Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Exploring the effects of corpus-based business English writing instruction on EFL learners’ writing proficiency and perception

  • Published:
Journal of Computing in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This exploratory research presents the implementation and evaluation of the effects of integrating corpus consultation with business English writing instruction. The subjects consisted of English as a foreign language (EFL) learners enrolled in two undergraduate business English writing classes. Two groups of EFL students were randomly assigned, one group (n = 49) receiving corpus-based writing instruction constructed on a Moodle course management system (CMS), while the other group (n = 58) was given traditional lecture-based instruction. A mixed methods design combining qualitative and quantitative approaches has been chosen to investigate the overall effect of the corpus-based intervention on the improvement of business letter writing performance in aspects of lexical and syntactic complexity, as well as learners’ perceptions. The comparison of the pre- and post-tests of writing revealed a significant difference between the experimental and control groups after the instruction. Significant differences in students’ lexical and syntactic complexity were found between the pre- and post-test of the experimental group. Further, in response to a questionnaire survey and interview, the students stated they improved their writing skills regarding vocabulary, syntactic structure and content in general, and their writing confidence and linguistics awareness were also enhanced. The results suggest that the corpus provides useful resources to supplement existing materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balance, O. J. (2017). Pedagogical models of concordance use: correlations between concordance user preferences. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(3–4), 259–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1307228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, F., & Eckhardt, S. E. B. (2007). Applying corpus-based findings to form-focused instruction: The case of reported speech. Language Teaching Research, 11(3), 319–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benavides, C. (2015). Using a corpus in a 300-level Spanish grammar course. Foreign Language Annals, 48(2), 218–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardini, S. (2004). Corpora in the classroom: An overview and some reflections on future developments. In J. M. Sinclair (Ed.), How to use corpora in language teaching (pp. 15–36). John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatia, V. (1993). Analyzing genre: Language use in professional settings. Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, J. (2009). The design of an online concordancing program for teaching about reporting verbs. Language Learning and Technology, 13(1), 59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulton, A. (2009a). Testing the limits of data-driven learning: Language proficiency and training. ReCALL, 21(1), 37–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulton, A. (2009b). Data-driven learning: Reasonable fears and rational reassurance. Indian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 35(1), 81–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulton, A. (2010). Data-driven learning: Taking the computer out of the equation. Language Learning, 60(3), 534–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulton, A., & Cobb, T. (2017). Corpus use in language learning: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 67(2), 348–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulté, B., & Housen, A. (2014). Conceptualizing and measuring short-term changes in L2 writing complexity. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26, 42–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnard, P., Gill, P., Steward, K., Treasure, E., & Chadwick, B. (2008). Analysing and presenting qualitative data. British Dental Journal, 204, 429–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, A. (2007). Popularising corpus consultation by language learners and teachers. In E. Hidalgo, L. Quereda, & J. Santana (Eds.), Corpora in the foreign language classroom (pp. 3–16). Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, A., & O’Sullivan, Í. (2004). Corpus consultation and advanced learners’ writing skills in French. ReCALL, 16, 158–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, T. P., & Liou, H. C. (2005). Effects of web0based concordancing instruction on EFL students’ learning of verb-noun collocations. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(3), 231–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, J. Y. (2014). The use of general and specialized corpora as reference sources for academic English writing: A case study. ReCALL, 26(2), 243–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C. F., & Kuo, C. H. (2011). A corpus-based approach to online materials development for writing research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 30, 222–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H. J. H. (2011). Developing and evaluating a web-based collocation retrieval tool for EFL students and teachers. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(1), 59–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M.-H., Huang, S.-T., Chang, J. S., & Liou, H.-C. (2015). Developing a corpus based paraphrase tool to improve EFL learners’ writing skills. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(1), 22–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2013.783873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, T. (1997). Is there any measurable learning from hands-on concordancing? System, 25, 301–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotos, E. (2014). Enhancing writing pedagogy with learner corpus data. ReCALL, 26(2), 202–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotos, E., Link, S., & Huffman, S. (2017). Effects of DDL technology on genre learning. Language Learning and Technology, 21(3), 104–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, A. (2007). Getting to ’know’ connectors? Evaluating data-driven learning in a writing skills course. In E. Hidalgo, L. Quereda, & S. Juan (Eds.), Corpora in the foreign language classroom (pp. 267–287). Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daskalovska, N. (2015). Corpus-based versus traditional learning of collocations. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(2), 130–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demirel, E. T. (2017). Detection of common errors in Turkish EFL students’ writing through a corpus analytic approach. English Language Teaching, 10(10), 159–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong, J., & Lu, X. (2020). Promoting discipline-specific genre competence with corpus-based genre analysis activities. English for Specific Purposes, 58, 138–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flowerdew, L. (2012). Exploiting a corpus of business letters from a phraseological, functional perspective. ReCALL, 24(2), 152–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankenberg-Garcia, A., Lew, R., Roberts, J. C., Rees, G. P., & Sharma, N. (2019). Developing a writing assistant to help EAP writers with collocations in real time. ReCALL, 31(1), 23–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaskell, D., & Cobb, T. (2004). Can learners use concordance feedback for writing errors? System, 32, 301–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilquin, G., Granger, S., & Paquot, M. (2007). Lerner corpora: the missing link in EAP pedagogy. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(4), 319–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey-Scholes, C. (2018). Computer-assisted detection of 90% of EFL student errors. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(1–2), 144–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, A. (2007). Evaluating language learners’ response to web-based, data-driven, genre teaching materials. English for Specific Purposes, 26, 462–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Z. (2014). The effects of paper-based DDL on the acquisition of lexico-grammatical patterns in L2 writing. ReCALL, 26(2), 163–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunston, S. (2002). Corpora in applied linguistics. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns, T. (1988). Micro-concord: A language learner’s research tool. System, 14(2), 151–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns, T. F., Hsingchin, L., & Lixun, W. (2008). Integrating corpus-based CALL programs in teaching English through children’s literature. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(5), 483–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaur, J., & Hegelheimer, V. (2005). ESL students’ use of concordance in the transfer of academic word knowledge: An exploratory study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(4), 287–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, C., & Miceli, T. (2010). Corpus-assisted created writing: Introducing intermediate Italian learners to a corpus as a reference resource. Language Learning and Technology, 14(1), 28–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kılıçkaya, F. (2015). Computer-based grammar instruction in an EFL context: Improving the effectiveness of teaching adverbial clauses. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(4), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2013.818563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotamjani, S. S., Razavi, O. F., & Hussin, H. (2017). Online corpus tools in scholarly writing: A case of EFL postgraduate student. English Language Teaching, 10(9), 61–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, S. L., & Chen, H. J. H. (2015). Dictionaries vs concordancers: Actual practice of the two different tools in EFL writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(4), 341–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laufer, B., & Waldman, T. (2011). Verb-noun collocations in second language writing: A corpus analysis of learners’ English. Language Learning, 61(2), 647–672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D., & Swales, J. (2006). A corpus-based EAP course for NNS doctoral students: Moving from available specialized corpora to self-compiled corpora. English for Specific Purposes, 25, 56–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H., Warschauer, M., & Lee, J. H. (2019). The effects of corpus use on second language vocabulary learning: A multilevel meta-analysis. Applied Linguistics, 40(5), 721–753. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, S. (2017). Using corpora to develop learners’ collocational competence. Language Learning and Technology, 21(3), 153–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y. C., & Yeh, Y. L. (2005). Online learning units on underused adjectives for college EFL students. In Proceedings of the 14th Inter’l Symposium on English Teaching (vol. 2, pp. 157–165). Taipei: Crane.

