Skip to main content
Log in

Migration Intravésicale du Dispositif Intra-Utérin à Propos de Cinq Cas

  • Article Original
  • Published:
African Journal of Urology Submit manuscript

Resume

La migration intravésicale du dispositif intra-utérin (DIU) par perforation utérine est une complication rare. Dans cette étude rétrospective monocentrique, nous présentons notre expérience de 5 cas colligés au sein de notre établissement entre 2004 et 2009. L’âge moyen de nos patientes est de 39 ans (32–48 ans). La symptomatologie clinique révélatrice était dominée par le syndrome irritatif vésical. Le diagnostic a été évoqué sur le couple écho/AUSP, puis confirmé par la cystoscopie. Le traitement a consisté en une lithotritie balistique du calcul avec extraction du stérilet par voie endoscopique chez 4 patientes et extraction chirurgicale chez une seule.

Abstract

Intravesical migration of intrauterine device (IUD) through a uterine perforation is a rare complication. In this retrospective study, we present our experience of 5 cases diagnosed in our institution between 2004 and 2009. The average age of our patients was 39 years (32–48 years). The clinical symptomatology was dominated by irritative bladder syndrome. The diagnosis was suggested on the plain abdominal X-ray and on ultrasound and, was confirmed by cystoscopy. The treatment consisted of ballistic lithotripsy of lithiasis and extraction of the IUD endoscopically in 4 patients and surgical removal in one.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Bibliographie

  1. Chang CH, Chou CY, Lee WI, Tzeng CC, Liu CH. Pelvic actinomycosis with colo-ileo-vesical fistula formation: Report of a case. J.Formos.Med.Assoc. 1992; Mar;91(3):342–345.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schwartzwald D, Mooppan UM, Tancer ML, Gomez Leon G, Kim H. Vesicouterine fistula with menouria: A complication from an intrauterine contraceptive device. J.Urol. 1986; Nov;136(5):1066–1067.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Joual A, Querfani B, Taha A, El Mejjad A, Frougui Y, Rabii R, et al. Intravesical migration of an intrauterine contraceptive device complicated by stones [Migration intravésicale d’un dispositif intra-utérin compliquée d’une lithiase]. Prog.Urol. 2004;14(3):374–375.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Haouas N, Sahraoui W, Youssef A, Thabet I, Mosbah AT. Migration intra-vesicale de dispositif intrauterin compliquee de lithiase [Intravesical migration of intrauterine device resulting in stone formation]. J.Gynecol.Obstet.Biol.Reprod.(Paris). 2006; May;35(3):288–292.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bacha K, Ben Amna M, Ben Hassine L, Ghaddab S, Ayed M. Dispositif intra-uterin migre dans la vessie [Intrauterine device migrating to the bladder]. Prog.Urol. 2001; Dec;11(6):1289–1291.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zeraïdi N. La migration intra-ovarienne d’un dispositif intra-utérin. J.Prat., XIII. 3:36–37.

  7. Riethmuller D, Gay C, Benoit S, Roth P, Schaal JP, Maillet R, et al. Can adbominal migration of an IUCD be responsible for uterine rupture during pregnancy? [La migration abdominale d’un DIU peut-elle etre a l’origine d’une rupture uterine gravidique?]. Rev.Fr.Gynecol. Obstet. 1996;91(10):496–498.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sparks RA, Purrier BG, Watt PJ, Elstein M. Bacteriological colonisation of uterine cavity: Role of tailed intrauterine contraceptive device. Br.Med.J.(Clin.Res.Ed). 1981; Apr 11;282(6271):1189–1191.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ibghi W, Batt M, Bongain A, Declemy S, Proton A, Hassen Kodhja R, et al. Stenose de la veine iliaque par migration d’un dispositif intra-uterin [Iliac vein stenosis caused by intrauterine device migration]. J.Gynecol. Obstet.Biol.Reprod.(Paris). 1995;24(3):273–275.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yalcin V, Demirkesen O, Alici B, Onol B, Solok V. An unusual presentation of a foreign body in the urinary bladder: A migrant intrauterine device. Urol.Int. 1998;61(4):240–242.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kriplani A, Banerjee N, Hemal AK, Takkar D. Partial perforation of bladder by multiload. Aust.N.Z.J.Obstet.Gynaecol. 1999; Feb;39(1):133–135.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Grody MH, Nyirjesy P, Chatwani A. Intravesical foreign body and vesicovaginal fistula: A rare complication of a neglected pessary. Int.Urogynecol.J.Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1999;10(6):407–408.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Villani U, Leoni S, Pastorello M, Casolari E, Manferrari F. Actinomycosis of bladder and intrauterine devices. Br.J.Urol. 1987; Nov;60(5):463–464.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Barki.

About this article

Cite this article

Barki, A., Ait Sakel, A., Benazzouz, M.H. et al. Migration Intravésicale du Dispositif Intra-Utérin à Propos de Cinq Cas. Afr J Urol 16, 60–64 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12301-010-0014-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12301-010-0014-7

Mots clés

Navigation