Skip to main content
Log in

Coupling of GC-MS/MS to Principal Component Analysis for Assessment of Matrix Effect: Efficient Determination of Ultra-Low Levels of Pesticide Residues in Some Functional Foods

  • Published:
Food Analytical Methods Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Functional foods provide nutritional and health benefits, yet they could be contaminated with residues like pesticides and polychlorobiphenyls. These residues affect the safety, quality, and consequently the commercial value of functional foods. Therefore, the validity and efficiency of residue determination methods constitute a major analytical concern. Reduction of matrix effect (ME) has always been the golden key for guaranteed sensitivity, selectivity, and high throughput analysis. This study aims for accurate determination and streamlined quantification of 200 pesticide residues in 16 matrices. Hence, QuEChERS protocol coupled to GC-MS/MS was then employed and separations were obtained in 25 min. Dilution of the final extracts of fresh and herbal samples was carried out to achieve an acceptable balance between sensitivity and peak characteristics. Dilution factors of 1x and 5x were selected for fresh and herbal samples, respectively. Principal component analysis (PCA) was then independently applied on the digitally exported total ion chromatograms (TICs) of the studied matrices and the calculated ME%. PCA score/loading plots of TICs demonstrated the key matrix constituents that influenced the obtained trends. Similarly, three main clusters were obtained after PCA of ME% indicating a dependent relationship between matrix type and the obtained effects. Out of the obtained three clusters, an appropriate representative matrix-matched calibration (R-MMC) was selected for ME compensation. Based on the EU validation guidelines, the proposed protocol was validated at 2 and 10 μg Kg−1 with acceptable method performance. Four proficiency testing (PT) and commercial samples were successfully analyzed. The proposed protocol would help laboratories to increase sample processing capacity and to ensure the safety of functional food products. This work should serve in setting standards that warranty the quality/safety of functional foods by national regulatory authorities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdi H, Williams LJ (2010) Principal component analysis. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews: computational statistics 2(4):433–459

    Google Scholar 

  • Anastassiades M, Lehotay SJ, Stajnbaher D, Schenck FJ (2003) Fast and easy multiresidue method employing acetonitrile extraction/partitioning and dispersive solid-phase extraction for the determination of pesticide residues in produce. J AOAC Int 86(2):412–431

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bigliardi B, Galati F (2013) Innovation trends in the food industry: the case of functional foods. Trends Food Sci Technol 31(2):118–129

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown SD, Sum ST, Despagne F, Lavine BK (1996) Chemometrics. Anal Chem 68(12):21–62

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cajka T, Sandy C, Bachanova V, Drabova L, Kalachova K, Pulkrabova J, Hajslova J (2012) Streamlining sample preparation and gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis of multiple pesticide residues in tea. Anal Chim Acta 743:51–60

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Camara JS, Alves MA, Marques JC (2006) Multivariate analysis for the classification and differentiation of Madeira wines according to main grape varieties. Talanta 68(5):1512–1521

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Camino-Sanchez FJ, Zafra-Gomez A, Ruiz-Garcia J, Bermudez-Peinado R, Ballesteros O, Navalon A, Vilchez JL (2011) UNE-EN ISO/IEC 17025: 2005 accredited method for the determination of 121 pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Food Comp Anal 24(3):427–440

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Codex Alimentarius Commission (1993) CAC, Joint FAO/WHO Food Standard Program, 2, p. 391

  • de Sousa FA, Costa AIG, de Queiroz MELR, Teofilo RF, Neves AA, de Pinho GP (2012) Evaluation of matrix effect on the GC response of eleven pesticides by PCA. Food Chem 135(1):179–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurachem guide 2014: The fitness for purpose of analytical methods-a laboratory guide to method validation and related topics

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurachem/CITAC guide: Quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission Regulation (2005) (396/2005/EC) on maximum residue levels of pesticides in or on food and feed of plant and animal origin and amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC. vol 70

  • Farahi A, Achak M, El Gaini L, El Mhammedi MA, Bakasse M (2015) Electrochemical determination of paraquat in citric fruit based on electrodeposition of silver particles onto carbon paste electrode. J Food Drug Anal 23(3):463–471

