Abstract
Not seeking to gain privilege for the Black community, Afrocentrism seeks to speak the truth about the suffering of racial discrimination and enslavement. Feminism exposes the stereotypes surrounding Black women due to sexism, racism and capitalism. Silence only serves to increase fear and to diminish the power of oppressed Black women. Investigating the theme of African women in poetry became central to contemporary literary studies. This study analyzes Maya Angelou’s use of imagery and body-oriented conceptual metaphors in her poetry in order to compare her perception of the African female body to that of other African poets, using LIWC-2022 and conceptual metaphor analysis. Angelou’s poems, often pessimistic, focus on societal power. Stylistically, Angelou overuses personal pronouns and does not tend to utilize impersonal pronouns. Her poetry is sentimental and emphasizes the role of the family in accordance with her understanding of the external world. Metaphors such as “Nation is a body,” “Nation is a family,” “Nation is a person,” “Social group is a fabric” and “Body is a container for emotions” are common within her oeuvre. The metaphoric understanding of “Body is a container for emotions” was most salient to understand frequently used conceptual metaphors like “Anger is the heat of fluid in a container.” However, in her book “I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings” the most detected conceptual metaphors are “Social groups are complex structures,” “Social group is a family” and “Community is a family”. Angelou’s style of writing and the psycholinguistic content of her work exerts a powerful influence over her readers. She focuses on society, family, the struggles inherent within social networks and the paths Black women chose to follow during these struggles.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdo, M., Alghonaim, A., & Essam, B. (2020). Public perception of COVID-19’s global health crisis on Twitter until 14 weeks after the outbreak. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqaa037
Arenas, E. S. (2018). Exploring Pornography in Widad Benmoussa’s Poetry Using LIWC and Corpus Tools. Sexuality and Culture, 22(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-018-9513-7
Arenas, E., & Essam, B. (2018). Cognitive Exploration of “Traveling” in the Poetry of Widad Benmoussa. East European Journal of Psycholinguistics, 2018(5), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2583544
Barber, R. C. (2019). Picturing freedom: The legacy of representing black womanhood. In The Routledge Companion to African American Art History (pp. 382–394). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351045193-34
Bivan, A. D., Iwoketok, U. E., & Agye, Z. A. (2018). Hybridity and ambivalence: The consequence of the diaspora compromise. Diaspora Studies, 11(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/09739572.2017.1331608.
Boyd, R. L., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2015). Did Shakespeare Write Double Falsehood? Identifying Individuals by Creating Psychological Signatures With Text Analysis. Psychological Science, 26(5), 570–582. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614566658
Choudhry, S. I., & Asif, S. I. (2013). “Ain’t I A Woman”: Exploring femininities in diaspora in Angelou’s I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.3.466-474
Davidson, C. N., Wagner-Martin, L., Ammons, E., Harris, T., Kibbey, A., Ling, A., & Radway, J. (2005). The oxford companion to: Women’s writing: In the United States. The Oxford Companion to Women’s Writing in the United States. https://doi.org/10.1093/acref/9780195066081.001.0001
Dobris, C. A. (1996). Maya angelou: Writing the “black voice”; for the multicultural community. Howard Journal of Communications, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10646179609361709
Essam, B. A. (2016). Nizarre Qabbani’s Original Versus Translated Pornographic Ideology: A Corpus-Based Study. Sexuality and Culture, 20(4), 965–986. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-016-9369-7
Evans, S. Y. (2015). Healing traditions in Black women’s writing: Resources for poetry therapy. Journal of Poetry Therapy, 28(3), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/08893675.2015.1051286
Gibbons, A., & Whiteley, S. (2021). Do worlds have (fourth) walls? A Text World Theory approach to direct address in Fleabag. Language and Literature, 30(2), 105–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947020983202
Gore, D. F. (2013). Black Internationalist Feminism: Women Writers of the Black Left, 1945–1995. Journal of American History, 99(4), 1309–1310. https://doi.org/10.1093/jahist/jas658
Harisunker, N., & du Plessis, C. (2021). A journey towards meaning: An existential psychobiography of maya angelou. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 17(3), 210–220. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.5491
Hayes, G. A. (2012). Conceptual blending theory, “Reverse amnesia”, and the study of Tantra. Journal of Hindu Studies, 5(2), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhs/his022
Hembrough, T. (2016). Writing as an Act of Self-Embodiment: Hurston, Moody, and Angelou Combat Systemic Racial and Sexual Oppression. Journal of African American Studies, 20(2), 164–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12111-016-9326-4
Jacobs, A. M. (2015). Towards a eurocognitive poetics model of literary reading. In Cognitive Neuroscience of Natural Language Use (pp. 135–159). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107323667.007
Jacobs, A. M. (2017). Quantifying the beauty of words: A neurocognitive poetics perspective. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00622
Jacobs, A. M., & Willems, R. M. (2018). The fictive brain: Neurocognitive correlates of engagement in literature. Review of General Psychology, 22(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000106
King, L. (2004). African American womanism: From Zora Neale Hurston to Alice Walker. In The Cambridge Companion to: The African American Novel (pp. 233–252). https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521815746.015
Lakoff, G. (2012). Explaining Embodied Cognition Results. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(4), 773–785. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01222.x
Lakoff, G. (2014). Mapping the brain’s metaphor circuitry: Metaphorical thought in everyday reason. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(DEC). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.0095
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, D. (1989). Metaphors we live. University of Chicago press.
