Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Willow Root Development and Morphology Changes Under Different Irrigation and Fertilization Regimes in a Vegetation Filter

  • Published:
BioEnergy Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Determining the appropriate wastewater dose to supply nutrients while avoiding overirrigation is essential for achieving more balanced above- and belowground development of the plants, thereby ensuring high filtering functionality of a willow vegetation filter system. Aboveground biomass and root development of a 3-year-old willow vegetation filter in response to three increasing doses of secondary-treated urban wastewater under both fertilized and unfertilized conditions were evaluated. Fine, coarse and total root biomass, fine root length density (FRLD), specific fine root length (SFRL) and specific root area (SRA) were assessed in soil core samples collected at four different depths (0–20, 20–40, 40–60 and 60–80 cm) in all treatments. While aboveground biomass increased as wastewater amounts and fertilization increased (from 23.89 Mg ha−1 in non-irrigated condition to 47.07 Mg ha−1 in the highest wastewater dose, from 31.5 Mg ha−1 in unfertilized plots to 40.1 Mg ha−1 in the fertilized), total and fine root biomass decreased when willow was irrigated with the highest wastewater dose (i.e. total root biomass is 2.54 Mg ha−1 in non-irrigated condition—1.36 Mg ha−1 in the highest wastewater dose). The root biomass did not follow the same development pattern, and a significant decrease in fine root biomass was observed when the highest irrigation dose was applied. In these circumstances, we believe that the supply in water and nutrient is sufficient to the development of the willows which react by diminishing the amount of roots proportionally to the aboveground parts. This may lead to a higher transpiration rate and allow willows to avoid a surplus of water in the soil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

SRC:

Short-rotation coppice

RBD:

Root biomass density (Mg ha−1)

FRLD:

Fine root length density (cm cm−3)

SFRL:

Specific fine root length (m g−1)

SRA:

Specific root area (m2 kg−1)

References

  1. Perttu KL (1993) Biomass production and nutrient removal from municipal wastes using willow vegetation filters. J Sustain For 1(3):57–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Truu M, Truu J, Heinsoo K (2009) Changes in soil microbial community under willow coppice: the effect of irrigation with secondary-treated municipal wastewater. Ecol Eng 35(6):1011–1020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Guidi W, Piccioni E, Bonari E (2008) Evapotranspiration and crop coefficient of poplar and willow short-rotation coppice used as vegetation filter. Bioresour Technol 99:4832–4840

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mirck J, Isebrands JG, Verwijst T, Ledin S (2005) Development of short-rotation willow coppice systems for environmental purposes in Sweden. Biomass Bioenergy 28:219–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dimitriou I, Rosenqvist H (2011) Sewage sludge and wastewater fertilisation of short rotation coppice (SRC) for increased bioenergy production—biological and economic potential. Biomass Bioenergy 35(2):835–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Guidi W, Labrecque M (2010) Effects of high water supply on growth, water use, and nutrient allocation in willow and poplar grown in a 1-year pot trial. Water Air Soil Pollut 207:85–101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Perttu K, Kowalik P (1997) Salix vegetation filters for purification of waters and soils. Biomass Bioenergy 12:9–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Aronsson P, Heinsoo K, Perttu K, Hasselgren K (2002) Spatial variation in above-ground growth in unevenly wastewater-irrigated willow Salix viminalis plantations. Ecol Eng 19:281–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Elowson S (1999) Willow as a vegetation filter for cleaning of polluted drainage water from agricultural land. Biomass Bioenergy 16:281–290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dimitriou I, Aronsson P (2011) Wastewater and sewage sludge application to willows and poplars grown in lysimeters—plant response and treatment efficiency. Biomass Bioenergy 35(1):161–170

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dimitriou I, Eriksson J, Adler A, Aronsson P, Verwijst T (2006) Fate of heavy metals after application of sewage sludge and wood–ash mixtures to short-rotation willow coppice. Environ Pollut 142(1):160–169

