Skip to main content
Log in

Why Class Formation Occurs in Humans but Not among Other Primates

A Primate Coalitions Model

  • Published:
Human Nature Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most human societies exhibit a distinct class structure, with an elite, middle classes, and a bottom class, whereas animals form simple dominance hierarchies in which individuals with higher fighting ability do not appear to form coalitions to “oppress” weaker individuals. Here, we extend our model of primate coalitions and find that a division into a bottom class and an upper class is inevitable whenever fitness-enhancing resources, such as food or real estate, are exploitable or tradable and the members of the bottom class cannot easily leave the group. The model predicts that the bottom class has a near flat, low payoff and always comprises at least half the society. The upper class may subdivide into one or more middle class(es), resulting in improved payoff for the topmost members (elite). The model predicts that the bottom class on its own is incapable of mounting effective counter-coalitions against the upper class, except when receiving support from dissatisfied members of the middle class(es). Such counter-coalitions can be prevented by keeping the payoff to the lowest-ranked members of the middle classes (through concessions) well above that of the bottom class. This simple model explains why classes are also absent in nomadic hunter-gatherers and predominate in (though are not limited to) societies that produce and store food. Its results also agree well with various other known features of societies with classes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2008). Persistence of power, elites, and institutions. American Economic Review, 98, 269–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberts, S. C. (2012). Magnitude and sources of variation in male reproductive performance. In J. C. Mitani, J. Call, P. M. Kappeler, R. A. Palombit, & J. B. Silk (Eds.), The evolution of primate societies (pp. 412–431). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, R. D. (1974). The evolution of social behavior. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 3, 325–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altmann, S. A. (1962). A field study of the sociobiology of the rhesus monkey, Macaca mulatta. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 102, 338–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bissonnette, A., de Vries, H., & van Schaik, C. P. (2009). Coalitions in male Barbary macaques, Macaca sylvanus: Strength, success and rules of thumb. Animal Behaviour, 78, 329–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, C. (1999). Hierarchy in the Forest: The evolution of egalitarian behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boone, J. L. (1992). Competition, conflict, and the development of hierarchies. In E. A. Smith & B. Winterhalder (Eds.), Evolutionary ecology and human behavior (pp. 301–337). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgerhoff Mulder, M., et al. (2009). Intergenerational wealth transmission and the dynamics of inequality in small-scale societies. Science, 326, 682–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S., and Gintis, H. (2011) A cooperative species: Human reciprocity and its evolution. Princeton, NJ and Oxford, UK: Princeton University Press.

  • Chapais, B. (1995). Alliances as a means of competition in primates: Evolutionary, developmental, and cognitive aspects. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 38, 115–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. H., et al. (2006). Intrasexual competition and sexual selection in cooperative mammals. Nature, 444, 1065–1068.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, R. B. (1999). Paths toward democracy: The working class and elites in Western Europe and South America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, R. M. (1958). Speculations on the origin of coinage. Historia: Zeitschrift für alte Geschichte, 7, 257–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahrendorf, R. (1959). Class and class conflict in industrial society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. (2012). The world until yesterday: What we can learn from traditional societies. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R. I. M. (1988). Primate social systems. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earle, T., & Kristiansen, K. (2010). Organizing Bronze Age societies: The Mediterranean, Central Europe, and Scandinavia compared. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, F. (2004) The origin of the family, private property, and the state. Chippendale, Australia: Resistance books. (originally published in 1884).

  • Flannery, K., & Marcus, J. (2012). The creation of inequality: How our prehistoric ancestors set the stage for monarchy, slavery, and empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinde, R. A. (1976). Interactions, relationships and social structure. Man, 11, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, P. L., Kaplan, H. S., & Boone, J. L. (2010). A theory of leadership in human cooperative groups. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 265, 633–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntingford, F., & Turner, A. (1987). Animal conflict. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurwicz, L. (1996). Institutions as families of game forms. Japanese Economic Review, 47, 113–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, H., Hooper, P. L., & Gurven, M. (2009). The evolutionary and ecological roots of human social organization. Philosophical Transactions Royal Society, London B, 364, 3289–3299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeley, L. H. (1988). Hunter-gatherer economic complexity and "population pressure": A cross-cultural analysis. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 7, 373–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, R. L. (2013). The lifeways of hunter-gatherers: The foraging spectrum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knauft, B. M. (1991). Violence and sociality in human evolution. Current Anthropology, 32, 391–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, T. A., Smith, M. E., Bogaard, A., Feinman, G. M., Peterson, C. E., Betzenhauser, A., Pailes, M., Stone, E. C., Marie Prentiss, A., Dennehy, T. J., Ellyson, L. J., Nicholas, L. M., Faulseit, R. K., Styring, A., Whitlam, J., Fochesato, M., Foor, T. A., & Bowles, S. (2017). Greater post-Neolithic wealth disparities in Eurasia than in North America and Mesoamerica. Nature, 551, 619–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, G. (1986). The creation of patriarchy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leventoǧlu, B. (2014). Social mobility, middle class, and political transitions. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 58, 825–864.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R. J. (2002). Beyond dominance: The importance of leverage. Quarterly Review of Biology, 77, 149–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K., and Engels, F. (2002) The Communist Manifesto. London: Penguin Books. (originally published in 1848).

