Skip to main content
Log in

Socioeconomic Differences among Blacks in America: Over Time Trends

  • Published:
Race and Social Problems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Compared to Hispanic and Asian immigrants, black immigrants in the United States have been considerably less researched, and until very recently, black African immigrants remained a relatively understudied group. Using data from three waves of the US Census (1980, 1990, and 2000), we assess differences in earnings (and related measures of socioeconomic status) among male and female African Americans and black immigrants from Africa and the Caribbean. Results of the analysis suggest a sizeable earnings advantage for immigrants. Controlling for a host of human capital variables, however, reduced the gap between the earnings of African immigrants and native-born blacks, although the difference still remained statistically significant. No such attenuation was found for immigrants from the Caribbean. The results also indicate that for females only, the immigrant advantage has grown over time. Moreover, the findings show that additional years of work experience in the USA or in foreign countries correspond to a rather sizable increase in hourly earnings for both males and females, but, for males, this effect has grown weaker over time. Finally, men earned more than women, both overall and within comparison groups with the gap remaining relatively stable over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. According to a Migration Policy Institute report (McCabe 2011), the top countries of origin for the African-born in 2000 were, in alphabetical order, Egypt (138,194, or 9.3 % of all African immigrants), Ethiopia (148,221, or 9.9 %), Ghana (108,647, or 7.3 %), Kenya (87,267, or 5.8 %), and Nigeria (209,908, or 14.1 %). Other countries of birth for African immigrants with high numbers of immigrants in the United States included, alphabetically: Cameroon (30,726, or 2.1 %), Cape Verde (32,885, or 2.2 %), Eritrea (23,840, or 1.6 %), Liberia (72,111, or 4.8 %), Morocco (58,283, or 3.9 %), Sierra Leone (32,467, or 2.2 %), South Africa (82,339, or 5.5 %), and Sudan (35,821, or 2.4 %).

  2. The other key variable, of course, is gender (Corra and Kimuna 2009). As noted below, the work of Lopez (2003), for example, suggests that gender is a key variable that must be taken into account when examining immigrant adaptation.

  3. For the purpose of convenience, the term “native-born blacks” is used interchangeably with African Americans throughout this paper.

  4. This argument also implies that if men’s migration is more frequently motivated by economic incentives than women’s, immigrant men will be more positively selected. Chiswick (1978), for example, uses this line of reasoning to explain the slightly greater earnings advantage of sons whose only foreign-born parent was a father as compared to those whose only foreign-born parent was a mother.

  5. Notably, one study (Kalmijn 1996) also found generational differences in attainment between immigrant, second and later-generation Caribbean blacks; with the later generations generally indicating higher socioeconomic status. Implicitly, this means, at least for second and later-generation British Caribbeans, further gains on African Americans as compared to those gains for the immigrant’s generation.

  6. One study (Butcher 1994) uncovered an unexpected but interesting and important finding that is worth noting: remarkable similarity between native-born black “movers” (men who had moved out of their state of birth to another) and black Jamaican and other Caribbean immigrant men “on a variety of employment and wage measures” (p. 265, also see Model 2008). This finding suggests positive selectivity for both immigrants and native-born “movers,” suggesting migration to be the key variable, and not nativity.

  7. Nevertheless, an important and lasting contribution of Sowell’s (1978) essay is that it emphasized another dimension to the study of race and ethnicity in the United States that, until then, remained relatively under-studied: black immigrants as a natural comparison group to native-born blacks.

  8. As of the date of the preparation of this manuscript, IPUMS data for 2010 Census was not available. Analysis of ACS (American Community Survey) data for 2001–2010 (not reported here, but available upon request), however, revealed patterns that were very similar to those reported below.

  9. For a complete description of the IPUMS dataset (including sample and variable descriptions, data compilation and storage), see the IPUMS website at http://www.ipums.org.

  10. We avoid the frequently followed practice of randomly selecting 10 % of the African American sample for analysis (Dodoo 1997; Dodoo and Takyi 2002; Model 1991; Corra and Kimuna 2009), because, by sampling only 10 % of the native-born African Americans, but using all cases from Africa and from the Caribbean, most regression coefficients are almost certainly misleading because the weight of native African Americans on these coefficients is reduced. Also, the reliability (the precision) of the findings is almost certainly reduced by cutting back on the sample size. Only the interaction between holding a college degree and place of origin overcomes the first problem (regression coefficients), but the problem of losing precision remains. Hence, we run regression models on the full African American sample.

