Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinicopathological characteristics of breast cancer and trends in the management of breast cancer patients in Japan: Based on the Breast Cancer Registry of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society between 2004 and 2011

  • Special Article
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purposes

We conducted a study to analyze the clinicopathological characteristics of breast cancer in Japan registered to the Japanese Breast Cancer Registry of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society (JBCS). Trends in the management of breast cancer patients in Japan were also analyzed.

Patients and methods

More than 250,000 breast cancer patients were registered to the JBCS registry between 2004 and 2011. Demographic and clinicopathological factors in newly diagnosed primary breast cancer patients were registered to the JBCS through the Web-based system from affiliated institutes nationwide.

Results

Two distinct peaks were observed, in patients in their late 40s and early 60s, in the population-adjusted age distribution of breast cancer patients. An increased rate of screen-detected breast cancer may contribute to an earlier detection of breast cancer and increased rate of non-invasive ductal carcinoma. The positive rate of either ER or PgR appears to have increased in recent years. The annual rates of patients treated with breast-conserving surgery increased until 2006, but these increases stopped in 2007 and thereafter plateaued at approximately 60 %. The annual rates of patients treated with sentinel lymph node dissection alone have steadily increased. The annual rates of patients treated with preoperative trastuzumab plus chemotherapy have also increased, as well as those treated with postoperative aromatase inhibitors. The annual rates of patients treated with postoperative anthracycline-containing regimens have decreased, whereas those treated with postoperative taxane-containing regimens have increased. The postoperative use of trastuzumab has markedly increased since 2007.

Conclusion

Although this study was based on the registry database, several unique clinicopathological characteristics of breast cancer in Japan have been unveiled. Our results suggest that recent trends in the management of breast cancer patients in Japan were strongly followed by clinical evidence that originated from a number of clinical trials worldwide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Center for Cancer Control and Information Services, National Cancer Center, Japan. http://ganjoho.jp/public/index.html.

  2. Tokuda Y. The Japanese Breast Cancer Society Breast Cancer Registry in the National Clinical Database: current status and future perspectives. Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 2014;115(1):17–21 (in Japanese).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Greene FL. Breast tumours. In: Sobin LH, Wittekind C, editors. TNM classification of malignant tumours. 6th ed. New York: Wiley; 2002. p. 131–41.

    Google Scholar 

  4. World Health Organization. Tumours of the Breast and Female Genital Organs. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pant K, Dutta U. Understanding and management of male breast cancer: a critical review. Med Oncol. 2008;25(3):294–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hartman M, Czene K, Reilly M, Adolfsson J, Bergh J, Adami HO, et al. Incidence and prognosis of synchronous and metachronous bilateral breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(27):4210–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Heron DE, Komarnicky LT, Hyslop T, Schwartz GF, Mansfield CM. Bilateral breast carcinoma: risk factors and outcomes for patients with synchronous and metachronous disease. Cancer. 2000;88(12):2739–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Slattery ML, Kerber RA. A comprehensive evaluation of family history and breast cancer risk. The Utah population database. JAMA. 1993;270(13):1563–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Surveillance, Epidemiology, End Results Program. http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/breast.html.

  10. Kim Z, Min SY, Yoon CS, Lee HJ, Lee JS, Youn H, et al. Korean Breast Cancer Society. The basic facts of Korean breast cancer in 2011: results of a nationwide survey and breast cancer registry database. J Breast Cancer. 2014;17(2):99–106.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Baum M, Budzar AU, Cuzick J, Forbes J, Houghton JH, Klijn JG, ATAC Trialists’ Group, et al. Anastrozole alone or in combination with tamoxifen versus tamoxifen alone for adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with early breast cancer: first results of the ATAC randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;359(9324):2131–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jiralerspong S, Kim ES, Dong W, Feng L, Hortobagyi GN, Giordano SH. Obesity, diabetes, and survival outcomes in a large cohort of early-stage breast cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(10):2506–14.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/k-tyosa/k-tyosa13/index.html.

  14. Chen AC, Paulino AC, Schwartz MR, Rodriguez AA, Bass BL, Chang JC, Teh BS. Population-based comparison of prognostic factors in invasive micropapillary and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. Br J Cancer. 2014;111(3):619–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Brouckaert OI, Laenen A, Vanderhaegen J, Wildiers H, Leunen K, Amant F, et al. Applying the 2011 St Gallen panel of prognostic markers on a large single hospital cohort of consecutively treated primary operable breast cancers. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(10):2578–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Burstein HJ, Polyak K, Wong JS, Lester SC, Kaelin CM. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1430–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Li CI, Anderson BO, Daling JR, Moe RE. Trends in incidence rates of invasive lobular and ductal breast carcinoma. JAMA. 2003;289(11):1421–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ellis IO, Cornelisse CJ, Schnitt SJ, Sasco AJ, Sastre-Garau X, Kaaks R, et al. Invasive breast carcinoma. In: Tavassoli FA, Devilee P, editors. World Health Organization Classification of Tumors: pathology and genetics of tumors of the breast and female genital organs. Lyon: IARC Press; 2003. p. 13–59.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yamashita H, Iwase H, Toyama T, Takahashi S, Sugiura H, et al. Estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer in Japanese women: trends in incidence, characteristics, and prognosis. Ann Oncol. 2011;22:1318–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hosoda M, Yamamoto M, Nakano K, Hatanaka K, Takakuwa E, Hatanaka Y, et al. Differential expression of progesterone receptor, FOXA1, GATA3 and p53 between pre- and postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;144:249–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Clarke CA, Keegan TH, Yang J, Press DJ, Kurian AW, Patel AH, et al. Age-specific incidence of breast cancer subtypes: understanding the black-white crossover. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104(14):1094–101.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ko BS, Noh WC, Kang SS, Park BW, Kang EY, Paik NS, et al. Korean Breast Cancer Society. Changing patterns in the clinical characteristics of Korean breast cancer from 1996-2010 using an online nationwide breast cancer database. J Breast Cancer. 2012;15:393–400.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Leong SPL, Shen Z-Z, Liu T-J, Agarwal G, Tajima T, Paik N-S, Sandelin K, et al. Is breast cancer the same disease in Asian and Western Countries? World J Surg. 2010;34:2308–24.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rescigno J, Zampell JC, Axelrod D. Patterns of axillary surgical care for breast cancer in the era of sentinel lymph node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:687–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jagsi R, Abrahams P, Morrow M, Hawlet ST, Griggs JJ, Graff JJ, et al. Patterns and correlates of adjuvant radiotherapy receipt after lumpectomy and after mastectomy for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2396–403.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Registration Committee of the JBCS and the Public Health Research Foundation for their data collection and analysis. They also thank the affiliated institutes participating in the Breast Cancer Registry of the JBCS for their efforts to register patients’ data.

Conflict of Interest

J. Kurebayashi and S. Saji received research funding from Eisai Co. and Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, respectively. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junichi Kurebayashi.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PPTX 85 kb)

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kurebayashi, J., Miyoshi, Y., Ishikawa, T. et al. Clinicopathological characteristics of breast cancer and trends in the management of breast cancer patients in Japan: Based on the Breast Cancer Registry of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society between 2004 and 2011. Breast Cancer 22, 235–244 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-015-0599-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-015-0599-6

Keywords

Navigation