  • Mattison, S. M., Smith, E. A., Shenk, M. K., & Cochrane, E. E. (2016). The evolution of inequality. Evolutionary Anthropology, 25, 184–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosca, G. (1939) The ruling class. New York: McGraw-Hill. (originally published in 1896).

  • Muller, M. N., Wrangham, R. W., & Pilbeam, D. R. (2017). Chimpanzees and human evolution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, P., & Lenski, G. (2009). Human societies: An introduction to macrosociology. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, M. I., & Ariely, D. (2011). Building a better America, one wealth quintile at a time. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandit, S. A., Pradhan, G. R., Balashov, H., & van Schaik, C. P. (2016). The conditions favoring between-community raiding in chimpanzees, bonobos, and human foragers. Human Nature, 27, 141–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandit, S. A., & van Schaik, C. P. (2003). A model for leveling coalitions among male primates: Towards a theory of egalitarianism. Behavioral Ecology Sociobiology, 55, 161–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, S. T., van Schaik, C. P., & Lehmann, L. (2016). How institutions shaped the last major evolutionary transition to large-scale human societies. Philosophical Transactions Royal Society, London B, 371, 20150098.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentiss, A. M., Foor, T. A., Cross, G., Harris, L. E., & Wanzenried, M. (2012). The cultural evolution of material wealth-based inequality at Bridge River, British Columbia. American Antiquity, 77, 542–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preuschoft, S., & van Schaik, C. P. (2000). Dominance and communication: Conflict management in various social settings. In F. Aureli & F. B. M. de Waal (Eds.), Natural conflict resolution (pp. 77–105). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roemer, J. (1986). New directions in the Marxian theory of exploitation and class. In J. Roemer (Ed.), Analytical Marxism (pp. 81–113). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins, M. (1972). Stone Age economics. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. P. (2017). Against the grain: A deep history of the earliest states. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. A., & Choi, J.-K. (2007). The emergence of inequality in small-scale societies: Simple scenarios and agent based simulations. In T. A. Kohler & S. E. van der Leeuw (Eds.), The model-based archaeology of socionatural systems (pp. 105–119). Santa Fe: SAR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterck, E. H. M., Watts, D. P., & van Schaik, C. P. (1997). The evolution of female social relationships in nonhuman primates. Behavioral Ecology Sociobiology, 41, 291–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Schaik, C.P., Pandit, S.A., and Vogel, E.R. (2004). A model for within-group coalitionary aggression among males Behavioral Ecology Sociobiology 57, 101-109.

  • van Schaik, C. P., Pandit, S. A., & Vogel, E. R. (2006). Toward a general model for male-male coalitions in primate groups. In P. M. Kappeler & C. P. van Schaik (Eds.), Cooperation in Primates and humans: Mechanisms and evolution (pp. 151–171). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Rueden, C. R., & Jaeggi, A. V. (2016). Men's status and reproductive success in 33 non-industrial societies: Effects of subsistence, marriage system, and reproductive strategy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 113, 10824–10829.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, D. P. (2012). The apes: Taxonomy, biogeography, life history, and behavioral ecology. In J. C. Mitani, J. Call, P. M. Kappeler, R. A. Palombit, & J. B. Silk (Eds.), The evolution of primate societies (pp. 113–142). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, C., Majolo, B., Schülke, O., & Ostner, J. (2014). Male social bonds and rank predict supporter selection in cooperative aggression in wild Barbary macaques. Animal Behaviour, 95, 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge important suggestions from Abhaya Bhalkar, Nandan Pradhan, and Kai Michel. All the authors contributed equally in the formulation, analysis, and comparative study of the model.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gauri R. Pradhan.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pandit, S.A., Pradhan, G.R. & van Schaik, C.P. Why Class Formation Occurs in Humans but Not among Other Primates. Hum Nat 31, 155–173 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-020-09370-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-020-09370-9

Keywords

Navigation