Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Optimisation design and verification of the acoustic environment for multimedia classrooms in universities based on simulation

  • Research Article
  • Building Thermal, Lighting, and Acoustics Modeling
  • Published:
Building Simulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The acoustic environment of the classroom is one of the most important factors influencing the teaching and learning effects of the teacher and students. It is critical to ensure good speech intelligibility in classrooms. However, due to some factors, it may not be easy to achieve an ideal classroom acoustic environment, especially in large-scale multimedia classrooms. In a real renovation project of 39 multimedia classrooms in a university, seven typical rooms were selected, and the acoustic environment optimisation design and verification for these multimedia classrooms were performed based on simulation. First, the acoustic and sound reinforcement design schemes were determined based on the room acoustics software ODEON. Next, the effects of the optimisation design were analysed, and the simulated and measured results were compared; the accuracy of using the reduced sound absorption coefficients, which were determined empirically, was also examined. Finally, the recommended reverberation times (RTs) in multimedia classrooms corresponding to speech intelligibility were discussed, the effectiveness of the speech transmission index (STI) as a primary parameter for classroom acoustic environment control was considered, and the acoustic environment under the unoccupied and occupied statuses was compared. The results revealed that although there are many factors influencing the effect of classroom acoustic environment control, an adequate result can be expected on applying the appropriate method. Considering both the acoustic design and visual requirements also makes the classroom likely to have a good visual effect in addition to having a good listening environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alonso A, Suárez R, Sendra JJ (2017). Virtual reconstruction of indoor acoustics in cathedrals: The case of the Cathedral of Granada. Building Simulation, 10: 431–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AS/NZS (2016). AS/NZS 2107:2016, Acoustics—Recommended Design Sound Levels and Reverberation Times for Building Interiors. Sydney/Wellington: Standards Australia International Ltd. and Standards New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartel TW (1981). Effect of absorber geometry on apparent absorption coefficients as measured in a reverberation chamber. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 69: 1065–1074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berardi U, Iannace G (2020). The acoustic of Roman theatres in Southern Italy and some reflections for their modern uses. Applied Acoustics, 170: 107530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bistafa SR, Bradley JS (2000). Reverberation time and maximum background-noise level for classrooms from a comparative study of speech intelligibility metrics. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107: 861–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bork I (2005a). Report on the 3rd round robin on room acoustical computer simulation—Part 1: Measurements. Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 91: 740–752.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bork I (2005b). Report on the 3rd round robin on room acoustical computer simulation—Part II: Calculations. Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 91: 753–763.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley JS (1986). Speech intelligibility studies in classrooms. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 80: 846–854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley JS, Reich R, Norcross SG (1999a). A just noticeable difference in C50 for speech. Applied Acoustics, 58: 99–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley JS, Reich RD, Norcross SG (1999b). On the combined effects of signal-to-noise ratio and room acoustics on speech intelligibility. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106: 1820–1828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkmann F, Aspöck L, Ackermann D, et al. (2019). A round robin on room acoustical simulation and auralization. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 145: 2746–2760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunskog J, Gade AC, Bellester GP, et al. (2009). Increase in voice level and speaker comfort in lecture rooms. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125: 2072–2082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BB93 (2003). Building Bulletin 93. Acoustic Design of Schools. London: Department for Education and Skills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çakir O, İlal ME (2021). Utilization of psychoacoustic parameters for occupancy-based acoustic evaluation in eating establishments. Building Simulation, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-021-0828-1.

  • Cantor Cutiva LC, Vogel I, Burdorf A (2013). Voice disorders in teachers and their associations with work-related factors: A systematic review. Journal of Communication Disorders, 46: 143–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen F, Zhang H, Chen X, et al. (2020). Design method for interior decoration pollution control of buildings: Introduction and application. Building Simulation, 13: 637–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Chen B, Deng J, et al. (2021). The integration model of objective and subjective data of residential indoor environment quality in Northeast China based on structural equation modeling. Building Simulation, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-021-0835-2.

  • Chiang C, Lai C (2008). Acoustical environment evaluation of Joint Classrooms for elementary schools in Taiwan. Building and Environment, 43: 1619–1632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi YJ (2020a). The intelligibility of speech in university classrooms during lectures. Applied Acoustics, 162: 107211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi YJ (2020b). Evaluation of acoustical conditions for speech communication in active university classrooms. Applied Acoustics, 159: 107089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi YJ (2016). Effect of occupancy on acoustical conditions in university classrooms. Applied Acoustics, 114: 36–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen CL, Koutsouris G, Rindel JH (2014). Estimating absorption of materials to match room model against existing room using a genetic algorithm. In: Proceedings of Forum Acusticum, Krakow, Poland.

