Skip to main content
Log in

The Dark Triad Traits and Fame Interest: Do Dark Personalities Desire Stardom?

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Popular media has become increasingly flooded with material concerning fame and celebrities. Although the fascination with fame is not a new phenomenon, the emergence of YouTube.com and reality television has led to the perception that fame is something that seemingly anyone can achieve. Researchers have examined the characteristics that are associated with the desire for fame and have found that narcissism is one of the most consistent predictors of fame interest. The goal of the present study was to extend previous research by examining how the additional two Dark Triad personality traits (i.e., psychopathy and Machiavellianism; Paulhus and Williams 2002) and another conceptualization of narcissism (i.e., grandiose and vulnerable forms of pathological narcissism) relate to aspects of fame interest among 569 undergraduate students. Facets of psychopathy and narcissism were associated with multiple aspects of fame interest, whereas Machiavellianism was negatively associated with desiring fame for altruistic purposes only. Discussion focuses on possible explanations for the associations that the Dark Triad personality traits had with the six dimensions of fame interest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. To determine the best way to account for the shared variance between dimensions of fame interest, we ran two versions of our model, one in which we extracted a common fame seeking factor, and one in which we allowed the error terms associated with each fame dimension to correlate. There were very few differences in the results between these two models and we decided to use the version with correlated error terms to simplify the analyses. The analysis extracting the common fame factor is available in online Appendix A. We also conducted additional analyses that included only the PNI composite score, the SRPS composite score, and Machiavellianism as predictors. In the interest of parsimony, we did not include the results of these analyses in the manuscript but the results of these analyses are available from the first author upon request.

  2. We also conducted analyses that included participant sex as a possible moderator of the relationships between dark personality features and the dimensions of fame interest. Sex was found to moderate the relationship between secondary psychopathy and the perceived suitability, intensity, drive, and vulnerability dimensions of fame interest. Details of these analyses are available in online Appendix B.