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Alba AR, Garcia-Reyes JF (2008) Large-scale multi-residue methods for pesticides and their degradation products in food by advanced LC-MS. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 27(11):973–990

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frenich AG, Vidal JLM, Moreno JLF, Romero-Gonzalez R (2009) Compensation for matrix effects in gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry using a single point standard addition. J Chromatogr A 1216(23):4798–4808

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich MT, Martins ML, Prestes OD, Zanella R (2016) Use of factorial design in the development of multiresidue method for determination of pesticide residues in wheat by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Food Anal Methods 9(9):2541–2551

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujiyoshi T, Ikami T, Sato T, Kikukawa K, Kobayashi M, Ito H, Yamamoto A (2016) Evaluation of the matrix effect on gas chromatography-mass spectrometry with carrier gas containing ethylene glycol as an analyte protectant. J Chromatogr A 1434:136–141

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guilbault GG, Hjelm M (1989) Nomenclature for automated and mechanised analysis (recommendations 1989). Pure Appl Chem 61(9):1657–1664

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajslova J, Zrostlikova J (2003) Matrix effects in (ultra) trace analysis of pesticide residues in food and biotic matrices. J Chromatogr A 1000(1):181–197

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Katerina Mastovska LV, Melissa Churley and Thomas P. Doherty (2017) Evaluation of a high-sensitivity GC-MS/MS in the analysis of pesticide residues in complex samples: cost saving and other benefits, https://www.covancefoodsolutions.com/media/document/1/mastovskaasms17.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein J, Alder L (2003) Applicability of gradient liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry to the simultaneous screening for about 100 pesticides in crops. J AOAC Int 86(5):1015–1037

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koesukwiwat U, Lehotay SJ, Miao S, Leepipatpiboon N (2010) High throughput analysis of 150 pesticides in fruits and vegetables using QuEChERS and low-pressure gas chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1217(43):6692–6703

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kruve A, Leito I, Herodes K (2009) Combating matrix effects in LC/ESI/MS: the extrapolative dilution approach. Anal Chim Acta 651(1):75–80

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon H, Lehotay SJ, Geis-Asteggiante L (2012) Variability of matrix effects in liquid and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of pesticide residues after QuEChERS sample preparation of different food crops. J Chromatogr A 1270:235–245

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lehotay SJ, Mastovska K, Lightfield AR, Gates RA (2010) Multi-analyst, multi-matrix performance of the QuEChERS approach for pesticide residues in foods and feeds using HPLC/MS/MS analysis with different calibration techniques. J AOAC Int 93(2):355–367

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Liu X, Dong F, Xu J, Xu H, Hu M, Zheng Y (2016) Chemometric-assisted QuEChERS extraction method for the residual analysis of thiacloprid, spirotetramat and spirotetramat's four metabolites in pepper: application of their dissipation patterns. Food Chem 192:893–899

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li M, Dai C, Wang F, Kong Z, He Y, Huang YT, Fan B (2017) Chemometric-assisted QuEChERS extraction method for post-harvest pesticide determination in fruits and vegetables. Sci Rep 7:42489

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Wang Z, Gao F, Song D, Lu X (2018) Selection of representative matrices for the multiresidue analysis of pesticides in tea by GC-MS/MS. Anal Methods 10(8):855–866

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nie J, Miao S, Lehotay SJ, Li W-T, Zhou H, Mao X-H, Lu J-W, Lan L, Ji S (2015) Multi-residue analysis of pesticides in traditional Chinese medicines using gas chromatography-negative chemical ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Food Addit Contam: Part A 32(8):1287–1300

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pang G, Xie J, Chen Q, Hu Z (2012) How functional foods play critical roles in human health. Food Sci Human Wellness 1(1):26–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Pano-Farias NS, Ceballos-Magana SG, Munizz-Valencia R, Gonzalez J (2017) Validation and assessment of matrix effect and uncertainty of a gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry method for pesticides in papaya and avocado samples. J Food Drug Anal 25(3):501–509

