Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of geotechnical parameters for urban site in southern Khamis Mushait city, southwest Saudi Arabia, using seismic refraction method

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study includes the determination of the engineering physical parameters of a proposed urban expansion site at Khamis Mushait city, SW Saudi Arabia. The seismic refraction survey as a noninvasive seismic technique was used to determine the P wave velocity profile of the soil section in the studied site. This method provides a simplified characterization of subsurface in two-dimensional depth-velocity profiles. Seismic records obtained were processed and analyzed by SeisImager software to obtain one-dimensional P wave velocity (Vp) distribution. The measured P wave velocities were used to estimate relative density, N value, modulus of elasticity, uniaxial compression strength, ultimate tensile strength, ultimate bearing capacity, allowable bearing capacity, Poisson’s ratio, and rock quality designation. The results indicate that the investigated site is composed mainly of two soil layers. The top layer is interpreted as loose incompetent soil sediments (alluvial sediments) to the depth of 5 m with V p ranging between 300 and 880 m/s. This layer is underlain by the second competent soil layer with thickness reaching 18 m and V p ranging between 1,097 and 2,626 m/s. The second layer is considered as the foundation layer, and its determined engineering physical parameters are vital information for the engineers in construction and urban development of this site.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abd Elrahman MM (1989) Evaluation of the kinetic moduli of the surface materials and application to engineering geologic maps at Ma’Barrisabah area (Dhamar Province), Northern Yemen. Egypt J Geol 33:228–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Almadani S, Ibrahim E, Abdelrahman K, Al-Bassam A, Al-Shmrani A (2014) Magnetic and seismic refraction survey for site investigation of an urban expansion site in Abha district, south west Saudi Arabia. Arab J Geosci. doi:10.1007/s12517/014/1342/x

    Google Scholar 

  • Altindag R (2012) Correlation between P-wave velocity and some mechanical properties for sedimentary rocks. J South Afr Inst Min Metall 112:229–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Bery AA, Saad R (2012) Correlation of seismic P-wave velocities with engineering prameters (N value and rock quality) for tropical environmental study. Int J Geosci 3:749–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowles JE (1984) Physical and geotechnical properties of soils. Mc Graw-Hill International Book Company, London, 578p

    Google Scholar 

  • Brich F (1960) The velocity of compressional waves in rocks to 10 kbars: part 1. J Geophys Res 65:1083–1102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chary KB, Sarma LP, Lakshmi KJP, Vijayakumar NA, Lakshmi VN, Rao MV (2006) Evaluation of engineering properties of rock using ultrasonic pulse velocity and uniaxial compressive strength. Proceedings of the National seminar on Non-destructive evaluation, Hyderabad, pp 379–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng H, Hu ZY (2003) Some factors affecting the uniaxial strength of weak sandstone. Bull Eng Geol Environ 62:323–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’andrea DV, Fischer RL, Fogelson DE (1965) Prediction of compressive strength from other rock properties. US Bur Min Rep Invest 6702:23

    Google Scholar 

  • Deere DU, Miller RP (1966) Engineering classification and index properties for intact rock. Air Force Weapons Laboratory Technical Report, AFWL-TR 65–116, Kirtland Base, New Mexico

  • Entwisle DC, Hobbs PRN, Jones LD, Gunn D, Raines MG (2005) The relationships between effective porosity, uniaxial compressive strength and sonic velocity of intact Borrowdale volcanic group core samples from Sellafield. Geotech Geol Eng 23:793–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner GHF, Gardner LW, Gregory AR (1974) Formation velocity and density: the diagnostic basis for stratigraphic traps. Geophysics 39:770–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaviglio P (1989) Longitudinal wave propagation in a limestone: the relationship between velocity and density. Rock Mech Rock Eng 22:299–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geometrics Company (2009) SeisImager 2D software version 3.14

  • Hunt RE (1986) Geotechnical engineering analysis and evaluation. McGraw Hill-Ryerson, 729p

  • Inoue M, Ohomi M (1981) Relation between uniaxial compressive strength and elastic wave velocity of soft rock. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Weak Rock, Tokyo, pp 9–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Khandelwal M (2013) Correlating P-wave velocity with the physico-mechanical properties of different rocks. Pure Appl Geophys 170:507–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khandelwal M, Ranjith PG (2010) Correlating index properties of rocks with P-wave measurements. J Appl Geophys 71:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopf M, Müller HJ, Gottesmann B (1985) Correlation between pyroxene content and Vp and Vs under high pressure. Kapicka, A., Kropacek, V., Pros, Z. (eds.). Physical properties of the mineral system of the Earth’s Interior. Union Czech. Math. Phys., Prague, pp. 168–172

  • Lama RD, Vutukuri VS (1978) Handbook on mechanical properties of rocks. Trans. Tech. Publications, Clausthal, vol. 2, Germany

  • Mccann DM, Culshaw MG, Northmore KJ (1990) Rock mass assessment from seismic measurements, Field Testing in Engineering Geology. Bell, Culshaw, Cripps, and Coffey (eds.). Geological Society Publishing House, London, vol. 6,pp. 257–266

  • Parry RHC (1977) Estimating bearing capacity of sand from SPT values. JGED ASCE 103:1013–1045

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma PK, Singh TN (2008) A correlation between P-wave velocity, impact strength index, slake durability index and uniaxial compressive strength. Bull Eng Geol Environ 67:17–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh TN, Kripamoy S (2005) Geotechnical investigation of Amiyan landslide hazard zone in Himalayan region. Geotechnical Engineering for Disaster Mitigation and Rehabilitation, Uttaranchal

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjogren B (1984) Shallow refraction seismics. Champman and Hall, London, 270p

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yasar E, Erdogan Y (2004) Correlating sound velocity with density, compressive strength and Young’s modulus of carbonate rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41:871–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youash Y (1970) Dynamic physical properties of rocks: part 2, experimental result. Proceedings of the 2nd Congress of the International Society for Rock Mechanics, vol. 1, Privredni Pregled, Beograd, Yugoslavia, pp. 185–195

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to extend their sincere appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at king Saud University for funding this Research group No. RG -1435-035.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sattam Almadani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Almadani, S., Al-Amri, A., Fnais, M. et al. Evaluation of geotechnical parameters for urban site in southern Khamis Mushait city, southwest Saudi Arabia, using seismic refraction method. Arab J Geosci 8, 6225–6236 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1615-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1615-4

Keywords

Navigation