Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The relationship between the Net Promoter Score (NPS) and students’ college experiences at a state university

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to determine whether the Net Promoter Score (NPS) is relevant in higher educational institutions. The likelihood to recommend (LTR) of a business degree was examined in relation to the conceptualized antecedent factors of students’ university experience using NPS to identify different groups of students. To measure the conceptualized constructs, data is collected from students enrolled in a state university using an online survey. ANOVA is used to test the differences among NPS groups identified and the path analysis is used to test the relationships between antecedent factors and their LTR. All hypothesized relationships between antecedent variables, satisfaction, and LTR are confirmed. Results indicate a substantial divergence between the NPS of the business program and the NPS of university. In-depth qualitative interviews provided intriguing justifications for the variations in scores. Although the methodology used does not support generalization, we identify key challenges faced by the university students when recommending a business program to their friends and relatives. We make recommendations for how college administrators might use NPS data to their advantage while working to enhance the college experience for students. NPS is a simple, useful metric that offers valuable information about students’ experiences. Regardless of the nature of the higher education environment, higher education institutions can readily adopt and use it on a regular basis in addition to the current student satisfaction measurements employed at various touch points.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Zamil, K. M. (2017). Measuring the advocacy levels for UBT student by using Net Promoter Score. Saudi Journal of Business and Management Studies, 2, 264–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andaleeb, S. S., & Kara, A. (2013). The structure of service quality perceptions for multiple-encounter services. Quality Management in Healthcare, 22(4), 306–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anil, N. K., & İçli, G. E. (2013). MBA students’ satisfaction and loyalty: State vs. private universities in Turkey. TRŽIŠTE, 25(2), 177–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arslan, S., & Akkas, A. (2014). Quality of college life (QCL) of students in Turkey: Students’ life satisfaction and identification. Social Indicators Research, 115(2), 869–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baehre, S., O’Dwyer, M., O’Malley, L., & Lee, N. (2022). The use of Net Promoter Score (NPS) to predict sales growth: insights from an empirical investigation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 50(1), 67–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitner, M. J. (1990). Evaluating service encounters: The effects of physical surroundings and employee responses. Journal of Marketing, 54(April), 69–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R. (2003). Young people’s higher education choices: the role of family and friends. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 24(3), 283–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M., Fine, M. B., & Scheuer, C. L. (2017). Relationship quality in higher education marketing: the role of social media engagement. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 27(1), 40–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, M. E., Ball, S. J., Davies, J., & Reay, D. (2003). Gender issues in parental involvement in student choices of higher education. Gender and Education, 15(1), 21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, H., Douglas, S., & Silk, A. (1981). Measure unreliability: A threat to cross cultural marketing research. Journal of Marketing, 45(2), 98–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeShields, O. W., Kara, A., & Kaynak, E. (2005). Determinants of business student satisfaction and retention in higher education: Applying Herzberg’s two-factor theory. International Journal of Educational Management, 19(2), 128–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, K. M., & Healy, M. A. (2001). Key factors influencing student satisfaction related to recruitment and retention. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 10(4), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gürüz, K., Şuhubi, E. A. M., Şengör, C., Türker, K., & Yurtsever, E. (1994). “Türkiye’de ve Dünyada Yükseköğretim. Bilim ve Teknoloji. Türk Sanayicileri ve İşadamları Derneği (TÜSİAD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1988). LISREL VII: Analysis of linear structural relationships. Scientific Software.

  • Kara, A., Mintu-Wimsatt, A., & Spillan, J. E. (2022a).  An application of the net promoter score in higher education. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education (forthcoming). https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2021.2018088

  • Kara, A., Spillan, J. E., & Bell, C. (2022b). Efficacy of the net promoter score in predicting online MBA students’ intentions to give back to their alma mater. Working paper.

  • Lundvall, B. A. (2008). Higher education, innovation and economic development. Higher Education and Development, 8, 201–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maglio, P. P., & Spohrer, J. (2008). Fundamentals of service science. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 18–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marangoz, A. Y., & Arslan, F. M. (2015). Üniversitelerin pazarlanmasinda tutundurma boyutu: kavramsal bir irdeleme. Toros Üniversitesi İİSBF Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (Vol. 2, No. 4). Document is available at https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/270059. Accessed 1 April 2022.

  • McKnight, O. T., Paugh, R., Frey, K., & Song, C. (2019). Enhancing return on marketing investment: the net-promoter score in higher education. Marketing Management Association (MBAA International), pp. 1–8. Document is available at https://works.bepress.com/oscar_mcknight/63/. Accessed 22 April 2022.

  • Morse, R., & Castonguay, A. (2021). 2022 Best Global Universities Rankings. US News and World Report, October. Document is available at https://www.usnews.com/education/best-global-universities/. Accessed 22 Feb 2022.

  • Oliver, R. L. (1999). Whence consumer loyalty? Journal of Marketing, 63, 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reay, D., David, M., & Ball, S. (2001). Making a difference?: Institutional habituses and higher education choice. Sociological Research Online, 5(4), 14–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichheld, F. F. (2003). The one number you need to grow. Harvard Business Review, 81(12), 46–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seth, S., Scott, D., Svihel, C., & Murphy-Shigematsu, S. (2016). Solving the mystery of consistent negative/low net promoter score (NPS) in cross-cultural marketing research, Asia Marketing Journal, 17(4), 43–61. https://doi.org/10.53728/2765-6500.1411

  • Seymour, D. T. (1992), On Q: Causing quality in higher education, Macmillan Publishing Company, 100 Front St., Riverside, NJ 08075-7500.

  • Temizer, L., & Turkyilmaz, A. (2012). Implementation of student satisfaction index model in higher education institutions. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3802–3806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weerasinghe, I. M. S., Lalitha, R., & Fernando, S. (2017). Students’ satisfaction in higher education. American Journal of Educational Research, 5(5), 533–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zineldin, M., Akdag, H. C., & Vasicheva, V. (2011). Assessing quality in higher education: New criteria for evaluating students’ satisfaction. Quality in Higher Education, 17(2), 231–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Kara.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interests/Competing interests

The authors declare that the article is their own work and they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kara, A., Zeren, D. The relationship between the Net Promoter Score (NPS) and students’ college experiences at a state university. Int Rev Public Nonprofit Mark 20, 721–737 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-022-00352-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-022-00352-4

Keywords

Navigation