Skip to main content
Log in

Medical Responsibility and Clinical Guidelines: A Few Remarks from Two Italian Juridical Cases

  • Published:
Medicine Studies

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this paper is to assess the complex issue of responsibility in clinical practice. The paper focuses mainly on the relationship between personal- and medical-professional responsibility of practitioners and clinical guidelines.

Methods

After a theoretical review of the different definitions of responsibility in selected bioethical and biojuridical literature, two recent juridical proceedings concerning medical responsibility from Italian Courts are discussed. Subsequently, a theoretical analysis of the definition of clinical practice guidelines is proposed in order to show their feasibility to assess personal- and medical-professional responsibility.

Results

The definitions of responsibility and the two Italian cases show the theoretical and practical difficulties of shared assessments of both personal-professional and medical-professional responsibility in clinical practice. Clinical practice guidelines cannot be assumed as an objective code of action stating exactly a rule of conduct in all situations, but as a tool suggesting how to decide what to do in different conditions.

Conclusions

Responsibility in clinical practice is such a complex issue to deserve a special ethical assessment. The clinician’s personal-professional responsibility cannot be replaced or reduced by clinical practice guidelines, because medicine is as such a relationship focused on the expertize of practitioners. Nonetheless, a shared approach to different clinical conditions is needed in order to avoid a relativist outcome and protect patients’ and even clinicians’ rights. Formal guidelines (that describe not exactly what to do but how to decide what to do) are proposed as potential useful tool to achieve this aim.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AGREE Collaboration. 2003. Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: The AGREE project. Quality and Safety in Health Care 12(1): 18–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AGREE Next Steps Consortium. 2009. The AGREE II instrument (Electronic version). From http://www.agreetrust.org. Retrieved 07 Dec 2011.

  • Associazione Nazionale Medici Dirigenti—ANAAO-ASSOMED. 2011. Lettera del Presidente Costantino Troise alla Presidente della Federazione Nazionale dei Medici Chirurghi e Odontoiatri (FNOMCeO) e al Presidente della Federazione delle Società Medico-Scientifiche Italiane (FISM) del 16 marzo 2011. Prot. N. 155/2011/Snrm). From http://www.anaao.it/userfiles/lettera_fnom-fism_16marzo2011.pdf. Retrieved 07 Dec 2011.

  • Bloom, A.E. 1995. Law. In International encyclopaedia of ethics, ed. K.K. Roth, 485–488. London: Fitzroy Deaborn Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwers, M.C., M.E. Kho, G.P. Browman, J.S. Burgers, F. Cluzeau, G. Feder, B. Fervers, I.D. Graham, S. Hanna, and M.J. Makarski. 2010a. Development of the AGREE II, part 1: Performance, usefulness and areas for improvement. Canadian Medical Association Journal 182(10): 1045–1052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouwers, M.C., M.E. Kho, G.P. Browman, J.S. Burgers, F. Cluzeau, G. Feder, B. Fervers, I.D. Graham, S. Hanna, and M.J. Makarski. 2010b. Development of the AGREE II, part 2: Assessment of validity of items and tools to support application. Canadian Medical Association Journal 182(10): E472–E478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cane, P. 1992. An introduction to administrative law. Oxford: Clarendon.

  • Cane, P. 2002. Responsibility in law and morality. Portland: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cane, P. 2004. Responsibility in law and morality: Book’s symposium, author’s introduction. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 29: 160–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conference on Guideline Standardization (COGS). 2002. The COGS statement. From http://gem.med.yale.edu/cogs/statement.do. Retrieved 07 Dec 2011.

  • Corte di Cassazione (Quarta Sezione Penale). 2010. Sentenza n. 1873/2010 del 24 aprile 2010, depositata il 2 marzo 2011.

  • Corte di Cassazione (Quarta Sezione Penale). 2011. Sentenza n. 13758/2011 del 20 gennaio 2011, depositata il 7 aprile 2011.

  • Cribb, A. 2005. Health and the good society: Setting healthcare ethics in social context. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, J. 2005. Responsibility. In International encyclopaedia of ethics, ed. K.K. Roth, 742–745. London: Fitzroy Deaborn Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duff, R.A. 1998. Responsibility. In Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy, vol. 9, ed. E. Craig, 290–294. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Editorial Guiding the guidelines. 2011. Lancet 377(9772): 1125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellwood, P.M. 1988. Outcomes management, a technology of patient experience. New England Journal of Medicine 318: 1549–1556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feder, G., M. Eccles, R. Grol, C. Griffiths, and J. Grimshaw. 1999. Using clinical guidelines. British Medical Journal 318: 728–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forssen, A., E. Meland, I. Hetlevik, and R. Strand. 2011. Rethinking scientific responsibility. Journal of Medical Ethics 37(5): 299–302. doi:10.1136/jme.2010.038828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French, P. (ed.). 1999. The spectrum of responsibility. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

  • Hawkins, K. 1992. The uses of discretion. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasparro, N. 2009. Diritto Sanitario. Legislazione, organizzazione, amministrazione, etica e lavoro. Milano: Il Sole 24 ORE S.p.A.

