Abstract
Open Education Resources (OER) may support students in the Global South, who experience high cost of educational materials. This research aims to understand how students from the Global South adopt OER using the lens of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) with the concept of playfulness. In addition, we also explored the effect of cultural factors, such as long-term orientation (LTO) and indulgence versus restraint (IVR) on OER adoption intention. 1527 students from 27 higher education institutions in eight countries in the Global South participated in the study. Multilevel linear modeling was used to test the individual-level and cross-level hypotheses. The results suggested that perceived usefulness (PU), perceived ease of use (PEOU), and playfulness had a significant impact on students’ intention to adopt OER. Furthermore, playfulness also strengthened the relationship between PU and the intention to adopt OER. Although the two cultural factors did not have a direct impact on students’ intention to adopt OER, IVR moderated the relationship between PU and students’ intention to adopt OER. Our research contributes to the theory of technology adoption and culture as well as the practice of OER in the Global South. institutions in eight countries in the Global South participated in the study. Multilevel linear modeling was used to test the individual-level and cross-level hypotheses. The results suggested that perceived usefulness (PU), perceived ease of use (PEOU), and playfulness had a significant impact on students’ intention to adopt OER. Furthermore, playfulness also strengthened the relationship between PU and the intention to adopt OER. Although the two cultural factors did not have a direct impact on students’ intention to adopt OER, IVR moderated the relationship between PU and students’ intention to adopt OER. Our research contributes to the theory of technology adoption and culture as well as the practice of OER in the Global South.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data sharing
The data collected and the questionnaire were published on figshare repository after undergoing a quality assurance and de-identification process (Oliveira Neto & Rodello, 2020). The CCBY license was selected.
References
Abeywardena, I., & Dhanarajan, G. (2012). OER in Asia Pacific: Trends and Issues. Policy Forum for Asia and the Pacific: Open Education Resources Organised by UNESCO Bangkok and Commonwealth of Learning (COL), Thailand, (April), 1–4.
Abeywardena, I. S., Dhanarajan, G., & Chan, C. S. (2012). Searching and Locating OER: Barriers to the Wider Adoption of OER for Teaching in Asia. Proceedings of the Regional Symposium on Open Educational Resources: An Asian Perspective on Policies and Practice, Penang, Malaysia.
Ajjan, H., & Hartshorne, R. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt web 2.0 technologies: theory and empirical tests. The Internet and Higher Education, 11, 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.05.002.
Althunibat, A. (2015). Determining the factors influencing students’ intention to use m-learning in Jordan higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 65–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.046.
Apriyantopo, W., & Aprianingsih, A. (2020). Information communication and technology (ICT) adoption in asian countries: an empirical evidence of economic and socio-cultural factors. Binus Business Review, 11(3), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.21512/bbr.v11i3.6299.
Bagchi, K., Hart, P., & Peterson, M. F. (2004). National culture and information technology product adoption. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 7(4), 29&46.
Bearden, W. O., Money, R. B., & Nevins, J. L. (2006). A measure of long-term orientation: development and validation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(3), 456–467.
Blodgett, J. G., Bakir, B., & Rose, G. M. (2008). A test of the validity of Hofstede’s cultural framework. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 25(6), 339–349.
Bukowski, A., & Rudnicki, S. (2019). Not only individualism: The effects of long-term orientation and other cultural variables on national innovation success. Cross-Cultural Research, 53(2), 119–162.
Castañeda, J. A., Muñoz-Leiva, F., & Luque, T. (2007). Web Acceptance Model (WAM): moderating effects of user experience. Information & Management, 44, 384–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2007.02.003.
Chung, J., & Tan, F. B. (2004). Antecedents of perceived playfulness: an exploratory study on user acceptance of general information-searching websites. Information & Management, 41, 869–881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.08.016.
Cigdem, H., & Topcu, A. (2015). Predictors of instructors’ behavioral intention to use learning management system: a turkish vocational college example. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.049.
Dados, N., & Connell, R. (2012). The Global South. Contexts, 11(1), 12–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070306286706.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 318–340.
De Mooij, M., & Hofstede, G. (2010). The Hofstede model: applications to global branding and advertising strategy and research. International Journal of advertising, 29(1), 85–110.