Lauret, M. (2009). Alice Walker. In A Companion to Twentieth-Century United States Fiction (pp. 489–496). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444310108.ch47
Nicklas, P., & Jacobs, A. M. (2017). Rhetoric, neurocognitive poetics, and the aesthetics of adaptation. Poetics Today. https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-3869311
Nuttall, L. (2017). Online readers between the camps: A Text World Theory analysis of ethical positioning in We Need to Talk about Kevin. Language and Literature. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947017704730
Pennebaker, J. W., Mehl, M. R., & Niederhoffer, K. G. (2003). Psychological Aspects of Natural Language Use: Our Words, Our Selves. Annual Review of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145041
Pinkerton, S. M. (2016). Writing to Right Themselves: Poetry as a Psychological Intervention for Women with Depression. The Chicago School of Professional Psychology.
Rasse, C., Onysko, A., & Citron, F. M. M. (2020). Conceptual metaphors in poetry interpretation: A psycholinguistic approach. Language and Cognition, 12(2), 310–342. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2019.47
Rauuf, M., Nur, O., & Miranti, R. R. (2018). The analysis of figurative language used in ‘Still I Rise’ Poem by Maya Angelou. The International Summit on Science Technology and Humanity, (Iseth).
Rodrigues, F. F. X. (2019). In Maya Angelou’s name. Revista Estudos Feministas, 27(3). https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9584-2019V27N358624
Stickles, E., David, O., Dodge, E. K., & Hong, J. (2016). Formalizing contemporary conceptual metaphor theory. Constructions and Frames, 8(2), 166–213. https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.8.2.03sti
Sweetser, E., David, O., & Stickles, E. (2019). Chapter 1. MetaNet (pp. 23–47). https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.8.02swe
Tally, J. (1986). Why “womanism”? (p. 5). Revista de filología de la Universidad de La Laguna.
Wyatt-Brown, A. M., & Waxman, B. (2000). To Live in the Center of the Moment: Literary Autobiographies of Aging. Tulsa Studies in Women’s Literature, 19(1), 154. https://doi.org/10.2307/464420
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interests
None.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix 1 LIWC Analysis
Appendix 1 LIWC Analysis
Parameter | Angelou | Giovanni | Whittier | Walker | Dickinson |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Analytic | 75.87 | 58.44 | 93.95 | 77.0225 | 79.83 |
Clout | 76.91 | 71.28 | 82.05 | 71.1175 | 54.23 |
Authentic | 57.82 | 38.34 | 12.03 | 38.3825 | 45.34 |
Tone | 42.45 | 64.74 | 40.29 | 47.33 | 41.84 |
Six-letter words | 14.76 | 13.15 | 15.24 | 14.54 | 15.01 |
Function Words | 48.37 | 52.74 | 45.59 | 49.1875 | 50.05 |
Pronouns | 14.62 | 15.29 | 9.24 | 12.7475 | 11.84 |
Personal Pronouns | 11.71 | 10.48 | 6.19 | 9.0625 | 7.87 |
I | 4.92 | 4.17 | 0.56 | 3.25 | 3.35 |
We | 1.38 | 1.54 | 1.28 | 1.24 | 0.76 |
You | 2.95 | 2.25 | 1.59 | 1.9425 | 0.98 |
She/He | 1.32 | 1.39 | 1.95 | 1.6925 | 2.11 |
They | 1.13 | 1.13 | 0.81 | 0.9375 | 0.68 |
Impersonal Pronouns | 2.90 | 4.79 | 3.04 | 3.675 | 3.97 |
Articles | 7.31 | 7.37 | 9.32 | 8.445 | 9.78 |
