on leadership in a cross-cultural context: Making progress, and raising new questions. The Leadership Quarterly,14, 729–768.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberts, R. W., Hollenbeck, K., & Stone, J. A. (2002). Teacher performance incentives and student outcomes. The Journal of Human Resources,37(4), 913–927.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, E. M., & Lord, R. G. (1997). Implicit theories, self-schemas, and leader-member exchange. Academy of Management Journal,40(4), 988–1010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estapa, A. L. (2009). The relationship between the transformational leadership characteristics of principals, as perceived by teachers, and student achievement on standardized tests. (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No: 3378413).

  • Farh, J. L., Hackett, R. D., & Liang, J. (2007). Individual-level cultural values as moderators of perceived organizational support-employee outcome relationships in China: Comparing the effects of power distance and traditionalist. Academy of Management Journal,50, 715–729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler, F. E. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleischman, P. R. (1990). The healing spirit: Explorations in religion and psychotherapy. Cleveland, SC: Bonne Change.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, L. W. (2003). Toward a theory of spiritual leadership. The Leadership Quarterly,14, 693–727.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, E., Young, M., & Baker, B. D. (2011). Do principal preparation programs influence student achievement through the building of teacher-team qualifications by the principal? An exploratory analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly,47(1), 173–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenleaf, R. K. (2002). Essentials of servant leadership in focus on leadership. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, S. E. (2008). Relationship of principal leadership and school and teacher effects on student performance within a principal accountability system. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of South Carolina: Columbia.

  • Gronn, P. (2003). The new work of educational leaders: Changing leadership practice in an era of school reform. London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronn, P. (2006). The significance of distributed leadership. Educational Leadership Research,7, 160–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulbin, K. M. (2008). Transformational leadership: Is it a factor for improving student achievement in high poverty secondary schools in Pennsylvania? (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No: 3303551).

  • Hallinger, P. (2005). Instructional leadership and the school principal: A passing fancy that refuses to fade away. Leadership and Policy in Schools,4(3), 221–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallinger, P., Bickman, L., & Davis, K. (1996). School context, principal leadership, and student reading achievement. Elementary School Journal,96(5), 527–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpin, A. W., & Winer, B. J. (1957). A factorial study of the leader behavior descriptions. In R. M. Stogdill & A. E. Coons (Eds.), Leader behavior: Its description and measurement (pp. 399–451). Columbus, OH: Bureau of business research, Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampden-Turner, C., & Trompenaars, F. (1997). Mastering the infinite game: How East Asian values are transforming business practices. Oxford: Capstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanrahan, F., Field, A. P., Jones, F. W., & Davey, G. C. L. (2013). A meta-analysis of cognitive therapy for worry in generalized anxiety disorder. Clinical Psychology Review,33(1), 120–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardman, B. K. (2011). Teacher’s perception of their principal’s leadership style and the effects on student achievement in improving and non-improving schools. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of South Florida, FL.

  • Harris, A. (2012). Distributed leadership: Implications for the role of the principal. Journal of Management Development,31(1), 7–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris-Smith, C. E. S. (2012). A study of the effect of secondary school leadership styles on student achievement in selected secondary schools in Louisiana. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Louisiana, Louisiana.

  • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hause, R. J. (1971). A path-goal theory effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly,16, 321–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2009). Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership to school improvement and growth in math achievement. American Educational Research Journal,46(3), 659–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heck, R. H., Larsen, T. J., & Marcoulides, G. A. (1990). Instructional leadership and school achievement: Validation of a causal model. Educational Administration Quarterly,26(2), 94–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical method for meta-analysis. Cambridge: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hersey, P., & Blanchard, H. K. (1972). Management of organization behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NY: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the Mind. London: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G. J. (2005). Cultures and organizations: software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, S. G. (2004). School leadership and leadership development. Journal of Educational Administration,42, 669–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illich, I. (1998). Deschooling society. Middlesex: Harmondsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantabutra, S. (2005). Improving public school performance through vision-based leadership. Asia Pacific Education Review,6(2), 124–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karadağ, E. (Ed.). (2015). Leadership and organizational outcomes: Meta-analysis of empirical studies. Basel: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1952). Some recent findings in human relations research. In E. Swanson, T. Newcombe, & E. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (pp. 650–665). New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koh, W. L., Steers, R. M., & Terborg, J. R. (1995). The effects of transformational leadership on teacher attitudes and student performance in Singapore. Journal of Organizational Behavior,16(4), 319–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2007). The leadership challenge. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2010). The truth about leadership: The no-fads, heart-of-the matter facts you need to know. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krüger, M., & Scheerens, J. (2012). Conceptual perspectives on school leadership. In J. Scheerens (Ed.), School leadership effects revisited: A review and meta-analysis of empirical studies. Berlin: Acid-Free Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuchinke, K. P. (1999). Leadership and culture: Work-related values and leadership styles among one company’s U.S. and German telecommunication employees. Human Resource Development Quarterly,10(2), 135–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulinskaya, E., Morgenthaler, S., & Staudte, R. G. (2008). Meta-analysis: A guide to calibrating and combining statistical evidence. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kythreotis, A., Pashiardis, P., & Kyriakides, L. (2010). The influence of school leadership styles and culture on students’ achievement in Cyprus primary schools. Journal of Educational Administration,48(2), 218–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M., Walker, A., & Chui, Y. K. (2012). Contrasting effects of instructional leadership practices on student learning in a high accountability context. Journal of Educational Administration,50(5), 586–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K. (1992). The move toward transformational leadership. Educational Leadership,49(5), 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership and Management,28(1), 27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2000). The effects of transformational leadership on organizational conditions and student engagement with school. Journal of Educational Administration,38(2), 112–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2006). Transformational school leadership for large-scale reform: Effects on students, teachers, and their classroom practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement,17(2), 201–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., & Mascall, B. (2008). Collective leadership effects on student achievement. Educational Administration Quarterly,44(4), 529–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., Mascall, B., & Strauss, T. (2009). Distributed leadership according to the evidence. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K. A., & Riehl, C. (2003a). What do we already know about successful school leadership?. Washington, DC: AERA Division A Task Force on Developing Research in Educational Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K. A., & Riehl, C. (2003b). What we know about successful school leadership. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Likert, R. (1971). The principle of supportive relationships. Organization Theory, 279–304.

  • Littel, H. J., Corcoran, J., & Pillai, V. (2008). Systematic reviews and meta-analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis, K. S., Dretzke, B., & Wahlstrom, K. (2010). How does leadership affect student achievement? Results from a national US survey. School Effectiveness and School Improvement,21(3), 315–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddock, R. C., & Fulton, R. L. (1998). Motivation, emotions, and leadership: The silent side of management. Greenwood Publishing Group, Westport.

  • Maeyer, S. D., Rymenans, R., Petegem, P. V., Bergh, H.V. D., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2007). Educational leadership and pupil achievement: The choice of a valid conceptual model to test effects in school effectiveness research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 18(2), 125–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark, H. M., & Printy, S. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: an ıntegration of transformational and ınstructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly,39(3), 370–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, G. (2006). Future-focused leadership: Preparing schools, students, and communities for tomorrow’ realities. Alexandria, VA: Libra Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzano, R. J., Waters, T., & McNulty, B. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. Aurora, CO: ASCD and McREL.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, N. K. (2010). The relationship between principal leadership styles and student achievement in elementary schools. Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No: 3404635).

  • McGregor, D. (1960). Theory X and theory Y. Organization Theory,358, 374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRSLS International Study Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mwaura, G., Sutton, J., & Roberts, D. (1998). Corporate and national culture: An irreconcilable dilemma for the hospitality manager? International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management,10, 212–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, M. S. (1964). Who are your motivated workers? Harvard Business Review,22, 73–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, W. (2011). Transformational school leadership and student achievement: A case study. National Teacher Education Journal,4(3), 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, A. L. (2012). The relationship between middle school teachers’ perceptions of principals’ transformational leadership practices, teachers’ sense of efficacy and student achievement. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Southern Mississippi. Mississippi.

  • Newman, K. L., & Nollen, S. D. (1996). Culture and congruence: The fit between management practices and national culture. Journal of International Business Studies,27(4), 753–779.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newstrom, J. W., & Davis, K. (1993). Behavior in organizations. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J. D. (2011). Teachers as servant leaders. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noe, J. (2012). The relationshıp between principal’s emotional intelligence quotient, school culture and student achievement. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Liberty University, Virginia.

  • Odegaard, L. C. (2008). The relationship between teacher-identified principal leadership behavior and effectiveness and student achievement in South Dakota secondary schools (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No: 3318826).

