Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinicopathological features of breast cancer in Japanese female patients with Lynch syndrome

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Lynch syndrome (LS) is a predominantly inherited syndrome caused by a pathological germline mutation in one of the mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Whether breast cancer (BC) is one of the LS-associated tumors is controversial. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate the clinical features of BC in Japanese patients with LS.

Methods

Of 38 mutation carriers, 4 females with BC were examined in this study.

Results

Two of the four patients had multiple BC. Their median age at the diagnosis of BC was 63 (range, 47–84) years. The TNM (6th revision) stages of the six BCs were as follows: stage I, 33% (2/6); stage IIA, 50% (3/6); and stage IIB, 17% (1/6). Histological examination revealed four scirrhous, one papillotubular, and one medullary carcinoma. The positive ratios for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), and human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2) were 83.3% (5/6), 83.3% (5/6), and 16.7% (1/6), respectively. Two of the three specimens showed MSI-H and one showed MSS. These MSI-H BCs had tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Two of the three specimens showed an absence of MLH1 and PMS2 proteins on immunohistochemistry. The cumulative risks for a person with LS to develop BC were 4.35% at the age of 50 years, 8.70% at 60 years, and 21.5% at 70 years.

Conclusions

Our study results showed BC in Japanese females with LS to be an MSI-H tumor, which was ER and PgR positive and HER2 negative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Umar A, Boyer JC, Thomas DC, Nguyen DC, Risinger JI, Boyd J, et al. Defective mismatch repair in extracts of colorectal and endometrial cancer cell lines exhibiting microsatellite instability. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:14367–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Umar A, Boland CR, Terdiman JP, Syngal S, de la Chapelle A, Rüschoff J, et al. Revised Bethesda Guidelines for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome) and microsatellite instability. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:261–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Win AK, Lindor NM, Jenkins MA. Risk of breast cancer in Lynch syndrome: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res. 2013;15:27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Vasen HF. Clinical diagnosis and management of hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:81–92.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Heinimann K. Toward a molecular classification of colorectal cancer: the role of microsatellite instability status. Front Oncol. 2013;3:272.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Schouten JP, McElgunn CJ, Waaijer R, Zwijnenburg D, Diepvens F, Pals G. Relative quantification of 40 nucleic acid sequences by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Campeau PM, Foulkes WD, Tischkowitz MD. Hereditary breast cancer: new genetic developments, new therapeutic avenues. Hum Genet. 2008;124:31–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Easton DF. How many more breast cancer predisposition genes are there? Breast Cancer Res. 1999;1:14–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen S, Parmigiani G. Meta-analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 penetrance. J Clin Oncol. 2010;25:1329–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Engel C, Loeffler M, Steinke V, Rahner N, Holinski-Feder E, Dietmaier W, et al. Risks of less common cancers in proven mutation carriers with Lynch syndrome. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:4409–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Adem C, Soderberg CL, Cunningham JM, Reynolds C, Sebo TJ, Thibodeau SN, et al. Microsatellite instability in hereditary and sporadic breast cancers. Int J Cancer. 2003;107:580–2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jonsson M, Johannsson O, Borg A. Infrequent occurrence of microsatellite instability in sporadic and familial breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 1995;31:2330–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Paulson TG, Wright FA, Parker BA, Russack V, Wahl GM. Microsatellite instability correlates with reduced survival and poor disease prognosis in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 1996;56:4021–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shaw JA, Walsh T, Chappell SA, Carey N, Johnson K, Walker RA. Microsatellite instability in early sporadic breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 1996;73:1393–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Caldes T, Perez-Segura P, Tosar A, De La Hoya M, Diaz-Rubio E. Low frequency of microsatellite instability in sporadic breast cancer. Int J Oncol. 2000;16:1235–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Toyama T, Iwase H, Yamashita H, Iwata H, Yamashita T, Ito K, et al. Microsatellite instability in sporadic human breast cancers. Int J Cancer. 1996;68:447–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Aaltonen LA, Peltomäki P, Mecklin JP, Järvinen H, Jass JR, Green JS, et al. Replication errors in benign and malignant tumors from hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer patients. Cancer Res. 1994;54:1645–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Müller A, Edmonston TB, Corao DA, Rose DG, Palazzo JP, Becker H, et al. Exclusion of breast cancer as an integral tumor of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 2002;15:1014–9.

