Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The ethics of care and the tragedy of the commons

  • Research Article
  • Published:
International Review of Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we argue that the ethics of care can offer solutions to diverse tragedies of the commons. Building on Hayek’s (Law, legislation and liberty, Abingdon, Routledge, 1982) theory on the emergence of rules and norms, we outline the spheres of application of the ethics of care and the ethics of justice and outline how the two interact. We apply our analysis of the interaction of the ethics of care and the ethics of justice to the problem of the tragedy of the commons. The morality of care allows people to establish rules in small groups and to ensure the compliance with theoretically defined rules in the Great Society, thus potentially avoiding any tragedy of the commons in either realm. We illustrate our argument with two examples of the tragedy of the commons: fractional-reserve banking and environmental tragedies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Note that other proponents of a free market system differ from Hayek (1982). Rothbard (1982) rationally establishes an ethics of capitalism.

  2. On the evolutionary origin of law, see also Leoni (1991). An excellent presentation of the evolutionary origin of rules is also provided by van den Hauwe (1998).

  3. When we refer to the Great Society and small groups, we do not mean to refer to an exact amount of people. We use these terms as imaginary constructions to simplify the analysis. We can differentiate a small group from the Great Society based on the fact that the set of rules governing the small group can be rationally designed, whereas in the Great Society, the amount of dispersed factual knowledge makes it impossible to rationally design the governing set of rules.

  4. For the sake of exposition, we assume here that the small group is not embedded in the Great Society. It is true, as we mention below, that most small groups are currently embedded in the Great Society, but it is also true that some groups continue to live on the fringes of it, in the same way that many groups throughout history have not coexisted with the Great Society.

  5. The ethics of care is rooted in the feminist epistemological critiques of Cartesian rationalism. Feminist philosophers such as Bordo (1986) have argued that Cartesianism entailed the masculinization of science. According to Bordo, the rejection of subjectivity, emotions, and dependence—central concepts in the ethics of care—is a result of Cartesian rationalism. From another perspective, Hayek (1948, 1982) criticizes Cartesian rationalism for its erroneous assumption of the power of the human mind and introspection; he emphasizes limited human cognitive capacity, in contrast.

  6. More specifically, they are results of human action but not of human design, as Hayek (1982) remarks by citing Adam Ferguson’s famous words.

  7. For all those interested in the debate, see Selgin (1988), White (1989), and Selgin and White (1996) for the opinion that fractional-reserve banking does not cause economic cycles. See also Hoppe (1994), Hoppe et al. (1998), Huerta de Soto (1995, 1998), and Bagus et al. (2013), who resume the criticism of fractional-reserve banking initiated by Mises (2009) and Hayek (2008).

  8. See also a survey conducted by Evans (2010) in which almost 90 percent of depositors state that the reason they keep deposits is to have convenient access to their money (and have it kept safe). For a discussion of the meaning of complete availability, see Bagus and Howden (2016).

  9. A Latin word that means the same quantity of goods of the same quality and type (Huerta de Soto 2006).

  10. From the perspective of current positive law, the bank is the owner of the deposits, but there is much confusion. In a survey (Evans 2010), only 8 percent of depositors were aware of the legislation; 74 percent thought they were the legal owners of “their” deposits.

  11. Still, as Bagus (2010) proves, it is not sufficient to have a 100 percent–reserve requirement; it is also necessary that governments and central banks not bail banks out when they have roll-over problems or fail.

  12. We have to admit that banks not holding full reserves have a competitive advantage. In any case, the prevalence of an ethics of care would increase the psychic costs involved in credit expansion.

  13. Ostrom (1990, 30) defines a CPR as “a natural or man-made resource system that is sufficiently large as to make it costly (but not impossible) to exclude potential beneficiaries from obtaining benefits from its use.”

References

  • Abel AB, Bernanke BS, Croushore D (2014) Macroeconomics, 8th edn. Pearson, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagus P (2004) La tragedia de los bienes comunales y la escuela austriaca: Hardin, Hoppe, Huerta de Soto y Mises. Procesos De Mercado: Revista Europea De Economía Política 1(2):125–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagus P (2010) Austrian business cycle theory: are 100 percent reserves sufficient to prevent a business cycle? Libertarian Papers 2(2):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagus P, Howden D (2016) The economic and legal significance of “full” deposit availability. Eur J Law Econ 41:243–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagus P, Howden D, Block W (2013) Deposits, loans, and banking: clarifying the debate. Am J Econ Sociol 72(3):627–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagus P, Gabriel A, Howden D (2018) On the necessary and sufficient conditions for legitimate banking contracts. J Bus Ethics 147(3):669–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baier AC (1994) Moral prejudices: essays on ethics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry B (1995) Justice as impartiality. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Block W (1990) Economics and the environment: a reconciliation. The Fraser Institute, Canada, Vancouver

    Google Scholar 

  • Block W (1998) Environmentalism and economic freedom: the case for private property Rights. J Bus Ethics 17:1887–1899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block W, Davidson L (2011) The case against fiduciary media: ethics is the key. J Bus Ethics 98:505–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block W, Jankovic I (2016) Tragedy of the partnership: a critique of Elinor Ostrom. Am J Econ Sociol 75(2):289–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordo S (1986) The Cartesian masculinization of thought. Signs: J Women Culture Soc 11(3):439–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bubeck DE (1995) Care, gender, and justice. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Colombo M (2014) Caring, the emotions, and social norm compliance. J Neurosci Psychol Econ 7(1):33–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, A. J. (2010) Public attitudes to banking. A student consultancy project. ESCP Europe for the Cobden Centre.

