Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

What a Feminist Curiosity Contributes to the Study of Development

  • Published:
Studies in Comparative International Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This essay explores the various ways that women and gender have been included in international development thinking and practice by tracing the origins of the field of gender and development alongside its central debates, concepts, and accomplishments. This overview demonstrates that feminists have expanded the scope of development research and practice to include issues previously ignored but now recognized as central to development, and have provided more nuanced accounts of development by probing the underlying assumptions of development policy. In so doing, it argues, feminists have exposed the gendered nature of transnational flows and transformations, and have tracked their effects down to the level of diverse women and men’s daily lives. Drawing on the contributions in this special issue, this essay then highlights the multiple advantages of applying what Cynthia Enloe labeled a “feminist curiosity” to the study of development. By refusing to take the current state of affairs as natural or given, and refusing to accept as trivial women’s diverse lives and experiences, the papers in this special issue go beyond highlighting how international development efforts differentially affect women and men to demonstrating how women, men, and gender ideologies in particular places—whether development agencies, academic institutions, or local communities—critically shape international development itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In the 1970s, many feminists assumed birth control would be as empowering for women in developing countries as it had been for them. These assumptions, combined with fear mongering of Malthusian-like population control advocates (best exemplified in Paul Ehrlich's book, The Population Bomb), blinded many to the coercive aspects of US population policy. I thank Jane Jaquette for noting this.

References

  • Abrego L. Sacrificing families: navigating Laws, labor, and love across Borders. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balakrishnan R, editor. The hidden assembly line: gender dynamics of subcontracted work in a global economy. Bloomfield, Conn: Kumarian Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benería L. Shifting the risk: new employment patterns, informalization, and women’s work. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society. 2001;15(1):27–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benería L, Deere CD, Kabeer N. Gender and international migration: globalization, development, and governance. Fem Econ. 2012;18(2):1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benería L, Floro M, Grown C, MacDonald M. Introduction: globalization and gender. Fem Econ. 2000;6(3):vii–xviii.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benería, L., & Sen, G. Accumulation, reproduction, and “Women’s Role in Economic Development”: Boserup Revisited. Signs 1981; 7(2): 279–298.

  • Bergeron, S., & Healy, S. Beyond the “Business Case”: a community economies approach to gender, development and social economy. In Potential and Limits of Social Solidarity Economy. Geneva, Switzerland: UNRISD; 2013.

  • Boserup E. Woman’s role in economic development. United Kingdom: Earthscan; 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouta, T., Frerks, G., & Bannon, I. Gender, conflict, and development. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications; 2005.

  • Brown L, Haddad L, Richter A, Smith L. The gender dimensions of economic adjustment policies: potential interactions and evidence to date. World Dev. 1995;23(6):881–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunch C. Women’s rights as human rights: toward a re-vision of human rights. Human Rights Quarterly. 1990;12(4):486–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers R. Rural development: putting the last first. 1st ed. London ; New York: Routledge; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chant S, editor. The international handbook of gender and poverty: concepts, research, policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Pub; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornia GA, Jolly R, Stewart F, editors. Adjustment with a human face: protecting the vulnerable and promoting growth, vol. 1. New York: Oxford University Press; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall A. Missing men? Reflections on men, masculinities and gender in GAD. IDS Bull. 2000;31(2):18–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall, A., & Brock, K. “Poverty Reduction”, “Participation” and “Empowerment” in Development Policy (Overarching Concerns No. Paper Number 10). United Nations Research Institute for Social Development. 2005. Retrieved from http://people.stfx.ca/x2010/x2010mbm/My%20Housing%20Stuff/Beyond%20Buzzwords.pdf

  • Deere CD, Leon M. Empowering women: land and property rights in Latin America. 1st ed. Pittsburgh, Pa: University of Pittsburgh Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deere CD, Leon M. The gender asset gap: land in Latin America. World Dev. 2003;31(6):925–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desai M. The messy relationship between feminisms and globalizations. Gender & Society. 2007;21(6):797–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drolet J. Feminist perspectives in development: implications for women and microcredit. Affilia. 2010;25(3):212–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunaway WA. Introduction. In: Dunaway WA, editor. Gendered commodity chains: seeing women’s work and households in global production. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 2014. p. 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstein H. Feminism seduce: globalisation and the uses of gender. Aust Fem Stud. 2010;25(66):413–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elson D. Gender awareness in modeling structural adjustment. World Dev. 1995a;23(11):1851–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elson, D. Male bias in macro-economics: the case of structural adjustment. In D. Elson (Ed.), Male bias in the development process. New York, NY: Manchester University Press; 1995b, pp. 154–190.

