Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Simulating Long-Term Effects of Trash Management on Sugarcane Yield for Brazilian Cropping Systems

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Sugar Tech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Historically, trash has been burnt in Brazil. Recently, increasingly crops are being harvested green with trash retailed as blanket (GCTB) due to environmental restrictions, and because of the trash use as a feedstock for bioenergy. The presence of a trash blanket affects sugarcane crops, by conservation of soil moisture and a potential to increase soil carbon (C) and nitrogen (N). To gain insights into the impacts of the burnt-to-green cane trash blanket transition, a simulation study was conducted with the APSIM-Sugar crop model. Simulations were conducted over 100 years for 3 locations: Piracicaba-SP, Palmas-TO, and Maceió-AL, addressing 2 research questions: (1) what is the yield impact of the transition from burnt to GCTB due to soil N, C and water changes; and (2) what is the impact of trash removal on yield in fields managed under GCTBs. Both questions were answered based on the same set of simulations. We simulated the transition to GCTB after 25 years of burnt management combining four N rates and 3 trash removal treatments [no trash removal, 50 % trash removal (50 %) and 90 % trash removal (90 %)]. Simulated sugarcane yields have potential to respond positively to trash retention, and stalk yield for 50 and 90 % treatments decreased at rates proportional to the trash removal rates for Maceió and Piracicaba. In Palmas, located in a drier region, simulations showed trash retention having a positive effect firstly due to soil water retention. In Piracicaba, simulations also illustrated the potential negative, short-term impact of trash blanketing on yields due to the N immobilization by the decomposing trash.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ball-Coelho, Batista, E. Sampaio, H. Tiessen, and J. Stewart. 1992. Root dynamics in plant and ratoon crops of sugar cane. Plant and Soil 142(2): 297–305. doi:10.1007/BF00010975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basanta, Maria V., Durval Dourado-Neto, Klaus Reichardt, O.S. Osni, Julio C.M. Bacchi, Paulo C.O. Oliveira, Luis C. Trivelin, Tania T. Timm, Vladia Correchel Tominaga, and F.A.M. Cássaro. 2003. Management effects on nitrogen recovery in a sugarcane crop grown in Brazil. Geoderma 116(1): 235–248.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bristow, K.L., and G.S. Campbell. 1984. On the relationship between incoming solar radiation and daily maximum and minimum temperature. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 31(2): 159–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortes, Caio, C.O. Trivelin Paulo, and C. Vitti. Andre. 2012. Long-term decomposition of sugarcane harvest residues in Sao Paulo state, Brazil. Biomass and Bioenergy 42: 189–198. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.03.011.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gava, Glauber J.C., C.O. Paulo, Mauro W. Trivelin, Oliveira, and Claudimir P. Penatti. 2001. Growth and accumulation of nitrogen by sugarcane cultivated in soil covered with cane trash. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 36(11): 1347–1354. doi:10.1590/S0100-204X2001001100004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, M.H., R.J. Haynes, and J.H. Meyer. 2002. Soil organic matter content and quality: Effects of fertilizer applications, burning and trash retention on a long-term sugarcane experiment in South Africa. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 34(1): 93–102. doi:10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00160-2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keating, B.A., M.J. Robertson, R.C. Muchow, and N.I. Huth. 1999. Modelling sugarcane production systems I. Development and performance of the sugarcane module. Field Crops Research 61(3): 253–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwong, KFNK, P.C. Cavalot Deville, and V. Riviere. 1987. Value of cane trash in nitrogen nutrition of sugarcane. Plant and Soil 102(1): 79–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marin, Fabio R., James W. Jones, Abraham Singels, Frederick Royce, Eduardo D. Assad, Giampaolo Q. Pellegrino, and Flávio Justino. 2012. Climate change impacts on sugarcane attainable yield in Southern Brazil. Climatic Change. doi:10.1007/s10584-012-0561-y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marin, Fabio, James W. Jones, Frederick Royce, Carlos Suguitani, Jose C. Donzelli, and Daniel S.P. Nassif. 2011. Parameterization and evaluation of predictions of DSSAT/CANEGRO for Brazilian sugarcane. Agronomy Journal 103(2): 304–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Ross D.J., Peter J. Thorburn, and Peter Larsen. 2000. Quantifying the loss of nutrients from the immediate area when sugarcane residues are burnt. In Proceedings of the 2000 Conference of the Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists Held at Bundaberg, Queensland, Australia, 206–211. http://www.cabdirect.org/abstracts/20001912598.html. Accessed 28 Aug 2013.

  • Oliveira, Mauro W., Paulo C.O. Trivelin, Claudimir P. Penatti, and Marisa C. Piccolo. 1999a. Field decomposition and release of sugar cane trash nutrients. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 34(12): 2359–2362. doi:10.1590/S0100-204X1999001200024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, Mauro W., Paulo C.O. Trivelin, Glauber J.de C. Gava, and Claudemir P. Penatti. 1999b. Sugarcane trash degradation. Scientia Agricola 56(4): 803–809. doi:10.1590/S0103-90161999000400006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Probert, M.E., J.P. Dimes, B.A. Keating, R.C. Dalal, and W.M. Strong. 1998. APSIM’s water and nitrogen modules and simulation of the dynamics of water and nitrogen in fallow systems. Agricultural Systems 56(1): 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radambrasil Project. 1973–1986. Brazilian natural resources survey. Inst. Brasileiro Geografia e Estatıstica, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. (in Portuguese).

