Abstract
Photogrammetric 3D modeling of archaeological excavations, structures and monuments using archival photographs has achieved encouraging results thus far. This paper discusses the limitations posed by analogue archival photographs in photogrammetric processes and limiting the photographs used to one moment in time as well as photogrammetric methods with regard to camera calibrations by eliminating elements that reduce the quality of the modeling. This can be particularly important for models using archival photographs from different cameras and photographic times. When archival photographs are made available in an online database, there have been a number of processing elements that contribute to a reduction in the quality and accuracy of the photographs and their ability to be used viably in 3D modeling. Based primarily on retrospective photogrammetric projects undertaken in 2018, this paper demonstrates how archival photographs can perform at a level equivalent to contemporary digital photographs which have metadata. The work presented here illustrates the use of photographs archived by American School of Classical Studies in Athens for reconstructing archaeological sites in the Athenian Agora in order to aid in ascertaining deterioration as well as determining means of preservation and restoration.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barazzetti L, Mussio L, Remondino F, Scaioni M (2011) Targetless camera calibration. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci 38(Part 5/W16):8
Condorelli F, Rinaudo F. 2018 Cultural heritage reconstruction from historical photographs and videos, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLII-2, 259-265
Dawson I, Jones AM, Minkin L, Reilly P (2022) Temporal Frankensteins and Legacy Images. Digital 2:244–266. https://doi.org/10.3390/digital2020015
Eleftheriou V, Manidaki V (2010) Photogrammetric documentation as a tool for architectural research in the Acropolis works. Acropolis Restoration News 10:35–38
Falkingham PL, Bates KT, Farlow JO (2014) Historical photogrammetry: Bird’s Paluxy River dinosaur chase sequence digitally reconstructed as it was prior to excavation 70 years ago. PLoS ONE 9(4):e93247
Gruen A, Remondino F, Zhang Li (2002) Reconstruction of the Great Buddha of Bamiyan Afghanistan. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens 34(5):363–368
Johnson GW, Kase EW (1977) Mapping an ancient trade route with balloon photography. Photogrammetric Eng Remote Sens, 1489–1493
Maiwald F, Vietze T, Schneider D, Henze F, Münster S, Niebling F (2017) Photogrammetric analysis of historical image repositories for virtual reconstruction in the field of digital humanities. In: The international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences, Volume XLII-2/W3. Proceedings of the 3D Virtual Reconstruction and Visualization of Complex Architectures (1–3 March 2017, Nafplio, Greece).
Mavromati D (2010) Orthophotography and monuments The Problems of Photogrammetric Documentation of the Ancient Monuments. Acropolis Restoration News 10:16–19
Moullou D, Mavromati D (2007) Topographic and photogrammetric recording of the Acropolis of Athens. Proc. Of XXI International CIPA Symposium. 1–6 October, Athens, Greece, 515–520.
Moullou D (2010) The project “Development of Geographical Information Systems on the Acropolis of Athens” managing scientific questions of documentation. Acropolis Restoration News 10:12–15
Remondino F, Menna F (2008) Image-based surface measurement for close-range heritage documentation. Int Arch Photogrammetry, Remote Sens Spatial Inform Sci 37(5):199–2006
Thompson EH (1962) Photogrammetry in the restoration of Castle Howard. Photogram Rec 4:94–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9730.1962.tb00334.x
Wallace C (2016) Photogrammetry in Mediterranean Archaeology. UWSpace. http://hdl.handle.net/10012/10344
Wallace C (2017) Retrospective photogrammetry in Greek Archaeology. Stud Digital Heritage 1(2):607–626. https://doi.org/10.14434/sdh.v1i2.23251
Wallace CAB (2021) Retrospective Photogrammetry: ‘Building a Time Machine’. In: Handbook of cultural heritage analysis, 1st edn. Springer, pp 1643–1676
Whittlesey JH, Myers JW (1975) Whittlesey Foundation Field Season, 1975. J Field Archaeol 2(4):351–361. https://doi.org/10.1179/009346975791490908
Whittlesey JH, Wilson Myers J, Allen C (1977) The Whittlesey Foundation 1976 Field Season. J Field Archaeol 4(2):181–196. https://doi.org/10.1179/jfa.1977.4.2.181
Zawieska D, Markiewicz JS, Kopiasz J, Tazbir JS, Tobiasz A (2017) 3D modelling of the Lusatian Borough in Biskupin using archival data. In International archives of photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information science., XLII-2/W3, 665-669, 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W3-665-2017
Acknowledgements
Special thanks to Stephen Perry of Highart photography, New Zealand, James Herbst, John Camp, Craig Mauzy and Bruce Hartzler of The American School of Classical Studies in Athens and Betsey Robinson of Vanderbilt University, Tennessee for all of their kind assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Wallace, C.A.B. Refinement of retrospective photogrammetry: an approach to 3D modeling of archaeological sites using archival data. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 14, 192 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-022-01632-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-022-01632-0