    Google Scholar 

  19. de Leeuw WJ, van Puijenbroek M, Tollenaar RA, Cornelisse CJ, Vasen HF, Morreau H. Correspondence re: A. Muller et al., exclusion of breast cancer as an integral tumor of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Cancer Res;62:1014–9, 2003. 2003;63:1148–9.

  20. Blokhuis MM, Goldberg PA, Pietersen GE, Algar U, Vorster AA, Govender D, et al. The extracolonic cancer spectrum in females with the common “South African” hMLH1 c.C1528T mutation. Fam Cancer. 2008;7:191–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lotsari JE, Gylling A, Abdel-Rahman WM, Nieminen TT, Aittomäki K, Friman M, Pitkänen R, et al. Breast carcinoma and Lynch syndrome: molecular analysis of tumors arising in mutation carriers, non-carriers, and sporadic cases. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;12:R90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Grandval P, Barouk-Simonet E, Bronner M, Buisine MP, Moretta J, Tinat J, et al. Is the controversy on breast cancer as part of the Lynch-related tumor spectrum still open? Fam Cancer. 2012;11:681–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Topalian SL, Drake CG, Pardoll DM. Immune checkpoint blockade: a common denominator approach to cancer therapy. Cancer Cell. 2015;27:450–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Tumeh PC, Harview CL, Yearley JH, Shintaku IP, Taylor EJ, Robert L, et al. PD-1 blockade induces responses by inhibiting adaptive immune resistance. Nature. 2014;515:568–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Le DT, Uram JN, Wang H, Bartlett BR, Kemberling H, Eyring AD, et al. PD-1 blockade in tumors with mismatch-repair deficiency. Engl J Med. 2015;372:2509–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Shanley S, Fung C, Milliken J, Leary J, Barnetson R, Schnitzler M, et al. Breast cancer immunohistochemistry can be useful in triage of some HNPCC families. Fam Cancer. 2009;8:251–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Buerki N, Gautier L, Kovac M, Marra G, Buser M, Mueller H, et al. Evidence for breast cancer as an integral part of Lynch syndrome. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2012;51:83–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. National Comprehensive Cancer. Network (NCCN) guidelines. 2013. http://www.nccn.org. Accessed 12 Nov 2013.

  29. Watson P, Vasen HF, Mecklin JP, Bernstein I, Aarnio M, Järvinen HJ, et al. The risk of extra-colonic, extra-endometrial cancer in the Lynch syndrome. Int J Cancer. 2008;15:444–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ferreira FO, Ferreira CC, Rossi BM, Nakagawa WT, Aguilar S Jr, Santos EM, et al. Frequency of extra-colonic tumors in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) and familial colorectal cancer (FCC) Brazilian families: an analysis by a Brazilian Hereditary Colorectal Cancer Institutional Registry. Fam Cancer. 2004;3:41–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) under Grant no. JP18kk0205004.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nobuhiko Kanaya.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

12282_2018_931_MOESM1_ESM.tif

Supplementary Figure 1: Hematoxylin and eosin staining for breast cancers in Case 2. a: initial breast cancer (BC), b: second BC (TIF 365 KB)

12282_2018_931_MOESM2_ESM.tif

Supplementary Figure 2: Mismatch repair gene immunohistochemistry for the initial breast cancer in Case 2. a: MLH1 protein, b: MSH2 protein, c: MSH6 protein, d: PMS2 protein (TIF 726 KB)

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kanaya, N., Tanakaya, K., Yamasaki, R. et al. Clinicopathological features of breast cancer in Japanese female patients with Lynch syndrome. Breast Cancer 26, 359–364 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-018-0931-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-018-0931-z

Keywords

Navigation