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Volk TA, Abrahamson LP, Nowak CA, Smart LB, Tharakan PJ, White EH (2006) The development of short-rotation willow in the Northeastern United States for bioenergy and bioproducts, agroforestry and phytoremediation. Biomass Bioenergy 30(8–9):715–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Volk T, Abrahamson L, White E (2001) Root dynamics in willow crops. Biomass power for rural development technical report. Syracuse, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pacaldo R, Volk T, Briggs R (2013) Greenhouse gas potentials of shrub willow biomass crops based on below- and aboveground biomass inventory along a 19-year chronosequence. BioEnergy Res 6(1):252–262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Heaton RJ, Sims REH, Tungcul RO (2002) The root growth of Salix viminalis and Eucalyptus nitens in response to dairy farm pond effluent irrigation. Bioresour Technol 81(1):1–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Volk T, Abrahamson L, White EH (2001) Root dynamics in willow crops biomass power for rural development technical report. Syracuse, New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rytter R, Hansson A (1996) Seasonal amount, growth and depth distribution of fine roots in an irrigated and fertilized Salix viminalis L. plantation. Biomass Bioenergy 11:129–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Crow P, Houston T (2004) The influence of soil and coppice cycle on the rooting habit of short rotation poplar and willow coppice. Biomass Bioenergy 26(6):497–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jackson M, Attwood P (1996) Roots of willow (Salix viminalis L) show marked tolerance to oxygen shortage in flooded soils and in solution culture. Plant Soil 187(1):37–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Püttsepp Ü (2004) Effects of sustainable management practices on fine-root systems in willow (Salix viminalis, S. dasyclados), Grey Alder (Alnus incana) and Norway spruce (Picea abies) stands. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala

  21. Rytter R-M (1999) Fine-root production and turnover in a willow plantation estimated by different calculation methods. Scand J For Res 14(6):526–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Atkinson D (2000) Root characteristics: why and what to measure. In: Bengough AG, Engels C, Noordwijk M, Pellerin S, Geijn S, Smit A (eds) Root methods. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Cornelissen JHC, Lavorel S, Garnier E, Diaz S, Buchmann N, Gurvich DE, Reich PB, ter Steege H, Morgan HD, van der Heijden MGA, Pausas JG, Poorter H (2003) A handbook of protocols for standardized and easy measurements of plants functional traits worldwide. Australian J Bot 51:335–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Comas L, Bouma T, Eissenstat D (2002) Linking root traits to potential growth rate in six temperate tree species. Oecologia 132(1):34–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ryser P (2006) The mysterious root length. Plant Soil 286(1–2):1–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Böhm W (1979) Methods of studying root systems. Springer, Berlin, p 188

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Leuschner C, Harteveld M, Hertel D (2009) Consequences of increasing forest use intensity for biomass, morphology and growth of fine roots in a tropical moist forest on Sulawesi, Indonesia. Agric Ecosyst Environ 129(4):474–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gill RA, Jackson RB (2000) Global patterns of root turnover for terrestrial ecosystems. New Phytol 147(1):13–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bohm W (1979) Methods of studying root systems. Springer, Berlin, 188 pp

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Kücke M, Schmid H, Spiess A (1995) A comparison of four methods for measuring roots of field crops in three contrasting soils. Plant Soil 172(1):63–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zutter B, Mitchell R, Glover G, DH G (1999) Root length and biomass in mixtures of broomsedge with loblolly pine or sweetgum. Can J For Res 29:926–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gwenzi W, Veneklaas E, Holmes K, Bleby T, Phillips I, Hinz C (2011) Spatial analysis of fine root distribution on a recently constructed ecosystem in a water-limited environment. Plant Soil 344(1–2):255–272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Guidi W, Pitre FE, Labrecque M (2013) Short-rotation coppice of willows for the production of biomass in Eastern Canada. In: Matovic M.D. (Eds), Biomass now -sustainable growth and use. pp 421-448. InTech ISBN 978-953-51-1105-4

  34. Cavanagh A, Gasser MO, Labrecque M (2011) Pig slurry as fertilizer on willow plantation. Biomass Bioenergy 35(10):4165–4173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Labrecque M, Teodorescu T (2005) Field performances and biomass production of 12 willow and poplar clones in short-rotation coppice in southern Quebec (Canada). Biomass Bioenergy 29:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Stadnyk CN (2010) Root dynamics and carbon accumulation of six willow clones in Saskatchewan. University of Saskatchewan

  37. Keyes MR, Grier CC (1981) Above- and below-ground net production in 40-year-old Douglas-fir stands on low and high productivity sites. Can J For Res 11(3):599–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kozlowski T (1997) Responses of woody plants to flooding and salinity. Hernon, Victoria

    Google Scholar 

  39. Pezeshki SR, Anderson P, Shields FD (1998) Effects of soil moisture regimes on growth and survival of black willow (Salix nigra) posts (cuttings). Wetlands 18(3):460–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Good JEG, Williams TG (1986) Growth responses of selected clones of birch (Betula pendula roth., B. pubescens Ehrh.) and willow (Salix caprea L., S. cinerea L.) to nitrogen in solution culture. Plant Soil 92(2):209–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ågren G, Franklin O (2003) Root: shoot ratios, optimization and nitrogen productivity. Ann Bot 92(6):795–800

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Heilman P, Ekuan G, Fogle D (1994) Above- and belowground biomass and fine roots of 4-year-old hybrids of Populus trichocarpa x Populus deltoides and parental species in short-rotation culture. Can J For Res 24:1186–1192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Børja I, De Wit HA, Steffenrem A, Majdi H (2008) Stand age and fine root biomass, distribution and morphology in a Norway spruce chronosequence in southeast Norway. Tree Physiol 28(5):773–784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Makita N, Hirano Y, Mizoguchi T, Kominami Y, Dannoura M, Ishii H, Finér L, Kanazawa Y (2011) Very fine roots respond to soil depth: biomass allocation, morphology, and physiology in a broad-leaved temperate forest. Ecol Res 26(1):95–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Ostonen I, Lõhmus K, Helmisaari H-S, Truu J, Meel S (2007) Fine root morphological adaptations in Scots pine, Norway spruce and silver birch along a latitudinal gradient in boreal forests. Tree Physiol 27(11):1627–1634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. O’Grady AP, Worledge D, Battaglia M (2005) Temporal and spatial changes in fine root distributions in a young Eucalyptus globulus stand in southern Tasmania. For Ecol Manag 214(1–3):373–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Bakker MR, Jolicoeur E, Trichet P, Augusto L, Plassard C, Guinberteau J, Loustau D (2009) Adaptation of fine roots to annual fertilization and irrigation in a 13-year-old Pinus pinaster stand. Tree Physiol 29(2):229–238

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kucbel S, Jaloviar P, Scaron p, aacute k J (2011) Quantity, vertical distribution and morphology of fine roots in Norway spruce stands with different stem density. Plant Root 5:46–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study received financial support from the MDDEFP—Quebec. The authors wish to thank Francis Allard from Agro Énergie Inc. for providing access to the experimental field. We are grateful to Alexandre Naud, Dominic Desjardins and Matthew Mosseler for their assistance during soil coring. We also wish to thank Stéphane Daigle for the statistical support and Karen Grislis for the linguistic revision.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut de Recherche en Biologie Végétale, Université de Montréal and Montreal Botanical Garden, 4101 Sherbrooke East, Montreal, QC, H1X 2B2, Canada

    Ahmed Jerbi, Werther Guidi Nissim, Rémy Fluet & Michel Labrecque

Authors
  1. Ahmed Jerbi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Werther Guidi Nissim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rémy Fluet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michel Labrecque
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michel Labrecque.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jerbi, A., Nissim, W.G., Fluet, R. et al. Willow Root Development and Morphology Changes Under Different Irrigation and Fertilization Regimes in a Vegetation Filter. Bioenerg. Res. 8, 775–787 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-014-9550-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-014-9550-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation