Skip to main content
Log in

Impact Angle/Time Constraint Guidance Design Based on Fast Terminal Error Dynamics

  • Published:
Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Considering the problem that the optimal error dynamics can only converge at the terminal time, an impact angle/time constraint missile guidance law with finite-time convergence is designed in this paper, which is based on the pure proportional navigation (PPN) guidance law and the fast terminal error dynamics (FTED) approach. The missile guidance model and FTED equation are given first, and the dynamic equation of impact angle/time error based on PPN is also derived. Then, the guidance law is designed based on FTED, and the guidance error can converge to 0 in a finite time. Furthermore, considering the field of view constraint, the guidance law is improved by using the saturation function mapping method. Finally, a numerical simulation example is given to verify the effectiveness of the guidance law, which shows that the guidance law proposed in this paper can make the missile quickly adjust to the desired states in advance, and effectively relieve the overload saturation pressure of the actuator.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

a IA :

Biased term to regulate the terminal impact angle

a IT :

Biased term to regulate the terminal impact time

a m :

Guidance acceleration command of the missile

a PPN :

Pure proportional navigation (PPN) term of the acceleration command

(e r, e θ):

Line-of-sight (LOS) frame

M :

Missile

n :

Design parameter controlling the convergence curvature of the saturation function

N :

Proportional navigation gain

p, q :

Regulation parameters of the nonlinear term, which are positive odd numbers and p > q

r :

Vector of the relative distance between the target and the missile

r m :

Position vector of the missile

r t :

Position vector of the target

t :

Current flying time

t 0 :

Initial time

t f :

Terminal time

t d :

Desired impact time

(t m, n m):

Velocity frame

t go :

Remaining flight time

T :

Target

v m :

Velocity vector of the missile

(x 0, y 0):

Position of the missile at the initial time

(x f, y f):

Position of the missile at the terminal time

(X, Y):

Inertial frame

α :

Coefficient of the linear term

β :

Coefficient of the nonlinear term

ε :

Tracking error

ε t :

Impact time error

ε ϕ :

Impact angle error

θ m :

Velocity leading angle

θ max :

Maximum field of view (FOV) angle of the missile

σ :

LOS angle

ϕ 0 :

Flight path angle of the missile at the initial time

ϕ d :

Desired terminal impact angle

ϕ f :

Flight path angle of the missile at the terminal time

ϕ m :

Flight path angle

References

  1. LIAO X P, LI K B, LIU Y H, et al. Analytical solution of pure proportional navigation guidance law and three-dimensional guidance with impact angle constraint [J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2021, 53(12): 42–50 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  2. ZHANG Y, TANG S J, GUO J. Adaptive terminal angle constraint interception against maneuvering targets with fast fixed-time convergence [J]. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 2018, 28(8): 2996–3014.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. XIONG S F, WANG W H, SONG S Y, et al. Extended state observer based impact angle constrained guidance law for maneuvering target interception [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2015, 229(14): 2589–2607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. LEE Y I, KIM S H, LEE J I, et al. Analytic solutions of generalized impact-angle-control guidance law for first-order lag system [J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2012, 36(1): 96–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. LI K B, LIAO X P, LIANG Y G, et al. Guidance strategy with impact angle constraints based on pure proportional navigation [J]. Acta Aeronautica ET Astronautica Sinica, 2020, 41(S2): 76–85 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  6. YANG S J, WEN Q Q, ZHOU G Q, et al. Guidance strategy considering strapdown seeker minimum field-of-view angle constraint [J]. Acta Aeronautica ET Astronautica Sinica, 2020, 41(S2): 226–236 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  7. CHENG Z T, LI J F, PENG G X, et al. Polynomial guidance with constrained impact angle based on Bezier curve [J]. Computing Technology and Automation, 2021, 40(4): 1–7 (in Chinese).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. HU Q L, CAO R H, HAN T, et al. Field-of-view limited guidance with impact angle constraint and feasibility analysis [J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2021, 114: 106753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. ZHANG Y X. Research on finite-time convergent sliding-mode guidance law [D]. Tianjin: Nankai University, 2013 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  10. ZHOU H B. Study on guidance law and cooperative guidance for multi-missiles based on finite-time and sliding mode theory [D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2015 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  11. JI Y. Research on sliding mode control theory based guidance algorithm [D]. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology, 2017 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  12. JEON I S, LEE J I, TAHK M J. Impact-time-control guidance law for anti-ship missiles [J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2006, 14(2): 260–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. HE S M, LEE C H, SHIN H S, et al. Optimal three-dimensional impact time guidance with seeker’s field-of-view constraint [J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2021, 34(2): 240–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. KANG S, ZHAO H, BU K C, et al. Impact time and angle control guidance law with look-angle constraint [J]. Missiles and Space Vehicles, 2020 (5): 58–61 (in Chinese).

  15. HUA W H, ZHANG Y J, ZHANG J P, et al. Sliding-mode guidance law for attack time cooperation of multi-missiles [J]. Journal of Chinese Inertial Technology, 2018, 26(1): 98–102 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  16. RUAN C, WEN Q Q, ZHANG W J. Three dimensional impact time control guidance law with field of view constraint [J]. Aero Weaponry, 2021, 28(1): 34–38 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  17. HE S M, LEE C H, SHIN H S, et al. Optimal error dynamics in missile guidance [M]//Optimal guidance and its applications in missiles and UAVs. Cham: Springer, 2020: 9–39.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. HE S M, LEE C H. Optimality of error dynamics in missile guidance problems [J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2018, 41(7): 1624–1633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. YU X H, ZHIHONG M. Fast terminal sliding-mode control design for nonlinear dynamical systems [J]. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Fundamental Theory and Applications, 2002, 49(2): 261–264.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. PARK K B, TSUJI T. Terminal sliding mode control of second-order nonlinear uncertain systems [J]. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 1999, 9(11): 769–780.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yangang Liang  (梁彦刚).

Additional information

Foundation item: the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 12002370)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qin, X., Liu, Y., Li, K. et al. Impact Angle/Time Constraint Guidance Design Based on Fast Terminal Error Dynamics. J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. (Sci.) 27, 823–832 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-022-2509-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-022-2509-3

Key words

CLC number

Document code

Navigation