Eringa, K., Caudron, L. N., Rieck, K., Xie, F., & Gerhardt, T. (2015). How relevant are Hofstede’s dimensions for inter-cultural studies? A replication of Hofstede’s research among current international business students. Research in Hospitality Management, 5(2), 187–198. https://doi.org/.
Fang, X., Chan, S., Brzezinski, J., & Xu, S. (2005). Moderating Effects of Task Type on Wireless Technology Acceptance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22, 123–157. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222220305.
Fernández Robin, C., McCoy, S., Yáñez Sandivari, L., & Yáñez Martínez, D. (2014). Technology Acceptance Model: worried about the Cultural Influence?. In F. F. H. Nah (Ed.), HCI in Business. Springer International Publishing.
Figlio, D., Giuliano, P., Ozek, U., & Sapienza, P. (2018).Long-Term Orientation and Educational Performance.
Gong, W., Li, Z. G., & Stump, R. L. (2007). Global internet use and access: cultural considerations. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 19(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1108/13555850710720902.
Guo, Q., Liu, Z., Li, X., & Qiao, X. (2018). Indulgence and long term orientation influence prosocial behavior at national level. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(SEP), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01798.
Hackbarth, G., Grover, V., & Yi, M. Y. (2003). Computer playfulness and anxiety: positive and negative mediators of the system experience effect on perceived ease of use. Information & Management, 40, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00006-X.
Hadad, S. (2017). Knowledge Economy: Characteristics and Dimensions. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 5(2), 203–225. https://doi.org/10.25019/mdke/5.2.03
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (Sixth ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Henderson, S., & Ostashewski, N. (2018). Barriers, incentives, and benefits of the open educational resources (OER) movement: An exploration into instructor perspectives. First Monday. 23(12). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v23i12.9172
HMBP, R. (2016). Role of National Culture on the Use of e-Government Services in Sri Lanka. Journal of Business & Financial Affairs, 5(2), https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0234.1000182.
Hodgkinson-Williams, C., & Arinto, P. B. (2017). Adoption and impact of OER in the Global South (171204-AM-ROER4D-combined-Web). In Adoption and impact of OER in the Global South. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1005330
Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values - Volume 5 de Cross Cultural Research and Methodology Series. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.br/books?id=Cayp_Um4O9gC&printsec=frontcover&hl=pt-PT#v=onepage&q&f=false
Hofstede, G. (1995). Multilevel research of human systems: flowers, bouquets and gardens. Human Systems Management, 14(3), 207–217.
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: the Hofstede Model in Context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014.
Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G. J. (2005). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw Hill.
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the mind: Intercultural Cooperation and its importance for Survival. New York: McGrawHill.
Hofstede, G., & Minkov, M. (2013). Values survey module 2013 manual.
Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Hsu, H. F., Wong, W. T., & Chen, M. Y. (2012). Applying the technology acceptance model in a study of the factors affecting usage of the Taiwan digital archives system. Computers & Education, 57, 2086–2094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.011.
Hoque, M. R., & Bao, Y. (2015). Cultural influence on adoption and use of e-Health: evidence in Bangladesh. Telemedicine and e-Health, 21(10), 845–851.
Hox, J. J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: techniques and applications (2nd ed.). Routledge Academic.
Hsiao, H., Wang, P., & Lu, S. (2018). Using the Technology Acceptance Model to analyze the learning outcome of Open Education Resources. Chinese Business Review, 17(9), 479–487. https://doi.org/10.17265/1537-1506/2018.09.004.
Hung, S. Y., Tsai, J. C. A., & Chou, S. T. (2016). Decomposing perceived playfulness: a contextual examination of two social networking sites. Information & Management, 53, 698–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.02.005.
Im, I., Hong, S., & Kang, M. S. (2011). An international comparison of technology adoption: testing the UTAUT model. Information and Management, 48(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2010.09.001.
Kim, B. W., Lee, W. G., Lee, B. R., & Shon, J. G. (2015). Influencing factors in OER usage of adult learners in Korea. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 16(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i2.2051.
Kim, S. (2015). National culture and public service motivation: investigating the relationship using Hofstede’s five cultural dimensions. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(1), 23–40.
King, W. R., & He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 43, 740–755. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6VD0-4KJDWWR1/2/d3b98b0264bec28d6c581e2127e00176
King, M., Pegrum, M., & Forsey, M. (2018). MOOCs and OER in the Global South: Problems and potential. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(5). 1–19.
Kiraz, E., & Ozdemir, D. (2006). The relationship between educational ideologies and technology acceptance in pre-service teachers. Educational Technology and Society, 9(2), 152–165.
Lai, C., Wang, Q., Li, X., & Hu, X. (2016). The influence of individual espoused cultural values on self-directed use of technology for language learning beyond the classroom. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 676–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.039.
Laitinen, E. K., & Suvas, A. (2016). Financial distress prediction in an international context: moderating effects of Hofstede’s original cultural dimensions. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 9, 98–118.
Lee, B. C., Yoon, J. O., & Lee, I. (2009). Learners’ acceptance of e-learning in south Korea: theories and results. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1320–1329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.014.
Lee, S. G., Trimi, S., & Kim, C. (2013). The impact of cultural differences on technology adoption. Journal of world business, 48(1), 20&29.
Liu, Y., Li, H., & Carlsson, C. (2010). Factors driving the adoption of m-learning: an empirical study. Computers & Education, 55, 1211–1219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.018.
Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A., & Williams, S. A. (2013). MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012. International review of research in open and distributed learning, 14(3), 202–227.
Luppicini, R. (2005). A systems definition of educational technology in society. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 8(3), 103–109.
Mahomed, A. S. B., McGrath, M. G., & Yuh, B. Z. (2017). The impact of Hofstede’s National Culture on usage of emails among Academician in Malaysian Public Universities. International Journal of Economics and Management, 11(1), 153–185.
Manochehri, N. N., & Sharif, K. (2009, September). Impact of classroom technologies on individual learning behavior-A Case Study. In 2009 IEEE Toronto International Conference Science and Technology for Humanity (TIC-STH) (pp. 200–205). IEEE.
McCoy, S., Galletta, D. F., & King, W. R. (2007). Applying TAM across cultures: the need for caution. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(1), 81–90.
McCoy, S., Everard, A., & Jones, B. M. (2005). An examination of the technology acceptance model in Uruguay and the us: a focus on culture. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 8(2), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2005.10856395.
Merkin, R. S. (2004). Cultural long-term orientation and facework strategies. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 12(3), 163-176.
Minkov, M., & Hofstede, G. (2012). Hofstede’s fifth dimension: new evidence from the World values Survey. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 43(1), 3–14.
Mohammadi, H. (2015). Social and individual antecedents of m-learning adoption in Iran. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 191–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.006.
Moon, J. W., & Kim, Y. G. (2001). Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context.Information & Management, 38,217–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00061-6
Murphy, A. (2013). Open educational practices in higher education: Institutional adoption and challenges. Distance education, 34(2), 201–217.
Nascimbeni, F., & Burgos, D. Unveiling the Relationship between the Use of Open Educational Resources and the Adoption of Open Teaching Practices in Higher Education, Sustainability 2019, 11,5637; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205637
Ngimwa, P., & Wilson, T. (2012). An empirical investigation of the emergent issues around OER adoption in Sub-Saharan Africa. LEARNING MEDIA AND TECHNOLOGY, 37(4), 398–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2012.685076.
OCDE (1996). The knowledge-based economy organisation for economic co-operation and development. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=OCDE/GD%2896%29102&docLanguage=En
Oliveira, & Neto (2020). José Dutra; Rodello, Ildeberto Aparecido.: Data on the Open Educational Resources differentiation in Global South. figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12195075
Padilla-Meléndez, A., del Aguila-Obra, A. R., & Garrido-Moreno, A. (2013). Perceived playfulness, gender differences and technology acceptance model in a blended learning scenario. Computers & Education, 63, 306–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.014.
Park, S. B., Chung, N., & Woo, S. C. (2013). Do reward programs build loyalty to restaurants? The moderating effect of long-term orientation on the timing and types of rewards. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 23(3), 225–244.
Peña-García, N., Gil-Saura, I., Rodríguez-Orejuela, A., & Siqueira-Junior, J. R. (2020). Purchase intention and purchase behavior online: a cross-cultural approach. Heliyon, 6(6), 1–11. e04284.
Persico, D., Manca, S., & Pozzi, F. (2014). Adapting the Technology Acceptance Model to evaluate the innovative potential of e-learning systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 614–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.045.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879.
Ryu, S., & Moon, C. W. (2009). Long-term orientation as a determinant of relationship quality between channel members. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 8(11). 1–10.
Sánchez, R. A., & Hueros, A. D. (2010). Motivational factors that influence the acceptance of Moodle using TAM. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1632–1640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.011.
Schoonenboom, J. (2014). Using an adapted, task-level technology acceptance model to explain why instructors in higher education intend to use some learning management system tools more than others. Computers & Education, 71, 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.016.
Singh, S. (2006). Cultural differences in, and influences on, consumers’ propensity to adopt innovations. International Marketing Review, 23(2), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651330610660074.
Sledgianowski, D., & Kulviwat, S. (2009). Using Social Network Sites: the Effects of playfulness, critical Mass and Trust in a hedonic context. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 49, 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2009.11645342.
Solomon, D. L. (2000). Toward a post-modern agenda in instructional technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02300497.
Srite, M., & Karahanna, E. (2006). The role of espoused national cultural values in technology acceptance.MIS Quarterly,679–704.
Sriwindono, H., & Yahya, S. (2012). The effects of cultural dimension on MIS acceptance. 2012 IEEE 6th International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology, ICMIT 2012, 424–429. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMIT.2012.6225843
Straub, E. T. (2009). Understanding Technology Adoption: theory and future directions for Informal Learning. Review of Educational Research, 79, 625–649. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325896.
Sørnes, J. O., Stephens, K. K., Sætre, A. S., & Browning, L. D. (2004). The Reflexivity between ICTs and Business Culture: Applying. Informing Science, 7, 1–30.
Šumak, B., Hericko, M., Pušnik, M., & Polančič, G. (2017). Factors affecting university students’ use of moodle: an empirical study based on TAM. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 13(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.2017010102.
Teo, T., & Huang, F. (2019). Investigating the influence of individually espoused cultural values on teachers’ intentions to use educational technologies in chinese universities. Interactive Learning Environment, 27(5–6), 813–829.
Teo, T., Lee, C. B., Chai, C. S., & Wong, S. L. (2009). Assessing the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers in Singapore and Malaysia: a multigroup invariance analysis of the technology acceptance model (TAM). Computers & Education, 53(3), 100–1009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.017.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wang, H. Y., & Wang, S. H. (2010). User acceptance of mobile internet based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: Investigating the determinants and gender differences. Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 38, 415–426. Retrieved from http://libproxy.unm.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=s3h&AN=48791136&site=eds-live&scope=site
Wang, Y. S., Wu, M. C., & Wang, H. Y. (2009). Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40, 92–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00809.x.
William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. (n.d.). Open Educational Resources. Hewlett Foundation (Blog). Retrieved on June 10 (2021). https://hewlett.org/strategy/open-educational-resources/.
Wiley, D., Bliss, T. J., & McEwen, M. (2014). Open Educational Resources: a review of the literature. In J. Michael Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 781–789). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_63.
Wong, G. K. W. (2016). The behavioral intentions of Hong Kong primary teachers in adopting educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64, 313–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9426-9LB - Wong2016.
Yoo, B., Donthu, N., & Lenartowicz, T. (2011). Measuring Hofstede’s five dimensions of cultural values at the individual level: development and validation of CVSCALE. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 23(3–4), 193–210.
Yoon, C. (2009). The effects of national culture values on consumer acceptance of e-commerce. Information & Management, 46(5), 294–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2009.06.001.
Zhou, Z., Jin, X. L., Fang, Y., & Vogel, D. (2015). Toward a theory of perceived benefits, affective commitment, and continuance intention in social virtual worlds: cultural values (indulgence and individualism) matter. European Journal of Information Systems, 24(3), 247–261. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.27.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank ROER4D project and International Development Research Centre for their support of this work.
Funding
The data collection presented in this manuscript was carried out with the aid of a grant from the International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
de Oliveira Neto, J.D., Law, V. & Kang, S.“. Adoption of open educational resources in the global south. J Comput High Educ (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-023-09351-8
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-023-09351-8