  • England P (2005) Emerging theories of care work. Ann Rev Sociol 31(1):381–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan C (1982) In a different voice: psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162(3859):1243–1248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauwe van den L (1998) Evolution and th production of rules - some preliminary remarks. Eur J Law Econ 5:81–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauwe van den L (2006) The uneasy case for fractional-reserve free banking. Procesos De Mercado Revista Europea De Economía Política 3(2):143–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauwe van den L (2008) Credit expansion, the prisoner´s dilemma, and free banking as mechanism design. Procesos De Mercado Revista Europea De Economía Política 5(2):133–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauwe van den L (2010) Free banking, the real-balance effect, and Walras´law. Procesos De Mercado Revista Europea De Economía Política 7(1):241–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek FA (1945) The use of knowledge in society. Am Econ Rev 35(4):519–530

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek FA (1948) Individualism: true and false. In: Hayek FA (ed) Individualism and economic order. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek FA (1982) Law, legislation and liberty. Routledge, Abingdon

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (2008) Prices and production and other works: F.A. Hayek on money, the business cycle, and the gold standard. Auburn: The Ludwig von Mises Institute.

  • Held V (2006) The ethics of care: personal, political, and global. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe H-H (1994) How is fiat money possible?-or, the devolution of money and credit. The Review of Austrian Economics 7(2):49–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe H-H, Hülsmann JG, Block W (1998) Against fiduciary media. Q J Austrian Econ 1(1):19–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huerta de Soto J (1995) A critical analysis of central banks and fractional-reserve free banking from the Austrian school perspective. The Review of Austrian Economics 8(2):25–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huerta de Soto J (1998) A critical note on fractional-reserve free banking. Q J Austrian Econ 1(4):25–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huerta de Soto J (2006) Money, bank credit, and economic cycles. The Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn

    Google Scholar 

  • Hülsmann JG (2008) The ethics of money production. The Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn

    Google Scholar 

  • Kittay EF (1999) Love’s labor: Essays on women, equality, and dependency. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Leoni B (1991) Freedom and the law, 3rd edn. Liberty Fund, Indianapolis, In

    Google Scholar 

  • Liedtka JM (1996) Feminist morality and competitive reality: A role for an ethic of care? Bus Ethics Q 6(2):179–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mises L (2009) The theory of money and credit. The Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn

    Google Scholar 

  • Mousourakis G (2012) Fundamentals of Roman private law. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson JA (2011) Care ethics and markets: A view from feminist economics. In: Hamington M, Sander-Staudt M (eds) Applying care ethics to business. Springer, New York, pp 35–53

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson JA, England P (2002) Feminist philosophies of love and work. Hypathia 17(2):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noddings N (1984) Caring, a feminine approach to ethics and moral education. University of California Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (1990) Governing the Commons. the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Paillé P, Mejía-Moleros JH, Marché-Paillé A, Chen CC, Yang C (2016) Corporate greening, exchange process among co-workers, and ethics of care: an empirical study of the determinants of pro-environmental behaviors at coworkers-level. J Bus Ethics 136:655–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petit E (2014) Ethique du care et comportement pro-environnemental. Revue D’economie Politique 124(2):243–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulcini E (2013) Care of the world: fear, responsibility and justice in the global age. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rothbard MN (1982) The ethics of liberty. Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbard MN (2000) America’s great depression. The Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbard MN (2001) The case for a 100 percent gold dollar. The Ludwig von Mises, Auburn

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruddick S (1995) Injustice in families: Assault and domination. In: Held V (ed) Justice and care: essential readings in feminist ethics. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 203–223

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Selgin GA (1988) The theory of free banking: money supply under competitive note issue. Rowman and Littlefield, Totowa

    Google Scholar 

  • Selgin GA, White LH (1996) In defense of fiduciary media-or, we are not devo(lutionists), we are misesians! Review of Austrian Economics 9(2):83–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon RC (1998) The moral psychology of business: Care and compassion in the corporation. Bus Ethics Q 8(3):515–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tronto JC (1993) Moral boundaries: a political argument for an ethic of care. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • van Staveren I (2005) Modelling care. Rev Soc Econ 63(4):567–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Staveren I (2013) Caring finance practices. J Econ Issues 47:419–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White LH (1989) Competition and currency. New York University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • White TI (1992) Business, ethics, and Carol Gilligan’s “two voices.” Bus Ethics Q 2(1):51–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philipp Bagus.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moreno-Casas, V., Bagus, P. The ethics of care and the tragedy of the commons. Int Rev Econ 68, 405–422 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-021-00376-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-021-00376-y

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation