Skip to main content
Log in

Interaction of a golf ball with the flagstick and hole

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sports Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Changes to the Rules of Golf for 2019 allow a golfer to make a stroke from the putting green with the flagstick unattended in the hole. Such an action would previously incur a penalty. This work provides a model framework for the interaction among the ball, hole, and flagstick. The model is based in part on earlier work by Holmes, who examined the ball without the flagstick as allowed under the former rules. The interaction of the ball with the hole/flagstick area is evaluated for whether the ball is holed and for the final distance from the hole in the case of a miss. The flagstick is found to be of mixed benefit, performing more as a backstop as the impact with the flagstick becomes more central (head-on). Glancing blows at higher input angles are found to cause missed shots at lower velocities. Putts that are too fast to be made whether the flagstick is in or out of the hole are found to rest closer to the hole with the flagstick present. The implications are that shots for which the line of putt is better known (increasing the odds of central impact) and where speed may not be well controlled (e.g., greenside pitch shots) benefit from having the flagstick in the hole.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. If the ball center of mass is below the surface of the hole, the contact point will lie at \((x_c,y_c,z)\). However, the case of contact with the ball center of mass below the hole edge leads to capture of the ball and is thus not considered here.

  2. An angled flagstick will change this assumption.

  3. This is the sort of transition which leads to a putt exiting the hole on a horseshoe-shaped trajectory.

References

  1. Jorgensen T (1994) The physics of golf. Contemp Phys 35

  2. Penner A (2003) The physics of golf. Rep Prog Phys 66:131–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Betzler N, Slater C, Strangwood M, Monk S, Otto S, Wallace E (2011) The static and dynamic stiffness behaviour of composite golf shafts and their constituent materials. Sports Eng 14:27–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Swanek D, Carey J (2007) Braided composite materials for the production of lightweight, high rigidity golf shafts. Sports Eng 10:195–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McNally W, Henrikson E, McPhee J (2019) A continuous analytical shaft model for fast dynamic simulation of the golf swing. Sports Eng 22:20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. MacKenzie S, Springings E (2010) Understanding the mechanisms of shaft deflection in the golf swing. Sports Eng 12:69–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Petersen W, McPhee J (2010) Shape optimization of golf clubface using finite element impact models. Sports Eng 12:77–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Traub L, Munson A, McBurney J (2019) Experimental study of drag reduction on a golf driver club using discrete surface elements. Sports Eng 22:12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Monk S, Davis C, Otto S, Strangwood M (2005) Material and surface effects on the spin and launch angle generated from a wedge/ball interaction in golf. Sports Eng 8:3–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Crabill J, Witherden F, Jameson A (2019) High-order computational fluid dynamics simulations of a spinning golf ball. Sports Eng 22:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yaghoobian N, Mittal R (2018) A computational approach for predicting plant canopy induced wind effects on the trajectory of golf shots. Sports Eng 21:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Penner A (2002) The physics of putting. Can J Phys 80:83–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Daemi N, Henning S, Gilbert J, Yuya P, Ahmadi G (2016) On generalized rolling of golf balls considering an offset center of mass and rolling resistance: a study of putting. Sports Eng 19:35–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lindsay N (2003) Topspin in putters - a study of vertical gear-effect and its dependence on shaft coupling. Sports Eng 6:81–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Holmes B (1991) Putting: how a golf ball and hole interact. Am J Phys 59(2):129–136

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. United States Golf Association (2019) Rules of Golf. http://www.usga.org/content/usga/home-page/rules-hub.html. Accessed: 04 March 2019

  17. Mase T (2019) https://www.golfdigest.com/story/the-science-behind-why-the-flagstick-should-be-pulled-999-percent-of-the-time. Accessed: 12 Nov 2019

  18. Pelz D (2019) http://www.golf.com/instruction/2019/01/02/dave-plez-putt-with-the-flagstick-in-rule-change-2018. Accessed: 14 Oct 2019

  19. United States Golf Association (2012) Stimpmeter Instruction Booklet. Brochure, https://www.usga.org/content/dam/usga/pdf/imported/StimpmeterBookletFINAL.pdf

  20. Pelz D (2007) http://www.golf.com/instruction/dave-pelz-all-my-secrets. Accessed: 14 Oct 2019

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. N. Kuchnicki.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuchnicki, S.N. Interaction of a golf ball with the flagstick and hole. Sports Eng 24, 8 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-021-00347-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-021-00347-0

Keywords

Navigation