  • Liu, D. (2011). Making grammar instruction more empowering: An exploratory case study of corpus use in the learning/teaching of grammar. Research in the Teaching of English, 45(4), 353–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, D., & Jiang, P. (2009). Lexicogrammatical approach to grammar instruction in EFL and ESL contexts. The Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, X. F. (2010). Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(4), 474–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, X. F. (2012). The relationship of lexical richness to the quality of ESL learners’ oral narratives. The Modern Language Journal, 96(2), 190–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, X. F. (2017). Automated measurement of syntactic complexity in corpus-based L2 writing research and implications for writing assessment. Language Testing, 34(4), 493–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEnery, T., & Wilson, A. (2001). Corpus linguistics (2nd ed.). Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, Í., & Chambers, A. (2006). Learners’ writing skills in French: Corpus consultation and learner evaluation. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 49–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paltridge, B. (2002). Thesis and dissertation writing: An examination of published advice and actual practice. English for Specific Purposes, 21, 125–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Paredes, P. (2019). A systematic review of the uses and spread of corpora and data-driven learning in CALL research during 2011–2015. Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1667832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Römer, U. (2011). Corpus research applications in second language teaching. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 205–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skorczynska, H. (2010). A corpus-based evaluation of metaphors in a business English textbook. English for Specific Purposes, 29, 30–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Y.-C. (2007). Learner perceptions of a concordancing tool for academic writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(4), 323–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Y. C., & Wang, L. Y. (2003). Concordancers in the EFL classroom: Cognitive approaches and collocation difficulty. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16(1), 83–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swales, J. (2002). Integrated and fragmented worlds: EAP materials and corpus linguistics. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 150–164). Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tribble, C. (1996). Writing. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, K. J. (2019). Corpora and dictionaries as learning aids: inductive versus deductive approaches to constructing vocabulary knowledge. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(8), 805–826. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1527366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, Y. C., & Liou, H. C. (2006). The effects of online conjunction materials on college EFL students’ writing. System, 34, 270–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upton, T. A., & Connor, U. (2001). Using computerized corpus analysis to investigate the textlinguistic discourse moves of a genre. English for Specific Purposes, 20, 313–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vergaro, C. (2004). Discourse strategies of Italian and English sales promotion letters. English for Specific Purposes, 23, 181–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, C. (2011). How a corpus-based study of the factors which influence collocation can help in the teaching of business English. English for Specific Purposes, 30, 101–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y. J. (2016). The effects of utilizing corpus resources to correct collocation errors in L2 writing—Students’ performance corpus use and perceptions. In S. Papadima-Sophocleous, L. Bradley, & S. Thouësny (Eds.), CALL communities and culture—papers from EUROCALL 2016 (pp. 479–484). Research-publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, X. W. (2018). A corpus-based study of modal verbs in Chinese learners’ academic writing. English Language Teaching, 11(2), 122–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, Y., Liou, H. C., & Li, Y. H. (2007). Online synonym materials and concordancing for EFL college writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(2), 131–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, C. (2011). Concordancing in L2 writing class: An overview of research and issues. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10, 130–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, H. (2008). More than a linguistic reference: The influence of corpus technology on L2 academic writing. Language Learning and Technology, 12(2), 31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, H., & Hirvela, A. (2004). ESL student attitudes toward corpus use in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 257–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, H., & Jo, J. W. (2014). Direct and indirect access to corpora: An exploratory case study comparing students’ error correction and learning strategy use in L2 writing. Language Learning and Technology, 18(1), 96–117.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the anonymous reviewers and the editor for their valuable comments. The research and the preparation of the manuscript were supported by the project NSC102‐2410‐H‐214‐011 of National Science Council, Taiwan. The author’s special thanks also goes to Mr. Patrick Quinlivan and Mr. Paul Briody for their suggestions to improve this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yea-Ru Tsai.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Interview questions

