Abstract
The Seville Statement on Violence rejected the view that violence and war were in any way rooted in human nature and proclaimed that they were merely a cultural artifact. This paper points out both the valid and invalid parts of the statement. It concludes that the potential for both war and peace is embedded in us. The human behavioral toolkit comprises a number of major tools, respectively geared for violent conflict, peaceful competition, or cooperation, depending on people’s assessment of what will serve them best in any given circumstance. Conflict is only one tool—the hammer—in our diverse behavioral toolkit. However, all three behavioral strategies are not purely learned cultural forms. This naive nature/nurture dichotomy overlooks the heavy and complex biological machinery that is necessary for the working of each of them and the interplay between them. They are all very close under our skin and readily activated because they have all been very handy during our long evolutionary past. At the same time, they are variably calibrated to particular conditions through social learning, which means that their relative use may fluctuate widely. Thus, state authority has tilted the menu of human choices in the direction of the peaceful options in the domestic arena, and changing economic, social, and political conditions may be generating a similar effect in the international arena.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
This article was originally the keynote address for the 2017 WESIPS Conference.
The former error seems to be the motivation for Fry’s works. Unfortunately, the latter position is at least implied by leading evolutionist biologist E. O. Wilson (2012).
These statistics agree remarkably with Ember’s earlier survey of hunter-gatherers (1978).
References
Ardrey, R. (1966). The territorial imperative: A personal inquiry into the animal origins of property and nations. New York: Atheneum.
Beroldi, G. (1994). Critique of the Seville statement on violence. American Psychologist, 49(10), 847–848.
Boehm, C. (2013). The biocultural evolution of conflict resolution between groups. In D. Fry (Ed.), War, peace, and human nature: The convergence of evolutionary and cultural views (pp. 315–340). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Burch, E. (2005). Alliance and conflict: The world system of the Inupiaq Eskimos. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Ember, C. (1978). Myths about hunter-gatherers. Ethnology, 17, 439–448.
Freud, S. (1920). Beyond the pleasure principle. (Reprinted in The complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, 1953–1974, London: Hogarth, vol. 18, pp. 7–64.)
Freud, S. (1923). The ego and the id. (Reprinted in The complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, 1953–1974, London: Hogarth, vol. 19, pp. 12–66.)
Freud, S. (1930). Civilization and its discontents. (Reprinted in The complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, 1953–1974, London: Hogarth, vol. 21, pp. 57–45.)
Freud, S. (1933a). New introductory lectures on psychoanalysis. (Reprinted in The complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, 1953–1974, London: Hogarth, vol. 22, pp. 5–182.)
Freud, S. (1933b). Why war? (Reprinted in The complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, 1953–1974, London: Hogarth, vol. 22, pp. 203–215.)
Fry, D. (2006). The human potential for peace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fry, D. (Ed.). (2013). War, peace, and human nature: The convergence of evolutionary and cultural views. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fry, D., & Söderberg, P. (2013). Lethal aggression in mobile forager bands and implications for the origins of war. Science, 341, 270–273.
Gat, A. (1999). The pattern of fighting in simple, small-scale, pre-state societies. Journal of Anthropological Research, 55, 563–583.
Gat, A. (2000). The human motivational complex: Evolutionary theory and the causes of hunter-gatherer fighting. Anthropological Quarterly, 73(1), 20–34; 73(2), 74–88; 73(3), 165–168.
Gat, A. (2006). War in human civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gat, A. (2015). Proving communal warfare among hunter-gatherers: The quasi-Rousseauan error. Evolutionary Anthropology, 24, 111–126.
Gat, A. (2017). The causes of war and the spread of peace: But will war rebound? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldstein, J. (2011). Winning the war on war: The decline of armed conflict worldwide. New York: Penguin.
Guilaine, J., & Zammit, J. (2005). The origins of war: Violence in prehistory. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Keely, L. (1996). War before civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kelly, R. (2013). From the peaceful to the warlike: Ethnographic and archaeological insights into hunter-gatherer warfare and homicide. In D. Fry (Ed.), War, peace, and human nature: The convergence of evolutionary and cultural views (pp. 151–167). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
LeBlanc, S., & Register, K. (2003). Constant battles: The myth of the peaceful noble savage. New York: St. Martin.
Lorenz, K. (1966). On aggression. London: Methuen.
Manson, J. H., & Wrangham, R. W. (1987). Is human aggression nonbiological? Problems with the statement on violence. Human Ethnology Newsletter, 5(2), 3–4.
Mead, M. (1940). Warfare is only an invention—not a biological necessity. Asia, 40(8), 402–405.
Morris, D. (1967). The naked ape: A zoologist’s study of the human animal. London: Jonathan Cape.
Morris, I. (2014). War: What is it good for? New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. New York: Norton.
Pinker, S. (2011). The better angels of our nature: Why violence has declined. New York: Viking.
Simmel, G. (1955). Conflict: The web of group affiliations. Glencoe: Free Press.
UNESCO. 1986. The Seville Statement. Paris: UNESCO. http://www.culture-of-peace.info/vita/2011/seville2011.pdf. Accessed 21 Feb 2019.
Walker, P. (2001). A bioarchaeological perspective on the history of violence. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 573–596.
Wilson, E. O. (2012). Is war inevitable? Discover, June 12. (Excerpted from The social conquest of Earth, New York: Norton, 2012).
Wrangham, R., Wilson, M., & Muller, M. (2006). Comparative rates of violence in chimpanzees and humans. Primates, 47, 14–26.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gat, A. Is War in Our Nature?. Hum Nat 30, 149–154 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-019-09342-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-019-09342-8