Resume
La migration intravésicale du dispositif intra-utérin (DIU) par perforation utérine est une complication rare. Dans cette étude rétrospective monocentrique, nous présentons notre expérience de 5 cas colligés au sein de notre établissement entre 2004 et 2009. L’âge moyen de nos patientes est de 39 ans (32–48 ans). La symptomatologie clinique révélatrice était dominée par le syndrome irritatif vésical. Le diagnostic a été évoqué sur le couple écho/AUSP, puis confirmé par la cystoscopie. Le traitement a consisté en une lithotritie balistique du calcul avec extraction du stérilet par voie endoscopique chez 4 patientes et extraction chirurgicale chez une seule.
Abstract
Intravesical migration of intrauterine device (IUD) through a uterine perforation is a rare complication. In this retrospective study, we present our experience of 5 cases diagnosed in our institution between 2004 and 2009. The average age of our patients was 39 years (32–48 years). The clinical symptomatology was dominated by irritative bladder syndrome. The diagnosis was suggested on the plain abdominal X-ray and on ultrasound and, was confirmed by cystoscopy. The treatment consisted of ballistic lithotripsy of lithiasis and extraction of the IUD endoscopically in 4 patients and surgical removal in one.
Bibliographie
Chang CH, Chou CY, Lee WI, Tzeng CC, Liu CH. Pelvic actinomycosis with colo-ileo-vesical fistula formation: Report of a case. J.Formos.Med.Assoc. 1992; Mar;91(3):342–345.
Schwartzwald D, Mooppan UM, Tancer ML, Gomez Leon G, Kim H. Vesicouterine fistula with menouria: A complication from an intrauterine contraceptive device. J.Urol. 1986; Nov;136(5):1066–1067.
Joual A, Querfani B, Taha A, El Mejjad A, Frougui Y, Rabii R, et al. Intravesical migration of an intrauterine contraceptive device complicated by stones [Migration intravésicale d’un dispositif intra-utérin compliquée d’une lithiase]. Prog.Urol. 2004;14(3):374–375.
Haouas N, Sahraoui W, Youssef A, Thabet I, Mosbah AT. Migration intra-vesicale de dispositif intrauterin compliquee de lithiase [Intravesical migration of intrauterine device resulting in stone formation]. J.Gynecol.Obstet.Biol.Reprod.(Paris). 2006; May;35(3):288–292.
Bacha K, Ben Amna M, Ben Hassine L, Ghaddab S, Ayed M. Dispositif intra-uterin migre dans la vessie [Intrauterine device migrating to the bladder]. Prog.Urol. 2001; Dec;11(6):1289–1291.
Zeraïdi N. La migration intra-ovarienne d’un dispositif intra-utérin. J.Prat., XIII. 3:36–37.
Riethmuller D, Gay C, Benoit S, Roth P, Schaal JP, Maillet R, et al. Can adbominal migration of an IUCD be responsible for uterine rupture during pregnancy? [La migration abdominale d’un DIU peut-elle etre a l’origine d’une rupture uterine gravidique?]. Rev.Fr.Gynecol. Obstet. 1996;91(10):496–498.
Sparks RA, Purrier BG, Watt PJ, Elstein M. Bacteriological colonisation of uterine cavity: Role of tailed intrauterine contraceptive device. Br.Med.J.(Clin.Res.Ed). 1981; Apr 11;282(6271):1189–1191.
Ibghi W, Batt M, Bongain A, Declemy S, Proton A, Hassen Kodhja R, et al. Stenose de la veine iliaque par migration d’un dispositif intra-uterin [Iliac vein stenosis caused by intrauterine device migration]. J.Gynecol. Obstet.Biol.Reprod.(Paris). 1995;24(3):273–275.
Yalcin V, Demirkesen O, Alici B, Onol B, Solok V. An unusual presentation of a foreign body in the urinary bladder: A migrant intrauterine device. Urol.Int. 1998;61(4):240–242.
Kriplani A, Banerjee N, Hemal AK, Takkar D. Partial perforation of bladder by multiload. Aust.N.Z.J.Obstet.Gynaecol. 1999; Feb;39(1):133–135.
Grody MH, Nyirjesy P, Chatwani A. Intravesical foreign body and vesicovaginal fistula: A rare complication of a neglected pessary. Int.Urogynecol.J.Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1999;10(6):407–408.
Villani U, Leoni S, Pastorello M, Casolari E, Manferrari F. Actinomycosis of bladder and intrauterine devices. Br.J.Urol. 1987; Nov;60(5):463–464.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Barki, A., Ait Sakel, A., Benazzouz, M.H. et al. Migration Intravésicale du Dispositif Intra-Utérin à Propos de Cinq Cas. Afr J Urol 16, 60–64 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12301-010-0014-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12301-010-0014-7