  • Elson, D., & Pearson, R. Nimble fingers make cheap workers: an analysis of women’s employment in third world export manufacturing. Fem Rev 1981; 7(1): 87–107.

  • Enloe C. Bananas, beaches and bases: making feminist sense of international politics. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enloe C. The curious feminist: searching for women in a new age of empire. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enloe C. Globalization and militarism: feminists make the link. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Kelly MP. For we are sold, I and my people: women and industry in Mexico’s frontier. Albany: State University of New York Press; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser AS. Becoming human: the origins and development of women’s human rights. Human Rights Quarterly. 1999;21(4):853–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman C. High tech and high heels in the global economy: women, work, and pink-collar identities in the Caribbean. Durham, NC: Duke University Press Books; 2000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Freire P. Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum; 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman EJ. Gendering the agenda: the impact of the transnational women’s rights movement at the UN conferences of the 1990s. Women's Stud Int Forum. 2003;26(4):313–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gimenez M. Global capitalism and women: from feminist politics to working class Women’s politics. In: Lindio-McGovern L, Wallimann I, editors. Globalization and third world women: exploitation, coping and resistance. Surrey, England: Ashgate; 2009. p. 35–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higer AJ. International women’s activism and the 1994 Cairo population conference. In: Meyer MK, Prügl E, editors. Gender politics in global Governance. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers; 1999. p. 122–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaquette JS, Staudt K. Women, gender, and development. In: Women and gender equity in development theory and practice: institutions, resources, and mobilization. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 2006. p. 17–52.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jaquette JS, Staudt KA. Women as “at-risk reproducers:” women and US population policy. In: Sapiro V, editor. Women, biology and public policy. Beverly Hills: Sage Press; 1985. p. 225–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joachim J. Shaping the human rights agenda: the case of violence against women. In: Meyer MK, Prügl E, editors. Gender politics in global governance. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers; 1999. p. 142–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabeer N. Reversed realities: gender hierarchies in development thought. In: London. New York: Verso; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabeer, N. Resources, agency, achievements: reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Dev Chang 1999; 30(3): 435-464.

  • Kabeer N. From feminist insights to an analytical framework: an institutional perspective on gender inequality. In: Kabeer N, Subrahmanian R, editors. Institutions, relations and outcomes: a framework and case studies for gender-aware planning. New Dehli: Kali for Women; 2000. p. 3–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keck ME, Sikkink K. Activists beyond borders: advocacy networks in international politics. 1st ed. Ithaca, N.Y: Cornell University Press; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby P, Henry M. Rethinking masculinity and practices of violence in conflict settings. International Feminist Journal of Politics. 2012;14(4):445–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee-Smith D, Hinchey Trujillo C. Unequal rights: women and property. In: Jaquette JS, Summerfield G, editors. Women and gender equity in development theory and practice: institutions, resources, and mobilization. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 2006. p. 159–72.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Livingston J. Gender, sexual violence, and the global assembly line. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies. 2004;25(1):59–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melinda Gates on Gender Equality and the Global Economy. The Huffington post. 2016. Retrieved from http://rise.huffingtonpost.com/watch/melinda-gates-gender-equality-and-global-economy

  • Moghadam VM. Gender and the global economy (1999). In: Roberts JT, Hite AB, editors. The globalization and development reader: perspectives on development and global change. 1st ed. Malden, Mass: Wiley; 2007. p. 135–52.