  • Čudina M, Prezelj J, Pušlar-Čudina M (2016). The impact of paintings hung on lecture room walls on the speech intelligibility and perception of background noise. Indoor and Built Environment, 25: 659–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Bruijn A (1973). A mathematical analysis concerning the edge effect of sound absorbing materials. Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 28: 33–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz C, Velazquez C (1995). A live evaluation of the RASTI-method. Applied Acoustics, 46: 363–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DIN (2016). DIN 18041–2016, Acoustic Quality in Rooms—Specifications and Instructions for the Room Acoustic Design. Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Normung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duquesnoy AJ, Plomp R (1980). Effect of reverberation and noise on the intelligibility of sentences in cases of presbyacusis. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 68: 537–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuchi T, Ueno K (2004). Guidelines on acoustic treatments for school buildings proposed by the Architectural Institute of Japan. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Congress on Acoustics.

  • Galbrun L, Kitapci K (2016). Speech intelligibility of English, Polish, Arabic and Mandarin under different room acoustic conditions. Applied Acoustics, 114: 79–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GB (2010). GB 50118–2010, Code for Design of Sound Insulation of Civil Buildings. Beijing: China Quality and Standards Publishing. (in Chinese)

  • GB (2012). GB 8624–2012, Classification for Burning Behavior of Building Materials and Products. Beijing: China Quality and Standards Publishing. (in Chinese)

  • GB (2017). GB 18580–2017, Indoor Decorating and Refurbishing Materials—Limit of Formaldehyde Emission of Wood-based Panels and Finishing Products. Beijing: China Quality and Standards Publishing. (in Chinese)