  • Raij, Bernardo V., J.A. Heitor Cantarella, A.M. Quaggio, and C. Furlani. 1996. Fertilization recommendations for the State of São Paulo, 2nd ed. Campinas: Instituto Agronômico de Campinas - IAC. (Technical Bulletin, 100) (in Portuguese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, C.W., and D.A. Wright. 1984. WGEN: A model for generating daily weather variables. Agriculture Research Service 8: 83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, Fiona A., and Peter J. Thorburn. 2007a. Decomposition of sugarcane harvest residue in different climatic zones. Soil Research 45(1): 1–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, Fiona A., and Peter J. Thorburn. 2007b. Management of sugarcane harvest residues: Consequences for soil carbon and nitrogen. Soil Research 45(1): 13–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rossetto, Raffaella, L.F. Felipe, Marcos Dias, G.A. Landell, Heitor Cantarella, Sergio Tavares, André C. Vitti, and Daniel Perecin. 2010. N and K fertilisation of sugarcane ratoons harvested without burning. In Proc Int Soc Sugar Cane Technol 27: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, A.W., A.W. Wood, and P.G. Saffigna. 1996. Long term effects of green cane trash retention on herbert river soils. In Sugarcane: Research towards efficient and sustainable production, 178–180. Brisbane, Australia: CSIRO Division of Tropical Crops and Pastures.

  • Thorburn, P.J., Elisabeth A. Meier, and M.E. Probert. 2005. Modelling nitrogen dynamics in sugarcane systems: Recent advances and applications. Field Crops Research 92(2): 337–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorburn, P.J., B.A. Keating, F.A. Robertson, and A.W. Wood. 2000. Long-term changes in soil carbon and nitrogen under trash blanketing. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists 22: 217–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorburn, Peter J., Elisabeth A. Meier, K. Collins, and Fiona A. Robertson. 2012. Changes in soil carbon sequestration, fractionation and soil fertility in response to sugarcane residue retention are site-specific. Soil and Tillage Research 120: 99–111. doi:10.1016/j.still.2011.11.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorburn, Peter J., Jody S. Biggs, K. Collins, and M.E. Probert. 2010. Using the APSIM model to estimate nitrous oxide emissions from diverse Australian sugarcane production systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 136(3–4): 343–350.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thorburn, Peter J., M.E. Probert, and Fiona A. Robertson. 2001. Modelling Decomposition of Sugar Cane Surface Residues with APSIM-Residue. Field Crops Research 70(3): 223–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasella, Jose, and M.G. Hodnett. 1998. Estimating soil water retention characteristics from limited data in Brazilian Amazonia. Soil Science 163(3): 190.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vallis, I., W.J. Parton, B.A. Keating, and A.W. Wood. 1996. Simulation of the effects of trash and N fertilizer management on soil organic matter levels and yields of sugarcane. Soil and Tillage Research 38(1–2): 115–132. doi:10.1016/0167-1987(96)01014-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Antwerpen, R., J.H. Meyer, and P.E.T. Turner. 2001. The effects of cane trash on yield and nutrition from the long-term field trial at Mount Edgecombe. In Proceedings South African Sugarcane Technologists Association, 75: 235–241, Mount Edgecombe.

  • Van Antwerpen, R., Peter J. Thorburn, H. Horan, J.H. Meyer, and C.N. Bezuidenhout. 2002. The impact of trash management on soil carbon and nitrogen: II Implications for sugarcane production in South Africa. Proceedings of the South African Sugar Technologists’ Association 76: 269–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitti, André C., Heitor Cantarella, Paulo C.O. Trivelin, Raffaella Rossetto. 2008. Nitrogen. In Sugarcane, ed. Leila L. Dinardo-Miranda, 239–269. Campinas: IAC (in Portuguese).

  • Vitti, André C., C.O. Paulo, G.J. de Trivelin, C. Gava, Claudimir P. Penatti, Isabela R. Bologna, Carlos E. Faroni, C.J. Henrique, and Franco. 2007. Produtividade da cana-de-açúcar relacionada ao nitrogênio residual da adubação e do sistema radicular. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 42(2): 249–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, Andrew W. 1991. Management of crop residues following green harvesting of sugarcane in north Queensland. Soil and Tillage Research 20(1): 69–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr. Antonio Dias Santiago, Dr. Ronaldo Souza Resende, and Dr. Paulo Albuquerque Silva, from Embrapa Coastal Tablelands, for the experimental data from Alagoas, and for the comments on the simulations for Maceió, to Dr. Aderson Soares Andrade Jr. from Embrapa Mid-North, for the experimental data of União/PI, and to Dr. Joddy Biggs, CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, for the guidance in the APSIM-Sugar calibration. This research was partially supported by Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation—Embrapa (Project 02.11.01.025.00.00) and Brazilian Council for Science and Tecnology—CNPq (Projects 302872/2012-4 and 480702/2012-8).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fábio R. Marin.

Additional information

Paper presented at the XXVIII Congress of the International Society of Sugar Cane Technologists, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 24-27 June 2013 and published here with the agreement of the Society.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marin, F.R., Thorburn, P.J., da Costa, L.G. et al. Simulating Long-Term Effects of Trash Management on Sugarcane Yield for Brazilian Cropping Systems. Sugar Tech 16, 164–173 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-013-0265-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-013-0265-2

Keywords

Navigation