  • Graham, R., M. Mancher, D. Miller Wolman, S. Greenfield, and E. Steinberg (eds.). 2011. Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greco, M., A. Pagni, and A. Panti (eds.). 2006. Guida all’esercizio professionale per i medici-chirurghi e gli odontoiatri. Torino: C. G. Edizioni Medico Scientifiche.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R.M., A. Donovan, and S.A. Jauss (eds.). 2008. Global bioethics. Issues of conscience for the twenty-first century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H.L.A. 1968. Punishment and responsibility. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgs, R. 1997. Responsibility. In The new dictionary of medical ethics, ed. K.M. Boyd, R. Higgs, and A.J. Pinching, 222–223. London: BMJ Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurwitz, B. 1999. Legal and political considerations of clinical practice guidelines. British Medical Journal 318: 661–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Medicine. 1992. Guidelines for clinical practice. From development to use. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medical Professionalism Project. 2002. Charter on medical professionalism. Medical professionalism in the new millennium: A physicians’ charter. Lancet 359(9305): 520–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minhas, R. 2007. Eminence-based guidelines: A quality assessment of the Second Joint British Societies’ guidelines on the prevention of cardiovascular disease. International Journal of Clinical Practice 61(7): 1137–1144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moschetti, I., D. Brandt, R. Perera, M. Clarke, and C. Heneghan. 2011. Adequacy of reporting monitoring regimens of risk factors for cardiovascular disease in clinical guidelines: Systematic review. British Medical Journal 342: d1289. doi:10.1136/bmj.d1289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neiburg Terkel, A., and S. Duval. 1999. Responsibility. In: Encyclopedia of ethics, Vol. 234. New York: Facts on file.

  • NHS Executive. 1996. Clinical guidelines. Leeds: NHSE.

  • Ogleterre, T.W. 2003. Responsibility. In: Encyclopedia of bioethics, Vol. 3, ed. Post, S.G., 2379–2385. New York: Macmillan Reference—Thomson Gale.

  • Panti, A. 2004. La prospettiva etica. In La responsabilità del medico: professionale, penale, clinica e sociale, 29–30. Roma: Iniziative Sanitarie.

  • Paycheng, O., and S. Szerman. 2006. À la rencontre de l’éthique. Guide pratique des textes de référence. Les fondements du questionnement éthique dans le domaine de la santé. Paris: Éditions Heures de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raine, R., C. Sanderson, and N. Black. 2005. Developing clinical guidelines: A challenge to current methods. British Medical Journal 331: 631–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, T.M. 1998. What we owe to each other. Harvard: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidtz, D., and R.E. Goodin. 1999. Social welfare and individual responsibility: For and against. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shekelle, P.G., S.H. Woolf, M. Eccles, and J. Grimshaw. 1999. Clinical guidelines: Developing guidelines. British Medical Journal 318: 593–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, A. 2011. Editorial. Catching up with evidence-based medicine. Virtual Mentor 13(1): 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, K. 1995. Clinical guidelines and negligence liability. In Clinical effectiveness: From guidelines to cost effective practice, ed. M. Deighan, and S. Hitch, 127–135. Brentwood: Earlybrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinburne, R. 2005. Responsibility. In The shorter Routledge encyclopaedia of philosophy, vol. 906, ed. E. Craig. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. 2010. Report of the International Bioethics Committee of UNESCO (IBC) on social responsibility and health. From http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0018/001878/187899e.pdf. Retrieved 28 Sept 2011.

  • Vincent, N.A. 2009a. Responsibility: Distinguishing virtue from capacity. Polish Journal of Philosophy 3(1): 111–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, N.A. 2009b. What do you mean I should take responsibility for my own ill health? Journal of Applied Ethics and Philosophy 1: 39–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, N.A. 2010. On the relevance of neuroscience to criminal responsibility. Criminal Law and Philosophy 4: 77–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickline vs California. 1986. California. Reporter 228: 671–677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolf, S.H., R. Grol, A. Hutchinson, M. Eccles, and J. Grimshaw. 1999. Potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. British Medical Journal 318: 527–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Medical Association. 1949. International code of medical ethics. From http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/c8/. Retrieved 28 Sept 2011.

  • World Medical Association. 1995. WMA Statement on health promotion. From http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/h7/. Retrieved 28 09 2011.

  • World Medical Association. 1996. WMA statements on professional responsibility for standards of medical care. From http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/m8/. Retrieved 28 Sept 2011.

  • World Medical Association. 2009. Medical ethics manual. From http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/30ethicsmanual/pdf/ethics_manual_en.pdf. Retrieved 28 Sept 2011.

  • Zimmerman, M.J. 2001. The nature of intrinsic value. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlo Petrini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Petrini, C., Farisco, M. Medical Responsibility and Clinical Guidelines: A Few Remarks from Two Italian Juridical Cases. Medicine Studies 3, 157–169 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12376-012-0073-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12376-012-0073-0

Keywords

Navigation