References

  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2011). Amos (version 20.0) [computer program]. Chicago, IL: IBM/SPSS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babiak, P., & Hare, R. D. (2006). Snakes in suits: when psychopaths go to work. New York, NY: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babiak, P., Neumann, C. S., & Hare, R. D. (2010). Corporate psychopathy: talking the walk. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 28, 174–193.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, R. (1975). An empirical classification of psychopathic personality. British Journal of Psychiatry, 127, 456–460.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, R., & Geis, F. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York, NY: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, D. J., & Michie, C. (2001). Refining the construct of psychopathy: towards a hierarchical model. Psychological Assessment, 13, 171–188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, K. A., & Pincus, A. L. (2003). Interpersonal analysis of grandiose and vulnerable narcissism. Journal of Personality Disorders, 17, 188–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Emmons, R. A. (1987). Narcissism: theory and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 11–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J. D., & Trimm, F. F., IV. (2008). On being eager and uninhibited: narcissism and approach-avoidance motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1004–1017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., Richards, S. C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). The dark triad of personality: a 10-year review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 199–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabbard, G. O. (1989). Two subtypes of narcissistic personality disorder. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 53, 527–532.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gountas, J., Gountas, S., Reeves, R. A., & Moran, L. (2012). Desire for fame: scale development and association with personal goals and aspirations. Psychology and Marketing, 29, 680–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, D., Long, C. R., & Dal Cin, S. (2013). Fame and the social self: the need to belong, narcissism, and relatedness predict the appeal of fame. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 490–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. D. (1985). Comparison of procedures for the assessment of psychopathy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 7–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. D. (1991). The hare psychopathy checklist-revised. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harpur, T., Hare, R., & Hakstian, R. (1989). A two-factor conceptualization of psychopathy: construct validity and implications for assessment. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 103, 741–747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, G., Rice, M., & Quinsey, V. (1994). Psychopathy as a taxon: evidence that psychopaths are a discrete class. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 387–397.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, B. M., Markon, K. E., Patrick, C. J., Krueger, R. F., & Newmann, J. P. (2004). Identifying psychopathy subtypes on the basis of personality structure. Psychological Assessment, 16, 276–288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobwitz, S., & Egan, V. (2006). The dark triad and normal personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 331–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2011). Differentiating the dark triad within the interpersonal circumplex. In L. M. Horowitz & S. Strack (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal psychology: theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic interventions (pp. 249–269). New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpman, B. (1941). On the need of separating psychopathy into two distinct clinical types: the symptomatic and the idiopathic. Journal of Criminal Psychopathology, 3, 112–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, M. R., Kiehl, K. A., & Fitzpatrick, C. M. (1995). Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalized population. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 151–158.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lilienfeld, S. O. (1998). Methodological advances and developments in the assessment of psychopathy. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 99–125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, M. (2015). Risk anything! secondary, rather than primary psychopathy, is associated with diverse risk-taking in evolutionarily relevant domains. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 9, 197–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmut, M. K., Menictas, C., Stevenson, R. J., & Homewood, J. (2011). Validating the factor structure of the self-report psychopathy scale in a community sample. Psychological Assessment, 23, 670–678.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maltby, J. (2010). An interest in fame: confirming the measurement and empirical conceptualization of fame interest. British Journal of Psychology, 101, 411–432.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, K., Donnellan, M. B., Hopwood, C. J., & Ackerman, R. A. (2011). The two faces of narcissus? An empirical comparison of the narcissistic personality inventory and the pathological narcissism inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 577–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, M. M., Donnellan, M. B., & Navarrete, C. D. (2012). A life history approach to understanding the dark triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 601–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mealey, L. (1995). The sociobiology of sociopathy: an integrated evolutionary model. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 523–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. D., & Campbell, W. K. (2008). Comparing clinical and social-personality conceptualizations of narcissism. Journal of Personality, 76, 449–476.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. D., Hoffman, B. J., Gaughan, E. T., Gentile, B., Maples, J., & Campbell, W. K. (2011). Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism: a nomological network analysis. Journal of Personality, 79, 1013–1042.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Noser, A. E., & Zeigler-Hill, V. (2014). Self-esteem instability and the desire for fame. Self and Identity, 13, 701–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, C., Zempolich, K., & Levenston, G. (1997). Emotionality and violent behavior in psychopaths: a biosocial analysis. In A. Raine (Ed.), Biosocial bases of violence (pp. 145–161). New York, NY: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D. L., Hemphill, J. D., & Hare, R. D. (2012). Manual for the self-report psychopathy scale. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pincus, A. L., Ansell, E. B., Pimentel, C. A., Cain, N. M., Wright, A., & Levy, K. N. (2009). Initial construction and validation of the pathological narcissism inventory. Psychological Assessment, 21, 365–379.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raskin, R. N., & Hall, C. S. (1979). A narcissistic personality inventory. Psychological Reports, 45, 590.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raskin, R. N., & Hall, C. S. (1981). The narcissistic personality inventory: alternate form reliability and further evidence of construct validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 159–162.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raskin, R. N., & Terry, H. (1988). A principal-components analysis of the narcissistic personality inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 890–902.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rauthmann, J. F., & Will, T. (2011). Proposing a multidimensional Machiavellianism conceptualization. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 39, 391–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skeem, J. L., Poythress, M., Edens, J. F., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Cale, E. M. (2003). Psychopathic personality or personalities? Exploring potential variants of psychopathy and their implications for risk assessment. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 8, 513–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skeem, J. L., Johansson, P., Andershed, H., Kerr, M., & Eno Louden, J. (2007). Two subtypes of psychopathic violent offenders that parallel primary and secondary variants. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116, 395–409.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Southard, A. C., Noser, A. E., Pollock, N. C., Mercer, S. H., & Zeigler-Hill, V. (2015). The interpersonal nature of dark personality features. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 34, 555–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapper, J., & Morris, D. (2005, February 25). Celebrity media spinning out of control? ABC News. Retrieved from http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/Entertainment/story?id=528898&page=6.

  • Uhls, Y. T., & Greenfield, P. M. (2012). The value of fame: preadolescent perceptions of popular media and their relationship to future aspirations. Developmental Psychology, 48, 315–326.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, H. M., Ready, C. B., & Weitenhagen, E. (2009). Narcissism and task persistence. Self and Identity, 8, 78–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. T., Kruger, D. J., & Wilke, A. (2009). Life history variables and risk-taking propensity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 77–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K. M., Paulhus, D. L., & Hare, R. D. (2007). Capturing the four-factor structure of psychopathy in college students via self-report. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88, 205–219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Young, S. M., & Pinsky, D. (2006). Narcissism and celebrity. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 463–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashton C. Southard.