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pico Y, Blasco C, Font G (2004) Environmental and food applications of LC-tandem mass spectrometry in pesticide-residue analysis: an overview. Mass Spectrom Rev 23(1):45–85

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pinho GP, Neves AA, Queiroz MELR, Silverio FO (2009) Matrix effect in pesticide quantification by gas chromatography. Quim Nova 32(4):987–995

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rutkowska E, Lozowicka B, Kaczynski P (2017) Modification of multiresidue QuEChERS protocol to minimize matrix effect and improve recoveries for determination of pesticide residues in dried herbs followed by GC-MS/MS. Food Anal Methods 11(3):709–724

    Google Scholar 

  • SANTE (2017) A guidance document on analytical quality control and method validation procedures for pesticides residues analysis in food and feed. European commission SANTE/11813/2017 (2018), Brussels Belgium

  • Shatat SM, Eltanany BM, Mohamed AA, Al-Ghobashy MA, Fathalla FA, Abbas SS (2018) Coupling of on-column trypsin digestion-peptide mapping and principal component analysis for stability and biosimilarity assessment of recombinant human growth hormone. J Chromatogr B 1072:105–115

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shendy AH, Al-Ghobashy MA, Mohammed MN, Alla SAG, Lotfy HM (2016a) Simultaneous determination of 200 pesticide residues in honey using gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in conjunction with streamlined quantification approach. J Chromatogr A 1427:142–160

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shendy AH, Al-Ghobashy MA, Alla SAG, Lotfy HM (2016b) Development and validation of a modified QuEChERS protocol coupled to LC-MS/MS for simultaneous determination of multi-class antibiotic residues in honey. Food Chem 190:982–989

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singh S, Kumar V, Thakur S, Banerjee BD, Chandna S, Rautela RS, Grover SS, Rawat DS, Pasha ST, Jain SK (2011) DNA damage and cholinesterase activity in occupational workers exposed to pesticides. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 31(2):278–285

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Specht W, Tillkes M (1980) Gas-chromatographische Bestimmung von Ruckstanden an Pflanzenbehandlungsmitteln nach Clean-up Uber Gel-Chromatographie und Mini-Kieselgel-Saulen-Chromatographie,Gas-chromatographic determination of pesticide residues after clean-up by gel-permeation chromatography and mini-silica gel-column chromatography. Fresenius Zeitschrift fur analytische Chemie 301(4):300–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahnke H, Kittlaus S, Kempe G, Alder L (2012) Reduction of matrix effects in liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry by dilution of the sample extracts: how much dilution is needed? Anal Chem 84(3):1474–1482

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suchi Chawla HKP, Gor HN, Vaghela KM, Solank i PP, Shah PG (2017) Evaluation of matrix effects in multiresidue analysis of pesticide residues in vegetables and spices by LC-MS/MS. J AOAC Int 100(3):1–8. https://doi.org/10.5740/jaoacint.17-0048

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Cassman KG, Matson PA, Naylor R, Polasky S (2002) Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418(6898):671–677

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • World Health O (2007) WHO guidelines for assessing quality of herbal medicines with reference to contaminants and residues

  • World Health O (2015) World health statistics 2015. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Worley B, Powers R (2013) Multivariate analysis in metabolomics. Current Metabolomics 1(1):92–107

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Medhat A. Al-Ghobashy.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

None

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 677 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 39 kb)

ESM 3

(DOCX 158 kb)

ESM 4

(DOCX 35 kb)

ESM 5

(DOCX 37 kb)

ESM 6

(DOCX 37 kb)

ESM 7

(DOCX 31 kb)

ESM 8

(DOCX 55 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shendy, A.H., Eltanany, B.M., Al-Ghobashy, M.A. et al. Coupling of GC-MS/MS to Principal Component Analysis for Assessment of Matrix Effect: Efficient Determination of Ultra-Low Levels of Pesticide Residues in Some Functional Foods. Food Anal. Methods 12, 2870–2885 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-019-01643-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-019-01643-z

Keywords

Navigation