Skip to main content
Log in

Socially conscious consumer behavior: the role of ethical self-identity and priming

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research examines the roles that dispositional ethical self-identity (ESI) and situational priming play in socially conscious consumption choices, using an experimental design approach. We advance the literature of socially conscious consumption by specifically comparing the competing explanations of assimilation, licensing, compensation, and neutralization. Consistent with real-world pricing, participants considered a more expensive socially conscious product vs. a less expensive conventional product. Individuals who feel an ethical orientation is part of their self-identity were more inclined toward environmental product choice. In addition, an assimilation effect took place; priming positive environmental behaviors led to a more environmental product choice than a neutral prime. Priming negative environmental behaviors suggested a neutralization response, where participants may have denied or cognitively minimized the effects of their previous negative behavior. This study contributes to theory by testing competing explanations for environmental choices. It demonstrates a tendency toward assimilation rather than licensing when positively primed, and a tendency toward neutralization rather than compensation or assimilation when negatively primed. It also demonstrates that there is a practical benefit of prompting consumers to consider their past positive environmental behaviors to encourage further environmentalism. Additionally, prompting those who are already “on board” with environmentalism may help to attain even better outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Here we use ethical, socially conscious, and socially responsible consumer behavior interchangeably, consistent with the literature.

References

  • Abbas, M., & Bashir, F. (2020). Having a green identity: Does pro-environmental self-identity mediate the effects of moral identity on ethical consumption and pro-environmental behaviour? Studies in Psychology, 41(3), 612–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Accenture (2020). COVID-19 Increasing consumers’ focus on “Ethical Consumption,” Accenture survey finds. Downloaded April 4, 2022, from: https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/covid-19-increasing-consumers-focus-onethical-consumption-accenture-survey-finds.htm

  • Amin, S., & Tarun, M. T. (2022). Boosting ecological food consumption behavior among millennials: role of health consciousness, perceived consumer effectiveness and ethical self-identity. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 33(6), 1344–1361. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-07-2021-0180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aquino, K., & Reed, A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423–1440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aquino, K., Freeman, D., Reed, A., II., Lim, V. K., & Felps, W. (2009). Testing a social-cognitive model of moral behavior: the interactive influence of situations and moral identity centrality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanken, I., Van De Ven, N., & Zeelenberg, M. (2015). A meta-analytic review of moral licensing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(4), 540–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burger, A. M., Schuler, J., & Eberling, E. (2022). Guilty pleasures: Moral licensing in climate-related behavior. Global Environmental Change, 72, 102415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, M. C., Manning, K. C., Leonard, B., & Manning, H. M. (2016). Kids, cartoons, and cookies: Stereotype priming effects on children’s food consumption. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2(26), 257–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caruana, R. (2007). A sociological perspective of consumption morality. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 6(5), 287–304. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çekirdekci, ŞO., & Latif, F. O. B. (2019). Users and non-users of counterfeits: motivations, emotional outcomes and neutralization processes. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 28(6), 733–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chartrand, T. L., Huber, J., Shiv, B., & Tanner, R. (2008). Nonconscious goals and consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 189–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, S., Sreen, N., Rana, J., Dhir, A., & Sadarangani, P. H. (2021). Impact of ethical certifications and product involvement on consumers decision to purchase ethical products at price premiums in an emerging market context. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-021-00288-1

  • Chatzidakis, A., Hibbert, S., & Smith, A. P. (2007). Why people don’t take their concerns about fair trade to the supermarket: The role of neutralisation. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatzidakis, A., Smith, A., & Hibbert, S. (2006). Ethically concerned, yet unethically behaved”: Towards an updated understanding of consumer’s (un) ethical decision making. In C. Pechmann & L. Price (eds.), NA—Advances in Consumer Research, 33, 693–698.

  • Cone Communications/Ebiquity (2015). Global CSR Study. https://www.porternovelli.com/findings/2015-cone-communications-global-csr-study/. Accessed 3 July 2022.

  • Cotte, J., & Trudel, R. (2009). Socially conscious consumerism: A systematic review of the body of knowledge. Network for Business Sustainability: Knowledge Project Series, 1–65. https://eldis.org/document/A44981.

  • Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2004). Business ethics: a european perspective. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Astous, A., & Legendre, A. (2009). Understanding consumers’ ethical justifications: A scale for appraising consumers’ reasons for not behaving ethically. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(2), 255–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Detert, J. R., Treviño, L. K., & Sweitzer, V. L. (2008). Moral disengagement in ethical decision making: A study of antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 374–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickenbrok, C., & Martinez, L. F. (2018). Communicating green fashion across different cultures and geographical regions. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 15(2), 127–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freestone, O., & McGoldrick, P. (2008). Motivations of the ethical consumer. Journal of Business Ethics, 79(4), 445–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukukawa, K., Zaharie, M. M., & Romonţi-Maniu, A. I. (2019). Neutralization techniques as a moderating mechanism: Ethically questionable behavior in the Romanian consumer context. Psychology & Marketing, 36(2), 138–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hameed, I., Waris, I., Amin, & Haq, M. (2019). Predicting eco-conscious consumer behavior using theory of planned behavior in Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(15), 15535–15547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosta, M., & Zabkar, V. (2021). Antecedents of environmentally and socially responsible sustainable consumer behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 171(2), 273–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janiszewski, C., & Wyer, R. S., Jr. (2014). Content and process priming: A review. Journal of consumer psychology, 24(1), 96–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, U., & Dhar, R. (2006). Licensing effect in consumer choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(2), 259–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kossmann, E., & Gómez-Suárez, M. (2018). Decision-making processes for purchases of ethical products: gaps between academic research and needs of marketing practitioners. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 15(3), 353–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, M., Li, J., Tan, M., & Zhong, Y. (2021). Exposure to money modulates the processing of charitable donation: An event-related potentials study. Neuroscience Letters, 765, 136277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazar, N., & Zhong, C. B. (2010). Do green products make us better people? Psychological Science, 21(4), 494–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, S., Oates, C. J., Young, C. W., & Hwang, K. (2006). Toward sustainable consumption: Researching voluntary simplifiers. [Article]. Psychology & Marketing, 23(6), 515–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, S. (2008). Conceptualizing immoral and unethical consumption using neutralization theory. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 36(3), 261–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, D. M., & Levine, T. R. (2021). It’s the situation and your disposition: A test of two honesty hypotheses. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(2), 213–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Megicks, P., Memery, J., & Williams, J. (2008). Influences on ethical and socially responsible shopping: Evidence from the UK grocery sector. Journal of Marketing Management, 24(5/6), 637–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Memery, J., Megicks, P., & Williams, J. (2005). Ethical and social responsibility issues in grocery shopping: A preliminary typology. Qualitative Market Research, 8(4), 399–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaelidou, N., & Hassan, L. (2008). The role of health consciousness, food safety concern and ethical identity on attitudes and intentions towards organic food. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 32(2), 163–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, L. A., Webb, D. J., & Harris, K. E. (2001). Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(1), 45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast, G. P., & Tsang, A. S. (2019). Explaining socially responsible consumption. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 36(1), 146–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotella, A., & Barclay, P. (2020). Failure to replicate moral licensing and moral cleansing in an online experiment. Personality and Individual Differences, 161, 109967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachdeva, S., Iliev, R., & Medin, D. L. (2009). Sinning saints and saintly sinners: The paradox of moral self-regulation. Psychological Science, 20(4), 523–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02326.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ShabbirHusain, R. V. (2022). Green offering: more the centrality, greater the scepticism. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-021-00324-0.

  • Shaw, D., Grehan, E., Shiu, E., Hassan, L., & Thomson, J. (2005). An exploration of values in ethical consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 4(3), 185–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, M., & Monson, T. C. (1975). Persons, situations, and the control of social behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(4), 637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soares Júnior, A. P., Zucoloto, C. R. F., de Freitas André, O., & Mainardes, E. W. (2019). Healthy food purchasing behavior for children. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 16(1), 103–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahan, R., & Gerbasi, K. (1972). Short, homogenous versions of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28(2), 191–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, G. M., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 664–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szmigin, I., Carrigan, M., & McEachern, M. (2009). The conscious consumer: Taking a flexible approach to ethical behavior. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33(2), 224–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanford, S., Kim, M., & Kim, E. J. (2020). Priming social media and framing cause-related marketing to promote sustainable hotel choice. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 28(11), 1762–1781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trudel, R. (2019). Sustainable consumer behavior. Consumer Psychology Review, 2(1), 85–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, J., Braun Kohlová, M., & Bahník, Š. (2021). No evidence of within-domain moral licensing in the environmental domain. Environment and Behavior, 53(10), 1070–1094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Birgelen, M., Semeijn, J., & Behrens, P. (2011). Explaining pro-environment consumer behavior in air travel. Journal of Air Transport Management, 17(2), 125–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, D. (2014). Attenuating depletion using goal priming. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(4), 497–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yarimoglu, E., & Binboga, G. (2019). Understanding sustainable consumption in an emerging country: The antecedents and consequences of the ecologically conscious consumer behavior model. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(4), 642–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong, B., Liljenquist, J. A., & Cain, D. M. (2009). Moral self-regulation: Licensing and compensation. In De D. Cremer (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on ethical behavior and decision making (pp. 75–89). NC Information Age Publishing.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded in part by the University of Lethbridge MSc Management program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

This article utilizes thesis research conducted by the first author, under the supervision and guidance of the second author. The second author drafted the article, drawing in part on text and analyses from the first author’s thesis as well as adding additional text and analyses.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debra Z. Basil.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This research received ethics approval from the Authors’ university internal review board, and participants were provided with informed consent.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no known competing interests or conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hanel, V., Basil, D.Z. Socially conscious consumer behavior: the role of ethical self-identity and priming. Int Rev Public Nonprofit Mark 20, 427–445 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-022-00348-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-022-00348-0

Keywords

Navigation