  1. 1.

    What are the most useful and valuable things you have learned in the course?

  2. 2.

    What corpus search activities have you done and for what type of information?

  3. 3.

    What have you learned from the corpus searches that you and your group members have done?

  4. 4.

    In learning what aspects of language have you found the use of corpora most useful?

  5. 5.

    What do you think are the greatest challenge(s) in the use of corpora for English learning?

  6. 6.

    What types of searches would you like to do more in the future for English learning?

  7. 7.

    Based on your learning this semester, what do you think is the relationship between grammar and vocabulary (entirely different or closely related) and why?

  8. 8.

    Besides what you have been provided, what additional help and resources would you like to have in the future in order to use corpora more effectively for English learning?

Appendix 2: Sample worksheet completed by a student: letter of application

Structural moves

Description of their function

Key words

Examples of sentences, phrases& expressions found by a student

Heading

The writer should write something personal information

  

—name, age and marital status (single/married)

Married

I've found that being married changes everything

—brief education (including Degree, Major courses, Special training)

Degree

University, which I left in 1952 with an Honours Degree (2A)

—skills/qualification, ex. language gaining/better customer contact/computer skills

Skills

Your organizational skills and attention to detail have made my job easier

Work experiences

The writer describes previous work experience to show positions and duties

  

—Previous experience, ex. While I was a team leader at (company), I worked for (time of work, ex. three months)

I worked for

Previously I worked for Aomori Beer Co. as an accountant

—Mention work relevant to the post you are applying for

Concerned with

I have been concerned with work in the electronic field since I graduated in physics at Manchester University at the age of 22

Reasons for leaving a job

If necessary, it’d better to write it as positive as you can

Left

She left for personal reasons and we were sorry indeed to lose her

Reasons for applying for the post

The writer explains why you want the job, and your particular skills and experiences would be valuable in the company

Experience

The attached resume summarizes my experience and demonstrates my successful advancement

Polite ending

The writer ends a letter with more information if necessary, ex. I look forward to hearing from you.

Look forward to

We look forward to a continuing good business relationship with you

Appendix 3: Excerpt of a participant’s letter of application in the pre-test and the post-test

Pre-test

Post-test

Dear Mr. Black

I saw the information on the craigslist that a translator is required in your company. And I would like to apply for this job. I am about to graduate from XXX University and majored in English. I have plenty of experience in translating since I was a translator in school newspaper, and I have also done some part-time job as a translator. Therefore, i believe that I am quite qualified for this job. In addition, I have also learned some basic German and Spanish. Besides, I am quite a diligent and responsible person. And I have a wide range of knowledge. I really hope that you can give a consideration to my application. I am looking forward to your reply

Best Regards,

Lizzy

Dear Miss Green,

My name is Lizzy Sun. I am an undergraduate in XXX University major in English. And I will graduate from the university in the June of next year with a bachelor’s degree. And I am writing to you to apply for the job vacancy

I have quite a lot working experience both in university and companies. In the first two year of my college years, I engaged in English Innovation Association in our university and have organized lots of English learning activities. Moreover, I was promoted to the manager of the association and have successfully held four different kinds of English competition during my term. On the other hand, I have also worked as an intern in marketing of a language teaching school. My main work is to introduce the teaching principle and methods to the potential customers and post advertisements online. During the internship I have gain many skills of communicating to the customers. In the last summer holiday, I fortunately got a chance to work as an intern in an international company. The work is also concerned with marketing skills. And I have learned a lot during the working experience

Recently I saw your post on craigslist. I am particularly interested in opportunities at your company. And I believe that I am quite qualified for this job. Firstly, as you mentioned in your wanting list, my English is quite good as I am majored in applied English in university and I can communicate in English very fluently which I believe has reached your requirement. Secondly, I have lots of experience in marketing department as I have previously worked in two company concerned with marketing area. Last but not the least, I personally is very interested in travel. And I have visited lots of beautiful countries and cities before. I firmly believe that my experiences and enthusiasm enables me be an satisfying employees in your company

I really hope that you can give consideration to my job application and we can have further discussion about the job. I am looking forward to your reply

Best regards,

Lizzy Sun

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsai, YR. Exploring the effects of corpus-based business English writing instruction on EFL learners’ writing proficiency and perception. J Comput High Educ 33, 475–498 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-021-09272-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-021-09272-4

Keywords

Navigation