  11. English proficiency or the ability to understand and speak English well varies across immigrant groups. It should be noted that this variable is self-reported in the census documents, thus, it is a subjective measure of the ability to understand and speak the English language well.

  12. Ideally, one would want to control for labor market conditions that might affect earnings. However, our data were not conducive to this type of analysis. As a rather weak proxy, we computed three-way interaction terms for group of origin, region, and urban residence and entered them into the models. The results were not significant across any of the groups and their inclusion did not change the substantive conclusions presented below. We also used state of residence instead of region as the location control and the results were the same.

  13. We ran additional models and found that men earned more than women, both overall and within comparison groups.

  14. Use of a logged dependent variable allows interpretation of coefficients as percentage changes in the dependent variable, once the appropriate calculation has been made: percent change in the dependent variable for a unit change in the independent variable = (e B − 1)*100.

  15. Corra and Kimuna’s recent analysis (2009) similarly finds subtle but important earnings differences among female African Americans, African, and Caribbean immigrants. After distinguishing Caribbean immigrants into three categories of linguistic heritage—English, French, and Spanish—Corra and Kimuna (2009) report noticeably higher average earnings for African, English, and French Caribbean immigrant women than that for their African American counterparts.

  16. One interpretation of this finding is that the earnings advantage of African immigrants, relative to native-born blacks, to a sizeable degree, is accounted for by favorable earnings-related endowments possessed by African immigrants (Dodoo 1997). By contrast, the fact that no such attenuation is found for Caribbean immigrants (both males and females) suggests that the advantage in earnings-related attributes like education and occupation that Caribbean immigrants exhibit over African Americans (see Table 2 above) does not fully account for the earnings difference between these two groups. As noted above, there is some evidence that black African immigrants face substantial discrimination in the US labor market (Scroggins 1989; Takougang 1995; Apraku 1996; Kposowa 2002). It may very well be the case that this is especially true for African immigrant males.

  17. Interaction/trend estimates that are not significant are not reported in Table 4. For males, this includes estimates for African, Caribbean, Immigrated under 16, married, citizenship, the English language dummies (none, poor, and good) and foreign degree; for females, it includes South, citizenship, the English language dummies, US experience and its squared term, and foreign experience and its squared term.