Prepositions | 12.85 | 11.66 | 14.59 | 12.8925 | 12.47 |
Auxiliary Verbs | 5.62 | 8.52 | 3.72 | 6.005 | 6.16 |
Adverbs | 3.34 | 4.22 | 2.55 | 3.6 | 4.29 |
Conjunctions | 5.97 | 6.82 | 6.72 | 6.7725 | 7.58 |
Negations | 1.73 | 2.14 | 0.92 | 1.6025 | 1.62 |
Verbs | 12.91 | 16.67 | 8.63 | 12.6075 | 12.22 |
Adjectives | 4.47 | 4.20 | 5.22 | 4.545 | 4.29 |
Comparisons | 1.57 | 1.63 | 1.78 | 1.785 | 2.16 |
Interrogatives | 1.43 | 1.75 | 1.82 | 1.7625 | 2.05 |
Numbers | 0.77 | 2.20 | 0.88 | 1.2075 | 0.98 |
Quantifiers | 1.34 | 1.72 | 1.19 | 1.4425 | 1.52 |
Affect | 6.79 | 5.42 | 7.79 | 6.3075 | 5.23 |
Positive Emotions | 3.84 | 3.72 | 4.28 | 3.725 | 3.06 |
Negative Emotions | 2.92 | 1.66 | 3.47 | 2.555 | 2.17 |
Anxiety | 0.56 | 0.23 | 0.57 | 0.465 | 0.50 |
Anger | 0.77 | 0.43 | 0.79 | 0.56 | 0.25 |
Sad | 1.00 | 0.44 | 1.10 | 0.8275 | 0.77 |
Social | 11.85 | 11.56 | 9.57 | 10.15 | 7.62 |
Family | 0.90 | 0.79 | 0.34 | 0.545 | 0.15 |
Friends | 0.23 | 0.25 | 0.17 | 0.225 | 0.25 |
Female | 1.32 | 1.33 | 0.78 | 1.15 | 1.17 |
Male | 1.52 | 1.23 | 2.14 | 1.6075 | 1.54 |
Cognitive Processes | 7.03 | 11.24 | 4.94 | 8.0525 | 9.00 |
Insight | 1.51 | 2.09 | 0.89 | 1.5225 | 1.60 |
Causal | 0.88 | 1.28 | 0.57 | 0.945 | 1.05 |
Discrepancies | 0.83 | 1.99 | 0.52 | 1.175 | 1.36 |
Tentative | 1.29 | 2.35 | 1.08 | 1.77 | 2.36 |
Certainty | 1.26 | 1.54 | 1.09 | 1.265 | 1.17 |
Differentiation | 2.00 | 3.38 | 1.71 | 2.5975 | 3.30 |
Perceptual Processes | 5.32 | 4.03 | 4.45 | 4.36 | 3.64 |
See | 2.16 | 1.46 | 1.90 | 1.78 | 1.60 |
Hear | 1.56 | 1.35 | 1.24 | 1.2225 | 0.74 |
Feel | 1.27 | 0.80 | 1.18 | 1.04 | 0.91 |
Biological Processes | 4.55 | 3.25 | 3.02 | 3.5225 | 3.27 |
Body | 2.60 | 1.11 | 1.76 | 1.7875 | 1.68 |
Health | 0.78 | 0.47 | 0.66 | 0.6625 | 0.74 |
Sexual | 0.28 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.1625 | 0.12 |
Ingest | 0.72 | 1.21 | 0.39 | 0.7225 | 0.57 |
Drives | 7.14 | 7.16 | 7.86 | 6.92 | 5.52 |
Affiliation | 2.67 | 2.85 | 2.21 | 2.3425 | 1.64 |
Achievement | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.9925 | 1.03 |
Power | 2.74 | 2.16 | 4.03 | 2.815 | 2.33 |
Reward | 0.83 | 1.25 | 0.68 | 0.875 | 0.74 |
Risk | 0.54 | 0.43 | 0.59 | 0.545 | 0.62 |
Past Focus | 3.22 | 4.53 | 2.54 | 3.51 | 3.75 |
Present Focus | 8.14 | 9.81 | 4.55 | 7.2175 | 6.37 |
Future Focus | 1.25 | 1.13 | 1.35 | 1.2475 | 1.26 |
Relativity | 15.90 | 12.98 | 13.28 | 14.4175 | 15.51 |
Motion | 2.72 | 2.56 | 1.96 | 2.415 | 2.42 |
Space | 8.05 | 6.16 | 7.37 | 7.045 | 6.60 |
Time | 5.47 | 4.54 | 4.10 | 5.2125 | 6.74 |
Work | 0.84 | 1.24 | 1.00 | 0.94 | 0.68 |
Leisure | 1.12 | 1.86 | 0.69 | 1.0775 | 0.64 |
Home | 0.64 | 0.70 | 0.40 | 0.595 | 0.64 |
Money | 0.51 | 0.48 | 0.71 | 0.495 | 0.28 |
Religion | 0.89 | 0.38 | 2.38 | 1.2475 | 1.34 |
Death | 0.56 | 0.30 | 0.61 | 0.55 | 0.73 |
Informal Language | 0.60 | 0.56 | 1.02 | 0.6575 | 0.45 |
Swear | 0.17 | 0.05 | 0.09 | 0.085 | 0.03 |
Netspeak | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.41 | 0.245 | 0.08 |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Khalifa, H., Essam, B.A. How does Maya Angelou perceive the African female body?. J Afr Am St 26, 203–220 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12111-022-09581-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12111-022-09581-7