Abstract
Several sociologists arc currently debating the relationship of sociology to the physical environment. Their debates beg a question of more general importance to sociology: How do we organize our thinking about phenomena that are at once physical or material and symbolic or ideal? Our intention is not to add another voice in favor of or opposed to theorizing material, physical, or organic characteristics, but to examine the process of thinking about environments and more generally the realist-idealist divide. Environment (like the body) is unlike typical social science concepts in so far as it is both physical and social. If, for example, status and role are purely social concepts, environment is always more than social. I low do sociologists approach what is always more than social in the study of physical environments? Theorizing environments, we propose, is fashioned by the analytic stance of the investigator as legislative, interpretive, or symbolic realist. The strengths and weaknesses of these stances are discussed, and throughout our discussion empirical work representing each ol them is introduced. A final inquiry examines how sociologists can approach these three stances. Two strategies are identified: to assume each stance mirrors the environment as it actually exists or assume the stances are terminologies for exploring various combinations of the physical-symbolic properties ol environments. A brief plea is made for the second strategy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bauman, Zygmunt. 1986. Legislators and Interpreters. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Benton, Ted. 1991.“Biology and Social Science: Why The Return of the Repressed Should Be Given a (Cautious) Welcome.” Sociology, 25(1):1–29.
Borges, Jorge Luis. 1864. Labyrinths: Selected Stories and Other Writings. New York: New Directions.
Brown, Phil. 1991.“The Popular Epidemiology Approach to Toxic Waste Contamination.” In Stephen R. Couch and Steve Kroll-Smith (eds.), Communities At Risk (pp. 133–155). New York: Peter Lang.
Brown, Phil and Edwin Mikkelsen. 1997. No Safe Place: Toxic Waste, Leukemia, and Community Action. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Brown, Richard II. 1987. Society as Text. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Burke, Kenneth. 1989. Kenneth Burke On Symbols and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Buttel, Frederick. 1993.“Environmental Sociology as Science and Social Movement.” Environment, Technology, and Society 73(Fall): 10–11.
Buttel, Frederick and Peter Taylor. 1992.“Environmental Sociology and Global Environmental Change: A Critical Assessment.” Society and Natural Resources 5:211–230.
Catton, William R. 1982. Overshoot: The Ecological Basis of Revolutionary Change. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Clarke, Lee. 1989. Acceptable Risk? Making Decisions in a Toxic Environment. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Collins, Randall. 1975. Conflict Sociology. NY: Academic Press.
Couch, Stephen R. and Steve Kroll-Smith. 1994.“Environmental Controversies, Interactional Resources, and Rural Communities: Siting Versus Exposure Disputes.” Rural Sociology 59:25–41.
Derrida, Jacques. 1976. Grammatology. Baltimore: John's Hopkins University Press.
Dickens, Peter. 1992. Society and Nature: Towards A Green Social Theory. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Douglas, Mary and Aaron Wildavsky. 1983. Risk and Culture. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Dunlap, Riley E. 1993.“Constructivist versus Objectivist Approaches to Environmental Sociology: A Comparison.” Paper presented at the Conference on the“Social Functions of Nature,” Chantilly, France.
-. 1993a.“The Nature and Causes of Environmental Problems: A Socio-Ecological Perspective.” Paper presented at the KSA International Conference on Environmental Development, Seoul, Korea.
—. and William R. Catton, Jr. 1994.“Struggling with Human Exemptionalism: The Rise, Decline and Revitalization of Environmental Sociology.” 'The American Sociologist 25:5–29.
Durkheim, Emile and Marcel Mauss. 1963. Primitive Classification. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dyer, Christopher, D.A. Gill, and J.S. Picou. 1992.“Social Disruption and the Valdez Oil Spill.” Sociological Spectrum 12:105–126.
Eitzen, D. Stanley and Maxine Baca Zinn. 1991. Social Problems (Fifth lidition). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Edelstein, Michael. 1991.“Ecological Threats and Spoiled Identities.” In Stephen R. Couch and Steve Kroll-Smith(eds.), Communities Al Risk (pp. 205–225). New York: Peter Lang.
Eaber, Daniel and James O'Connor. 1989.“Rejoinders in Discussion: The Struggle for Nature.” Capitalism, Nature, and Socialism 1:174–178.
Eeyerabend, Paul. 1975. Against Method. London: Verso.
Freudenburg, William R. 1988.“Perceived Risk, Real Kisk: Social Science and the Art of Probabilistic Risk Assessment.” Science 242:44–49.