Appendices

Appendix A

Path Model Accounting for Shared Variance Between Dimensions of Fame Interest by Extracting a Common “Fame-Seeking” Factor

The model is displayed in Fig. 2 and the standardized path coefficients are presented in Table 4.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Path model of the associations that the Dark Triad personality features had with dimensions of fame interest. Note: Rectangles indicate measured variables and circles indicate disturbance terms. The positive significant associations are indicated by solid black arrows, negative significant associations are indicated by dashed black arrows, and nonsignificant associations are indicated by dashed grey arrows. The significant correlations among the predictor variables (i.e., the Dark Triad personality features) and outcome variables (i.e., dimensions of fame interest) are indicated by solid curved bidirectional arrows and nonsignificant correlations are represented by dashed curved bidirectional arrows

Table 4 Standardized path coefficients predicting dimensions of fame interest using Dark Triad personality features

Appendix B

Separate Path Analyses for Men and Women Predicting Dimensions of Fame Interest Using the Dark Triad

In order to account for shared variability between the dimensions of fame interest, we allowed the error terms associated with each dimension of fame interest to be correlated in each of these three models. Our first model included interaction terms between each dark personality feature and sex of participant in order to investigate possible differences between men and women. Standardized path coefficients for these interactions are presented in Table 5. Significant interactions emerged between sex and secondary psychopathy for the perceived suitability, intensity, drive, and vulnerability dimensions of fame interest. No other interactions between dark personality features and participant sex were significant. Next, in order to probe these interactions and examine any other differences between men and women in the relationships between dark personality features and dimensions of fame interest, we conducted separate path analyses for men and women. These models are displayed in Panels A and B of Fig. 3 and standardized path coefficients are presented in Table 6.

Table 5 Standardized path coefficients for interactions between dark personality features and participant sex predicting dimensions of fame interest
Fig. 3
figure 3

Path models of the associations that the dark personality features had with dimensions of fame interest. Note: Panel A depicts associations for women and Panel B depicts associations for men. Rectangles indicate measured variables and circles indicate disturbance terms. The positive significant associations are indicated by solid black arrows, negative significant associations are indicated by dashed black arrows, and nonsignificant associations are indicated by dashed grey arrows. The significant correlations among the predictor variables (i.e., dark personality features) and outcome variables (i.e., dimensions of fame interest) are indicated by solid curved bidirectional arrows and nonsignificant correlations are represented by dashed curved bidirectional arrows

Table 6 Standardized path coefficients predicting dimensions of fame interest using dark personality features

Secondary psychopathy was positively related to the celebrity lifestyle dimension of fame interest for both men and women, suggesting that individuals high in secondary psychopathy desire the celebrity lifestyle regardless of biological sex. The association between secondary psychopathy and the intensity dimension of fame interest was positive for both men and women, although this association was stronger for men suggesting that both men and women higher in secondary psychopathy intensely desire fame, but this desire is stronger for men. Finally, secondary psychopathy was positively associated with the perceived suitability, drive, and vulnerability dimensions of fame interest in men only. These results may suggest that, although both men and women higher in secondary psychopathy are similar in their desire for the flashy aspects of the celebrity lifestyle and also intensely desire fame, only men higher in this dark personality feature view themselves are possessing characteristics suitable for fame, report working to achieve fame status, and desire this status for reasons of enhancing feelings of self-worth. Perhaps women are attracted to the lifestyle of celebrities and find it desirable, but doubt that they would ever be able to achieve fame status because they do not view themselves as possessing suitable characteristics for fame. This doubt could potentially be a reason that women higher in secondary psychopathy did not report working hard to achieve fame or desiring fame for reasons of improving feelings of self-worth.

Another possibility for the sex difference in patterns of association between secondary psychopathy and dimensions of fame interest could possibly be related to sex differences in the value of risk-taking. Following evolutionary accounts of secondary psychopathy (e.g., Mealey 1995), individuals high in this dark personality feature may adopt a fast life history strategy and may be more likely to engage in risk-taking (Lyons 2015; McDonald et al. 2012). Further, men have been found to be more likely to take risks in a number of domains to achieve higher status and attract mates, possibly because they may stand to benefit more, reproductively speaking, from these risks (Wang et al. 2009). If striving to achieve fame status can be considered a form of risk-taking, as the vast majority of individuals to seek fame status do not achieve it, then the current results are in line with previous research finding that men are more likely to take these sorts of risks (e.g., Wang et al. 2009). It is important to note that these explanations are purely speculation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Southard, A.C., Zeigler-Hill, V. The Dark Triad Traits and Fame Interest: Do Dark Personalities Desire Stardom?. Curr Psychol 35, 255–267 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9416-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9416-4

Keywords

Navigation