References

  • Apraku, K. (1991). African émigrés in the United States: A missing link to Africa’s social and economic development. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apraku, K. (1996). Outside looking in: An African perspective on American Pluralistic Society. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, E. M., Horan, P. M., & Tolbert, C. (1980). Industrial segmentation and labor market discrimination. Social Problems, 28(2), 113–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borch, C., & Corra, M. (2010). Differences in earnings among black and non-black African immigrants in the United States, 1980–2000: A cross-sectional and temporal analysis. Sociological Perspectives, 53(4), 573–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borjas, G. (1985a). Assimilation, changes in cohort quality, and the earnings of immigrants. Journal of Labor Economics, 3, 463–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borjas, G. (1985b). Self selection and the earnings of immigrants. American Economic Review, 77, 531–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borjas, G. (1987). Self selection and the earnings of immigrants. American Economic Review, 77, 531–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borjas, G., & Bronars, S. (1991). Immigration and the family. Journal of Labour Economics, 9(2), 123–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, I., & Misra, J. (2003). The intersection of gender and race in the labor market. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 487–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budig, M. J., & England, P. (2001). The wage penalty for motherhood. American Sociological Review, 66(2), 204–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, K. (1994). Black immigrants in the United States: A comparison with native blacks and other immigrants. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 47, 265–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, S. J., Corra, M., & Carter S. (2009). The Interaction of race and gender: Changing gender-role attitudes, 1974–2006. Social Science Quarterly, 90(1), 196–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiswick, B. (1978). The effects of americanization on the earnings of foreign born men. Journal of Political Economy, 86(5), 897–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiswick, B. (1979). The economic progress of immigrants: Some apparently universal patterns. In W. Fellner (Ed.), Contemporary economic problems (pp. 357–399). Washington, DC: The American Enterprise Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, S., Crenshaw, K., & McCall, L. (2013). Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications, and praxis. Signs, 38(4), 785–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, P. N., & Huffman, M. L. (2003). Occupational segregation and the devaluation of women’s work across U.S. labor markets. Social Forces, 81(3), 881–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. (2000a). Gender, black feminism, and black political economy. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 568, 41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. (2000b). Black feminist thought (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corra, M., & Kimuna, S. (2009). Double jeopardy? Female African and Caribbean immigrants in the United States. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35(6), 1015–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coverman, S. (1986). Occupational segmentation and sex differences in earnings. In R. Robinson (Ed.), Research in social stratification and mobility (Vol. 5, pp. 139–172). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djamba, Y. K. (1999). African immigrants to the United States: A socio-demographic profile in comparison to native blacks. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 34(2), 210–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djamba, Y., & Bean, F. (1999). Black and white African women in America: Demographic profile and socio-economic assimilation. African Population Studies, 14(1), 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodoo, F. N.-A. (1991a). Earnings differences among blacks in America. Social Science Research, 20, 93–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodoo, F. N.-A. (1991b). Immigrant and native black workers’ labor force participation in the United States. National Journal of Sociology, 5, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodoo, F. N.-A. (1991c). Blacks and earnings in New York State. Sociological Spectrum, 11, 203–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodoo, F. N.-A. (1991d). Minority immigrants in the United States: Earnings attributes and economic success. Canadian Studies in Population, 18, 42–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodoo, F. N.-A. (1997). Assimilation differences among Africans in America. Social Forces, 76, 527–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodoo, F. N.-A., & Takyi, B. K. (2002). Africans in the diaspora: Black–white earnings differences among America’s Africans. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 25(6), 913–941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Bois, W. E. B. (1962). Letter communication about the Proposed Encyclopedia Africana Project Accra, Ghana.

  • Dugger, K. (1988). Social location and gender-role attitudes: A comparison of Black and White women. Gender & Society, 2, 425–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foner, N. (1985). Race and color: Jamaican migrants in London and New York City. International Migration Review, 19, 708–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glazer, N., & Moynihan, D. (1963). Beyond the melting pot. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T Press and Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greeley, A. (1976). Ethnicity, denomination, and inequality . Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, L. (1992). Who prospers?. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawk, B. (1992). Africa’s media image. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, R. (1973). Toward a theory of racial differences in employment. Social Forces, 52, 16–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, R., & Kaufman, R. (1982). Economic dualism: A critical review. American Sociological Review, 47(6), 727–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hossfeld, K. (1994). Hiring immigrant women: Silicon valley’s simple formula. In M. Zinn & B. Dill (Eds.), Women of color in U.S. Society,. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasso, G. (2007a). Dimensions of immigration and gender. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Sociological Association, New York.

  • Jasso, G. (2007b). Immigration and American inequality. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Sociological Association, New York.

  • Kalmijn, M. (1996). The socioeconomic assimilation of Caribbean American Blacks. Social Forces, 74, 911–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, E. W. (1992). Race, gender, and attitudes toward gender stratification. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55, 311–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasinitz, P. (1992). Caribbean New York: Black immigrants and the politics of race. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, R. L. (2002). Assessing alternative perspectives on race and sex employment segregation. American Sociological Review, 67(4), 547–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kent, M. M. (2007). Immigration and America’s Black population. Population Bulletin, 62(4), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korenman, S., & Neumark, D. (1991). Does marriage really make men more productive? Journal of Human Resources, 26(2), 282–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kposowa, A. J. (2002). Human capital and the performance of African immigrants in the U.S. labor market. The Western Journal of Black Studies, 26, 175–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, G. (1983). Main currents in Caribbean thought: The historical evolution of Caribbean Society in its ideological aspects, 1492–1900. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberson, S. (1980). A piece of the pie. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J. R., & Deane, G. (2003). Black diversity in metropolitan areas. New York: Lewis Mumford Center for Comparative Urban and regional Research, University of Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, N. (2003). Hopeful girls, troubled boys: Race and gender disparity in urban education. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, K. (2011). African immigrants in the United States. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute. http://www.migrationinformation.org/USfocus/display.cfm?ID=847. Accessed 6 Jan 2014.

  • McCall, L. (2001). Complex inequality: Gender, class, and race in the new economy. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, L. (2005a). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(3), 1771–1800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCall, L. (2005b). Gender, race, and the restructuring of work: Organizational and institutional perspectives. In P. Tolbert, R. Batt, S. Ackroyd, & P. Thompson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of work and organization (pp. 74–94). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mincer, J. (1974). Schooling, experience, and earnings. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishel, L., Bernstein, J., & Allegretto, S. (2007). The state of working America, 2006. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Model, S. (1991). Caribbean immigrants: A black success story? International Migration Review, 25, 248–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Model, S. (1995). West Indian prosperity: Fact or fiction? Social Problems, 42, 535–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Model, S. (1997). An occupational tale of two cities: Minorities in London and New York. Demography, 34, 539–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Model, S. (2008). West Indian immigrants: A black success story?. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Model, S., & Ladipo, D. (1996). Context and opportunity: Minorities in London and New York. Social Forces, 75, 485–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mpanya, M. (1995). Stereotypes of hunger in U.S. hunger appeals. In D. Shields (Ed.), The color of hunger (pp. 25–33). New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oaxaca, R. (1973). Male–female wage differentials in urban labor markets. International Economic Review, 14(3), 693–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A., & Bach, R. (1985). Latin journey: Cuban and Mexican immigrants in the United States. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A., & Böröcz, J. (1989). Contemporary immigration: Theoretical perspectives on its determinants and modes of incorporation. International Migration Review, 23(3), 606–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A., & Rumbaut, R. G. (2001). Legacies: The story of the immigrant second generation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A., & Rumbaut, R. G. (2006). Immigrant America: A portrait. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, J. (1986). Immigration and the future of the U.S. black population. Population Today, 14, 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reskin, B. F. (1988). Bringing the men back in: Sex differentiation and the devaluation of women’s work. Gender & Society, 2(1), 58–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, G. (2007). Contemporary sociological theory and its classical roots: The basics. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roos, P. A. (1990). Review of revolving doors: Sex segregation and women’s careers, by Jerry Jacobs. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 1315–1316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, A. (1951). Some thoughts on the distribution of earnings. Oxford Economic Papers, 3, 135–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scroggins, D. (1989). Atlanta: A Magnet for Emigres, but Racial Barriers a Surprise. Atlanta Journal and Constitution, August 20, B1.

  • Sowell, T. (1978). Three black histories. In T. Sowell & L. D. Collins (Eds.), Essays and data on American ethnic groups (pp. 7–64). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowell, T. (1981). Ethnic America: A history. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowell, T. (1994). Race and culture: A world view. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, D. (2002). Signs of a boom in African influx: Surge’s impact seen throughout country. The Washington Post.

  • Takougang, J. (1995). Black immigrants to the United States. The Western Journal of Black Studies, 19, 50–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomaskovic-Devey, D. (1993). Gender and racial inequality at work. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Immigration and Naturalization Service. (1998). Statistical yearbook of the U.S. immigration and naturalization service. Washington, DC: Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, M. (1994a). Differing perspectives of racism: West Indians, African Americans and whites in the workplace. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Sociological Association, Los Angeles, California.

  • Waters, M. (1994b). Ethnic and racial identities of second-generation black immigrants in New York City. International Migration Review, 28, 795–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. L. (1992). The hidden escalator: Hidden advantages for men in the ‘female’ professions. Social Problems, 39(3), 253–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaffiro, J. (1992). Review of the Western media and the stereotyping of Africa. Africa Today, 39, 81–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeleza, P. T. (2002). Contemporary African migration in a global context. African Issues, 30(1), 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinn, B. M., & Dill, T. (1996). Theorizing difference from multiracial feminism. Feminist Studies, 22(2), 321–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mamadi K. Corra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Corra, M.K., Borch, C. Socioeconomic Differences among Blacks in America: Over Time Trends. Race Soc Probl 6, 103–119 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12552-014-9114-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12552-014-9114-5

Keywords

Navigation