  • O’Donnell, R. J., & White, G. P. (2005). Within the accountability era: Principals’ instructional leadership behaviors and student achievement. NASSP Bulletin,89(645), 56–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petitti, D. B. (2000). Meta-analysis, decision analysis and cost effectiveness analysis: Methods for quantitative syndissertation in medicine. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raines, P. L. (2012). The role of the high school principal in improving student learning and achievement. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Regent University, Virginia.

  • Reddin, W. J. (1970). Effective management by objectives the 3D method of MBO. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinsin, V., Hohepa, M., & Lyoyd, C. (2009). School leadership and student outcomes: Identifying what works and why. Wellington: New Zealand Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, V. M., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly,44(5), 635–674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. A., & Gray, P. (2006). School leadership and student achievement: The mediating effects of teacher beliefs. Canadian Journal of Education,29(3), 798–822.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlechty, P. C. (2005). Okulu yeniden kurmak (Çev. Y. Özden). Ankara: Nobel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrum, L., & Levin, B. B. (2013). Leadership for twenty-first-century schools and student achievement: Lessons learned from three exemplary cases. International Journal of Leadership in Education,16(4), 379–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schyns, B., & Schillng, J. (2013). How bad are the effects of bad leaders? A meta-analysis of destructive leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly,24, 138–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergiovanni, T. J., & Starratt, R. J. (1988). Supervision: Human perspectives. New York: McGraw-Hill College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shatzer, R. H., Caldarella, P., Hallam, P. R., & Brown, B. L. (2013). Comparing the effects of instructional and transformational leadership on student achievement Implications for practice. Educational Management Administration & Leadership,29, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213502192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shavitt, S., Lalwani, A. K., Zhang, J., & Torelli, C. J. (2006). The horizontal/vertical distinction in cross-cultural consumer research. Journal of Consumer Psychology,16, 325–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, S. H., Slater, C. L., & Backhoff, E. (2013). Principal perceptions and student achievement in reading in Korea, Mexico, and the United States educational leadership, school autonomy, and use of test results. Educational Administration Quarterly,49(3), 489–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singelis, T. M., Triandis, H. C., Bhawuk, D. P. S., & Gelfand, M. J. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Research,29, 240–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J. (2005). Distributed leadership. The Educational Forum,69, 143–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher,30(3), 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2004). Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies,36(1), 3–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stogdill, R. M. (1948). Personal factors associated with leadership: A survey of the literature. Journal of Psychology,25, 35–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stogdill, R. M. (1950). Leadership, membership, and organization. Psychological Bulletin,47, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, J., & Leithwood, K. (2012). Transformational school leadership effects on student achievement. Leadership and Policy in Schools,11(4), 418–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Testa, M. R. (2002). Leadership dyads in the cruise industry: The impact of cultural congruency. International Journal of Hospitality Management,21, 425–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tindle, J. A. (2012). Dimensions of principal support behaviors and their relationship to organizational citizenship behaviors and student achievement in high schools. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA.

  • Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. C., & Gelfand, M. J. (1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,74, 118–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troutman, L. D. (2012). The impact of principal leadership on school culture and student achievement. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Wingate University, Wingate, NC.

  • Tsui, A. S., Nifadkar, S. S., & Ou, A. Y. (2007). Cross-national, cross-cultural organizational behavior research: Advances, gaps, and recommendations. Journal of Management,33, 426–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, J. W., & Prater, M. (2011). Instructional, transformational, and managerial leadership and student achievement: High school principals make a difference. NASSP Bulletin,95(1), 5–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vroom, V. H., & Yetton, P. W. (1973). Leadership and decision making. Pittsburg: University of Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wampold, B. E., Ahn, H., & Kim, D. (2000). Meta-analysis in the social sciences: A useful way to make sense of a series of findings from a large number of studies. Asia Pacific Education Review,1(1), 67–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. F. (1943). Street corner society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witziers, B., Bosker, R. J., & Krüger, M. L. (2003). Educational leadership and student achievement: The elusive search for an association. Educational Administration Quarterly,39(3), 398–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. (1999). An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. Leadership Quarterly,10(2), 285–305.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was financially supported by Turkish Academy of Sciences’ The Young Scientists Awards (GEBIP).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Engin Karadag.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 36 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 18 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karadag, E. The effect of educational leadership on students’ achievement: a cross-cultural meta-analysis research on studies between 2008 and 2018. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 21, 49–64 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09612-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09612-1

Keywords

Navigation