  • Murdock DF. When women have wings: feminism and development in Medellín, Colombia. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 2008.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parpart JL, Rai S, Staudt K. Rethinking em(power)ment, gender, and development: an introduction. In: Parpart JL, Rai SM, Staudt K, editors. Rethinking empowerment: gender and development in a global/local world. New York, N.Y: Routledge; 2002. p. 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parreñas RS. Servants of globalization: women, migration, and domestic work. 1st ed. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson R, Jackson C. Introduction: interrogating development: feminism, gender and policy. In: Jackson C, Pearson R, editors. Feminist visions of development: gender analysis and policy. London ; New York: Routledge; 1998. p. 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prieto-Carrón M. Bringing resistance to the conceptual center: threats to social reproduction and feminist activism in Nicaraguan commodity chains. In: Dunaway WA, editor. Gendered commodity chains: Seeing Women’s work and households in global production. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 2014. p. 225–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prügl E. What is a worker? Gender, global restructuring, and the ILO convention on homework. In: Meyer MK, Prügl E, editors. Gender politics in global governance. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers; 1999. p. 197–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramamurthy P. Feminist commodity chain analysis: a framework to conceptualize value and interpret perplexity. In: Dunaway WA, editor. Gendered commodity chains: seeing women’s work and households in global production. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 2014a. p. 38–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramamurthy P. Why is buying a “madras” cotton shirt a political act? A feminist commodity chain analysis (2004). In: Roberts JT, Hite AB, Chorev N, editors. The globalization and development reader: perspectives on development and global change. Malden, MA: Wiley; 2014b. p. 204–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts A. Financial crisis, financial firms...and financial feminism? The rise of “transnational business feminism” and the necessity of Marxist-feminist IPE. Soc Stud. 2012;8(2):85–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts A. The political economy of “transnational business feminism”: problematizing the corporate-led gender equality agenda. International Feminist Journal of Politics. 2015;17(2):209–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez RM. Migration, transnational politics, and the state: challenging the limits of law: Filipina migrant workers’ transnational struggles in the world for protection and social justice. In: Lindio-McGovern L, Wallimann I, editors. Globalization and third world women: exploitation, coping and resistance. Surrey, England: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.; 2009. p. 49–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross RJS. In chains at the bottom of the pyramid: gender, the informal economy, and sweated labor in global apparel production. In: Dunaway WA, editor. Gendered commodity chains: seeing women’s work and households in global production. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 2014. p. 91–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands, J. Questioning empowerment: working with women in Honduras. Oxford [England]; Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Oxfam ; Humanities Press International [distributor]; 1997.

  • Roy A. Poverty capital: microfinance and making of development. New York: Routledge; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salzinger L. Manufacturing sexual subjects: “harrassment”, desire and discipline on a maquiladora shopfloor. Ethnography. 2000;1(1):67–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salzinger L. Making fantasies real: producing women and men on the maquila shop floor. NACLA Rep Am. 2001;34(5):13–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanmiguel-Valderrama O. The feminization and racialization of labour in the Colombian fresh-cut flower industry. J Dev Soc. 2007;23(1–2):71–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schouten, P., & Dunham, H. Theory talk #48: Cythia Enloe on militarization, feminism, and the international politics of banana boats. 2012. Retrieved from http://www.theorytalks.org/2012/05/theory-talk-48.html

  • Sharp J, Briggs J, Yacoub H, Hamed N. Doing gender and development: understanding empowerment and local gender relations. Trans Inst Br Geogr. 2003;28(3):281–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjoberg L, Via S, editors. Gender, war, and militarism: feminist perspectives. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sklair L. Assembling for development: the maquila industry in Mexico and the United States. Reprint ed. London: Routledge; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparr P, editor. Mortgaging women’s lives: feminist critiques of structural adjustment. London: Zed Books; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Fourth World Conference on Women. Beijing declaration and platform for action. New York, NY: United Nations Division for the Advancement of Women; 1995.

  • Tickner JA. Gender in international relations: feminist perspectives on achieving global security. New York: Columbia University Press; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinker, I. Persistent inequalities: women and world development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1990.

  • Tinker I. Nongovernmental organizations: an alternative power base for women? In: Meyer MK, Prügl E, editors. Gender politics in global Governance. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield; 1999. p. 88–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinker I. Empowerment just happened: the unexpected expansion of women’s organizations. In: Jaquette JS, Summerfield G, editors. Women and gender equity in development theory and practice: institutions, resources, and mobilization. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 2006. p. 268–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinker I, Summerfield G, editors. Women’s rights to house and land: China, Laos, Vietnam. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Pub; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Hoogte L, Kingma K. Promoting cultural diversity and the rights of women: the dilemmas of “intersectionality” for development organisations. Gend Dev. 2004;12(1):47–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein I. Forward. In: Dunaway WA, editor. Gendered commodity chains: seeing women’s work and households in global production. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 2014. p. xi–xiii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeates N. Global care chains: bringing in transnational reproductive laborer households. In: Dunaway WA, editor. Gendered commodity chains: seeing women’s work and households in global production. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 2014. p. 175–89.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Jane Jaquette and the two anonymous reviewers for their comments on this piece.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erin Beck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beck, E. What a Feminist Curiosity Contributes to the Study of Development. St Comp Int Dev 52, 139–154 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-017-9243-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-017-9243-0

Keywords

Navigation