Skip to main content
Log in

System power loss optimization of electric vehicle driven by front and rear induction motors

  • Published:
International Journal of Automotive Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Power loss optimization aiming at the high-efficiency drive of front-and-rear-induction-motor-drive electric vehicle (FRIMDEV) as an effective way to improve energy efficiency and extend driving range is of high importance. Different from the traditional look-up table method of motor efficiency, power loss optimization of the dual- motor system based on the loss mechanism of induction motor (IM) is proposed. First of all, based on the power loss characteristic of FRIMDEV from battery to wheels, the torque distribution optimization model aiming at the minimum system power loss is put forward. Secondly, referring to d-q axis equivalent model of IM, the power loss functions of the dual-IM system are modeled. Then, the optimal torque distribution coefficient (β o) between the two IMs is derived, and the theoretical switching condition (T sw) between the single- and dual-motor-drive mode (SMDM and DMDM) is confirmed. Finally, a dual-motor test platform is developed. The derived torque distribution strategy is verified. The influence of motor temperature on β o and T sw are tested, and the correction models based on temperature difference are proposed. Based on the system power loss analysis, it can be confirmed that, under low load conditions, the SMDM takes priority over the DMDM, and the controller of the idling motor should be shut down to avoid the additional excitation loss. While under middle to high load conditions, even torque distribution (β o = 0.5) is preferred if the temperature difference between the two IMs is small; otherwise, β o should be corrected based on dual-motor temperatures. The theoretical T sw derived without dealing with temperature difference is a function only of motor speed, while temperature difference correction of it should be conducted in actual operations based on motor resistance changing with temperature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

η :

overall energy transfer efficiency of the front and rear power train systems

P out :

output power of battery (W)

P invl, P ml, P tl :

power loss caused by inverter, motor and transmission system (W)

β :

power distribution coefficient between the two motors

c :

unit conversion factor

P f, P r :

power distributed to front and rear powertrain (W)

T d :

torque requirement of driver (N·m)

w f, w r :

front and rear motor speed (rad·s−1)

f(V):

mechanical loss of the dual transmission systems

F(β):

overall power loss model of the two motors

w max :

maximum speed of motor (rad·s−1)

f f(βT d, wf), f r((1−β)T d, w r):

loss function of the front and rear motor system

i sqc, i rqc :

iron loss current of stator and rotor in q-axis (A)

i sqt :

q-axis stator current divided into torque current (A)

i sd :

d-axis stator current (A)

w e, w ro :

synchronous angular and electrical angular speed (rad·s−1)

R rc, R sc :

equivalent resistance of iron loss in rotor and stator (Ω)

P :

number of pole pairs

T e :

electromagnetic torque of IM (N·m)

L m, L r :

mutual and rotor inductance (H)

T r :

excitation time constant

ψ r :

flux linkage (Wb)

k :

ratio coefficient

T l :

motor load (N·m)

R si, R ri :

stator and rotor winding resistance (Ω)

P m, P s, P cu, P Fe :

friction loss, stray loss, cooper loss and iron loss (W)

I smax :

maximum phase current (A)

i sd_rate :

d-axis rated current of stator (A)

i sqmax :

maximum q-axis current in stator (A)

\(\sigma = 1 - \frac{{L_m^2}}{{{L_1}{L_s}}}\) :

eakage coefficient

U max :

maximum allowed voltage (V)

L s :

stator inductance (H)

P fm :

mechanical power loss caused by the motored front powertrain system (W)

K 2 :

ratio of stator resistance in front motor to that in rear one

K 3 :

ratio of rotor resistance in front motor to that in rear one

i d, i q :

excitation current and torque current of motor (A)

T sw’:

corrected switching torque (N·m)

T sw_ref :

reference value of the switching torque (N·m)

K 2’ and K 3’:

temperature correction coefficients

f_:

front powertrain system

r_:

rear powertrain system

References

  • Abrahamsen, F., Blaabjerg, F., Pedersen, J. and Thoegersen, P. B. (2001). Efficiency-optimized control of mediumsize induction motor drives. IEEE Trans. Industry Applications 37, 6, 1761–1767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. and Wang, J. (2010). Energy-efficient control allocation for over-actuated systems with electric vehicle applications. ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conf., 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z., Xiong, R. and Wang, K. (2015). Optimal energy management strategy of a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle based on a particle swarm optimization algorithm. Energies 8, 5, 3661–3678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan, Q. (2015). Stray Losses Analysis and Design of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor for Electric Vehicle. M. S. Thesis. Shenyang University of Technology. China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu, J., Ouyang, M., Lu, D., Li, L. and Lu, L. (2013). Energy efficiency optimization of electric vehicle driven by in-wheel motors. Int. J. Automotive Technology 14, 5, 763–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, H., He, H. and Sun, F. (2013). A combined cooperative braking model with a predictive control strategy in an electric vehicle. Energies 6, 12, 6455–6475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, H., He, H. and Xiao, X. (2014). A predictive distribution model for cooperative braking system of an electric vehicle. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, W. (2012). Research on Matching Technique for EV Powertrain. Ph. D. Dissertation. Shandong University. China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, J., Yoo, J. and Yi, K. (2011). Driving control algorithm for maneuverability, lateral stability, and rollover prevention of 4WD electric vehicles with independently driven front and rear wheels. IEEE Trans. Vehicular Technology 60, 7, 2987–3001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y. and Tan, D. (2012). Study on the dynamics of the in-wheel motor system. IEEE Trans. Vehicular Technology 61, 8, 3510–3518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mademlis, C., Kioskeridis, I. and Margaris, N. (2004). Optimal efficiency control strategy for interior permanentmagnet synchronous motor drives. IEEE Trans. Energy Conversion 19, 4, 715–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutoh, N. (2012). Driving and braking torque distribution methods for front-and rear-wheel-independent drivetype electric vehicles on roads with low friction coefficient. IEEE Trans. Industrial Electronics 59, 10, 3919–3933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutoh, N., Kato, T. and Murakami, K. (2011). Front-andrear-wheel-independent-drive-type electric vehicle (FRID EV) taking the lead for next generation ECOvehicles. SAE Paper No. 2011-39-7206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutoh, N., Miyaji, R. and Yamaguchi, T. (2012). Outstanding running performance of front- and-rearwheel-independent-drive-type electric vehicle (FRID EV) under various transient running conditions. IECON 38th Annual Conf. IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, 2971–2976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutoh, N., Takahsshi, Y. and Tomita, Y. (2008). Failsafe drive performance of FRID electric vehicles with the structure driven by the front and rear wheels independently. IEEE Trans. Industrial Electronics 55, 6, 2306–2315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutoh, N., Takayanagi, T., Murai, S. and Yamaguchi, T. (2012). Cornering control method for front and rear wheel independent drive type electric vehicle (FRID EV) on roads with low friction coefficients. IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conf. (VPPC), 1143–1148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schouten, N., Salman, M. and Kheir, N. (2002). Fuzzy logic control for parallel hybrid vehicles. IEEE Trans. Control Systems Technology 10, 3, 460–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sul, K. (2013). Control of Electric Machine Drive Systems. China Machine Press. Beijing, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesla (2016). Electric All-Wheel Drive. https://www.tesla.com/models

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Y., Chai, F. and Cheng, S. (2008). Analysis of modulation pattern and losses in inverter for PMSM drives. IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conf. (VPPC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, X. and Wang, J. (2012). Torque distribution strategy for a front- and-rear-wheel-driven electric vehicle. IEEE Trans. Vehicular Technology 61, 8, 3365–3374.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, F. (2013). Research on Powertrain Parameters Design and Vehicle Control Strategy for Pure Electric Vehicle. Ph. D. Dissertation. Jilin University. China.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chao Ma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, B., Gao, S., Ma, C. et al. System power loss optimization of electric vehicle driven by front and rear induction motors. Int.J Automot. Technol. 19, 121–134 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-018-0012-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-018-0012-5

Keywords

Navigation