Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Substitution or complementation: the influence of parents’ educational level on sheepskin effects in the individual returns to education in China

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Education Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Numerous researches have already revealed the existence of sheepskin effects and proved the signaling value of education based on empirical materials from developing or developed countries; however, only a few empirical studies have explored the mechanism lying behind the proved educational signaling value. With this regard, based on recent 6-year cross-section data from China General Social Survey, the authors discussed the interactive effects between the educational signaling value and parents’ educational level. After correcting the selective bias and endogenous issues by multiple methods—Heckman two-stage, IV, and comprehensive models combined HTS and IV—it finds that there exist obvious sheepskin effects in the returns to education in China and robust complementary effects between parents’ educational level and the signaling function of individual’s education on their personal income.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. CGSS’ sampling design, instruction, items, and variables can be found at http://www.chinagss.org/.

  2. It shall be noted that the valid samples only act as the basis sample for regular analysis, and the samples would be enlarged into full sample when correcting the selective bias, which means the samples that do not have access to the labor market or those in non-employment series would be involved in the probability function analysis.

  3. CPI 2006–2012: (last year = 100) 101.5, 104.8, 105.9, 99.3, 103.3, 105.4, 103.6. http://data.stats.gov.cn/workspace/index?m=hgnd.

  4. In previous CGSS survey, companies are classified into six categories, the state-owned or state-controlled, collective ownership or collective holdings, private/minying or private/minying holdings, Hongkong-Macao-Taiwan invested companies or holdings, foreign companies or foreign holdings, other. In this research, “public sectors” (state-owned or collective) refers to the first two categories (indicated by 1), and other four categories are included in “non-public sectors” (reference group, indicated by 0)

  5. According to ILO (1988), there are nine major groups, chief executives, senior officials, and legislators; professionals; technicians and associate professionals; general clerk; service and sales workers; skilled agricultural, forestry and fishery workers; craft and related trades workers; plant and machine operators, and assemblers; elementary occupations.

  6. The percentage increase in hourly salary associated with a dummy variable coefficient is calculated as, \({e^{\mathop \beta \limits^{ \wedge } }} - 1\)where e is the base of natural logarithm, \(\mathop \beta \limits^{ \wedge }\) is the estimated coefficient of dummy variable; for example, the estimated coefficient of college education degree is 0.414, and then the sheepskin effects of college education is \({e^{0.414}} - 1\) = 0.513.

  7. Because the parameter of inverse mills ratio is negative significantly, so the estimate by OLS (without modify self-selection bias) will overestimate these variables’ effects.

  8. The possible reason for the higher estimated results by IV than the estimated results by OLS is that, the IVs in our models may be not perfect and will raise the bias to some extent. This situation always occurs in previous studies on the returns to education. (Card 1999; Griliches 1977; Gunderson and Oreopoulos 2010).

References

  • Anna, C., & Mauricio, C. (2009). Sheepskin effects and the relationship between earnings and education: Analyzing their evolution over time in Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Economia, 63(3), 209–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arabsheibani, G., & Manfor, L. (2001). Non-linearities in returns to education in Libya. Education Economics, 9(2), 139–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1973). Higher education as a filter. Journal of Public Economics, 2(3), 193–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, T., Patrick, D., & Haisken-DeNew J, P. (2005). Sheepskin effects in Japan. International Journal of Manpower, 26(4), 320–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belman, D., & Heywood, J. (1997). Sheepskin effects by cohort: Implications of job matching in a signaling model. Oxford Economic Papers, 49(4), 623–637.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bian, Y. (1997). Bringing strong ties back in: Indirect ties, network bridges, and job searches in China. American Sociological Review, 62(3), 366–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitzan, J. (2009). Do sheepskin effects help explain racial earnings differences? Economics of Education Review, 28(6), 759–766.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, S., & Heckman, J. (1993). The nonequivalence of high school equivalents. Journal of Labor Economics, 11(Part 1), 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Card, D. (1999). The causal effect of education on earnings. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.) Handbook of labor economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterji, M., Seaman, P., & Singell, L. (2003). A test of the signaling hypothesis. Oxford Economic Papers, 55(2), 191–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevalier, A., Harmon, C., Walker, I., & Zhu, Y. (2004). Does education raise productivity, or just reflect it? Economic Journal, 142(11), 499–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. (1968). The concepts of equality of educational opportunity. Harvard Educational Review, 38(1), 7–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrer, A., & Riddell, W. (2002). The role of credentials in the Canadian labour market. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d’économique, 35(4), 879–905.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores-Lagunes, A., & Audrey, L. (2010). Interpreting degree effects in the returns to education. Journal of Human Resources, 45(2), 439–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. (2000). Sheepskin effects and the returns to education in New Zealand: Do they differ by ethnic groups. New Zealand Economic Papers, 34(2), 201–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. (1977). Estimating the returns to schooling: Some econometric problems. Econometrica, 45(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, M., & Oreopoulos, P. (2010). Returns to education in developed countries. In E. Barker, M. McGaw & P. Peterson (Eds.), International encyclopaedia of education. New York: Elsevier Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, D., Hu, Y., & Lin, J. (2014). Rates of return to education for china’s formal employments based on model specification test. Statistical Research, 31(8), 19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermalz, S. (2006). More detail on the pattern of returns to educational signals. Southern Economic Journal, 73(1), 125–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hungerford, T., & Solon, G. (1987). Sheepskin effects in returns to education. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 69(1), 175–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, D., & Page, M. (1996). Degrees matter: new evidence on sheepskin effects in the returns to education. Review of Economics and Statistics, 78(4), 733–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroch, A., & Sjoblam, K. (1994). Schooling as human capital or signal: Some evidence. Journal of Human Resources, 29(1), 156–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layard, R., & Psacharopoulous, G. (1974). The screening hypothesis and the returns to education. Journal of Political Economy, 82(5), 985–998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, F., & Ding, X. (2005). Investigating job matching status to test the screen hypothesis: An application of the wiles test in Chinese graduate labor market. Peking University Education Review, 4, 50–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, F., Morgan, W., & Chen, X. (2008). The effects of absolute years and relative rankings of schooling on earnings in China: The test for productive function and informational function of education. Chinese Journal of Population Science, 1, 67–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z., & Tan, Z. (2011). The analysis of graduate employment under the function of human capital and social capital. Modern University Education, 2, 38–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., & Morley, G. (2013). Credential effects and the returns to education. Labour: Review of Labour Economics and Industrial Relations, 27(2), 225–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Z. (2015). Long-term change in returns to higher education in China: 1988–2007. Peking University Education Review, 13(4), 65–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mary, S. (2008). Sheepskin effects in the returns to education. Applied Economics Letters, 15(3), 217–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mora, J., & Muro, J. (2008). Sheepskin effects by cohorts in Colombia. International Journal of Manpower, 29(2), 111–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olneck, M. (1977). The effects of education. In C. Christopher Jencks et al. (Eds.), Who gets ahead? The determinants of economic success in America. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oosterbeek, H. (1992). Study duration and earnings: A test in relation to the human capital versus screening debate. Economics Letter, 40(2), 223–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pons, E. (2006). Diploma effects by gender in the Spanish labour market. Labour, 20(1), 139–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pons, E., & Blanco, M. (2005). Sheepskin effects in the Spanish labour market: A public-private sector analysis. Education Economics, 13(3), 331–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riddell, C. W. (2008). Understanding ‘sheepskin effects’ in the returns to education: The role of cognitive skills. Canada: Department of Economics, University of Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, G. (1979). Testing the educational screening hypothesis. Journal of Political Economy, 87(5), 227–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, W. (1961). Investment in human capital. American Economic Review, 51(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shabbir, T. (2013). Sheepskin effects of investment in schooling: Do they signal family background? case of Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Commerce & Social Sciences, 7(1), 43–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shabbir, T., & Ashraf, J. (2011). Interpreting sheepskin effects of investment in schooling. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 5(2), 202–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, H., & Zhang, Q. (2015a). Quantitative analysis of diploma effects of personal return of education: Evidence from China. Education & Economy, 1, 29–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, H., & Zhang, Q. (2015b). Diploma effects under the interaction between labor market segmentation and family capital. Educational Research, 36(8), 22–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Su, L., & Meng, D. (2013). Strong ties or weak ties: The using of college graduates’ social capital in employment. Journal of Huazhong Normal University, 52(5), 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trostel, P., Walker, I., & Wooley, P. (2002). Estimates of the economic returns to schooling for 28 countries. Labour Economics, 9(1), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., & Liu, Z. (2015). Education: Promoting the human capital or Signaling? Education & Economy, 6(4), 30–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen, D. (2005). The impacts of SES on higher education opportunity and graduate employment in China. Peking University Education Review, 3, 58–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y., & Wang, X. (2009). Occupational gender segregation and gender wage gap in urban China. Sociological Studies, 4, 88–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Zhao, Y., Park, A., & Song, X. (2005). Economic returns to schooling in urban china, 1988 to 2001. Journal of Comparative Economics, 33(4), 730–752.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Q. (2017). Is the signaling value of education higher in the public sector? an empirical study based on the sheepskin effects method. Education & Economy, 5, 27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., & Lin, D. (2014). Gender disparities between income and rate of return to education of migrant workers. Peking University Education Review, 12(3), 121–140.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Data analyzed in this paper were collected by the research project “Chinese General Social Survey (CGSS)” carried out by the National Survey Research Center, Renmin University of China (NSRC). The authors appreciate the assistance in providing data by the institutes and individuals aforementioned. The views expressed herein are those of the authors.

Funding

The research was supported by funds from the National Natural Science Foundation in China, for the project “The Relationship between the Value-Added in Higher Education and Graduates’ Employment: Theoretical Analysis and Empirical Examination Based on Educational Economics” (Grant No. 71673097).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhiyuan Liu.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Q., Liu, Z. Substitution or complementation: the influence of parents’ educational level on sheepskin effects in the individual returns to education in China. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 20, 595–606 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09578-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09578-0

Keywords

Navigation