Freudenburg, William R., Scott Frickel, and Robert Gramling. 1995.“Beyond the Society-Nature Divide: Learning to Think About a Mountain.” Sociological Tonim 10:361–392.
Freudenburg. William R. and Robert Gramling. 1994. Oil In Troubled Waters. Albany. MY: SUNY Press.
Fuchs, Stephan. 1992. The Professional Quest for 'Truth: A Social Theory of Science and Knowledge. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Geertz, Clifford. 1983. Local Knowledge. New York: Basic Books.
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis. NY: Harper.
Gramling, Robert. 1996. Oil on the P.dge. Albany: New York University Press.
Greider, Thomas and Lorraine Garkovich. 1994.“Landscapes: The Social Construction of Nature and the Environment.” Rural Sociology 59:1–21.
Gunter, Valerie J., Marilyn Aronolf, and Susan Joel. 1999.“Toxic Contamination and Communities: Using an Ecological-Symbolic Perspective to Theorize Response Contingencies.” The Sociological Quarterly 40:623–640.
Hewison, Robert. 1987. 'The Heritage Industry. London: Routledge.
Hymes, Dell. 1974. I'oundalions in Sociolinguistics. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Kroll-Smith, Steve. 1995.“Toxic Contamination and the Loss of Civility.” Sociological Spectrum 15:377–396.
— and Shirley Laska. 1994.“The GEC Debate: Notes on Theorizing and Researching the Environment; Or, Where is Our Newton?” Environment, Technology, and Society 74(Winter):l-3.
— and Stephen R. Couch. 1991.“What Is A Disaster? An F'cological-Symbolic Approach to Resolving the Definitional Debate.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 9:355–366.
—, Stephen R. Couch and Brent K. Marshall. 1997.“Sociology, Extreme Environments and Social Change.” Current Sociology 45(3):1–18.
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Second Edition). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Levine, Adeline. 1981. Love Canal: Science, Politics and People. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Love, Ruth L. 1997.“The Sound of Crashing Timber: Moving to an Ecological Sociology.” Society & Natural Resources 10:211–222.
Mclaughlin, Paul. 1994.“Constructivism and Human Ecology.” Paper presented at the seventh meeting of the Society of Human Ecology, East Lansing, Michigan.
Parsons. Talcott. 1951. The Social System. NY: The Free Press.
Picou, J. Steven and Duane Gill. 1996.“The Exxon Valdez Oil Spill and Chronic Psychological Stress.” In F. Rice et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the EVOS Symposium (pp. 1–15). American Fisheries Society Symposium 18.
—. 1997.“Commercial Fishers and Stress: Psychological Impacts of the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill.” In J. Steven Picou, Duane A. Gill, and Maurie J. Cohen (eds.), The Exxon Valdez Disaster (pp. 211–235). Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall Hunt.
Rosa, Eugene A. 1998. “Metathcoretical Foundations for Post-Normal Risk.” Journal of Risk Research 1: 15–44.
Rorty, Richard. 1981. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
—. 1982. Consequences of Pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Salleh, Ariel. 1983.“Deeper than Deep Ecology: The Eco-Feminist Connection.” Environmental Ethics 6:339–45.
Schnaiherg, Allan. 1980. The Environment. NY: Oxford University Press.
Shrivastava, Paul. 1987. Bbopal. Anatomy of a Crisis. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Soper, Kate. 1995. What Is Nature? Oxford: Blackwell.
Spector, Malcolm and John I. Kitsuse. 1977. Constructing Social Problems. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Timpanaro. Sebastiane. 1996. On Materialism. London: Routledge.
Warren, Karen. 1990.“The Power and Promise of Ecological Feminism.” Environmental Ethics 9:3–20.
Warren, Roland L. 1987. The Community In America. Boston: University Press of America.
Weigert, Andrew. 1991.“Transverse Interaction: A Pragmatic Perspective on Environment As Other.” Symbolic Interaction 14:353–363.
Willard, Charles. 1996. liberalism and the Problem of Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The authors thank Vern Baxter, Fred Buttel, Steve Couch, Riley Dunlap, Bill Freudenburg, Susan Mann and anonymous others who read and commented on earlier drafts of this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kroll-Smith, S., Gunter, V. & Laska, S. Theoretical stances and environmental debates: Reconciling the physical and the symbolic. Am Soc 31, 44–61 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-000-1004-1
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-000-1004-1