Abstract
Based on his previous elaborations on semiotic fitting, Kalevi Kull develops a relations-focused theory of beauty in the organic world. I will point to further strands of thought in the Western history of ideas that have introduced the convergence of the aesthetic and organic. The reflections of Immanuel Kant and the early romantics are foundational for these parallels, although not necessarily in concordance with the biocentric and biosemiotic stance of Kull. This comment also raises some questions related to the compatibility of some arguments with the authors who are mentioned as inspirational sources of the theory. In the end, additional authors are suggested as potential associates of biosemiotic aesthetics, authors who might help to broaden the scope of aesthetic phenomena covered by the theory.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Notes
Although the German word “empfundene” that Uexküll uses in the quoted phrase, leaves open, which mental operation would correspond to it in Kantian terms.
References
Beiser, F. C. (2003). The Romantic Imperative: The Concept of Early German Romanticism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Brentari, C. (2015). Jakob von Uexküll: the Discovery of the Umwelt between Biosemiotics and Theoretical Biology. Dordrecht: Springer
Cioran, E. (1976 [1973]). The Trouble with Being Born. New York: Arcade Publishing
Cioran, E. (1975 [1949]). A Short History of Decay. New York:Viking Press
Dalton, S. (2015). How Beauty Disrupts Space, Time and Thought: Purposiveness Without a Purpose in Kant’s Critique of Judgment. E-LOGOS – Electronic Journal for Philosophy, 22(1), 5–14
Kant, I. (2000 [1790]). Critique of the Power of Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Kull, K. (2020). Semiotic Fitting and the Nativeness of Community. Biosemiotics, 13(1), 9–19
Kull, K. (2021). Natural Selection and Self-Organization Do Not Make Meaning, while the Agent’s Choice Does. Biosemiotics, 14(1), 49–53
Kull, K. (2022). The Biosemiotic Fundamentals of Aesthetics: Beauty is the Perfect Semiotic Fitting. Biosemiotics, 15(1)
Otabe, T. (2005). Die Chiffreschrift der Natur. Ihr Zusammenhang mit der Kunst bei Kant, Schelling und Novalis. In L. Knatz, & T. Otabe (Eds.), Ästhetische Subjektivität: Romantik & Moderne (pp. 233–247). Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann
Rueger, A. (2007). Kant and the Aesthetics of Nature. The British Journal of Aesthetics, 47(2), 138–155
Schelling, F. W. J. (1800). System des transzendentalen Idealismus. Tübingen: Cotta
von Uexküll, J. (1913). In Gross, F. (Ed.), Bausteine zu einer biologischen Weltanschauung: Gesammelte Aufsätze. München: F. Bruckmann A-G
Zapffe, P. W. (2004 [1933]). The Last Messiah. Philosophy Now, 45, 35–39
Funding
Financial support was provided by Estonian Research Council Grant PRG314.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
I declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Magnus, R. Grounding Biosemiotic Aesthetics: Extensions Back and Forward. Biosemiotics 15, 41–45 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-022-09479-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-022-09479-7