  • Han N, Mak CM (2008). Improving speech intelligibility in classrooms through the mirror image model. Applied Acoustics, 69: 945–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haverinen-Shaughnessy U, Shaughnessy RJ, Cole EC, et al. (2015). An assessment of indoor environmental quality in schools and its association with health and performance. Building and Environment, 93: 35–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson M (1999). Experimental investigation of the acoustical characteristics of university classrooms. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106: 1810–1819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson M, Rempel R, Kennedy S (1999). Measurement and prediction of typical speech and background-noise levels in university classrooms during lectures. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105: 226–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houtgast T, Steeneken HJM, Plomp R (1980). Predicting speech intelligibility in rooms from the modulation transfer function. I. General room acoustics. Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 46: 60–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houtgast T, Steeneken HJM (1984). A multi-language evaluation of the RASTI-method for estimating speech intelligibility in auditoria. Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 54: 185–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEC (2011). IEC 60268–16, Sound System Equipment—Part 16: Objective Rating of Speech Intelligibility by Speech Transmission Index. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEC (2020). IEC 60268–16, Sound System Equipment—Part 16: Objective Rating of Speech Intelligibility by Speech Transmission Index. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2003a). ISO 354: 2003, Acoustics—Measurement of sound absorption in a reverberation room. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2003b). ISO 9921: 2003, Ergonomics—Assessment of Speech Communication. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang J (1998). Comparison of speech intelligibility between English and Chinese. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103: 1213–1216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knecht HA, Nelson PB, Whitelaw GM, et al. (2002). Background noise levels and reverberation times in unoccupied classrooms. American Journal of Audiology, 11: 65–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi M, Morimoto M, Sato H, et al. (2007). Optimum speech level to minimize listening difficulty in public spaces. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121: 251–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristiansen J, Lund SP, Persson R, et al. (2014). A study of classroom acoustics and school teachers’ noise exposure, voice load and speaking time during teaching, and the effects on vocal and mental fatigue development. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 87: 851–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen VO (1932). Architectural Acoustics. New York: The American Institute of Physics.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Leccese F, Rocca M, Salvadori G (2018). Fast estimation of speech transmission index using the reverberation time: Comparison between predictive equations for educational rooms of different sizes. Applied Acoustics, 140: 143–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee MC, Mui KW, Wong LT, et al. (2012). Student learning performance and indoor environmental quality (IEQ) in air-conditioned university teaching rooms. Building and Environment, 49: 238–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu S, Yan X, Xu W, et al. (2016). Improving auditorium designs with rapid feedback by integrating parametric models and acoustic simulation. Building Simulation, 9: 235–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madbouly AI, Noaman AY, Ragab AHM, et al. (2016). Assessment model of classroom acoustics criteria for enhancing speech intelligibility and learning quality. Applied Acoustics, 114: 147–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahdavi A, Kainrath B, Orehounig K, et al. (2008). Measurement and simulation of room acoustics parameters in traditional and modern bath buildings. Building Simulation, 1: 223–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Trapet M, Vorländer M (2015). Uncertainty analysis of standardized measurements of random-incidence absorption and scattering coefficients. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137: 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijs L, Jansens G, Vermeir G, et al. (2002). Absorbing surfaces in ray-tracing programs for coupled spaces. Applied Acoustics, 63: 611–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odeon (2020). ODEON Room Acoustics Software, User’s Manual, Version 16. Denmark: Technical University of Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelegrín-García D, Smits B, Brunskog J, et al. (2011). Vocal effort with changing talker-to-listener distance in different acoustic environments. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129: 1981–1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelegrín-García D, Brunskog J, Rasmussen B (2014). Speaker-oriented classroom acoustics design guidelines in the context of current regulations in European countries. Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 100: 1073–1089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng J, Bei C, Sun H (2011). Relationship between Chinese speech intelligibility and speech transmission index in rooms based on auralization. Speech Communication, 53: 986–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng J, Wang D, Lau SK, et al. (2015). An investigation of acoustic treatment for children in a classroom of an elementary school. Applied Acoustics, 89: 42–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng J, Lau S-K, Zhao Y (2020). Comparative study of acoustical indices and speech perception of students in two primary school classrooms with an acoustical treatment. Applied Acoustics, 164: 107297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips NA (2016). The implications of cognitive aging for listening and the framework for understanding effortful listening (FUEL). Ear and Hearing, 37: 44S–51S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinho PG, Pinto M, Almeida RMSF, et al. (2016). Aspects concerning the acoustical performance of school buildings in Portugal. Applied Acoustics, 106: 129–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinten J, Braat-Eggen PE, Hornikx M, et al. (2017). The indoor sound environment and human task performance: A literature review on the role of room acoustics. Building and Environment, 123: 315–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rennies J, Schepker H, Holube I, et al. (2014). Listening effort and speech intelligibility in listening situations affected by noise and reverberation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 136: 2642–2653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricciardi P, Buratti C (2018). Environmental quality of university classrooms: Subjective and objective evaluation of the thermal, acoustic, and lighting comfort conditions. Building and Environment, 127: 23–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russo D, Ruggiero A (2019). Choice of the optimal acoustic design of a school classroom and experimental verification. Applied Acoustics, 146: 280–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sala E, Viljanen V (1995). Improvement of acoustic conditions for speech communication in classrooms. Applied Acoustics, 45: 81–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sala E, Rantala L (2016). Acoustics and activity noise in school classrooms in Finland. Applied Acoustics, 114: 252–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shield B, Conetta R, Dockrell J, et al. (2015). A survey of acoustic conditions and noise levels in secondary school classrooms in England. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137: 177–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shtrepi L, Astolfi A, Rychtáriková M (2014). The influence of a volume scale-factor on scattering coefficient effects in room acoustics. Building Acoustics, 21: 153–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberg S, Laine A, Sala E, et al. (2000). Prevalence of voice disorders among future teachers. Journal of Voice, 14: 231–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toyinbo O, Shaughnessy R, Turunen M, et al. (2016). Building characteristics, indoor environmental quality, and mathematics achievement in Finnish elementary schools. Building and Environment, 104: 114–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valente DL, Plevinsky HM, Franco JM, et al. (2012). Experimental investigation of the effects of the acoustical conditions in a simulated classroom on speech recognition and learning in children. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131: 232–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visentin C, Prodi N, Cappelletti F, et al. (2018). Using listening effort assessment in the acoustical design of rooms for speech. Building and Environment, 136: 38–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vorländer M (2013). Computer simulations in room acoustics: Concepts and uncertainties. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133: 1203–1213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (1999). Guidelines for Community Noise. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu S, Peng J, Bi Z (2014). Chinese speech intelligibility in low frequency reverberation and noise in a simulated classroom. Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 100: 1067–1072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu S, Peng J, Xiao Y, Huang W (2021). The effect of low frequency reverberation on Chinese speech intelligibility in two classrooms. Applied Acoustics, 182: 108241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z, Becerik-Gerber B, Mino L (2013). A study on student perceptions of higher education classrooms: Impact of classroom attributes on student satisfaction and performance. Building and Environment, 70: 171–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zannin PHT, Marcon CR (2007). Objective and subjective evaluation of the acoustic comfort in classrooms. Applied Ergonomics, 38: 675–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zannin PHT, Zwirtes DPZ (2009). Evaluation of the acoustic performance of classrooms in public schools. Applied Acoustics, 70: 626–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao W, Kang J, Jin H (2017). Effects of geometry on the sound field in atria. Building Simulation, 10: 25–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu P, Mo F, Kang J (2014). Relationship between Chinese speech intelligibility and speech transmission index under reproduced general room conditions. Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 100: 880–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu P, Mo F, Kang J (2015). Influence of sound source characteristics in determining objective speech intelligibility metrics. Applied Acoustics, 89: 188–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu P, Tao W, Mo F, et al. (2020). Experimental comparison of speech transmission index measurement in natural sound rooms and auditoria. Applied Acoustics, 165: 107326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51778100, No. 11774266, No. 51878110, No. 51278078).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Architecture and Fine Art, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, 116023, China

    Peisheng Zhu, Wanqi Tao, Xiaodong Lu, Fei Guo & Hongchi Zhang

  2. School of Physics Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China

    Fangshuo Mo

Authors
  1. Peisheng Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wanqi Tao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiaodong Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fangshuo Mo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Fei Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hongchi Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fangshuo Mo.

Electronic Supplementary Material

12273_2021_875_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

Optimisation design and verification of the acoustic environment for multimedia classrooms in universities based on simulation

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, P., Tao, W., Lu, X. et al. Optimisation design and verification of the acoustic environment for multimedia classrooms in universities based on simulation. Build. Simul. 15, 1419–1436 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-021-0875-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-021-0875-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation